Pages:
Author

Topic: Open Source XPM (Primecoin) GPU Miner & Pool xpmforall.org - page 45. (Read 110156 times)

newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Yes it is small - normally R7 260X is 1/3 of R9 280X. I try it for a lot of algorithms X11, X13, Eterum and gives around 1/3.  Only for quark gives a little bit more than 1/3 of R9 280X

I am trying to compare the characteristics of some cards, but do not understand what is crucial. Core frequency? At the moment I only understood that the frequency of memory and amount of memory are not very important.
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0


gollumist, qqqq, thank you for your answers!
hmm.. 3.4 CPD is very small. I thought that it would be the same as hd7850 (4.7 CPD).



Yes it is small - normally R7 260X is 1/3 of R9 280X. I try it for a lot of algorithms X11, X13, Eterum and gives around 1/3.  Only for quark gives a little bit more than 1/3 of R9 280X
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Hello!
I'm mining on HD 7850 (it's about 4.7 CPD).
Anyone tried to use new analog of this card - R7 260X (or another R7 series, there are no R7 in "GPUs supportes" at the first message of this topic).

Maybe you mean R9 270 which is analog 7850 i guess

R9 270 ~ 5,4 CPD (950/1400) Downvolted to 1,0v

Hello, qqqq!
I mean exactly R7. Is it supported with this miner?

I don't have R7. And my results was obtained with Claymore miner.

Hi - Yes it is supported.
I mine with such card R7 260X and it gave me about 3,4 CPD

gollumist, qqqq, thank you for your answers!
hmm.. 3.4 CPD is very small. I thought that it would be the same as hd7850 (4.7 CPD).

newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
Hello!
I'm mining on HD 7850 (it's about 4.7 CPD).
Anyone tried to use new analog of this card - R7 260X (or another R7 series, there are no R7 in "GPUs supportes" at the first message of this topic).

Maybe you mean R9 270 which is analog 7850 i guess

R9 270 ~ 5,4 CPD (950/1400) Downvolted to 1,0v

Hello, qqqq!
I mean exactly R7. Is it supported with this miner?

I don't have R7. And my results was obtained with Claymore miner.
Hi - Yes it is supported.
I mine with such card R7 260X and it gave me about 3,4 CPD
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
Hello!
I'm mining on HD 7850 (it's about 4.7 CPD).
Anyone tried to use new analog of this card - R7 260X (or another R7 series, there are no R7 in "GPUs supportes" at the first message of this topic).

Maybe you mean R9 270 which is analog 7850 i guess

R9 270 ~ 5,4 CPD (950/1400) Downvolted to 1,0v

Hello, qqqq!
I mean exactly R7. Is it supported with this miner?

I don't have R7. And my results was obtained with Claymore miner.
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Hello!
I'm mining on HD 7850 (it's about 4.7 CPD).
Anyone tried to use new analog of this card - R7 260X (or another R7 series, there are no R7 in "GPUs supportes" at the first message of this topic).

Maybe you mean R9 270 which is analog 7850 i guess

R9 270 ~ 5,4 CPD (950/1400) Downvolted to 1,0v

Hello, qqqq!
I mean exactly R7. Is it supported with this miner?
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
Hello!
I'm mining on HD 7850 (it's about 4.7 CPD).
Anyone tried to use new analog of this card - R7 260X (or another R7 series, there are no R7 in "GPUs supportes" at the first message of this topic).

Maybe you mean R9 270 which is analog 7850 i guess

R9 270 ~ 5,4 CPD (950/1400) Downvolted to 1,0v
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Hello!
I'm mining on HD 7850 (it's about 4.7 CPD).
Anyone tried to use new analog of this card - R7 260X (or another R7 series, there are no R7 in "GPUs supportes" at the first message of this topic).
hero member
Activity: 799
Merit: 1000
Does anyone use Fury, Fury X or Nano card?
How much CPD we can get from those cards?



I tried R9 Nano via this miner ~ 9.5 - 10 CPD.

With Claymore it doesn't mine, tried different Opencls. I thinks it's because he abandoned his project and don't update his miner anymore
Thats one very expensive card for 280x performance heh.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
Does anyone use Fury, Fury X or Nano card?
How much CPD we can get from those cards?



I tried R9 Nano via this miner ~ 9.5 - 10 CPD.

With Claymore it doesn't mine, tried different Opencls. I thinks it's because he abandoned his project and don't update his miner anymore
jr. member
Activity: 117
Merit: 2
Does anyone use Fury, Fury X or Nano card?
How much CPD we can get from those cards?

legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
Last few days i noticed that XPM blockchain perhaps was forked. I may be mistaken but as i mine solo i got a different heights in my wallet of blocks than yours pool has and according https://coinplorer.com/XPM it's also different.
Coinplorer sometimes stops synchronization up to 2-3 days, it's better to check standalone primecoin-qt wallet.


Right now i see that yours (pool) height of blocks and my wallet are the same. But this 2-3 days it was not.
sr. member
Activity: 2106
Merit: 282
👉bit.ly/3QXp3oh | 🔥 Ultimate Launc
Last few days i noticed that XPM blockchain perhaps was forked. I may be mistaken but as i mine solo i got a different heights in my wallet of blocks than yours pool has and according https://coinplorer.com/XPM it's also different.
Coinplorer sometimes stops synchronization up to 2-3 days, it's better to check standalone primecoin-qt wallet.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
Last few days i noticed that XPM blockchain perhaps was forked. I may be mistaken but as i mine solo i got a different heights in my wallet of blocks than yours pool has and according https://coinplorer.com/XPM it's also different.
sr. member
Activity: 2106
Merit: 282
👉bit.ly/3QXp3oh | 🔥 Ultimate Launc
Does xpmclient can control over 10 GPUs on 1 system?
this utility would crash if assign over 10 GPUs, is this a openCL limitation or can be fix by xpmclient next ver?
10GPUs? 5xHD7990 or what? Smiley
It's not OpenCL limitation.. may be bug in xpmclient. I don't have access to rig with so much GPUs, can't test that.

Unfortunately, i needed to hack the xpmclient.cpp file to remove the test after the line 1251 about incompatible configuration :
Do you try remove kernel.bin and recompile kernel ?
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Hi,

I was trying for a long time to make work this GPU miner on my laptop (Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M) without success, and today it works  Smiley !
Code:
# ./xpmclient -b
madPrimeMiner-v1.1
ClientName = 'modulix'  ClientID = 1962103082  InstanceID = 2241023174
Address = 'AG7ofBFDfjoPNWvYapLUj2DL4KXDMSyNJA'
found platform[0] name = 'NVIDIA CUDA'
Found 1 devices
Using device 0 as GPU 0
GeForce GTX 765M; 4 compute units
square 320 bits: 315.070ms (425.993M ops/sec)
square 320 bits: 323.220ms (415.252M ops/sec)
multiply 320 bits: 244.722ms (548.450M ops/sec)
square 352 bits: 363.831ms (368.901M ops/sec)
multiply 352 bits: 297.200ms (451.607M ops/sec)
Fermat tests 320 bits: 229.570ms (0.571M ops/sec)
Fermat tests 352 bits: 276.810ms (0.474M ops/sec)

 *** hashmod benchmark ***
 MHash per second: 37.204
 Hash per iteration: 37.266 (0.000444 %)
 Average hash multiplier size: 30.620

 *** sieve (check) benchmark ***
 * [OK] found candidates by CPU: 5431 by GPU: 5435
 * [OK] invalid candidates: 0
 * [OK] CPU/GPU candidates difference: 0

 *** sieve (performance) benchmark ***
 * scan speed: 2.303 G
 * iteration time: 239.022ms
 * candidates per second: 30096.465
 * candidates per iteration: 7193.70 (3017.97 320bit, 4175.73 352bit)
 * 320bit/352bit ratio: 0.723/1

Unfortunately, i needed to hack the xpmclient.cpp file to remove the test after the line 1251 about incompatible configuration :
Code:
        config_t config = miner->getConfig();
        /*
        if (config.TARGET != clKernelTarget ||
            config.PCOUNT != clKernelPCount ||
            config.STRIPES != clKernelStripes ||
            config.WIDTH != clKernelWidth ||
            config.WINDOWSIZE_ != clKernelWindowSize) {
          printf("Existing OpenCL kernel (kernel.bin) incompatible with configuration\n");
          printf("Please remove kernel.bin file and restart miner\n");
          exit(1);
        }
        */

I don't know exactly what is bad in this test, but after i tried to put in config.txt file same values as found in gpu/config.cl without success, i tried to remove the test and... now, it's ok ;-)

The values i have in my config.txt :
Code:
server = "xpmforall.org";
port = "6666";
address="xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";
name="modulix";
cpuload="1";
platform="nvidia";
target="10";
weaveDepth="40960";
sieveSize="420";
width="20";
windowSize="4096";
devices=["1", "0", "0", "0"];

I hope that this post could enhance this great project !

newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
Does xpmclient can control over 10 GPUs on 1 system?
this utility would crash if assign over 10 GPUs, is this a openCL limitation or can be fix by xpmclient next ver?
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
found platform[0] name = 'NVIDIA CUDA'
Found 6 devices
Using device 0 as GPU 0
Using device 1 as GPU 1
Using device 2 as GPU 2
Using device 3 as GPU 3
Using device 4 as GPU 4
Using device 5 as GPU 5
Compiling ...
Source: 236814 bytes
binsize = 1585831 bytes
OpenCL error: -30 at /HDD/build/projects/xpmclient/xpmclient/xpmclient.cpp:1027
Post more information - OS, GPUs, driver version, your config.txt (if it was changed).

So how to solve this problem? I also meet this error message.
OS: win8.1
Did you change something in config.txt ?
What driver version you use ?
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
found platform[0] name = 'NVIDIA CUDA'
Found 6 devices
Using device 0 as GPU 0
Using device 1 as GPU 1
Using device 2 as GPU 2
Using device 3 as GPU 3
Using device 4 as GPU 4
Using device 5 as GPU 5
Compiling ...
Source: 236814 bytes
binsize = 1585831 bytes
OpenCL error: -30 at /HDD/build/projects/xpmclient/xpmclient/xpmclient.cpp:1027
Post more information - OS, GPUs, driver version, your config.txt (if it was changed).

So how to solve this problem? I also meet this error message.
OS: win8.1
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
eXtremal
Any news about otimization for NVIDIA ?
same question
with opencl it is very hard (nearly impossible) to reach top performance on nvidia. Better ask for cuda primecoin miner )))

...ok...someone with cuda primecoin miner ?? Smiley
Pages:
Jump to: