Topic: [overview] LoyceV's useful data on Bitcointalk - page 5. (Read 7638 times)

This is cool! I've unlocked 5 years LoyceV! so you can post it there.

I love the age counter Guess what year I was born

It's not me, mediaBuzz is the guy. I just made it visible.
I'll edit my post, seems like it's misleading. Sorry about that mediaBuzz.

I wonder how you get the data and compressing all the time, this job is really great  It seems that everything is fully recorded. Can you guide me to do somethings like that?

This is mediaBuzz's work, i just made it visible.
It's awful compression but manage to go little bit under 2.5Mb. At lease more people can see what you did there and open the link itself

Alternative link here :
https://imgur.com/a/mWXcDTP

https://gph.is/g/aXJgjje This was for 5 years LoyceV! topic, but while I was looking for a way to send this, you closed it (I couldn't it compress it till the bitcoin talk acceptable size anyways )

This means that if his trust setting is the default trust, he is not trusted by anyone and he was not excluded by anyone, he won't be there, right? It seems like a brand new member who just created an account here. I understand the problem, thank you for the help 

If a user isn't on the list, it means RapTarX didn't set a custom Trust list, and is also not included (or excluded) by anyone else.

Hi,
May I ask about your trust list viewer? I just went to BPIP to see the trust list viewer for RapTarX. But it is empty there   How does that happen and how can I see it? Can you tell me  
EDIT: add image

  Thanks for your explanation! So corresponding to each trust, we will have a different color shown on the profile. Sorry for my misunderstanding, I thought black was the color of distrust 
I understand the trust system, I just don't know its color on BPIP. Thank you, sir!

You're probably looking for [BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action], but I can answer this for you:

Neutral feedback is black, so yours is black:


Satoshi's feedback is green:


And game-protect's feedback is red:


You may be interested in LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.

I am not sure this is where I can ask questions  I just look at BPIP to see information about my account. There is a little weird here 

Why is my trust color black  Although I'm not a DT member, I don't have any negative trusts either, so why is black  It makes me feel negative. Is it a sign to mark that I'm not a reliable person?

You're a really great guy. I wish we could speak the same language. Your statistics scholar and data mining is very good.

I wish you continued success @Loyc 👍👍

I'm okay with this slight difference in semantics

Dear Loyce,

Is it time to change username to display name for your usernames.txt data dump? Both the format and the file name.
Display name will be right for all cases whilst username will be not.

You might want to take a look at the new BPIP project thread. 

I was not sure if I should "edit" my above post or write a new post, yet the passage of three days between this post and the above post seems to be sufficient and adequate justification for a new post, even though related.

Within the past couple of hours, I noticed that BPIP seems to be working again, so in that regard, I take back any and all of any of my bad thoughts that I may have been having regarding VOD, whether justified or not and whether direct or indirect or any negative implication that I may have implied or inferred with my above "taking marbles home" analogy in the above post.

In other words, long live BPIP!!!!!   Thanks VOD for getting it going again!!!!


Edit:  Based on ibminer's below post, I will leave my earlier text (as I had written it), but just point out, here, for clarity, that I have added that new thread to my watch list, and I recognize that ibminer and suchmoon have jointly taken over responsibility and ownership of the BPIP site.   Thanks for that, and thanks for redirecting me to the new thread.

There are a lot of us who had gotten used to several of the informational and interface presentations of BPIP, yet it is starting to feel like a "take my marbles and go home" kind of situation.

Of course, VOD had contributed a lot over the years, and of course, there is not always recognition for HARD work that is done, but that is the nature of both open source and these kinds of forum contributions that can devolve into nonsensical personal arguments and all or nothing "you or me" kinds of presentations.

If VOD does not continue with BPIP, then hopefully someone else will take the reins of such a project with some kind of similar interface and/or accessibility of certain kinds of forum-related information.    I don't want to jinx anything, and surely I am not superstitious, yet at the same time, I understand that sometimes, we could be at the end of an era and the person(s) that had historically been doing that kind of work does play his cards hard and sticks with his hand, however, stubborn that might seem to be.

Richie_T did a similar thing with Chartbuddy - even though a precedent had been set for the existence and utility of Chartbuddy, no forum member has so far taken up the reins of programming a Chartbuddy 2.0, just like we might be witnessing the early days for a need for a BPIP 2.0 programmer.. .and surely I have no fucking skills beyond possibly rhetorically filling up the spaces of various threads with walls of text, to the extent that might questionably do any good in any direction:  good, bad or ugly?...

 

Thank you for the answer. You have a great resource that I visit a lot. It's a pity that the website doesn't have the dates of user bans. I also really hope that Vod will restore the BIP.

Sorry, I didn't keep track of this. Currently, I upload banned users once a day, and I have "modlog records for the past 6 months, but for the majority of bans I won't have any data on when it happened. I got many users on my list from Vod, and even that list doesn't cover the full history of bans on Bitcointalk.

I'm still hoping Vod will fix it again