Pages:
Author

Topic: Overview of Bitcointalk Signature Anti-Spam Campaign Managers - page 8. (Read 29287 times)

legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
You should probably clarify or confirm those escrowed amounts as well as some of them seem way off. Are they total amounts held over their lifetime or all at once?

I asked him to clarify and he responded that it's over their lifetime. I do think that maximum amount held at one point is a much better representation.
global moderator
Activity: 4018
Merit: 2728
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
How about including rank and/or sign-up date?

You should probably clarify or confirm those escrowed amounts as well as some of them seem way off. Are they total amounts held over their lifetime or all at once? I suspect people have given both. They can also be misleading. Somebody holding 1 bitcoin a hundred times doesn't mean they can be trusted with 100 bitcoins. Also, somebody holding 100 bitcoins five years or so ago probably wouldn't even be worth 1 bitcoin now. The figure I gave was the highest amount I've held at any one time and was probably over £10k cash value at the time, and I think things like these should be stipulated as they can be very misleading or even give a false sense of security. In this case I think the highest value people have held at any one time is a better indicator. Somebody could quite easily hold on to many small amounts dozens of times until his total is 10 bitcoins or whatever then just disappear if anyone every gives him a large amount at once.


Hilariousandco:

Hilariousandco,a Lamborghini Member,

The one and only. Skurrt skurrt.

He on one of the person who is trusted by a great deal of people in bitcointalk,including theymos.  Cheesy


You should probably remove the part including theymos (unless he's said otherwise). He may trust me to moderate the forum at a Global level but this doesn't necessarily mean he would vouch for me to hold onto large amounts of cash (or run signature campaigns - not that he doesn't or wouldn't but I feel unless he's specifically said this it shouldn't be here and may give me an unfair advantage).
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
DarkStar_:
He has been managing ChipMixer campaign for more than a year now has paid every single week on time

Not entirely accurate, off the top of my head I had to do a double round once and payments were delayed twice (?)
legendary
Activity: 2383
Merit: 1551
dogs are cute.
- The thread will be self-moderated to avoid unnecessary spam.
I forget to activate that all the time too Tongue
Damn it,you caught hold of it before I removed it Angry. Yeah I forgot too. Sad
Just posting here to read updates. Thanks for doing this!
Its my pleasure. I'll make sure to keep this one updated.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
- The thread will be self-moderated to avoid unnecessary spam.
I forget to activate that all the time too Tongue

Just posting here to read updates. Thanks for doing this!
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1065
✋(▀Ĺ̯ ▀-͠ )
-snip-

Check the image again and change the number 4 to 2, normally you will see then the correct default trust rating (and let's try to stay on topic Wink).
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
Trust is relative, isn't it? The trust we see is based on our own trust settings. So we are seeing pugman's trust setting in OP. My end it will be different and in your end it will be something else. Can anyone correct me if I am wrong? I may be wrong in understanding the trust system.

But, If I am right then may be trust column  need not to be added.
The trust ratings above are not based on my trust settings. The ratings are purely default,meaning the ones that everybody sees. I didn't the ratings based on my settings,as that would be biased.

Can you see this
I believe this is how we set the DefaultTrust? If yes then now I see totally different ratings for above members. It does not match with the original post, my previous post (the post under OP).

What am I missing?  Roll Eyes


update:
Thanks pugman and InvoKing
I was in dark LOL

 
legendary
Activity: 2383
Merit: 1551
dogs are cute.
Trust is relative, isn't it? The trust we see is based on our own trust settings. So we are seeing pugman's trust setting in OP. My end it will be different and in your end it will be something else. Can anyone correct me if I am wrong? I may be wrong in understanding the trust system.

But, If I am right then may be trust column  need not to be added.
The trust ratings above are not based on my trust settings. The ratings are purely default,meaning the ones that everybody sees. I didn't the ratings based on my settings,as that would be biased.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
Great job on the list. Good to read especially the little introductions under the list. Looks like some of these members has huge experiences.
Thanks. Smiley

You deserve the good words. By the way I have updated my last post above, I will appreciate your feedback. I might need to review the original trust system topic again.
legendary
Activity: 2383
Merit: 1551
dogs are cute.
Nice work. The default trust appears to be good solution to rate them although for Lauda it will be a negative point especially if the person who is willing to hire them hasn't a forum account.
I would recommend an asterisk for lauda instead of showing his DT and add comments on the text about it. (that's my opinion ofc)
I thought about it too,but there's a conflict between the managers Sad. Personal feuds shouldn't come in between of professionalism. But thank you,if more people want it,I'll add some info Smiley.
Great job on the list. Good to read especially the little introductions under the list. Looks like some of these members has huge experiences.
Thanks. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1065
✋(▀Ĺ̯ ▀-͠ )
Nice work. The default trust appears to be good solution to rate them although for Lauda it will be a negative point especially if the person who is willing to hire them hasn't a forum account.
I would recommend an asterisk for lauda instead of showing his DT and add comments on the text about it. (that's my opinion ofc)
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
Great job on the list. Good to read especially the little introductions under the list. Looks like some of these members has huge experiences.



update2:
Please ignore below. I got my answers.

update1:
DT
Trust is relative, isn't it? The trust we see is based on our own trust settings. So we are seeing pugman's trust setting in OP. My end it will be different and in your end it will be something else. Can anyone correct me if I am wrong? I may be wrong in understanding the trust system.

But, If I am right then may be trust column  need not to be added.
legendary
Activity: 2383
Merit: 1551
dogs are cute.
Reserved.

Managers in review :

1. legendster

2. Julerz12

3. Wapinter - Is currently ban evading and his campaigns are being abused. Do your own due diligence and then hire any manager!

4. Goinmerry
legendary
Activity: 2383
Merit: 1551
dogs are cute.
Overview of Bitcointalk Signature Anti-Spam Campaign Managers


|     Advertisement     |



Advertised sites, items, etc are not endorsed and may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
This spot is taken. Advertise here for the month of September.




|
Manager
Pages:
Jump to:
© 2020, Bitcointalksearch.org