Topic: overwhelming consensus excludes Lauda, remains in DT2, went in2 buz w sold act - page 15. (Read 11909 times)

I mean, he has certainly never denied being Satoshi.

Nullius' knowledge about blockchain science and cryptography is a dead giveaway. His arrogance is a dead giveaway. He is an alt-account of a member who was here long before Bitcoin was even talked about in the mainstream. No way in the world he just registered in this forum last March 29, 2017. If you're an expert in blockchains, you pretty much have visited or even make posts here in Bitcointalk in the past.

Also the fact that he keeps butting into Bitcointalk and DT politics, I would assume he is one of the main cast of characters of the forum drama we are witnessing. A real newcomer would probably stick to Bitcoin discussions on protocol, trading or even the altcoin ann section.

He could even be Satoshi. 

I'm watching, from the shadows. nullius, being new here, has properly understood what Quickscammer is while the "old and reputable members" are unable to do so. In the case of the absence of bias, this makes me wonder just how much more intelligent he is in comparison to this guy:

or the other I-used-to-do-good-but-i-lived-long--enough-to-become-the-villain member.

---

JayJuanGee, the whole thread is a joke consisting of slinging mud my way. I've yet to see a single statement that wasn't misinterpreted (or a complete lie) in some way in order to smear my name. This is what happens when you bring competition to the escrow space, and tag account traders/abusive farmers and whatnot. Preemptive defense is what they tend to call it. Take out the competition before you're out of business. The thread has made a somewhat enjoyable turn with legitimate users discussing and not the busted baboons such as "Merited by toolbox (1), CoolWave (1)" (see OP) discussing things. Of course, the latter one is a ICO bumping provider. The collusion is clear, and you might be struck down under false pretenses if you speak out about the charity failing investment scheme.

I've seriously considered that. However, Quickseller is the equivalent of a rock when compared to nullius, intelligence-wise. Therefore, I find that rather highly improbable.

Then they boldly call themselves "reputable". No reputable person would have such a disgusting history.

You already know the answer to that question. There is also 'shorena', who was likely escrowing accounts for Quickscammer (or in general) at least in one point of time[1]. 'But Lauda, I do not feel that you should be tagging account traders!' - I wonder why.

---

[1] Nevermind, here's the evidence for that unlike the made-up-non-existing evidence that Quickscammer keeps talking about. Given the shady and dishonest nature of everyone involved, here's the archived reference link: https://archive.fo/jpi0S.

Being new here, it has come to my attention that the prominent 'third world country' buster - The Sadist showed up here, trying to debunk his multiple personality disorder. Sadly, my popcorn supply is running dangerously low. Back to you 'nice folks' very soon.


For the kind eyes of the forum administration, I am new here and I am still learning the ropes. I don't take part in despicable acts like trolling and account farming. Have a nice day!

My avatar was not taking sides at all in this matter and barely even attempting to engage in the substance of the discussion, because it only seemed to be obsessed with suchmoon, but surely not in any kind of negative way.. but just in a kind of tit for tat kind of way...   you know the saying that imitation is a form of flattery.. I think that is what my avatar was attempting.

Regarding accusation of accounts being controlled by one folk or another, the suspicions sometimes run a bit too high, but I don't have any evidence to really jump into that kind of battle to the extent that there might be evidence or logic in this case in any kind of direction.

For the most part, I thought that this was a thread to attempt to beat up on Lauda... I am sure Lauda is happy to get a bit of breathing space for a while and perhaps to get something more meaningful done.     Lauda.. can you come back, so we can beat up on you and your cat, or at least try?

Five-nines?  That’s all?  I’d thought my post demonstrated a fascinating new mathematical discovery of sarcasm-probability exceeding 1.0.

Such surpassing of tautological limits is easy.  Here, I will treat you to an exemplary demonstration:


Well, you caught me red-handed there.  Yes, I am Quickseller.  I have a one centimeter long penis, and I live in my mother’s basement.  I divide my lonesome existence between scamming people, account-selling, sockpuppeting, and frenzied exercise of my psychotically obsessive hatred for Lauda.  My only friend in the whole wide world is OgNasty, my soul-brother, who is just like me except that he wishes he could have sex with women.

suchmoon, that’s an awfully nice account you have there.  Default-trusted!  Mmm, tasty.  Would you please sell it to me?  Thanks.    I will give you 1000000 BTC for it (well, not really—scamming here, gotcha! ).

Anyway, it’s too bad you caught me like that.  Now, I will need to start myriad forum threads making wild accusations against you on the basis of no evidence whatsoever.  Watch out!

---

Your avatar seems to have mistaken who said what.  No matter.  It’s good to this thread finally devolve to laughter, seeing as how it started with a sick joke.

Yeah, but my avatar could not stop itself from wanting to spout something out, and I don't even think that my avatar cared if it was on topic or not, because it did not even seem to care about the substance of the signature discussion...  It seemed to have gone into a kind of autopilot mode, and seemed to want to get in a little dig... it was saying, suchmoon, suchmoon.. .and laughing... for some reason....   I tried to stop its wordiness choices, but I couldn't.   

Someone (one of those anti-Lauda crusaders, complete accident I'm sure /sssss) in another thread told me that I'm getting paid for my signature. None of the things in my sig make any sense as ads. Nullius was just dialing that nonsense up to 11 and I'm five-nines-confident that he was indeed being sarcastic.

Of course it may turn out that nullius is actually an alt of Quickseller and we'll all look rather silly then, but that's a worry for another day.

Are you saying my sarcasm detector is malfunctioning? That does happen, suchmoon knows!   If so, how, enlighten me,  I'm pretty straightforward I guess. I admire your skills, so I'm not sure what you want from me.

Being new here...  Oh, never mind.

---

I’m so glad my words amused the three of you.  Now, would somebody please explain this to owlcatz?

Sarcasm shill...


hahahahahahahaha


For some strange reason, Me, my avatar and I  (the three of us, aka "we")  kind of like it..    

Told you so. It doesn't fucking work.

Dear suchmoon, sarcasm shill:  A little help here, please?

LOL... Man, I admire your mad skillz, but there is nothing going on with Suchmoon putting whatever they like in the sig, they are not getting paid for that, trust me, I've been here quite some time and know Suchmoon pretty well... You need to tone down the tinfoil hat thing. People like me and them - we don't get paid shit for our sigs, we do what we want with them.

Cheers, and keep creating epicness buddy!

owlcatz

No, you sleazy dodger, the Master Ethical Mature Expert was referring to the payola you get for shilling for so-called “BitcoinTalk rules”.

Being new here, I may not yet know THE TRUTH of all the subtle undercurrents in whatever backroom dealings you Legendaries do to oppress the new users.  But I’m not blind.  The evidence of your “rules” graft is right there in your signature!  Your sarcasm-grift only adds insult to injury.

Being new here, you might not know this, but sarcasm on intertubes doesn't work. I should know because according to the Master Ethical Mature Expert of Bitcointalk I'm getting paid by sarcasm to carry it in my signature and I'm clearly doing a horrible job shilling it, seeing that my payments have been 0 so far.

If it involves anything worse than downloading terabytes of porn .torrents, and thusly giving himself carpal tunnel syndrome—well, I am not sure I want to finish that sentence.  The images flashing through my mind are already too unpleasant.  From his persistent “LOOK, I’M A MAN!!” posturing, it’s patently obvious that Mr. Nasty has abnormal difficulty with women.  The habits and histories developed by such males tend to be unpleasant, indeed.


Quickseller’s m.o. is so terribly predictable, in that and every other way.  Is there anybody stupid enough to find him credible?  No, wait—don’t answer that.


Yes, I saw that.  Surely, the excuse will be that unrelieved tumescence in the human male can make for exceedingly poor judgment.  Not that that would be a valid excuse for Quickselling his soul and his trust.  Such things must go cheaply for the author of those words.


Uh-oh.  Given how dumb they are, I guess I’m in trouble.  I have some experience for an apt comparison:

You might not want to know that history.

He sneaks in a very distasteful lie on every other page hoping that somebody won't notice and debunk it.

Of course you can, he is after all known for selling DT accounts to scammers. And I'm the dishonest one? Actually, nevermind that. The truth about Quickscammer is as follows:
"Obviously, QS pulled a questionable move with the self-escrow. Despite him being the target of much hate he continues to help the community.". At this point you might need a moment or two to absorb this.
"continues to help the community"... by selling DT accounts to known scammers.
A friend of a friend reliable unidentified source said that.

---

[1] I would expect one of the cartel members to use this, which is obviously not actual intent to purchase an account of any kind, as an excuse to tag you. Watch out.

Very well.  Then, I shall only spread truths about him:  The truths which SaltySpitoon said are offtopic in this thread; and also, the quintessential truth that despite his too-desperate attempts to prove his manhood with silly graphics and empty posturing, Mr. Nasty will never be able to get the girls like I can.

(I omit Quickseller from that latter discussion, on grounds that I seriously question his interest in womankind other than for scamming purposes.)


Wow, I should read upthread.  That very well may be the single most twisted misapplication of the legal system which I have ever seen!  Worse, I include statements by lawyers in that assessment.


Thanks.  I will.  But as a most memorable ladyfriend once told me, I am “mad, bad, and dangerous to know”.

(Hey, word-reading people, is there any chance that you could fill in for the semi-literate morons QS/OG dynamic duo?  Thanks.)


What!?  You mean that to be like you, I must expend hours and years of my life on grim, thankless tasks to help protect the forum for the benefit of others?  That’s so much work.

Is there any way I could shortcut all this “work to help others” stuff by purchasing a DT account from Quickseller?

A friend of a friend reliable unidentified source said that if you were to shamelessly spread lies about OgNasty, you'd very likely get neg. rated (or excluded) by him. However, if Quickseller does this to others then it's fine.


He claims he has evidence. I do not see evidence after you've explicitly denied this.

Thanks. Stay vigilant.

Step 1) Start tagging account traders. Step 2) Start tagging abusers (i.e. abusive account farmers). Step 3) Voila. You've severely impacted Quickscammer's business and thus are on his list of evil users.