Pages:
Author

Topic: P2Pool Server List - page 7. (Read 106619 times)

hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
May 21, 2013, 09:53:35 AM
That will do me for now. Thanks.  Smiley
zvs
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
May 21, 2013, 09:50:59 AM
Agreed. Hoever, the more I think about it, I think I would prefer an automatic approach.  Have cgminer find the nearest p2pool nodes.  In that way, I can specify my own or preferred nodes, and not have to worry if it fails when I am sleep, as cgminer will just find someone elses.
OK, it's not the automated method you speak of, but I just thought I'd mention:

http://p2pool.hostv.pl/

which is fancier.  But needs to be updated by the Polish gentleman to remove at least one dupe in the BTC section  Shocked

....

You could always just have 3 or 4 pools...
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
May 21, 2013, 07:52:12 AM
Agreed. Hoever, the more I think about it, I think I would prefer an automatic approach.  Have cgminer find the nearest p2pool nodes.  In that way, I can specify my own or preferred nodes, and not have to worry if it fails when I am sleep, as cgminer will just find someone elses.
full member
Activity: 194
Merit: 100
May 21, 2013, 07:38:06 AM
A lot of the servers on this list dont work anymore.  I have set my own p2pool node up (which I will advertise soon), and now I want to find a couple of backups.  There has to be way to automate this information.

Has this been discussed at all? Two things spring to mind:

1. Auto discovery of p2pool nodes, and use ping to find the closest (this could be built into the mining software).
2. Have p2pool optionally advertise it's location to a map every hour or so. This would be a config setting in p2pool, detailing Latitude/Longitude, rate etc.


Most logical place for this type of info would be:
http://p2pool.info/

As that site seems to keep track of the pool as a whole...
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
May 21, 2013, 07:27:53 AM
A lot of the servers on this list dont work anymore.  I have set my own p2pool node up (which I will advertise soon), and now I want to find a couple of backups.  There has to be way to automate this information.

Has this been discussed at all? Two things spring to mind:

1. Auto discovery of p2pool nodes, and use ping to find the closest (this could be built into the mining software).
2. Have p2pool optionally advertise it's location to a map every hour or so. This would be a config setting in p2pool, detailing Latitude/Longitude, rate etc.
legendary
Activity: 1361
Merit: 1003
Don`t panic! Organize!
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
May 19, 2013, 04:43:14 PM
I am pleased to announce Litecoin P2Pool (Litecoinp2pool.com) a P2Pool Based Pool Mining Server   - - FAST LINUX SERVER IN EUROPE  - http://litecoinp2pool.com

Pool URL: LITECOINP2POOL.COM
Port: 9327
User: Your LTC Wallet Address
Pass: Any Password You Want

* Mine Litecoins taking advantage of pooled mining resources
* No need to Sign Up. No need to worry about someone guessing your pool server password. Simply connect to our server using your LTC address as your username and any password.
* DDOS resistant. The nature P2Pool being decentralised means that we are not impacted by DDOS. (Yes I was also tired of Pools going down every few hours)
* Safe and secure payment system mechanism with accountability across all the nodes of the network

Example syntax for CGMNice & Easy.INER to get you started:
cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://litecoinp2pool.com:9327 -u LKqYn5oC47y75svTjfxZroDHjtNkFh1kmJ -p xxxx1  -I 18 -w 256 --auto-fan

For the Regular Top Miners there is potential for you to come on board as Pool Moderators and to share some of the fees if we decide to introduce a fee in the future. Id like to build a team of people up who have an interest in LTC and Pools. Add me on skype if you want to be considered. My Skype is SEOCrow
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
May 17, 2013, 10:49:02 PM
asia
china
http://p2pool.co.in/

btc
bitcoin.p2pool.co.in:9332

ltc
litecoin.p2pool.co.in:9327

trc
terracoin.p2pool.co.in:9322
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Watch out for the "Neg-Rep-Dogie-Police".....
May 17, 2013, 03:29:47 PM
i wonder how many people go to that p2pool.org site and see all the dead/orphan shares and decide that p2pool sucks?   Huh

How very dare you. You must be a witch that must be burned at the stake for blasphemy....twice...... Cheesy Wink
zvs
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
May 17, 2013, 02:12:21 PM
i wonder how many people go to that p2pool.org site and see all the dead/orphan shares and decide that p2pool sucks?   Huh
zvs
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
May 17, 2013, 12:48:58 PM
http://p2pool.hostv.pl/
New features:
-  check  GetWorkTemplateLatency
- added sorting for tables (just click on table header).
- added filter for BTC/LTC/TRC nodes

Best,
sViruS

the GWTL is heavily influenced by max block size.. i.e. the ridiculous 1000 maxblocksize on one of the servers shown will give it a significant advantage over any server that has any transactions.  likewise, the 5000 max blocksize on my server gives myself an advantage over 95% of the others

but , pls do at least 2000 size,  1000 would have missed two 20+ transaction fees the last week
member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
May 17, 2013, 11:10:45 AM
http://p2pool.hostv.pl/
New features:
-  check  GetWorkTemplateLatency
- added sorting for tables (just click on table header).
- added filter for BTC/LTC/TRC nodes

Best,
sViruS
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
May 12, 2013, 04:27:10 PM
Thanks hahaha Smiley I can just imagine doing that face to people in the street randomly and check their reaction Grin
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Watch out for the "Neg-Rep-Dogie-Police".....
May 12, 2013, 03:51:14 PM
Montreal::Quebec::Canada::http://mine-a-coin.com:9327/::1%::LTC::Mine-a-coin.com::NS

Cool avatar my man - Pans Labyrinth - a classic  Grin
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
May 11, 2013, 04:23:30 PM
Montreal::Quebec::Canada::http://mine-a-coin.com:9327/::1%::LTC::Mine-a-coin.com::NS
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Scattering my bits around the net since 1980
May 09, 2013, 03:29:44 PM
(deleted response, as it was unclear if the fees to what I was replying to, were also going to be paid out PPLNS or Proportional, and if Proportional, then that negated the assumption of PPLNS I was making)

-- Smoov


newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
May 08, 2013, 11:04:26 PM
Hey all,
Just opening up our new p2pool to everyone. My buddy and I have been testing it and everything is working great.
There is 0% fee at the moment and only LTC mining.
We're working on adding many more scrypt coins to the server in the very near future.
The server is hosted on the east coast of Australia in a data center, connection and ping for Aussies should be ideal!

Address is - p2pool.net.au

Brisbane::Australia::http://p2pool.net.au:9327/::0%::LTC::p2pool.net.au::chances

Username is your wallet address and password is anything.

By the end of next week we should have some more coins available and a frontpage for all the pools.

Any suggestions would be appreciated Wink
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
May 08, 2013, 10:53:28 PM
#2, not sure.  Also I don't think that'd be incentive enough to risk p2pool orphans with.

#1 and #3, I think would cause problems for people using p2pool with high latency.

I don't see why #1 would, it would allow a window averaging 10s after a share to submit a share based on the previous one. Unless your latency is several seconds larger than the other miners you shouldn't be penalized by your latency in any noticeable way.
zvs
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
May 08, 2013, 10:37:58 PM
#2, not sure.  Also I don't think that'd be incentive enough to risk p2pool orphans with.

#1 and #3, I think would cause problems for people using p2pool with high latency. 

The current reward for solving a share is .5%, right?  So .125 (+ some small bit from transaction fees)?  Average block has maybe .2 to .5 in transaction fees?  I still just think changing the reward to the transactions is the best way to solve the problem.

... and it can be changed if and when transaction fees become a more significant portion of blocks (when reward drops to 12.5, or some other event)

I don't see why ppl complain about that
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
May 08, 2013, 06:37:39 PM
Is there something that can be done? Force p2pool shares to contain a certain number of transactions? A number small enough that doesn't kill small pool latency but big enough to help the network?

See my previous posts...

If nothing can be done to speed up bitcoind which would clearly be the better solution as it would benefit everyone, there are at least several relatively complicated approach p2pool could use:

  • allow a share to "adopt" an orphan share (ie: reference two shares instead of one), which would greatly reduce latency impacts on the miner's efficiency, this has often been discussed but never been implemented, probably quite complex
  • for each miner, compute the fees associated with each share and distribute fees proportionately to all submitted shares (unlike the block reward itself which would remain in proportion to the number*complexity of shares submitted). I'm not sure if it's doable in a secure way, I'm not familiar enough with the sharechain implementation, but if it's doable it's probably not trivial to get right.
  • the simplest would be to punish shares with fewer transactions when a fork happens in the sharechain by always building on the share with the largest number of transactions but I'm not sure it would be enough
Pages:
Jump to: