Topic: P2Pool Server List - page 5. (Read 106711 times)
If you're into devcoins (price stable, and support open source developers!), then I've got a bitcoin/devcoin p2pool node at http://blisterpool.com:9332. All Bitcoin and Devcoins merge mined are given to miners with no fee, plus I also have a minimum 10,000 dvc paid out daily split by hashpower, if the merge mining isn't enough. Just have to register a bitcoin/devcoin address pair on the main site and login with the bitcoin address on the miner. Couldn't be easier to get free devcoins!
Checkout http://bithasher.net for bitcoin mining. Connect to mine.bithasher.net:9332. Hosted in New York and very responsive.
http://cryptal.net/pools/
Coins to choose from:
BTC - Bitcoin
CSC - Casinocoin
DOGE - Dogecoin
LTC - Litecoin
TRC - Terracoin
WDC - Worldcoin
Fee: 1 %
Server location: France, Roubaix
Basic P2Poolin'
Coins to choose from:
BTC - Bitcoin
CSC - Casinocoin
DOGE - Dogecoin
LTC - Litecoin
TRC - Terracoin
WDC - Worldcoin
Fee: 1 %
Server location: France, Roubaix
Basic P2Poolin'
Adding miningpoolserver.com to the list!
We are mining BTC and a few other scrypt coins at this point. We consistently have over 100% efficiency at our pools
Miners Available:
https://bitcointalk.org/?topic=3878.0 - https://github.com/downloads/Kiv/poclbm/guiminer-20121203.exe *Windows Version*
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/old-bfgminer-3100-modular-asicfpga-gbtstrtm-rpc-maclnxw64-antu1-drb-168174 - http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/bfgminer/3.1.3/bfgminer-3.1.3-win32.zip *Windows 32 Bit Version*
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/old-bfgminer-3100-modular-asicfpga-gbtstrtm-rpc-maclnxw64-antu1-drb-168174 - http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/bfgminer/3.1.3/bfgminer-3.1.3-win64.zip *Windows 64 Bit Version*
To mine BTC with us, just point your miner to:
Host: http://btc.miningpoolserver.com:9332
Username: BitcoinAddress
Password: WhateverYouWouldLike
You can find the additional coins we mine at miningpoolserver.com
-Mike
We are mining BTC and a few other scrypt coins at this point. We consistently have over 100% efficiency at our pools
Miners Available:
https://bitcointalk.org/?topic=3878.0 - https://github.com/downloads/Kiv/poclbm/guiminer-20121203.exe *Windows Version*
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/old-bfgminer-3100-modular-asicfpga-gbtstrtm-rpc-maclnxw64-antu1-drb-168174 - http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/bfgminer/3.1.3/bfgminer-3.1.3-win32.zip *Windows 32 Bit Version*
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/old-bfgminer-3100-modular-asicfpga-gbtstrtm-rpc-maclnxw64-antu1-drb-168174 - http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/bfgminer/3.1.3/bfgminer-3.1.3-win64.zip *Windows 64 Bit Version*
To mine BTC with us, just point your miner to:
Host: http://btc.miningpoolserver.com:9332
Username: BitcoinAddress
Password: WhateverYouWouldLike
You can find the additional coins we mine at miningpoolserver.com
-Mike
A lot of the servers on this list dont work anymore. I have set my own p2pool node up (which I will advertise soon), and now I want to find a couple of backups. There has to be way to automate this information.
Has this been discussed at all? Two things spring to mind:
1. Auto discovery of p2pool nodes, and use ping to find the closest (this could be built into the mining software).
2. Have p2pool optionally advertise it's location to a map every hour or so. This would be a config setting in p2pool, detailing Latitude/Longitude, rate etc.
Has this been discussed at all? Two things spring to mind:
1. Auto discovery of p2pool nodes, and use ping to find the closest (this could be built into the mining software).
2. Have p2pool optionally advertise it's location to a map every hour or so. This would be a config setting in p2pool, detailing Latitude/Longitude, rate etc.
http://p2pool-nodes.info/
Thank you for adding this. The OP and many of the replies have pools that aren't around any more and links to tools that are no longer online.
Are any of these node pools ASIC ready?
They should all be if that are on v13.
Are any of these node pools ASIC ready?
This thread should be hacked into pieces. I've updated a new thread with CURRRENT and WORKING pools.
I went through, literally, every link on all 22 pages of this and checked each and everyone to verify if it's working. Let's please lock/kill this thread. It's out of date, not being managed/updated.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/updated-current-p2pool-server-list-264533
Hopefully this one gets stickied so that the P2Pool list for BitcoinTalk is kept up to date for once.
I went through, literally, every link on all 22 pages of this and checked each and everyone to verify if it's working. Let's please lock/kill this thread. It's out of date, not being managed/updated.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/updated-current-p2pool-server-list-264533
Hopefully this one gets stickied so that the P2Pool list for BitcoinTalk is kept up to date for once.
Adding BTCMiners.net to the list!
As you can guess we are mining BTC only at this point. There is a 2% fee, this is for upkeep of our server on the Midwest side of the states effectively giving a low fee % to most of the Eastern USA, Midwest, Southern and some Western parts of the USA. The server is hosted in Indianapolis, IN with 50+ Mbps downstream connection and a 30Mbps+ upstream connection on a dedicated server.
Miners Available:
https://bitcointalk.org/?topic=3878.0 - https://github.com/downloads/Kiv/poclbm/guiminer-20121203.exe *Windows Version*
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/old-bfgminer-3100-modular-asicfpga-gbtstrtm-rpc-maclnxw64-antu1-drb-168174 - http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/bfgminer/3.1.3/bfgminer-3.1.3-win32.zip *Windows 32 Bit Version*
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/old-bfgminer-3100-modular-asicfpga-gbtstrtm-rpc-maclnxw64-antu1-drb-168174 - http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/bfgminer/3.1.3/bfgminer-3.1.3-win64.zip *Windows 64 Bit Version*
Version 13.2 - Avalon/ASIC Supported!
To mine with us, point your miner to:
Host: http://BTCMiners.net:9332
Username: BitcoinAddress+DifficultyVariable
Password: WhateverYouWouldLike
**Explanation of "DifficultyVariable" in the 'Username' column.**
For 1GH/s and below use: BitcoinAddress+1
Between 2GH/s and 3GH/s use: BitcoinAddress+2
Between 3GH/s and 4GH/s use: BitcoinAddress+4
Between 4GH/ and 5GH/s use: BitcoinAddress+6
(Basically add 1 difficulty rating per GH/s in intervals of 2 respectively. This should alleviate some bandwidth concerns and also give us a pseudo higher GH/s local rate which should in turn yield us more shares.)
Any additional income from fees outside of the minimum required amount needed for the server's upkeep will be once a month split between all the users (locally connected) equally! So everyone who mines with us gets a monthly bonus, yay!
Any questions, please inbox me!
Happy mining,
BTCMiners.net
As you can guess we are mining BTC only at this point. There is a 2% fee, this is for upkeep of our server on the Midwest side of the states effectively giving a low fee % to most of the Eastern USA, Midwest, Southern and some Western parts of the USA. The server is hosted in Indianapolis, IN with 50+ Mbps downstream connection and a 30Mbps+ upstream connection on a dedicated server.
Miners Available:
https://bitcointalk.org/?topic=3878.0 - https://github.com/downloads/Kiv/poclbm/guiminer-20121203.exe *Windows Version*
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/old-bfgminer-3100-modular-asicfpga-gbtstrtm-rpc-maclnxw64-antu1-drb-168174 - http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/bfgminer/3.1.3/bfgminer-3.1.3-win32.zip *Windows 32 Bit Version*
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/old-bfgminer-3100-modular-asicfpga-gbtstrtm-rpc-maclnxw64-antu1-drb-168174 - http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/bfgminer/3.1.3/bfgminer-3.1.3-win64.zip *Windows 64 Bit Version*
Version 13.2 - Avalon/ASIC Supported!
To mine with us, point your miner to:
Host: http://BTCMiners.net:9332
Username: BitcoinAddress+DifficultyVariable
Password: WhateverYouWouldLike
**Explanation of "DifficultyVariable" in the 'Username' column.**
For 1GH/s and below use: BitcoinAddress+1
Between 2GH/s and 3GH/s use: BitcoinAddress+2
Between 3GH/s and 4GH/s use: BitcoinAddress+4
Between 4GH/ and 5GH/s use: BitcoinAddress+6
(Basically add 1 difficulty rating per GH/s in intervals of 2 respectively. This should alleviate some bandwidth concerns and also give us a pseudo higher GH/s local rate which should in turn yield us more shares.)
Any additional income from fees outside of the minimum required amount needed for the server's upkeep will be once a month split between all the users (locally connected) equally! So everyone who mines with us gets a monthly bonus, yay!
Any questions, please inbox me!
Happy mining,
BTCMiners.net
Antrim::UK::http://847Pool.no-ip.biz:9332::0.5%::BTC::847Pool::HellDiverUK
As usual, mine with your payout address as your username.
As usual, mine with your payout address as your username.
I have added 3 low latency nodes, lets wait if this makes less orphans as befor.
You didn't have enough shares previously to make a meaningful comparison.
There are 2 reasons you shouldn't change your parameters too often:
- Each p2pool restart is income lost
- To compare the only important parameter, efficiency, you need enough shares
If you want to compare efficiency with a 1/
1% precision -> 100 to 1000 shares.
This makes for another useful tip: if you suspect that your setup is not performing well, compare your efficiency and your number of shares when you have at least 20 shares.
If your efficiency is 100% -
- if
/100 < 1/ , you are OK, - if
/100 <= 10/ , you should pay attention, - if
/100 > 10/ , you should worry, start looking for the potential source of your problem and prepare a new configuration (and wait for at least 100 shares to confirm that something is wrong)
For example if your efficiency is 95% (n = 5) at 20 shares you are fine. If your efficiency is 95% at 200 shares you should worry.
Of course if you are already above 100% and keep being above it, there's no problem: it means that you will eventually earn more than on a 100% PPS pool and that some other users on P2Pool are contributing to your wealth by having a less efficient setup. Sit back, relax and count the blocks (monitor your efficiency and setup an alert when it goes below 99% to be on the safe side), on the 100th block, compare your income with a theoretical 100% PPS pool and celebrate the result.
Quote
I'm not sure of your thought process here, but if you are referring to the number of nodes or some somewhat large latencies for 3 of them (>100ms), 8 nodes is enough (in fact I had good results with 6) and you never proved otherwise.
This node is at ~102% efficiency with Avalons (which have large latencies which should make it a bit below 100%). Again this contradicts the assertion that 8 nodes isn't enough. When a node is above 100% efficiency (or even around 100%) I don't understand how it should "need" anything, it's already fine.
This node is at ~102% efficiency with Avalons (which have large latencies which should make it a bit below 100%). Again this contradicts the assertion that 8 nodes isn't enough. When a node is above 100% efficiency (or even around 100%) I don't understand how it should "need" anything, it's already fine.
because we just like to be average, I guess
i see he changed it up and has 0 orphans in 11 now... instead of 3 orphans out of 15 or whatever it was before.
yes, the efficiency is less atm, but DOAs would just be a luck factor
since his bitcoind latency is only 0.204s, there should be very few orphans (instead they would be DOA).
I have added 3 low latency nodes, lets wait if this makes less orphans as befor.
Quote
I'm not sure of your thought process here, but if you are referring to the number of nodes or some somewhat large latencies for 3 of them (>100ms), 8 nodes is enough (in fact I had good results with 6) and you never proved otherwise.
This node is at ~102% efficiency with Avalons (which have large latencies which should make it a bit below 100%). Again this contradicts the assertion that 8 nodes isn't enough. When a node is above 100% efficiency (or even around 100%) I don't understand how it should "need" anything, it's already fine.
This node is at ~102% efficiency with Avalons (which have large latencies which should make it a bit below 100%). Again this contradicts the assertion that 8 nodes isn't enough. When a node is above 100% efficiency (or even around 100%) I don't understand how it should "need" anything, it's already fine.
because we just like to be average, I guess
i see he changed it up and has 0 orphans in 11 now... instead of 3 orphans out of 15 or whatever it was before.
yes, the efficiency is less atm, but DOAs would just be a luck factor
since his bitcoind latency is only 0.204s, there should be very few orphans (instead they would be DOA).
Avalon enabled p2pool (13.2)!
Running of RamDisk (Bitcoind GetBlockTemplate Latency < 200ms)
Set your BTC address and "+32" as username (eg. "16pZyakbCqPnxGaUpKLtuwzjNFezqJhd1N+32") and something for password (eg. "x")
Bayern :: Germany :: http://p2pool.mjke.de:9332 :: 0.5% :: BTC :: Avalon enabled pool 100mbit :: Ebereon
Happy mining!
Greets,
ebereon
Trying 178.27.235.42...Running of RamDisk (Bitcoind GetBlockTemplate Latency < 200ms)
Set your BTC address and "+32" as username (eg. "16pZyakbCqPnxGaUpKLtuwzjNFezqJhd1N+32") and something for password (eg. "x")
Bayern :: Germany :: http://p2pool.mjke.de:9332 :: 0.5% :: BTC :: Avalon enabled pool 100mbit :: Ebereon
Happy mining!
Greets,
ebereon
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host
you need to add some more nodes via --p2pool-node or you'll keep getting lots of orphans
{"194.151.78.33:9333": 32.99999237060547, "120.197.59.206:9333": 375.0, "87.198.219.221:9333": 52.00004577636719, "89.19.96.93:9333": 57.000160217285156, "162.216.16.197:9333": 125.99992752075195, "80.42.85.177:14679": 63.99989128112793, "122.57.39.189:9333": 484.9998950958252, "86.161.186.124:54987": 52.00004577636719}
isn't a good peer list
I'm not sure of your thought process here, but if you are referring to the number of nodes or some somewhat large latencies for 3 of them (>100ms), 8 nodes is enough (in fact I had good results with 6) and you never proved otherwise.
This node is at ~102% efficiency with Avalons (which have large latencies which should make it a bit below 100%). Again this contradicts the assertion that 8 nodes isn't enough. When a node is above 100% efficiency (or even around 100%) I don't understand how it should "need" anything, it's already fine.
Avalon enabled p2pool (13.2)!
Running of RamDisk (Bitcoind GetBlockTemplate Latency < 200ms)
Set your BTC address and "+32" as username (eg. "16pZyakbCqPnxGaUpKLtuwzjNFezqJhd1N+32") and something for password (eg. "x")
Bayern :: Germany :: http://p2pool.mjke.de:9332 :: 0.5% :: BTC :: Avalon enabled pool 100mbit :: Ebereon
Happy mining!
Greets,
ebereon
Trying 178.27.235.42...Running of RamDisk (Bitcoind GetBlockTemplate Latency < 200ms)
Set your BTC address and "+32" as username (eg. "16pZyakbCqPnxGaUpKLtuwzjNFezqJhd1N+32") and something for password (eg. "x")
Bayern :: Germany :: http://p2pool.mjke.de:9332 :: 0.5% :: BTC :: Avalon enabled pool 100mbit :: Ebereon
Happy mining!
Greets,
ebereon
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host
you need to add some more nodes via --p2pool-node or you'll keep getting lots of orphans
{"194.151.78.33:9333": 32.99999237060547, "120.197.59.206:9333": 375.0, "87.198.219.221:9333": 52.00004577636719, "89.19.96.93:9333": 57.000160217285156, "162.216.16.197:9333": 125.99992752075195, "80.42.85.177:14679": 63.99989128112793, "122.57.39.189:9333": 484.9998950958252, "86.161.186.124:54987": 52.00004577636719}
isn't a good peer list
Avalon enabled p2pool (13.2)!
Running of RamDisk (Bitcoind GetBlockTemplate Latency < 200ms)
Set your BTC address and "+32" as username (eg. "16pZyakbCqPnxGaUpKLtuwzjNFezqJhd1N+32") and something for password (eg. "x")
Bayern :: Germany :: http://p2pool.mjke.de:9332 :: 0.5% :: BTC :: Avalon enabled pool 100mbit :: Ebereon
Happy mining!
Greets,
ebereon
Running of RamDisk (Bitcoind GetBlockTemplate Latency < 200ms)
Set your BTC address and "+32" as username (eg. "16pZyakbCqPnxGaUpKLtuwzjNFezqJhd1N+32") and something for password (eg. "x")
Bayern :: Germany :: http://p2pool.mjke.de:9332 :: 0.5% :: BTC :: Avalon enabled pool 100mbit :: Ebereon
Happy mining!
Greets,
ebereon
Adding BTCMiners.net to the list!
As you can guess we are mining BTC only at this point. There is a 2% fee, this is to prepare the funds for our co-location hosting in Kansas city which is $50/month. We think this is a reasonable fee providing we're doing the hosting and upkeep of software as needed.
To mine with us, point your miner to:
Version 13.2 - Avalon/ASIC Supported!
http://btcminers.net:9332
Your username would be your Bitcoin address and the password would be anything you would like.
Any additional income from fees outside of the minimum required amount needed for the server's datacenter will be once a month split between all the users equally! So everyone who mines with us gets a monthly bonus, yay!
Any questions, please inbox me!
Happy mining,
BTCMiners.net
Format to be added to list:
Indianapols, Indiana :: USA :: http://btcminers.net:9332 :: 2% :: BTC :: ASIC/Avalon Supported Stratum Mining :: BTCMiners.net
As you can guess we are mining BTC only at this point. There is a 2% fee, this is to prepare the funds for our co-location hosting in Kansas city which is $50/month. We think this is a reasonable fee providing we're doing the hosting and upkeep of software as needed.
To mine with us, point your miner to:
Version 13.2 - Avalon/ASIC Supported!
http://btcminers.net:9332
Your username would be your Bitcoin address and the password would be anything you would like.
Any additional income from fees outside of the minimum required amount needed for the server's datacenter will be once a month split between all the users equally! So everyone who mines with us gets a monthly bonus, yay!
Any questions, please inbox me!
Happy mining,
BTCMiners.net
Format to be added to list:
Indianapols, Indiana :: USA :: http://btcminers.net:9332 :: 2% :: BTC :: ASIC/Avalon Supported Stratum Mining :: BTCMiners.net
nogleg.net:10332 is on the old forked p2pool, just for shits (40ghash or so it looks like), i decided to put a 5% fee (that was also just for shits and giggles)
nogleg.com:9332 has been up again for a while, it's on the new 1.2thash fork, 0% fee
** nogleg.net down. unhappy with crappy dual xeons
nogleg.com:9332 has been up again for a while, it's on the new 1.2thash fork, 0% fee
** nogleg.net down. unhappy with crappy dual xeons
Just wanted to add Harvestcoin(http://www.harvestcoin.com) into the mix:
For Litecoin mining point your miner to :
http://mining.harvestcoin.com:9327 and use your Litecoin address as username and anything as password.
For Bitcoin mining point your miner to
http://mining.harvestcoin.com:9332 and use your Bitcoin address for username and anything for password.
Support can be received from the official Bitcointalk thread :
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/harvestcoincom-p2pool-bitcoinlitecoin-easy-mining-pool-193561
For Litecoin mining point your miner to :
http://mining.harvestcoin.com:9327 and use your Litecoin address as username and anything as password.
For Bitcoin mining point your miner to
http://mining.harvestcoin.com:9332 and use your Bitcoin address for username and anything for password.
Support can be received from the official Bitcointalk thread :
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/harvestcoincom-p2pool-bitcoinlitecoin-easy-mining-pool-193561
Jump to: