Pages:
Author

Topic: PAPERBACK - Encyclopedia of Physical Bitcoins and Crypto-Currencies - page 14. (Read 27191 times)

legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
I'll take number 44.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
Have you thought about producing a companion collector's guide with pricing info for this comprehensive list of coins? Even if you just listed the original price they sold for, it would be a useful reference.
legendary
Activity: 1401
Merit: 1143
The Cryptonumist
Expect to see a cover design teaser in the next day or two!
legendary
Activity: 1401
Merit: 1143
The Cryptonumist
Any new Sneak peek?

Sure thing. This page is an example where two coins are depicted on a page.
The changes have made the design very clean and simple. i havve not yet decided what colors should be on the pages, so it is just white with grey tables for now. I did note that the bottom right photo is a little off-format; that will all be fixed. As for naming, I am using mainly the names provided by the manufacturer. Please also ignore the small '27ozt' and 'copper'; looks like they were mixed up in the formatting. That will all be fixed as the pages are checked against my database.

Feedback is welcome!

legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1001
I have hired a freelance graphic designer to re-format the entire guide to fit these specifications.

This task will be completed for Tuesday, as per latest update I recived. Final version can begin to be put together at that time and the final page count will be known soon after.

It took a little longer then anticipated. Now the correct format is set, and it looks MUCH better and sharper.


Any new Sneak peek?
legendary
Activity: 1401
Merit: 1143
The Cryptonumist
I have hired a freelance graphic designer to re-format the entire guide to fit these specifications.

This task will be completed for Tuesday, as per latest update I recived. Final version can begin to be put together at that time and the final page count will be known soon after.

It took a little longer then anticipated. Now the correct format is set, and it looks MUCH better and sharper.
legendary
Activity: 1401
Merit: 1143
The Cryptonumist
I have hired a freelance graphic designer to re-format the entire guide to fit these specifications.

This task will be completed for Tuesday, as per latest update I recived. Final version can begin to be put together at that time and the final page count will be known soon after.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Update:

The guide was originally designed in 100 PPI (pixels per inch) and an 6x8 aspect ratio. The standard for high quality printing is 300 PPI and the aspect ratio should be 6x9. I have hired a freelance graphic designer to re-format the entire guide to fit these specifications.

An issue here is that some photos which were previously 'good' may actually not be of a high enough quality. I will be addressing these issues as soon as re reformatted version is ready for me in about 5 days. I may specifically be needing some photos of Casascius and Lealana coins.

That said, everything is well on track for February delivery!

Once my 2oz coins arrive next week I will see if I can capture hi-res photos of all the different NastyFans Minted Seats for you.  Hoping to get a look at the final draft as well.   Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1017
Star Wars Ep. 9 is here
I can take more Lealana if needed, and I have all the major varieties.  All my Casascius are in slabs, so those wouldn't be good subjects to photograph.
legendary
Activity: 1401
Merit: 1143
The Cryptonumist
Update:

The guide was originally designed in 100 PPI (pixels per inch) and an 6x8 aspect ratio. The standard for high quality printing is 300 PPI and the aspect ratio should be 6x9. I have hired a freelance graphic designer to re-format the entire guide to fit these specifications.

An issue here is that some photos which were previously 'good' may actually not be of a high enough quality. I will be addressing these issues as soon as re reformatted version is ready for me in about 5 days. I may specifically be needing some photos of Casascius and Lealana coins.

That said, everything is well on track for February delivery!
legendary
Activity: 1401
Merit: 1143
The Cryptonumist
Are you still offering a 10% discount if you order two or more? If so, add one more to my order and PM me the remaining BTC balance to be paid. Thanks.

Yes, 10% discount applies, and it applies to the whole order. That means that anyone who has already purchased a copy, can effectively get a 2nd copy for 20% off!

Sent you a PM.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
Are you still offering a 10% discount if you order two or more? If so, add one more to my order and PM me the remaining BTC balance to be paid. Thanks.
legendary
Activity: 1401
Merit: 1143
The Cryptonumist
January 2nd update:

About a week behind schedule (I went on vacation  Cool ), but progressing well.

Current status:
- Only one more major producer to add. Need to add text to about 6-8 pages of more obscure producers. maybe 15 total pages need some significant work
- Casascius Section ALMOST DONE
- Final edits being made on Matthew's academic section today
- Cover still needs to be done, and the other things below that in the above list^.

Latest page estimates:
Academic section: ~16 pages
Encyclopedia section (coins and mint bios): ~200-205
Other sections include Glossary, Special Thanks, Counterfeits & Imitations, Citations / References, Author Bios, and more
It's fair to say we will come out in the ~240 page range

There are some rather obscure coins that have almost no data available for them. In these few cases, I might leave them out as to avoid writing something of very low quality, along with low quality photos. Thoughts?

I have opened up additional numbers for reservations.

TEASER: There will be some new, never-before-seen images of the Casascius 1,000 BTC gold coin!
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1017
Star Wars Ep. 9 is here
I went through all the websites and maker' s Bitcointalk forum coin announcements again to use the naming that each maker used.   I also reviewed all the specs for the coins again and took the rest of the photos today.  Sending this over to elianite so we can review it all.  
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1017
Star Wars Ep. 9 is here
New Coin Naming Convention

I have put together the below standardized format for identifying coins and rounds in the book. IU hope that it becomes standard among physical crypto-currency.

PF - Pre-Funded (coin funded directly by the manufacturer): Casascius, Microsoul, Titan, TGBEX, Crypto Imperator, Alitin, Nasty Fans seat coins

BF - Buyer-Funded (buyer funds coin directly, before it is shipped): Some Lealana coins

UF - Un-Funded
(shipped with private key secured, but without loaded value): Ravenbit, an option for many coins

Don't forget to add JPF - Just Plain Fun (No cash value, but the coolness value is pretty darn high.): Bitcoin Penny™ commemorative coins. Wink

Regards,
Christopher

We are categorizing those as "Rounds".  Nice coin BTW. 
legendary
Activity: 2676
Merit: 2203
BitcoinPenny.com
New Coin Naming Convention

I have put together the below standardized format for identifying coins and rounds in the book. IU hope that it becomes standard among physical crypto-currency.

PF - Pre-Funded (coin funded directly by the manufacturer): Casascius, Microsoul, Titan, TGBEX, Crypto Imperator, Alitin, Nasty Fans seat coins

BF - Buyer-Funded (buyer funds coin directly, before it is shipped): Some Lealana coins

UF - Un-Funded
(shipped with private key secured, but without loaded value): Ravenbit, an option for many coins

Don't forget to add JPF - Just Plain Fun (No cash value, but the coolness value is pretty darn high.): Bitcoin Penny™ commemorative coins. Wink

Regards,
Christopher
legendary
Activity: 1401
Merit: 1143
The Cryptonumist

you can refer to a coin as Shittyhead fuckface Version 1 if you want! It's your book

Careful, it could stick ...  Cheesy

It's a little tempting, but I wouldn't want to compromise the professionalism of the work Smiley.

I have made great progress with Bithalo, and I am sure that the final names will not cause too much disappointment to anyone
legendary
Activity: 1252
Merit: 1259
MONKEYNUTS

you can refer to a coin as Shittyhead fuckface Version 1 if you want! It's your book

Careful, it could stick ...  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1017
Star Wars Ep. 9 is here
In my research, I tried to refer to the maker's announcement or selling threads / website and used whatever they called it.  I also looked for their own explanation of metals, sizes, weights, mintages, etc.  

My preference is to use the naming convention of what each coin is officially called by their maker.

So for example, I may suggest something like the mint name, name of coin, denomination, material if it differentiates vs other coins offered:

Ravenbit Series 2.3 Node Bronze  - I earlier had the word 'Antique'...my mistake
Cryptolator Unchained 1BTC Silver
Crypto Imperator 10,000 Doge

then after, add other properties (type of physical, year, funding type) as needed, if desired.

I'll probably need to do another once-over to ensure I've got the naming correct.
hero member
Activity: 707
Merit: 500
Naming is the second question I haven't quite finalized. I will be working with Bithalo to formulate 'official' names (a sort of naming convention according to which all coins can be accurately named) for all coins according to a standardized format. This will likely put 'manufacturer-assigned names' or 'nicknames' is quotes at the end of the assigned name that is meant for categorization purposes.

Coming up with your own names for coins will likely only further confuse the issue. I understand the urge to "standardize" and "categorize", but it may be difficult given every manufacturer has their own way of doing things.


Ravenbit
Antique Bronze Coin, 2014 (UF) 'Node 2.4'
-Should 'metal' be specified in the name? Should it be specified always, sometimes, or never? what if metal is unckown? I need to decide this.


There is a simple solution: list the composition of the coin separately (not in the name). Listing Antique Bronze as the metal is actually incorrect; it is a brass (85% copper; 15% zinc) coin with an "antique bronze" finish. Bronze is typically copper and tin.

The series is 2.3; the website has not been updated, but the bitcointalk reference page in my signature is pretty much up to date.

- Frankly, I find the use of the 'series' concept to be extremely confusing, as not all manufacturers designate series. sometimes multiple 'series' are released at the same time. Is it designated based on hologram or production order or design? What about 'grey areas'? That said I do use the concept of 'series' in some descriptions in a more casual way, but want to avoid using them in formal categorization..

Ok then don't use it in your book; it's your book after all (I mean you can refer to a coin as Shittyhead fuckface Version 1 if you want! It's your book!) However, the fact of the matter is my reference page and website will be the official reference for all of my coins. I've put together a large amount of info on the thread and website and will be expanding/cleaning it up after the release of my newest design.

I'm not sure I have explained this before, but I use series as an alternate name for the coin. For example the "Node Bronze AT" Series 2.3.1 is broken down as follows:

2 represents the design (the first design "satoshi" is "1" and my next design will be "3")
3 represents the metal/finish
1 represents any special variations (in this case the artifical toning; or in the case of the Node L.E. the special serialized numbers)

The numbers are sequential based on release date.
Pages:
Jump to: