Topic: Participating in bounties with low allocations (Read 463 times)
I do not understand much what is meant by a low allocation, but I think that you wanted to say that this now makes it very difficult to participate for low-ranked participants, because now it is very difficult to find a project for junior members.
It's not that bad and allows to get something really worthy. After all, everything you get you get depending on how many people participate and how many stakes are given for each task. I recommend that one since there are not that much of participants and the stakes are pretty fair.
I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?
It's absolutely true that there are some projects that only allocating a small percentage to the bounty hunters, specially for those low ranking members like you that is only a jr. member. But if you have a higher rank, you will feel more the amount that you can earn from bounty hunting.
Don't participate in bounties that have low allocations, if you do so then you are just setting yourself up for disappointment when the rewards are finally paid out because you would not be getting a lot out of the bounty. If you want to make a good amount of money from bounties then you should always participate in the ones that have a high percentage of allocation for bounties
I think this has been a risk for the bounty hunters, because of the large number of participants joining the campaign, I think it is now possible to get more prizes rarely, because the ico project has split some percent in the number of their campaigns. , to be shared with all campaign participants. 
If campaign with small allocations have limit for participants you can get good profit. But truth is majority of bounty companies give you less than 100$ even with good allocation. So you should work hard to find campaigns which brings more than 100 $, because it very rarely.
I think for higher rank it is worth their time even though allocations are small. But many people might see this not worth the time, so they are not joining on it.
It is unfair to participate in drag campaigns too long but the amount of re-allocation is not high enough to spend time and effort. But now there are too many bounty players so you have to accept less dividends.
As a matter of fact, I think this issue of participating in bounty programs for months and afterwards be given little tokens is becoming more rampant. I was a victim of that too sometime ago that after the end of the bounty campaign, the tokens I was given did not even worth 30$. In my own opinion I think such project names should be noted and people should be discouraged from participating in it in the future.
Much depends on the rank in the subscription campaigns. In general, I think that it is worth looking for a bounty with a pool of at least 2 percent. Somebody say there are sometimes 3 percents, but I have not seen such campaigns..
Strongly depends on you, whether if you are okay with that price and with your accounts, or whatever you use to be a participant for such bounty.
I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?
Lets say the project you participated in will run for two months for $100. Time you spent daily for your daily task is 10 minutes thus you will spent about 10 hrs to complete your daily task (10 x 2 months or 60 days is 10 hrs). $100 for 10 hrs of task is i think a reasonable amount. Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?
1% is actually normal. There are still some bounties that only give 1% of their token supply to be the rewards for all participants. However, it will depend on our way to join and the total supply of the tokens. If the total supply is big, 1% will be legit, too. However, it is true that not all bounties are legit. We cannot predict which one will be legit after the end of the ICO. For, the unpredictable participants may register in the last remaining days.
Joining a low allocation project sometimes making us doubtful about the end of the project.
But form a small bounty allocation could give us a big reward when the project success, and the participant of the bounty are small. It's good for us.
But form a small bounty allocation could give us a big reward when the project success, and the participant of the bounty are small. It's good for us.
I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?
first of all let's be honest with ourselves when we say how much work bounty is. It's not. I'm also joining bounty campaigns now and then, but it takes me max 10 minutes each day to get the work done. If you worked for fiat that much, how much would you get paid?
It depends. If you write articles or make videos, it can take a long time to produce quality work. Also, it takes a while to write quality posts if you are in a signature campaign.
As much as possible, choose a campaign with a huge allocation for bounty campaign and less participants. You won't get big earnings if you settle on a low-budget bounty campaign especially now that not all of them set limit for participants. Some even reach 300 to 400 and that will give you a very small value in return.
The stake 1-2% of all sold tokens is a normal allocation for the bounty of a reliable project. Also you need to give a heed to the quantity of a stakes within the bounty allocation. Some managers give a low chunk of all bounty budget for certain campaigns (social networks, etc). It depends only on their own decision. If you don't agree with the size of rewards, just do not participate in this bounty campaigns.
Why you need to worry about it when you do the work and join the bounty is free. Plus, you have the right to choose the right campaign for you. I see some stretch bounty campaigns with shares for bonuses are very low. And in fact, these campaigns are not the least. I do not worry about it if it's a potential project or a really serious, legitimate project that focuses on the development of the project.
I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?
Well for me, this is the matter of choosing the right one for us. Sometimes, bounty hunters prefer to choose high allocation rates. I myself depends on how good or solid the projects is but we cannot avoid getting lost from failed projects that we think they will promise huge return or profit. Of course we need to make sure that our efforts as a bounty hunter woudn't be wasted so we need to make our own due diligence regarding choosing the best one. Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?
It is not bad to join bounty campaign with low allocations at least it is legit and only have a limit in participants.
agree, there are some campaign that has high allocation but at the end, they didn’t meet their expectations so at the end, they will scam many participants as well as the investors. 
I think it worth participating in them, simply because you are almost not doing anything, spending around 20 mins a day, which is not a big deal.
Jump to: