If we know fo sure that we'll just get less than $100 after months of participation in the bounty campaign.
I think we better not joining the campaign, that is not match with the effort we've done for the project.
Topic: Participating in bounties with low allocations - page 3. (Read 456 times)
It is really up to you when you continue making advertisement to the ICO bounty campaign that you are joining. It is much possible that many users or bounty hunters join in that ICO when that ICO you are joining with is a popular one. You can easily calculate the total allocated tokens and divide it to how much users, if you feel that it is too much low, you can leave and find another bounty that has a lot more bigger token allocation.
I would go for a good bounty with 1% allocation, rather than a bad bounty with 5% allocation. Because in the latter case, there is a very good chance that the token reward that you get in the end may be worthless.
Participating in low allocations is not bad if the participants will be less also
I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?
It is a very big challenge to the crypto world, which is why you need to look into every project and figure out the prospects to be sure about how successful the project would be.
Also, you need to grow up your facebook and twitter followers, to aid your stakes, and similarly you also have to ensure to follow rules of bounties as they help in earning alot of stakes and definitely alot of money too.
Just don't give up. be steadfast and remain calm
Goodluck.
I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?
I think before you participate in a certain bounty you need to be equipped with the informations about the project, their rules and regulations and of course how much will be allocated for the participants. But, you cannot be assured as to the success of the project. So, in effect there are times that the payment may sometimes be lower than you expected. Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?
For me it is okay to participate any bounty campaigns with low allocation the important is they are legit and the token will really distribute cause many bounties are not paying after finishing the ico. Its okay to received token even just a little amount than an bounty that promises a huge amount of token and then after the end of the day no token will distribute.
Of course, it is not humane in my opinion. Not worth the energy, thoughts, and time that we use to promote the project. It means not respecting someone. My advice should you avoid bounty with low token allocation. Yeah, we can give value to our own effort. If it is not profitable for you, then it should not be followed.
Most of the time, if the proportion of the bounty thread is not high, then the participants will not be particularly large.
So you can distribute as many tokens as you can. signature bounty is the biggest stake. You can find the fair share of bounty so you will make profit form bounty jobs. It is also be careful to scam bounty.
So you can distribute as many tokens as you can. signature bounty is the biggest stake. You can find the fair share of bounty so you will make profit form bounty jobs. It is also be careful to scam bounty.
it does not really matter whether the bounty has a large reward allocated or not because if that will scam you that doesnt still make sense at all. I think it is better to join a small bounty but legit than a too good to be true bounty with unsure payment.
Of curse no one likes to work month after month and in the end to get very small reward for the effort. I am trying to avoid projects like that,but form time ti time I get into one.
As what ive said above earlier , it is better to work with a small reward but with a sure payout than a high reward bounty that can potentially scam you. And also almost all the bounty ico campaigns were always running for a month or two. if you are just lazy to work and wait for a longer time then much better if you can just quit joining on them.
Most of the time, if the proportion of the bounty thread is not high, then the participants will not be particularly large.
So you can distribute as many tokens as you can. signature bounty is the biggest stake. You can find the fair share of bounty so you will make profit form bounty jobs. It is also be careful to scam bounty.
So you can distribute as many tokens as you can. signature bounty is the biggest stake. You can find the fair share of bounty so you will make profit form bounty jobs. It is also be careful to scam bounty.
Of curse no one likes to work month after month and in the end to get very small reward for the effort. I am trying to avoid projects like that,but form time ti time I get into one.
In my opinion we are actually choosing projects that we think are good. Even before joining the project we will see from the participants. If participants are many, it's better not to go. It will definitely get a little let alone a little tokennya allocation and the price is cheap.
I would not say bounty is dead. But it has become much more competitive. With the sheer amount of hype, and participants. The reward is much2 less than last year. With the growth of cryptocurrency and the budget of the bounty is stagnant, that is why you fell like u're getting much2 less. With participants with legendary or similar ranks does not really feel it, but with Jr. Member / Members, the amount is getting much smaller. I would suggest to avoid doing bounty full time if u have a low ranking account.
I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?
Is apart of bounty hunter experience sometimes you didn't expecting about the low stakes allocation of the project, and the hurting worse experience i can't received any reward from the bounty working for almost two months and the manager announce the project is pause wait for the new announcement about the payment until you can forget the payment because long time to wait.
I recommend next time you need to learn well the project to avoid scams or any kind of the strategy of dev's didn't paying to their participant promoting of the their project.
Well it depends on yourself, whether you think it's worth your time or not, the developers had the right to allocate how many percentage of the project for the bounty hunters, but if it's a good project then why not, think it as a long term investment, maybe in a month it worth 100$ but who knows in the next year it can become 1000$
I am not interested to join in low allocation bounty programs. My time has value, I am not only worked for money but also I need to be satisfied when I work. Recently, I have seen some bounty campaigns managed by the amazix team, only 100K$ total bounty budget for 3 months! Are you kidding me? though I am doing a signature bounty campaign managed by the amazix team.
Those low allocation bounties is worthless for me since, you're putting hardwork overall with all the time you have to support the project. It's more like you're in a physical job, the efforts was not paid and yet after the work done you'll be getting small rewards. If this altcoin system would want to aim great results for their project they should have to pay enough tokens to those who participated the ico, so that in the long run it will have good results in trading activities once it become live on exchanges.
We cannot totally blame the team for allocating a low percentage to bounty campaigns, this has always been the usual rate but participation campaign has received a large turn out this days such that what an individual get before on bounty participation is what 10 or more people share nowadays. We can only employ upcoming ICO teams to increase the percentage of allocation taking into consideration the larger number of bounty participants.
Sometimes its good though if there are less participants but low allocations in a good project and known platform. Income will be suck and i think no bounty hunter will join in their project.
Hmm! This is a topic which requires enough attention, I must confess, i’ve Participated in several campaign which I would say base on the rank of my account then, I can’t participate in signature campaigns. One of the challenges we are facing through this is the population of participants and the low count allocation by the team
in my opinion, it does not really matter. if the project has low allocation but it's only followed by a few participants and it turns out the project is successful it would be a big profit for the bounty hunter. the most important as a bounty hunter is we must maximize the promotion to get great results in the future.
Jump to: