Pebblecoin (XPB) - FIRST DPOS CRYPTONOTE COIN LIVE - Qt Wallet GUI - v0.4.4.1 - page 25.

iCEBREAKER

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1072

Crypto is the separation of Power and State.

Quote from: Wolf0 on January 31, 2015, 10:14:50 AM

Quote from: z38630610 on January 31, 2015, 03:15:20 AM

this have gpu miner but we can't us gpu miner mining ? dev ,i e3 1230 v2 mining 24hours give 300 coins , now all output 1.9 million coins who Such a large hash ? not gpu ? open pool to now about 10days ,This fair? and only linux no windows ,if this coin fair

Lol, conspiracy theories from idiots. Know any GPUs with 13GB of onboard RAM? Didn't think so.

I already mentioned a 16GB GPU:

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on January 15, 2015, 06:58:39 AM

Interesting idea, but 13GB is overkill for now and inadequate for the future. I'd use 8GB to start and have it double each year, because gaming GPUs are the most democratic-yet-botnet-resistant mining platform.

Why not start with a testnet until public CPU/GPU miners are optimized and block explorer/wallet/pool are ready?

Otherwise Claymore will pwn us all with a private miner for his quad FirePro W9100 box. Grin

Funny how this coin got on Poloniex before the total emission was stated in the thread, if not the OP! Tongue

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: XPB on January 30, 2015, 02:26:02 PM

Quote from: dhj1965 on January 30, 2015, 02:21:21 PM

Quote from: XPB on January 30, 2015, 02:12:30 PM

Quote from: barabeku on January 30, 2015, 02:08:47 PM

Quote from: XPB on January 30, 2015, 02:05:23 PM

Quote from: barabeku on January 30, 2015, 02:02:24 PM

Still waiting pool updates

What do you mean? The pool is back up on a different port, use the new miner.

Oh, i still can't connect to the latest port http://i.imgur.com/fXMAVwT.png

Oh that is odd... how many threads are you trying to run? Try with one thread first maybe? Also try option -T 120, maybe it will take longer to time out.

same here... even with -T 120 ... timeout after 30000 ms

dhj.

What are the specs of your machine? The binary I posted is working for me as we speak. We will figure it out.

No connection, 32GB of DDR4.

bytemuma

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

I'm in.. let's see how far this can go.. Grin

I'm sorry, but I have to pass this coin, 13GB is too much for my current computer.
Wish you luck.

z38630610

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

this have gpu miner but we can't us gpu miner mining ? dev ,i e3 1230 v2 mining 24hours give 300 coins , now all output 1.9 million coins who Such a large hash ? not gpu ? open pool to now about 10days ,This fair? and only linux no windows ,if this coin fair

PeaMine

hero member

Activity: 979

Merit: 510

Quote from: Wolf0 on January 30, 2015, 05:56:44 PM

Quote from: PeaMine on January 30, 2015, 05:08:54 PM

Anyone manage to get coins added to Poloniex using the new daemon?
I must be doing something wrong because none of them are showing up in Poloniex, but I am getting a TXID and the amount deducted from my balance, been almost 2 hours.

I made simplewallet and used that.

I'm using SimpleWallet though it is from before the fork, would that matter?
Daemon is updated for the new fork.
Maybe I'm missing something, but I also don't see a simplewallet in my latest git from source after making, just the new daemon.
It's the one I still have to use the ultra long command line parameters instead of simply ./simplewallet
[I always forget to mkdir obj when compiling from git on Linux, a heads up if anyone has issues making]

XPB

full member

Activity: 132

Merit: 100

Quote from: rastimonac on January 30, 2015, 04:02:12 PM

Quote from: XPB on January 30, 2015, 03:51:08 PM

Quote from: PeaMine on January 30, 2015, 03:48:35 PM

Getting 0.05H/S is this normal for a i7-4770K with 16GB of RAM?
Using all cores by default, and about 2GB RAM free.

Yes, that is pretty good. I am only getting 0.03 H/s on my 24GB machine, not sure what the processor is.

how many blocks can you mine in 24h??

The difficulty is currently 1462, meaning you have a 1 in 1462 chance to mine successfully. If the hashrate is 0.03 H/s then it'll take 1462 * (1/.03) seconds, or 13.5 hours to make 1462 attempts, which give you an expected value of 1 success. That means you should be able to mine about two blocks per day. I recommend using the pool to lower your variance.

PeaMine

hero member

Activity: 979

Merit: 510

Anyone manage to get coins added to Poloniex using the new daemon?
I must be doing something wrong because none of them are showing up in Poloniex, but I am getting a TXID and the amount deducted from my balance, been almost 2 hours.

rastimonac

sr. member

Activity: 426

Merit: 250

Quote from: XPB on January 30, 2015, 03:51:08 PM

Quote from: PeaMine on January 30, 2015, 03:48:35 PM

Getting 0.05H/S is this normal for a i7-4770K with 16GB of RAM?
Using all cores by default, and about 2GB RAM free.

Yes, that is pretty good. I am only getting 0.03 H/s on my 24GB machine, not sure what the processor is.

how many blocks can you mine in 24h??

XPB

full member

Activity: 132

Merit: 100

Quote from: PeaMine on January 30, 2015, 03:48:35 PM

Getting 0.05H/S is this normal for a i7-4770K with 16GB of RAM?
Using all cores by default, and about 2GB RAM free.

Yes, that is pretty good. I am only getting 0.03 H/s on my 24GB machine, not sure what the processor is.

XPB

full member

Activity: 132

Merit: 100

Quote from: ikiscream on January 30, 2015, 03:40:28 PM

not block found Huh

I don't know what you are saying or asking.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: XPB on January 30, 2015, 01:52:13 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on January 30, 2015, 01:49:19 PM

Quote from: bytemuma on January 30, 2015, 01:24:43 PM

13GB is overkill Huh

. I'd use 8GB to start and have it double each year.

What is the blocktime and total emission?

Thanks.

I suggested 8GB, too - still botnet-proof, and lets some more average people mine. But, oh, well. Maybe I'll hack up a reduced speed miner that requires less RAM.

I thought of that because of your suggestion, but if 8GB reduces to 3 or 4 GB then botnets could run the reduced-speed miner, and they would win because of numbers. As it is now, a regular person will be able to run a reduced-speed miner while the botnets still won't.

4GB is reasonable, because first off, its speed is reduced by a lot, and second, 4GB is a LOT of RAM. No one will just not notice something literally using half the system memory on a constant basis.

PeaMine

hero member

Activity: 979

Merit: 510

Getting 0.05H/S is this normal for a i7-4770K with 16GB of RAM?
Using all cores by default, and about 2GB RAM free.

XPB

full member

Activity: 132

Merit: 100

Quote from: barabeku on January 30, 2015, 03:38:40 PM

i think pool diff is still too high with current hash/sec.

Difficulty of 10 means one in 10 hashes should succeed, so you should get a valid share every 5-10 minutes or so. Ideally it would be lower but I have to limit the amount of hashes the pool has to do. Anyway the difficulty is variable, it will adjust down if you stay connect long enough, it will try to set it so you get a share every 100 seconds.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: bytemuma on January 30, 2015, 01:24:43 PM

13GB is overkill Huh

. I'd use 8GB to start and have it double each year.

What is the blocktime and total emission?

Thanks.

I suggested 8GB, too - still botnet-proof, and lets some more average people mine. But, oh, well. Maybe I'll hack up a reduced speed miner that requires less RAM.

ikiscream

full member

Activity: 205

Merit: 100

not block found Huh

barabeku

full member

Activity: 568

Merit: 100

umachit.fund

i think pool diff is still too high with current hash/sec.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: XPB on January 30, 2015, 01:33:50 PM

The new linux miner binary is up here. I have changed the ports so old miners don't clog up the pool resources. To run the new miner:

./minerd -o stratum+tcp://69.60.113.21:3350 -u YOUR_WALLET_ADDRESS -p x

Where's the source?

EDIT: oops, didn't check the git history.

dhj1965

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: XPB on January 30, 2015, 02:45:46 PM

Quote from: dhj1965 on January 30, 2015, 02:42:00 PM

Quote from: XPB on January 30, 2015, 02:26:02 PM

What are the specs of your machine? The binary I posted is working for me as we speak. We will figure it out.

I have tried on two different machines:

1. virtual machine 4 vCPU 24 GB Suse 13.2 on esx 5.5 host
2 IBM x3650 M3, 2 * Xeon 6-Core, 144 GB RAM suse 13.2

dhj.

I restarted the pool programs, any luck now?

EDIT: Note somebody is giving the pool invalid shares, make sure you use the new miner code/binary.

Connection seems to be stable now... but I found my hashrate very poor : 0,02 H/s on Option 1 (esx host equivalent to option #2)
Server option #2 just crashed and doesn't boot. Cannot check right now. Sad

ikiscream

full member

Activity: 205

Merit: 100

Quote from: XPB on January 30, 2015, 02:55:00 PM

Quote from: dhj1965 on January 30, 2015, 02:50:49 PM

Quote from: XPB on January 30, 2015, 02:45:46 PM

I restarted the pool programs, any luck now?

looks much better now

thanks
dhj

EDIT: I'm too fast

now: startum connec tion timedout . stratum connection interrupted. And then the conenction comes back

Hmm I am getting that too... but I am getting accepted shares. Not sure why the interrupts.

PByFOw... and PByFc9L..., you are giving the pool bad hashes!

my addres