Pages:
Author

Topic: PhoenixMiner 6.2c: fastest Ethereum/Ethash miner with lowest devfee (Win/Linux) - page 101. (Read 784857 times)

hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 520
Some juice from Discord:



Looks like NH downloaded and distributed the infected nonexistent 5.5d

@djeZo Show some integrity. Did NH distribute infected nonexistent 5.5d?



You can view here my reply: https://www.reddit.com/r/NiceHash/comments/lzsheq/phoenixminer_howwhywhat_statement_from_it_expert/

NiceHash Miner is open source, everyone can verify source and determine what happened. So, you have proof in your own hands but you still believe FUD started by minerstat?
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
Someone is constantly spamming a non-existent and infected version 5.5d. Prevent already newly registered users posting links.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
Some juice from Discord:

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/776876453525979166/818200828422127676/unknown.png

Looks like NH downloaded and distributed the infected nonexistent 5.5d

@djeZo Show some integrity. Did NH distribute infected nonexistent 5.5d?

newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
Some juice from Discord:

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/776876453525979166/818200828422127676/unknown.png

Looks like NH downloaded and distributed the infected nonexistent 5.5d
And there is. And at the same time they want to make someone else guilty. First of all, you need to stop using nicehash now. Since they downloaded the infected phoenix, like 5.5d, and added it to their distribution kit, spreading it through their software among other users. Ask yourself the question, where did the infected phoenix come from in the nicehash distribution? If Version 5.5c is not compromised. The developer of the phoenix current from the ethermine pool receives a commission of $ 19k per day! Why would he push the virus to miners? This nicehash screwed up. Preferably without nicehash. From all that has been read, a picture is drawn that the nicehash wants to push through his miner and is fanning panic. Smiley
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
My posts are not official statements of the company. I am making posts on my own. Freedom of speech. If you blame anyone, blame me, not the company. When it comes to reporters like Krebs, these would not publish evidence of planted evidence, because in such case, they would be ripped apart by the governments. They are not allowed to post anything shady about governments of western countries. You think the poor guy didn't try to reach media ? Of course he did... but when you start talking about "planted evidence", suddenly, room is empty and everyone runs away. I have seen it on my own eyes! I bet if I post that page from one file where it is clearly visible,that evidence was planted, my post would get deleted, even from this forum Smiley
This is why companies have social media policies, if you are posting about something directly related to your employers business as a known employee then it is as good as on their behalf. Most legitimate companies would fire employees for spouting conspiracy theory nonsense in their name or for associating them with the kind of FUD you are spreading.

That NiceHash apparently grant you free reign for this is implicit consent, and it reflects very poorly on them.

Now back to PhoenixMiner. If he is not anonymous, who is he then? What is his name? And don't give me this link: https://phoenixminer.ru/blog/ because it is obviously that this page was quickly created for shilling, just check the github address... it points to https://github.com/fireice-uk/ Shills are in such a hurry now that they just reuse GitHubs of other users...

That is his github, he wrote XMR-Stak with psychocrypt, and also links his social media accounts. Unfortunately he hasn't posted a photo on Insta of him holding his passport with "I am PhoenixMiner" sharpied on his forehead mind you.

Some juice from Discord:

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/776876453525979166/818200828422127676/unknown.png

Looks like NH downloaded and distributed the infected nonexistent 5.5d

So... what really happened is the NiceHash app is really badly written. To the point where it blindly downloads stuff from links it scrapes out of forum posts (without even verifying the author), doesn't do any kind of hash check to make sure it's an approved version, and installs it on end users computers... who the hell wrote that?
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
Wow so many old name suddenly popping up

djezo.. you're still here ? Smiley


member
Activity: 639
Merit: 19
What I see are lot of new user supporting now PhoenixMiner, what is really strange... user with 1st message saying is complete safe... as always is said... it is your money and they are your private keys... I hope you don't have them in your computer...
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Some juice from Discord:

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/776876453525979166/818200828422127676/unknown.png

Looks like NH downloaded and distributed the infected nonexistent 5.5d
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 520
That crook made sure that NiceHash didn't just vanish after hack in 2017 when CEO and chief of security Marko Kobal was hacked and consequently wallets drained for 4700. If this crook wasn't there and if he didn't insist that NiceHash must continue to operate, then users would never get back 4700 bitcoins and there would be no NiceHash today.

And watch how this verdict is overturned by constitutional court in the following months because of planted evidence and violation of human rights such as the right to defense - particularly to view evidence. Of course reporters didn't write that. It wouldn't be so shocking then eh? Would like to see you defend yourself when evidence is planted and then they don't allow you view that evidence. Everyone gets convicted that way.

I must say your posts, both here and on Reddit, are extremely unprofessional. Not to mention questionable in their content and intent. It might be an idea for NiceHash to hire an actual PR firm if they lack anybody competent in communicating with the general public rather than let people like you speak on their behalf.

Ignoring the nonsensical suggestion that Škorjanc is innocent, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you are spreading FUD to try and push users to a competing miner.

PhoenixMiner is not anonymous, he hasn't posted and his Mega got taken offline. This was likely due to a licensing complaint, which is the only part of your Reddit post that isn't rabid nonsense, but we do not know and there is zero reason to suspect malfeasance.

That PhoenixMiner is some backdoored monstrosity and Mega, of all companies, not only somehow got wind of it but kept this to themselves is about as ridiculous a proposition as I have heard in some time.

My posts are not official statements of the company. I am making posts on my own. Freedom of speech. If you blame anyone, blame me, not the company. When it comes to reporters like Krebs, these would not publish evidence of planted evidence, because in such case, they would be ripped apart by the governments. They are not allowed to post anything shady about governments of western countries. You think the poor guy didn't try to reach media ? Of course he did... but when you start talking about "planted evidence", suddenly, room is empty and everyone runs away. I have seen it on my own eyes! I bet if I post that page from one file where it is clearly visible,that evidence was planted, my post would get deleted, even from this forum Smiley

Now back to PhoenixMiner. If he is not anonymous, who is he then? What is his name? And don't give me this link: https://phoenixminer.ru/blog/ because it is obviously that this page was quickly created for shilling, just check the github address... it points to https://github.com/fireice-uk/ Shills are in such a hurry now that they just reuse GitHubs of other users...
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0

Will you continue mining with Phoenix Miner?

Would be interesting to get your answer to my poll:

https://www.reddit.com/r/EtherMining/comments/lzz52i/will_you_continue_mining_with_phoenix_miner/
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0


How come the hash of the github file doesn't match?

Because they modified it. - like they say, they merged two .zips.

newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
That crook made sure that NiceHash didn't just vanish after hack in 2017 when CEO and chief of security Marko Kobal was hacked and consequently wallets drained for 4700. If this crook wasn't there and if he didn't insist that NiceHash must continue to operate, then users would never get back 4700 bitcoins and there would be no NiceHash today.

And watch how this verdict is overturned by constitutional court in the following months because of planted evidence and violation of human rights such as the right to defense - particularly to view evidence. Of course reporters didn't write that. It wouldn't be so shocking then eh? Would like to see you defend yourself when evidence is planted and then they don't allow you view that evidence. Everyone gets convicted that way.

I must say your posts, both here and on Reddit, are extremely unprofessional. Not to mention questionable in their content and intent. It might be an idea for NiceHash to hire an actual PR firm if they lack anybody competent in communicating with the general public rather than let people like you speak on their behalf.

Ignoring the nonsensical suggestion that Škorjanc is innocent, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you are spreading FUD to try and push users to a competing miner.

PhoenixMiner is not anonymous, he hasn't posted and his Mega got taken offline. This was likely due to a licensing complaint, which is the only part of your Reddit post that isn't rabid nonsense, but we do not know and there is zero reason to suspect malfeasance.

That PhoenixMiner is some backdoored monstrosity and Mega, of all companies, not only somehow got wind of it but kept this to themselves is about as ridiculous a proposition as I have heard in some time.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Mega blocked all phoenix downloads, could someone reupload the original zipped 5.5c version for windows somewhere (going to crc check anyway) Thanks !! 🙌

+1 Since all other links can't be trusted, I'm waiting for a message of the original author. I'll send him a message.

This is last 5.5c version downloaded few days before MEGA-removing...
If anyone wants to upload it to any other site, let me know. I have account only at WebShare Smiley

https://webshare.cz/#/file/weguQcRSMH


DO NOT trust this file! Or any other file that doesn't match the SHASUM of the original archive hash listed in the OP.

Quote
If you want to check the integrity of the downloaded file, please use the following hashes (you need the last file PhoenixMiner_NVRTC_Windows.zip only if you want to mine BCI with Nvdia cards under Windows):
Code:

    File: PhoenixMiner_5.5c_Windows.zip
    ===================================
   SHA-1: 9a3efe6130ba21ab2ade9df38ff9d52a539d9693
 SHA-256: 0bb20989cd107c6b65d08da30f014df0b3cb94f8124253e2caee1dfa99431c2d
 SHA-512: 2e1aa259f6519d6759ccf679bf1b989c36fe504c9066cc3ba79537bf34129fb168b2956e385a4cf 593e45c3a22e89590319870fb502ff13a371932aad441b250

    File: PhoenixMiner_5.5c_Linux.tar.gz
    ====================================
   SHA-1: 43bc9221582c8e90188fb1b416df14a8259d5b4e
 SHA-256: 66914e1b5011c35cf6af3f0d3e7540f5fa1bbe1563105fd242a67a96437b8e69
 SHA-512: 1088fcfd06b1bf63a3ab0d92089504b37e634bc138290c432797594ed25d37f8e5a658cf4124b6b b4495592b2b90f89bf0a68d03f51ce97e61b69efbe0667943

    File: PhoenixMiner_NVRTC_Windows.zip
    ====================================
   SHA-1: ff6fa5e018adbd52caf631c42b7c2fac7ce48a51
 SHA-256: 8087757169405d51ea8ba818347fb05d0450aef985c29272165070346eb5a54a
 SHA-512: 7b2d832f7f40578bb1f501d5174467f5ae06612e601dab769fd56d39da48a471b18c6373435a485 155f70fec4017d8378797bf1e1dfe5d62fee30fa6a1d992c4

Code:
sha512sum PhoenixMiner_5.5c_Windows.zip
5b392b358184c57f9762f6969ca863771c43ef5bd28d72d66dbcf30e3a4490b524297413c12a62539b09fb3cb48ce6fe54021d51826bc9e40c1bc9badb87f063  PhoenixMiner_5.5c_Windows.zip

We keep a miner repository for NemosMiner here:
https://github.com/Minerx117/miners/releases/download/PhoenixMiner/PhoenixMiner_5.5c_Windows.zip
The PhoenixMiner package is a merge of PhoenixMiner_5.5c_Windows.zip & PhoenixMiner_NVRTC_Windows.zip.
Use @ your own risk.


How come the hash of the github file doesn't match?
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 520
Only today did I actually look into the company NiceHash that I had been using. They were founded by a crook. Found guilty, served time for creating the largest botnet ever revealed designed to steal banking info.

I will NEVER be using NiceHash again.

They caused a TON of people to panic today all to get traffic to their new open source miner. This is disgraceful.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NiceHash#Controversies

The SHA-1 of the .ZIP file is:
9a3efe6130ba21ab2ade9df38ff9d52a539d9693

I dont have the zip file because I deleted it once I extracted it

The SHA-1 of of my .EXE file is:
11428c3bdf728860fd057c411a95b14e13f05dbc

Are the ZIP and EXE checksum suppose to be different? is mine safe?

yes, .exe file looks original because I downloaded it from the first post of this thread a couple of weeks ago.

That crook made sure that NiceHash didn't just vanish after hack in 2017 when CEO and chief of security Marko Kobal was hacked and consequently wallets drained for 4700. If this crook wasn't there and if he didn't insist that NiceHash must continue to operate, then users would never get back 4700 bitcoins and there would be no NiceHash today.

And watch how this verdict is overturned by constitutional court in the following months because of planted evidence and violation of human rights such as the right to defense - particularly to view evidence. Of course reporters didn't write that. It wouldn't be so shocking then eh? Would like to see you defend yourself when evidence is planted and then they don't allow you view that evidence. Everyone gets convicted that way.
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Checksums for my unpacked 5.5C files downloaded 7.3.2021 follows:

PhoenixMiner.exe:
SHA1            11428C3BDF728860FD057C411A95B14E13F05DBC
SHA256          599393E258D8BA7B8F8633E20C651868258827D3A43A4D0712125BC487EABF92

EIO.dll:
SHA1            6DC4A9A58119472B986D896E8E367C7E4BF99477
SHA256          287E44F5067A4E770E8A0605F5720D3D1477ECC4AA4F3A26CE5D3A489AE79780

EIO.exe:
SHA1            8CDA60AC00BC66EF05BB9D96E18206D34CE46B11
SHA256          402438684406D1E3B2D1D5629151259AD864FFC55C8E6AB176F4C47C543D4FEE

IOMap64.sys
SHA1            5193B3BF50E5F9D6340398D045EA93574378763D
SHA256          AD20E44954960278AD965B05E8C67D9D314C200809B99B1B5A219A916CE06B21
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
i was downloaded this, it is save ?

https://prnt.sc/10fjiu2

https://image.prntscr.com/image/Iesm4KmnS9eeCbUVh393kw.png


Download Phoenix Miner 5.5c - AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner [2021]

Getting Started With Ethereum Mining Version: 5.5c File: *PhoenixMiner.exe, SHA1: 11428C3BDF728860FD057C411A95B14E13F05DBC

11428C3BDF728860FD057C411A95B14E13F05DBC

https://github-releases.githubusercontent.com/330932271/b20e6e00-7e47-11eb-9419-fd436a1406fc? .............. &actor_id=0&key_id=0&repo_id=330932271&response-content-disposition=attachment%3B%20filename%3DPhoenixMiner_5.5c_Windows_AMD_NVIDIA.Password-phoenix.zip&response-content-type=application%2Foctet-stream
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
Only today did I actually look into the company NiceHash that I had been using. They were founded by a crook. Found guilty, served time for creating the largest botnet ever revealed designed to steal banking info.

I will NEVER be using NiceHash again.

They caused a TON of people to panic today all to get traffic to their new open source miner. This is disgraceful.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NiceHash#Controversies

The SHA-1 of the .ZIP file is:
9a3efe6130ba21ab2ade9df38ff9d52a539d9693

I dont have the zip file because I deleted it once I extracted it

The SHA-1 of of my .EXE file is:
11428c3bdf728860fd057c411a95b14e13f05dbc

Are the ZIP and EXE checksum suppose to be different? is mine safe?

yes, .exe file looks original because I downloaded it from the first post of this thread a couple of weeks ago.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
The SHA-1 of the .ZIP file is:
9a3efe6130ba21ab2ade9df38ff9d52a539d9693

I dont have the zip file because I deleted it once I extracted it

The SHA-1 of of my .EXE file is:
11428c3bdf728860fd057c411a95b14e13f05dbc

Are the ZIP and EXE checksum suppose to be different? is mine safe?
Pages:
Jump to: