Topic: PhoenixMiner 6.2c: fastest Ethereum/Ethash miner with lowest devfee (Win/Linux) - page 34. (Read 784985 times)

Windows or linux ?
You should start your own thread as its more about automatic overlocking / undervolting than PhoenixMiner itself.
Hint: Both windows and linux have ways to automate such things.  Windows have batch files and linux can run scripts at startup. 

I read through a number of pages of posts regarding the different issues with the false malware reporting through the different tools (plus just to learn), but just wanted to check to make sure the main link or bundle was not an issue is all.  thanks all for the quick replies!

It's an ongoing thing. Please download the link only from the original post and avoid those newbie accounts posting the same malware over and over.

Went to the link and grabbed the latest windows version. With the latest version,  reports the same trojan is in the bundle..

If you using the downloads on the first page of this thread here you should be good !
https://phoenixminer.info/downloads/ is the official download link and dont use any other ones that posted in here , because sometimes there a fake downloads posted with malware.
If you getting some warning from the download from the first page its false positive .

hey All when I download the latest version from either the short's from the first page or using the repository link I keep getting a warning that "trojan.Gen.NPE" has been identified in the download. Which download is the actual official one with out any trojans?

@Notyourbusiness, just curious if you tried the advice given by @Rickirs and if it changed anything. Please let us know.

I too am seeing this occur on one of my four mining rigs and I can't figure out why. It doesn't run any other apps and I know that the source of the software utilities/drivers that I've installed is trustworthy. Initially I thought this could be the anti-virus/malware engine scanning memory however I've switched brands (from Windows Defender to Symantec Endpoint Protection) and disabled all periodically scheduled scans and this is still happening occasionally. The rig is 100% nVidia 30-series now, however I used to run mixed with AMD. I thought I did a thorough uninstall/cleanup of the AMD drivers when I stopped using those cards however I used the AMD cleanup utility not DDU so I'm curious about your experience.

Hi guys i hope you are doing good

in my country there are constants power cuts, so the miners will restart. the thing is, everytime it does, as i didnt start the miner as administrator, it would run without the voltage mods, so it gets high temperatures


i created a shortcut and use the options for it to always run as administrator, and to not ask to click it, but it either wont boot (if i put it on sell:startup), or will run but not as admin so no mods

is there any way to do this?

to start the pc and it runs the miner as admin so the voltage and clock and power mods work?

thanks :=)

Time to change until Phoenix release LHR

HI!
LHR Unlock?

Thanks for the reply i will take a look at the link currently hoovering up info as want to solve the stale share problem which im sure is caused by being stuck on kernel 0 for now.

Actually had a breakthrough late last night just before bed it was a "what if a try this" whilst my inner voice was "dont mess about when your this tired just go to bed man" moment, but after a fk it, it turns out two of the 6800's dont like mclock @ 1075 and drop down to 10Mhs with it. I suspect it it could be throttling as when i drop mclock down to 1050 on those two cards they come back to 63Mhs but with hotter mem temps than the others so the following is how i went to bed and woke with the rig still purring away nice n stable at around 380Mhs. :-)


-clkernel 0
#-clNew


-cvddc -165
-cclock 1200
-mclock 1125,1050,1125,1125,1050,1125

-tmax 60
-tt -60,-70,-60,-50,-50,-50
#-gt 6

GPU1: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 868 mV, mclock 1074 MHz, Tj 58C, Tmem 72C, 420 kH/J
GPU2: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 862 mV, mclock 1049 MHz, Tj 56C, Tmem 78C, 388 kH/J
GPU3: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 868 mV, mclock 1074 MHz, Tj 62C, Tmem 76C, 398 kH/J
GPU4: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 862 mV, mclock 1074 MHz, Tj 62C, Tmem 70C, 390 kH/J
GPU5: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 868 mV, mclock 1049 MHz, Tj 58C, Tmem 66C, 414 kH/J
GPU6: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 868 mV, mclock 1074 MHz, Tj 53C, Tmem 60C, 416 kH/J
GPUs power: 941.0 W; total power: 1141.0 W; cost: 6.30 USD/day; 333 kH/J

Eth speed: 383.928 MH/s, shares: 1862/1/21, time: 14:51
GPUs: 1: 63.194 MH/s (285/2) 2: 63.477 MH/s (330/5) 3: 64.645 MH/s (330/2) 4: 64.643 MH/s (287/2) 5: 63.488 MH/s (320/4) 6: 64.482 MH/s (311/6)



Now the above is all running under Manajaro which is a new experience for me with subtle differences to Ubuntu like no @reboot under crontab lol.


I have a test rig running Ubuntu 20.04.3 with AMDGPU driver 21.20 working nice for one GPU but no more and with no stales as able to use optimized kernels. I would like it very much if PM could release next version to solve the multiGPU issue with latest rocr driver which according to link below is related to rocr driver having PCIE 3.0 atomics limitation and i suppose a skeptic might scowl at AMD for messing with miners in that way unlike Nvidia and there LHR darkness. I haven yet been able to get ubuntu working with multigpu but even if possible its obvious i will be back to driver 20.40 stuck on kernel 0 same as Manjaro... On a side note i did try driver 21.30 just for a test, it crashes after building DAG for single GPU.

https://www.reddit.com/r/gpumining/comments/ptmyjd/ubuntu_20043_amdgpu_2130_opencl_rocr_rocm/
 

Have you tried changing the F-state on linux using a script?  You can get a stable 62.5 MHs on average for each card.

Check out the link below, it was built for HiveOS (which is an Ubuntu variant) so it might prove useful for you:

https://forum.hiveos.farm/t/rx6800-efficient-overclocking/26448/330

B450, Ryzen 3100, Windows 10 Pro, 6x 6700XT

You're using Linux so I think my numbers will differ but thanks for the reply!  Anyone else out there with 6700XT's on Win10? 

thanks for pointing it out tho i wouldnt mine with 6600's unless i found a lorry full in a field lol. As for Linux it can be challenge but very rewaring to break free of MS tho sometimes it can make one want to smash things up in a rage if its not bad enough learning new HW then throw in an unfamaliar distribution i been on Ubuntu till now having moved to Manjaro to get these 6800s singing without windows such is the passion for that here.


6 x RX6800XT up, undervolted and playing nice under linux.  except the stale shares to sort out....


GPU1: 48C 60% 147W, GPU2: 45C 60% 155W, GPU3: 51C 60% 151W, GPU4: 50C 49% 153W, GPU5: 45C 49% 145W, GPU6: 40C 49% 148W
GPU1: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 868 mV, mclock 1000 MHz, Tj 54C, Tmem 66C, 403 kH/J
GPU2: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 868 mV, mclock 1000 MHz, Tj 53C, Tmem 74C, 391 kH/J
GPU3: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 862 mV, mclock 1000 MHz, Tj 57C, Tmem 70C, 401 kH/J
GPU4: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 868 mV, mclock 1000 MHz, Tj 58C, Tmem 64C, 387 kH/J
GPU5: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 862 mV, mclock 1000 MHz, Tj 53C, Tmem 62C, 408 kH/J
GPU6: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 868 mV, mclock 1000 MHz, Tj 48C, Tmem 56C, 400 kH/J
GPUs power: 899.0 W; total power: 1099.0 W; cost: 6.07 USD/day; 326 kH/J
Eth: New job #9a8fdd86 from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999; diff: 10000MH
Eth: New job #beaaa833 from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999; diff: 10000MH
 
*** 0:09 *** 10/3 22:34 **************************************
Eth: Mining ETH on eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 for 0:09
Eth speed: 357.727 MH/s, shares: 23/0/0, time: 0:09
GPUs: 1: 60.585 MH/s (6) 2: 59.152 MH/s (4) 3: 59.165 MH/s (4) 4: 59.154 MH/s (1) 5: 60.514 MH/s (3) 6: 59.157 MH/s (5)
Eth: Accepted shares 23 (5 stales), rejected shares 0 (0 stales)
Eth: Incorrect shares 0 (0.00%), est. stales percentage 21.48%
Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 772.1 GH (!)
Eth: Average speed (5 min): 355.251 MH/s
Eth: Effective speed: 425.14 MH/s; at pool: 425.14 MH/s


time for a day or two away let the hash crack on...

Hi, wht chipset you on and flavour of os?


Running here Asus B550 gaming with Ryzen 5600 16gb DDR4 3200, bit ott for a rig but first new mobo in years was overdue nicely loaded with 5 x RX6800XT running cool n stable. adding 6th later tonight along with extra PSU and balance the load out as the current single cheap 2000W psu has v aggresive cooling fan that is putting out more noise than the GPU fans proper at present and it is not satisfactory but beasts these cards be.

Only managed so far to get Manjaro working for multiple GPU and have high stale rate also note but still testing that some cards dont mind a mclock setting but others throw a wobble with current drivers but the key i have found is below and right now no mclock is ok but would like to boost it up to 1075 to get the 64Mh that they will do but as things are stable and running ok for now heating the house now its gone chilly as testing continues lol


-clkernel 0 (all others crash) 
#-clNew
-cvddc -165
-cclock 1200
#-mclock 1125

-tmax 60
-tt -60,-60,-60,-50,-50




Phoenix Miner 5.7b Linux/gcc - Release build
--------------------------------------------

OpenCL driver version: 20.40-1147287
Unable to use OpenCL device Unknown AMD GPU (pcie 24) for Ethash mining <---- need to blacklist the IGFX lol
Available GPUs for mining:
GPU1: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (pcie 6), OpenCL 2.0, 16 GB VRAM, 72 CUs
GPU2: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (pcie 10), OpenCL 2.0, 16 GB VRAM, 72 CUs
GPU3: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (pcie 15), OpenCL 2.0, 16 GB VRAM, 72 CUs
GPU4: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (pcie 18), OpenCL 2.0, 16 GB VRAM, 72 CUs
GPU5: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (pcie 21), OpenCL 2.0, 16 GB VRAM, 72 CUs



GPU1: set GPU clocks to 1200 MHz (Vddc -165 mV)
GPU2: set GPU clocks to 1200 MHz (Vddc -165 mV)
GPU3: set GPU clocks to 1200 MHz (Vddc -165 mV)
GPU4: set GPU clocks to 1200 MHz (Vddc -165 mV)
GPU5: set GPU clocks to 1200 MHz (Vddc -165 mV)
GPU1: 47C 60% 145W, GPU2: 51C 60% 149W, GPU3: 42C 60% 155W, GPU4: 46C 49% 147W, GPU5: 42C 49% 150W
GPU1: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 868 mV, mclock 1000 MHz, Tj 54C, Tmem 66C, 411 kH/J
GPU2: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 868 mV, mclock 1000 MHz, Tj 58C, Tmem 70C, 400 kH/J
GPU3: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 862 mV, mclock 1000 MHz, Tj 50C, Tmem 72C, 384 kH/J
GPU4: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 868 mV, mclock 1000 MHz, Tj 55C, Tmem 64C, 405 kH/J
GPU5: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 862 mV, mclock 1000 MHz, Tj 50C, Tmem 58C, 397 kH/J
GPUs power: 746.0 W; total power: 946.0 W; cost: 5.22 USD/day; 315 kH/J
Eth speed: 305.134 MH/s, shares: 2145/0/17, time: 20:03
GPUs: 1: 61.163 MH/s (438/4) 2: 60.932 MH/s (449/6) 3: 61.163 MH/s (380/4) 4: 60.938 MH/s (442/2) 5: 60.938 MH/s (436/1)
 
*** 20:03 *** 10/3 20:03 **************************************
Eth: Mining ETH on eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 for 3:58
Eth speed: 297.897 MH/s, shares: 2145/0/17, time: 20:03
GPUs: 1: 59.574 MH/s (438/4) 2: 59.581 MH/s (449/6) 3: 59.574 MH/s (380/4) 4: 59.582 MH/s (442/2) 5: 59.585 MH/s (436/1)
Eth: Accepted shares 2145 (574 stales), rejected shares 0 (0 stales)
Eth: Incorrect shares 17 (0.79%), est. stales percentage 26.76%
Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 10.7 TH (!!!)
Eth: Average speed (5 min): 297.997 MH/s
Eth: Effective speed: 297.08 MH/s; at pool: 297.08 MH/s

Hey everyone,
New here, just set up a 6GPU 6700XT rig.  Anyone care to share their core, mem clocks, voltage, power limit and fan command line settings to lower the power and optimize the hashrates?  Would be much appreciated, thanks.

6800 is supported and recognised by PM v5.7b. while 6600 is not yet recognised by PM v5.7b.

and i'm not gonna use linux. too much hassle. i rather use windows.

Inbuilt straps work great with Vega 64 (samsung HBM) but not so well with Vega 56 (Hynix HBM).

Any chance Hynix straps will get some love?

Try to reload miner

Sorry, I'm not familiar with Linux, but anyway  "-ttj " and " -ttmem " are not supported for GTX1060.


For setting core temperature to 65 C you need to use " -tt 65 "
Also maybe try these options too:


[/quote]

As per my understanding,  none of the directives are working apart of -log 0 as now it not writing any logs. Whether I add -tt 65 or add -fcm, I see just no effect on gpus mining status.
[/quote]