Pages:
Author

Topic: Police State? - page 5. (Read 25883 times)

hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
April 25, 2013, 11:01:46 AM
If a policeman committed the type of crime on trial at Nuremburg, of course he would be held responsible.
Tossing a man in a cage for having a flower isn't violating that man's rights?

Anyway, the issue you have is with the voters.  Employing a policeman who would not enforce laws would be like employing a butcher who would not cut meat.
Employing a cop who would not enforce bad laws is like employing a butcher who will not sell the customer poisoned meat, even if he asks for it.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
April 25, 2013, 10:54:55 AM
Don't blame the police for the decisions of the voters.

Hey, guess what? Just like the individual soldier given a bad order, an individual cop can refuse to enforce a bad law. Cops don't get to say they were "just following orders" either.


Again, you are looking to blame the cop for action of the voters.  That does not make sense.

I'm blaming the cop for the actions of the cop. The voters don't people into cages for trading dried flowers. The cops do. The only person who is responsible for your actions is you. No matter who, or how many, tell you to do something, That doesn't absolve you of responsibility.

The voters raise the taxes that pay for the cages and demand the laws that require people be put into the cages.  That's where the problem lies.
Well, yes, I'd have to agree that having a system which allows people to initiate force by proxy upon people definitely is the root cause of the problem. Which is why I'm an anarchist. But if the people on the "pointy end of the spear," as it were, would refuse to do that initiating, it would also prevent the result. But they don't, and instead fall back on "I'm just enforcing the law."

That excuse didn't fly at Nuremberg, and it doesn't fly with me.

If a policeman committed the type of crime on trial at Nuremburg, of course he would be held responsible.

Anyway, the issue you have is with the voters.  Employing a policeman who would not enforce laws would be like employing a butcher who would not cut meat.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
April 25, 2013, 10:51:49 AM
Don't blame the police for the decisions of the voters.

Hey, guess what? Just like the individual soldier given a bad order, an individual cop can refuse to enforce a bad law. Cops don't get to say they were "just following orders" either.


Again, you are looking to blame the cop for action of the voters.  That does not make sense.

I'm blaming the cop for the actions of the cop. The voters don't people into cages for trading dried flowers. The cops do. The only person who is responsible for your actions is you. No matter who, or how many, tell you to do something, That doesn't absolve you of responsibility.

The voters raise the taxes that pay for the cages and demand the laws that require people be put into the cages.  That's where the problem lies.
Well, yes, I'd have to agree that having a system which allows people to initiate force by proxy upon people definitely is the root cause of the problem. Which is why I'm an anarchist. But if the people on the "pointy end of the spear," as it were, would refuse to do that initiating, it would also prevent the result. But they don't, and instead fall back on "I'm just enforcing the law."

That excuse didn't fly at Nuremberg, and it doesn't fly with me.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
April 25, 2013, 10:44:28 AM
Don't blame the police for the decisions of the voters.

Hey, guess what? Just like the individual soldier given a bad order, an individual cop can refuse to enforce a bad law. Cops don't get to say they were "just following orders" either.


Again, you are looking to blame the cop for action of the voters.  That does not make sense.

I'm blaming the cop for the actions of the cop. The voters don't people into cages for trading dried flowers. The cops do. The only person who is responsible for your actions is you. No matter who, or how many, tell you to do something, That doesn't absolve you of responsibility.

The voters raise the taxes that pay for the cages and demand the laws that require people be put into the cages.  That's where the problem lies.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
April 25, 2013, 10:37:03 AM
Don't blame the police for the decisions of the voters.

Hey, guess what? Just like the individual soldier given a bad order, an individual cop can refuse to enforce a bad law. Cops don't get to say they were "just following orders" either.


Again, you are looking to blame the cop for action of the voters.  That does not make sense.

I'm blaming the cop for the actions of the cop. The voters don't people into cages for trading dried flowers. The cops do. The only person who is responsible for your actions is you. No matter who, or how many, tell you to do something, That doesn't absolve you of responsibility.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
April 25, 2013, 10:28:20 AM
Don't blame the police for the decisions of the voters.

Hey, guess what? Just like the individual soldier given a bad order, an individual cop can refuse to enforce a bad law. Cops don't get to say they were "just following orders" either.


Again, you are looking to blame the cop for action of the voters.  That does not make sense.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
April 25, 2013, 09:51:34 AM
Don't blame the police for the decisions of the voters.

Hey, guess what? Just like the individual soldier given a bad order, an individual cop can refuse to enforce a bad law. Cops don't get to say they were "just following orders" either.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
April 25, 2013, 08:35:32 AM
I actually was going to be a cop at some point in my life, and I ended up falling in love with computers so now I am here, but I guess I just have a different view on that job. I think cops deserve a little bit of a better rap then they been getting. I just have a different experience with that job. Being an officer is the hardest job, especially in 2013, I know I am not going to convert anyone on this forum, but let just say one thing when see a cop if you hate them or whatever, just give him a thumbs up or hello or a thank you, cause you really don't understand how hard that job is and I do.

gweedo, if a person does both good and bad things. Lets say he is a rapist but works really hard and gives lots of money to charity. Does this excuse him of his crimes? does this make his crimes not crimes?

part of a cops job is to kidnap innocent people against their wills in order that they be locked away in a rape dungeon for the rest of their lives because they happened tohave the wrong type of leaf in their pockets. This is what cops facilitate when they engage in the armed kidnapping of innocent drug users. People who have harmed no one but themselves, which is their right since they own themselves.

Do they also do good things? sure of course they do. But does this make their crimes ok? hell no. Does that make them not criminals? hell no.


Drug laws are not down to the police.  Its down to your own people voting for them.  In London, the police actively lobbied to be allowed to stop harassing pot smokers.  The politicians slapped them down and at the moment police are only half-heartedly enforcing a law they regard as stupid.  The senior policeman involved resigned and ran for mayor.

http://www.brianpaddick.com/ - sadly he lost.

Don't blame the police for the decisions of the voters.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
April 25, 2013, 07:43:15 AM
I actually was going to be a cop at some point in my life, and I ended up falling in love with computers so now I am here, but I guess I just have a different view on that job. I think cops deserve a little bit of a better rap then they been getting. I just have a different experience with that job. Being an officer is the hardest job, especially in 2013, I know I am not going to convert anyone on this forum, but let just say one thing when see a cop if you hate them or whatever, just give him a thumbs up or hello or a thank you, cause you really don't understand how hard that job is and I do.

gweedo, if a person does both good and bad things. Lets say he is a rapist but works really hard and gives lots of money to charity. Does this excuse him of his crimes? does this make his crimes not crimes?

part of a cops job is to kidnap innocent people against their wills in order that they be locked away in a rape dungeon for the rest of their lives because they happened tohave the wrong type of leaf in their pockets. This is what cops facilitate when they engage in the armed kidnapping of innocent drug users. People who have harmed no one but themselves, which is their right since they own themselves.

Do they also do good things? sure of course they do. But does this make their crimes ok? hell no. Does that make them not criminals? hell no.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
April 25, 2013, 05:32:53 AM
Ok the nazi stuff really is bothering me, remember that is the 1920's to 1940's information was easily controlled, and today it is very difficult. I doubt anything like that would happen today in America.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIqJPLw5K20
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
April 25, 2013, 05:25:57 AM
I know you guys are probably hardcore left wing people and I am not hardcore right or left.

Left and right wing are limited descriptors.

Middle ground politics is still taking a hardcore position. The political middle ground in the US for example is more "right wing" both economically and socially than in western Europe. What about the political middle ground in North Korea?

I just want to leave this here...

http://youtu.be/7UZ10Y2LmnE?t=3m47s

If this doesn't make you proud of the police force for doing an amazing job, then you sir, shouldn't be living here, you should live on an island where you make the rules, cause you don't appreciate the freedoms you have, the loyalty to service these people are showing you and you just don't understand.

Wow, a cheering crowd! I want to be a part of it!!! But i'll be in the middle, so as not to take a hardcore left or right wing position!!
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 253
April 25, 2013, 03:22:14 AM

Propaganda, my friend, is a hell of a drug.  You think the majority of the American people actually understand anything beyond what mainstream media feeds them?  It's a task in and of itself to read between the lines.  The mistake here would be to blame Americans for things they know very little about.  The average American citizen is not the enemy.  Follow the money, and you'll find the culprits.

I never fell prey to the propaganda.  I've never been a nationalist, never worn a flag, owned one, etc...

I may not have known the truth, and used to find thinking hard, but I always knew when I was being lied to, even if I didn't know exactly what the truth was.  I don't have a lot of sympathy for the above view.  Do Americans not know that people die in wars?

How many people know but don't care because that is the way they make a living because they have a job at a military contractor?   They want the propaganda so they don't have to face the truth.  Supply and demand.   Media supplies what the people demand.   
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
April 25, 2013, 03:19:16 AM
Propaganda, my friend, is a hell of a drug. 

“The objection to propaganda is not only its appeal to unreason, but still more the unfair advantage which it gives to the rich and powerful.”

― Bertrand Russell
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
April 25, 2013, 03:11:35 AM
I used to know an Ice cream man that sold drugs. Executives at wall st, change documents. I mean every line of work has shitty people, shouldn't assume...

How many SWAT team takedowns of innocents do ice cream men and crooked traders engage in every year?

At least the ice cream dude and the trader would go to jail for killing someone "by mistake".
member
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
...and the BitcoinKid
April 25, 2013, 03:02:38 AM
I'm wary about wading into this but here is my 2 cents...

The whole problem is America's attitude towards the world at large.  They have built up a huge military, have bases all around the world and are constantly starting wars.  Yes, starting them. 

All this requires training a lot of people to be soldiers.  I understand this is quite an intensive process and many are traumatised by their times in a warzone.  And if they aren't, it means they are most probably psychotic.   Then you get the blowback terrorist attacks on American soil.  Solution?  Ramp up security.  Where to get more police from?  What about all those soldiers returning home that now need jobs?  Result, you get a police force full of soldiers who basically treat the streets of America the same way they treat the streets of Baghdad.

I don't like the police state, but it almost looks like the Amercian populace got what was coming to it, because of it's general complacency towards the growth of the military and implied consent of foreign invasions.  The wheel always turns.

Of course there are so many jobs related to military spending now that politicians can't reduce it. 

Ultimately, America dug it's own grave.   

Propaganda, my friend, is a hell of a drug.  You think the majority of the American people actually understand anything beyond what mainstream media feeds them?  It's a task in and of itself to read between the lines.  The mistake here would be to blame Americans for things they know very little about.  The average American citizen is not the enemy.  Follow the money, and you'll find the culprits.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 253
April 25, 2013, 02:07:47 AM
I'm wary about wading into this but here is my 2 cents...

The whole problem is America's attitude towards the world at large.  They have built up a huge military, have bases all around the world and are constantly starting wars.  Yes, starting them. 

All this requires training a lot of people to be soldiers.  I understand this is quite an intensive process and many are traumatised by their times in a warzone.  And if they aren't, it means they are most probably psychotic.   Then you get the blowback terrorist attacks on American soil.  Solution?  Ramp up security.  Where to get more police from?  What about all those soldiers returning home that now need jobs?  Result, you get a police force full of soldiers who basically treat the streets of America the same way they treat the streets of Baghdad.

I don't like the police state, but it almost looks like the Amercian populace got what was coming to it, because of it's general complacency towards the growth of the military and implied consent of foreign invasions.  The wheel always turns.

Of course there are so many jobs related to military spending now that politicians can't reduce it. 

Ultimately, America dug it's own grave.   
member
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
...and the BitcoinKid
April 25, 2013, 12:35:30 AM
OP get the fuck out of the US if you think you are so fucking prosecuted.  You have no idea a police state is.  I am sick you and your type.  It's simple.  Leave! 

Damn pampered Americans that whine and bitch have no idea what life is outside their little bubble.  I am an American that has lived all over the world. And still does now and not by choice.  So yes I know of what I speak.



Our rights merit discussion.  I think it was noble for OP to start a debate.  And don't you think those that realize the benefits of our system want to make sure they're maintained?  Rather then eroded one amendment after another?  Our constitutional rights were built up on the history of the fallacy of mankind.  It's our duty, AT THE VERY LEAST, to have debates on our interpretations of current events and their impact on our INALIENABLE rights as we see them.  Why turn a blind eye?  At least we should investigate.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
April 25, 2013, 12:33:30 AM
just say one thing when see a cop if you hate them or whatever, just give him a thumbs up or hello or a thank you, cause you really don't understand how hard that job is and I do.

What's this syrupy stuff? If I see a cop I'm friends with, we wave. If I don't know them, they get treated like the rest of world: polite indifference. There are good cops and there are bad cops. Bad cops can be supreme fuckups that good cops are afraid to say anything about because they don't want to be viewed as snitches, just like prison. Bad cops kill people, destroy the lives of innocents and are general plagues upon society.

The best of cops take out the bad cops as well as the criminals without a badge. We need more of those kinds of cops and less cop worship.
member
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
...and the BitcoinKid
April 25, 2013, 12:26:00 AM
I'm quite familiar with the problem but tell me this:

How would YOU have rooted out the Boston bomber jerkoff?

You run the PD.  Deploy WHO?  HOW?  With WHAT?

You ask people to cooperate in helping them do their job. I would.

Do not force them to. In my childhood in the USA, I had lived in the ghetto for a while. Police were chasing people through our yard on a regular basis (shootings happened like clockwork and gang violence was prevalent). They *always* asked to enter our house (despite our relation to law enforcement). They always notified us of what was going on with assumption that we were not related to the individual and were innocent. Watching the Boston videos it seems that they weren't being professional police, they were being professional soldiers.

If someone declines and you still have grounds to believe that the person you're looking for may be in the house, you ask a judge for a warrant to search and present him with your evidence. At least then there is accountability on the judge, versus not even knowing a cop's badge number as he forces you out of your house. You can sue later and have laws changed when warrants are improperly issued. Not so easy with vague "justified entry" by a single cop whom you don't even know his name and no one will tell you because "shut up, truther".

The point is, if we are supposed to have a law in society, the police need to follow it too, even to our detriment. If something needs to be changed, let it be agreed upon and not forced upon us.

Disclaimer: I've never been to Boston in my life, I don't know what the mood or tolerance to crime is like there. All I know is that if I had sworn to protect people, I'd protect them from myself and my kind as well.

The most sensible post. 

Please don't let police force over stepping their boundaries ever become acceptable behavior.  Too many times in the past, this was the turning point for the worst.  Isn't this what attracts some of us to Bitcoin in the first place?  By using the coin, we remove just a bit more of their foothold.  Let's not forget that Smiley.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
April 25, 2013, 12:15:09 AM
Honestly if you have nothing to hide, what is the big deal. I don't do drugs, I don't do creepy, weird things in my apartment with girls. I mean I am normal so I don't see the big deal in a special situation as this.
Do you close the door when you shit?

I think cops deserve a little bit of a better rap then they been getting. I just have a different experience with that job. Being an officer is the hardest job, especially in 2013, I know I am not going to convert anyone on this forum, but let just say one thing when see a cop if you hate them or whatever, just give him a thumbs up or hello or a thank you, cause you really don't understand how hard that job is and I do.
If they were more like peace officers, and less like law enforcement, they'd get the better treatment they "deserve." But as it is, they're the iron fist of the state, the guys who put people in cages for selling each other dried flowers. Yes, it's a hard job, and it's hard because they're doing some pretty shitty things to people.

Ok the nazi stuff really is bothering me, remember that is the 1920's to 1940's information was easily controlled, and today it is very difficult. I doubt anything like that would happen today in America.
"It can't happen here." Famous last words, there. Here's a better quote:

"Eternal vigilance is the price of Liberty."

Are you a cop do you know what they need? Also the camo really sticks out in an urban setting so why are you against them wearing camo? Honestly it is basically the same body armor just one is camo and the other one is blue, so I don't see your point.
That is my point. They don't need camo, it does them no good anyway, so what is it for?

Intimidation. Plain and simple. Same with the black tactical outfits.
Pages:
Jump to: