Pages:
Author

Topic: [POLL] Does EVAN DUFFIELD regret instamining DRK/DASH at 100x emission? - page 20. (Read 31431 times)

legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
Saturday night approaching Trollz...you will have to talk amongst yourself about Monero now Sad

For some Trollero home -

The Trolleros can take a look at the Monero pre-ann which says the emissions will follow the same path as bitcoin, but when it was scam launched the rate of emissions was changed to be completely opposite.

80% in the first 4 years, most of that coming in the first year.

The whole thing stinks to high heaven. The devs who were around at the time and are still around would rather sweep the truth under the carpet so they can keep goading the Trolleros and making them pack hunters.

What is it they keep saying, to ignore a scam is to be part of the scam.  Well they are all ignoring the Proven Monero Scam Launch. Can't hide it anymore I'm afraid

sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 255
Saturday night approaching Trollz...you will have to talk amongst yourself about Monero now Sad
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 255
So, is it fair to say pretty much all alt coins are fraud?

(Sigh) This what the scammers would like everyone to believe, but you can do your own research.

http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=a_massive_investigation_of_instamines_and_fastmines_for_the_top_alt_coins

I like this bit:

"When your cryptocurrency is enriching the few for the sake of the rest of us, how is that different that the USD and basic economic configuration today? "

So that's almost an exact definition of a crippled miner launch, where the devs enrich themselves over and above that of the miners.  Which is what happened in Monero's case: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11264770

Second, that article is a year old and the author says: NOTE: Mining of coins is ONLY ONE ASPECT OF A COIN.

then where he says:  Hopefully one can see after reading this article that coins like Novacoin, Goldcoin, Blackcoin, Darkcoin, etc are obviously bad investments.

Now year later the dev is still there and 'Darkcoin' is the top alt after LTC...wheras Nova, Gold, Black all gone.  So he was right about some coins...

And when everyone admits that dash was instamined, that the masternode incentive package encourages masternode operators to attack other mastenodes to gain the most profit, when everyone realizes that masternodes are centralizing in nature and have no business in a cryptosystem, then you'll get your race to the bottom and devtome's analysis proving correct--in the meantime keep distracting everyone of your coin's awfulness like a backstreetboy pointing to record sales and how many tone-deaf twelve-year-olds send them fan-mail.

If you say so Generalize.  But seeing a you invested in a coin where the devs themelves have Troll all day just for attention and can't even work out how to get a basic wallet working they cloned 1 year ago, while volume dries up almost completely and a few huge support walls from Warz on Poloniex, i'm fine for investment advice thank Smiley
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 14
. And even then, a year after, there's still a wallet with inputs connected to the instamine, that owns 11% of all Dash/Darkcoins in existence.

You know that's not true, because the actual buyer replied to you already today:



That's interesting, because I first found of that address here. If even Dash supporters don't know of someone owning 11% of the coin supply with inputs being linked back to the original instamine, then wow, you must be really transparent Otoh /s


I did a search with that address and found no links back to you Otoh, so it's either you're lying, trying to cover up who the real owner is, or...because that address isn't linked to you at all, so you clearly have not made it as "obvious as possible".


lol, for some people, obvious as possible needs to be kindergarten style, believe me those with the smarts to know what's going on in this space know very well that it's me and when I started to invest in a 10% + stake in DASH, which was way after the instamine phase and also partly due to how that was handled, I want my dev to have an ongoing big interest in making this coin a success.


So you are just reposting stuff you know is not true, avoiding the proven Monero scam launch, and attacking Dash...not much point talking on this anymore, more time wasting...go develop Monero - your Bittrex volume today...$8.  Lol Trollero Smiley

Otoh said that the address was known to be connected to him, but when I did a search for any links I found none (0). That address has been in no way, shape, or form connected to the Otoh previously. It's likely he's lying or mistyped somehow. So again, you're wrong.

All my coins were bought way, way after the instamine, it's actually one of the reasons I liked and invested in this coin, the likelihood that the devs had a good stake in making it work long term, which is being born out in practice.

Your statements don't add up. That address isn't linked to you at all,
has inputs from the original instamine, kind of sketchy if you ask me but I won't make any conclusions.

so you didn't do even basic research.  Otoh has published all his buys / addresses on the Dash thread.  And here is an early Bitcoiner taking this investment on Dash...like I said, you will just keep typing anything, pretty much all garbage, sorry  Grin

Again, are you slow? The address is not linked back to Otoh at all. Try searching it up yourself. Therefore Otoh has likely lied or somehow mistyped.
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
So, is it fair to say pretty much all alt coins are fraud?

(Sigh) This what the scammers would like everyone to believe, but you can do your own research.

http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=a_massive_investigation_of_instamines_and_fastmines_for_the_top_alt_coins

I like this bit:

"When your cryptocurrency is enriching the few for the sake of the rest of us, how is that different that the USD and basic economic configuration today? "

So that's almost an exact definition of a crippled miner launch, where the devs enrich themselves over and above that of the miners.  Which is what happened in Monero's case: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11264770

Second, that article is a year old and the author says: NOTE: Mining of coins is ONLY ONE ASPECT OF A COIN.

then where he says:  Hopefully one can see after reading this article that coins like Novacoin, Goldcoin, Blackcoin, Darkcoin, etc are obviously bad investments.

Now year later the dev is still there and 'Darkcoin' is the top alt after LTC...wheras Nova, Gold, Black all gone.  So he was right about some coins...

And when everyone admits that dash was instamined, that the masternode incentive package encourages masternode operators to attack other mastenodes to gain the most profit, when everyone realizes that masternodes are centralizing in nature and have no business in a cryptosystem, then you'll get your race to the bottom and devtome's analysis proving correct--in the meantime keep distracting everyone of your coin's awfulness like a backstreetboy pointing to record sales and how many tone-deaf twelve-year-olds send them fan-mail.
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 14
Stop acting stupid/trolling BlockaFett.

Otoh make the clear statement that he made it as "obvious as possible" that the address was his. Yet when I did a search there were absolutely no connections whatsoever between that address and him.

Therefore that can be counted as a lie. It's either he's trying to cover up the actual owner of that address, either that he lied and hasn't made it clear the address was his, or something else.

Either way it's bad, as that address has inputs connected to the original instamine, plus it owns 11% of all Dash in existence. As said before, Dash has horrible distribution regardless.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 255
. And even then, a year after, there's still a wallet with inputs connected to the instamine, that owns 11% of all Dash/Darkcoins in existence.

You know that's not true, because the actual buyer replied to you already today:



That's interesting, because I first found of that address here. If even Dash supporters don't know of someone owning 11% of the coin supply with inputs being linked back to the original instamine, then wow, you must be really transparent Otoh /s


I did a search with that address and found no links back to you Otoh, so it's either you're lying, trying to cover up who the real owner is, or...because that address isn't linked to you at all, so you clearly have not made it as "obvious as possible".


lol, for some people, obvious as possible needs to be kindergarten style, believe me those with the smarts to know what's going on in this space know very well that it's me and when I started to invest in a 10% + stake in DASH, which was way after the instamine phase and also partly due to how that was handled, I want my dev to have an ongoing big interest in making this coin a success.


So you are just reposting stuff you know is not true, avoiding the proven Monero scam launch, and attacking Dash...not much point talking on this anymore, more time wasting...go develop Monero - your Bittrex volume today...$8.  Lol Trollero Smiley

Otoh said that the address was known to be connected to him, but when I did a search for any links I found none (0). That address has been in no way, shape, or form connected to the Otoh previously. It's likely he's lying or mistyped somehow. So again, you're wrong.

All my coins were bought way, way after the instamine, it's actually one of the reasons I liked and invested in this coin, the likelihood that the devs had a good stake in making it work long term, which is being born out in practice.

Your statements don't add up. That address isn't linked to you at all,
has inputs from the original instamine, kind of sketchy if you ask me but I won't make any conclusions.

so you didn't do even basic research.  Otoh has published all his buys / addresses on the Dash thread.  And here is an early Bitcoiner taking this investment on Dash...like I said, you will just keep typing anything, pretty much all garbage, sorry  Grin
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 14
. And even then, a year after, there's still a wallet with inputs connected to the instamine, that owns 11% of all Dash/Darkcoins in existence.

You know that's not true, because the actual buyer replied to you already today:



That's interesting, because I first found of that address here. If even Dash supporters don't know of someone owning 11% of the coin supply with inputs being linked back to the original instamine, then wow, you must be really transparent Otoh /s


I did a search with that address and found no links back to you Otoh, so it's either you're lying, trying to cover up who the real owner is, or...because that address isn't linked to you at all, so you clearly have not made it as "obvious as possible".


lol, for some people, obvious as possible needs to be kindergarten style, believe me those with the smarts to know what's going on in this space know very well that it's me and when I started to invest in a 10% + stake in DASH, which was way after the instamine phase and also partly due to how that was handled, I want my dev to have an ongoing big interest in making this coin a success.


So you are just reposting stuff you know is not true, avoiding the proven Monero scam launch, and attacking Dash...not much point talking on this anymore, more time wasting...go develop Monero - your Bittrex volume today...$8.  Lol Trollero Smiley

Otoh said that the address was known to be connected to him, but when I did a search for any links I found none (0). That address has been in no way, shape, or form connected to the Otoh previously. It's likely he's lying or mistyped somehow. So again, you're wrong.

All my coins were bought way, way after the instamine, it's actually one of the reasons I liked and invested in this coin, the likelihood that the devs had a good stake in making it work long term, which is being born out in practice.

Your statements don't add up. That address isn't linked to you at all,
has inputs from the original instamine, kind of sketchy if you ask me but I won't make any conclusions.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 255
. And even then, a year after, there's still a wallet with inputs connected to the instamine, that owns 11% of all Dash/Darkcoins in existence.

You know that's not true, because the actual buyer replied to you already today:



That's interesting, because I first found of that address here. If even Dash supporters don't know of someone owning 11% of the coin supply with inputs being linked back to the original instamine, then wow, you must be really transparent Otoh /s


I did a search with that address and found no links back to you Otoh, so it's either you're lying, trying to cover up who the real owner is, or...because that address isn't linked to you at all, so you clearly have not made it as "obvious as possible".


lol, for some people, obvious as possible needs to be kindergarten style, believe me those with the smarts to know what's going on in this space know very well that it's me and when I started to invest in a 10% + stake in DASH, which was way after the instamine phase and also partly due to how that was handled, I want my dev to have an ongoing big interest in making this coin a success.


So you are just reposting stuff you know is not true, avoiding the proven Monero scam launch, and attacking Dash, even though early Bitcoiners are smart enough to invest like this while you troll...not much point talking on this anymore, more time wasting...go develop Monero - your Bittrex volume today...$8.  Lol Trollero Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 255
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 255
So, is it fair to say pretty much all alt coins are fraud?

(Sigh) This what the scammers would like everyone to believe, but you can do your own research.

http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=a_massive_investigation_of_instamines_and_fastmines_for_the_top_alt_coins

I like this bit:

"When your cryptocurrency is enriching the few for the sake of the rest of us, how is that different that the USD and basic economic configuration today? "

So that's almost an exact definition of a crippled miner launch, where the devs enrich themselves over and above that of the miners.  Which is what happened in Monero's case: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11264770

Second, that article is a year old and the author says: NOTE: Mining of coins is ONLY ONE ASPECT OF A COIN.

then where he says:  Hopefully one can see after reading this article that coins like Novacoin, Goldcoin, Blackcoin, Darkcoin, etc are obviously bad investments.

Now year later the dev is still there and 'Darkcoin' is the top alt after LTC...wheras Nova, Gold, Black all gone.  So he was right about some coins...
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 255
So, is it fair to say pretty much all alt coins are fraud?

No, it's not fair to say that.

But the rough consensus of the community is that Dark-cum-Dash is the most reprehensible of all the fraud coins:



Dash is so awful, it makes PayCoin look good!

Love how Ice thinks a poll means stuff.  And 21 votes is 'rough consensus of the community' when that's probably just most of the Monero community, like on every other poll they did recently.  You're special mate Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
So, is it fair to say pretty much all alt coins are fraud?

(Sigh) This what the scammers would like everyone to believe, but you can do your own research.

www.dewww.devtome.com/doku.php?id=a_massive_investigation_of_instamines_and_fastmines_for_the_top_alt_coins
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
So, is it fair to say pretty much all alt coins are fraud?

No, it's not fair to say that.

But the rough consensus of the community is that Dark-cum-Dash is the most reprehensible of all the fraud coins:



Dash is so awful, it makes PayCoin look good!
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 255
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 255
So, is it fair to say pretty much all alt coins are fraud?
Seems fair over 5000 times read
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/when-should-litecoin-be-launched-47418

I don't think all Alts are scams.  Generally easy way to tell fraud coins:  check the devs out and how much effort they are actually putting into development and if their goals have real world applications to improve on Bitcoin's performance as such.  If they are working hard for a long time and consistently doing this, and acting professionally and ethically, it means they value their own coin as a technology not just a P&D vehicle to get righ quick on (Just IMO)
full member
Activity: 227
Merit: 103
Have faith.
Pages:
Jump to: