Topic: [POLL] Does EVAN DUFFIELD regret instamining DRK/DASH at 100x emission? - page 6. (Read 31431 times)

family?

For weeks back in 2014 Dark/Dash was at sale for peanuts. I didnt mine, just bought some:



We made our distribution long ago. Stop with this "instamine" crap. The actual value of the coin is because the dedicated effort of Evan & team. This is no hard to understand.

You missed it. Get over it.

Edit: i reported you, no necessary to be offensive to FUD. Just show how clever you are

Now that the instamine fraud is out in the open, the only people supporting DASH are either braindead or scammers themselves.

Now that's a reply that could be applied to half of your posts.

Is that what I said? Or you do you miss nuance?

LoL. You must be one of generalizethis's "staunchly ethical, moral, and principled individuals".

(He says he's not but he "knows they exist").

Sorry in advance if I 'insulted' you earlier since generalize might be about to quote you one of the little trophies he collects from my posting history  

So much to read since my last post but everyone know Evan should go prison for him scam.

I didn't even say I was one of these people, but I do know they exist, there's a lot of them, and if you want to Bitcoin levels you better launch your coin right--you misread, I'm not saying this is my personal view, I'm saying any good strategist would have taken this into account and my criticism is of the strategy to ignore them. And good job insulting them and calling them myopic--I'll save this and keep it like the Cryptography isn't a big part of cryptocurrency post. Thanks. 

Oh look guys another Trollero 0 activity account!!

I think myopic clowns might be a more appropriate term, but if thats how you see yourself it sure explains most of your pontifical posts.

If you're selling the idea that you're on an ethics crusade then I might try and sell my remaining mooncoin. I'll probably get at least as many buyers.

Disgusting

Looks like the polls are in strong agreement.

Yet 'DASH' was able to pump quite a few times.  Is that real interest?  Or is it just speculators clamboring on a train that can crash at any moment.  Anyways I wonder if shorters will have any influence now that we have leveraged trading.

Now I really wanna c the voter's name because I am pretty sure most of them are Monero trolls with new accounts, instead of making new accounts why don't you do something as a community to make you're coin more valuable or at least have the developers to actually do some work?

Dark supporters continue dancing around the issue, but that screenshot of "NO PREMINE" is the smoking gun in all of this.

Why did Duffield include it in the original thread title? Because he recognizes people want an honest coin with no unfair advantages. The fact that the coin was not relaunched even after this supposed "bug" is proof of a dishonest developer that obviously cannot be trusted. He wanted an instamine that functioned like a premine, but didn't look like an instamine. Then he blamed it on a bug.

It's obvious the people defending these actions (and who continue making vicious personal attacks against the whistleblowers) are highly invested, and therefore biased

Sorry, but I'm not trying to prove anything. Just debunking the "proof" someone with an agenda has pieced together.



If a "customer" of a masternode actually paid to a masternode for its service, sent coins to it, and received coins of some other currency back, then I guess masternodes located in some countries might have to. But none of that is happening, so my guess is "no".

Really ?  LoL

Well, I'm happy to leave that interpretation to anyone who cares to check out the history. Suffice to say, the glee with which yourself and co-horts jumped on that little episode about sums up the depth of your contribution to this whole debate.

The point being made was that encryption was never a significant part of cryptocurrencies which still stands.

Ever heard of creating a "straw man" ? You should have because it's something you excel at. It means addressing the argument that the other side isn't making to draw attention away from the one that it is.

In the quoted thread the evaded point is the one I just made above regarding encryption. In this thread your straw man is the validity or otherwise of Dash's instamine as opposed to the extent to which has market viability independently of its launch. The reason you need to create straw men is simple - your case would be dead in the water if you had to address the relevant point since we've now had a year's worth of open trading, attacks and trolling on Dash during which time the 'instamine' has been promoted to almost hysterical levels and during which time it's done nothing but gain value since it's post May 2014 correction.

The reasons for that are well documented, here and everywhere else, but broadly speaking amount to the fact that people do not care how they get their hands on cryptocurrency assets - whether through mining or markets - as long as they can get them, and get them for what they perceive to be a competitive cost, again whether that be a mining cost or a monetary one.

Your arguments are bogus, as are your straw men, as are your technical appraisals regarding the use of cryptographic obfuscation in the public blockchain. Fortunately everyone can see it except a of your fellow deluded space cadets who follow the same short-circuted logic regarding monetary properties and what makes money work on an electronic platform.

Oh you mean the post where gmaxwell confirmed Darksend mixing is actually cryptography?

Btw it wasn't as much the understanding, but use of terminology rather that was in question.

At best, you're proving that fair distribution is neither provable or not provable with current facts--which leads one (at least if they're thinking) to wonder if they should trust the dev who says he accidentally mined over 35% of the current distribution in a couple days or the guy trying to fit together the most likely scenario based on what little facts are available. And if you don't trust either, you'll sit on the sidelines until more facts can be gathered (again, if you're thinking).

Also, do you have to follow KYC rules if your a masternode operator--no one from Dash will comment on that for me. Seems kind of pertinent with what's going on with Ripple and all. Off topic, I know, but seems like that door was opened the first time someone yelled Monero.

Just like going to a power lifting forum thinking a statistic that 1% of the population can bench their own weight has any relevance there.



Just like going to McDonald's on Thursday and seeing 10 people and thinking those were the only people eating there the whole week.