By replacing yourself in the position of the early ICO buyers, you will realise that putting the second ICO at the same price is unfair. 3000% is also way too big. 125, 150 or maybe 200% sounds a lot more reasonable.
There is no second ICO, and IOTA doesn't need more money. No idea where all the morons here get the idea that they have some kind of 'right' to buy things at a price of their choosing.
Where do you get the right to tell the rest of the board they can not have opportunity to buy in at a price you bought in just because the IOTA ico was not advertised like other big ICO's?
Why would you not want more funds to go into the software that you supposedly bought with no expectation of price inflation?
Do you not want the project to succeed? you could raise more funds?
NO, you and the tiny % of other hoarders just want to dump out as soon as you can for max gains.
If you were really interested in seeing IOTA have the best chance of success they you would vote for more BTC to be invested in the project through and ICO2.