POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana - page 19.

CryptoWarriorsssss

jr. member

Activity: 103

Merit: 1

Quote from: yhiaali3 on July 11, 2021, 10:32:50 PM

In fact, POLYGON'S MATIC and Solana are both very good and it's hard to choose between them, but I tend to prefer MATIC a bit more because of the good growth in a year compared to Solana's growth in a year can be clearly seen through the following comparison:

Investing in both coins is good, but for me I prefer investing in Matic because of the good growth in a year as well because its price is low compared to Solana, so you can buy larger quantities at a lower price and store them for a long time.

Thanks for your sharing the image ， but the price is not a matter

casperBGD

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1151

Nil Satis Nisi Optimum

Quote from: killerfrost on July 11, 2021, 10:55:28 PM

I see at this point it looks like MATIC is still getting more attention, and that's most evident when looking at the current capitalization of both. I think MATIC has a significant potential opportunity with the above motivations to become a strong competitor of layer 2, the ground for MATIC price growth will still have a very prosperous way.

long-term, Solana is better pick, IMO
Matic is a good project, that is here to stay, but influence will go down with Ethereum2.0 and PoS, and Solana has a complete ecosystem, that could thrive in the future

nevertheless, both are good, and should bring fine returns, as investment, do not take this as financial advise and do your own analysis

CryptoWarriorsssss

jr. member

Activity: 103

Merit: 1

Quote from: Cointikka on July 11, 2021, 10:28:12 PM

Why do you need them when Ethereum is already there, as soon as Ethereum shifts to POS consensus most of this project will become redundant. Also the gas fee has considerably reduced in the past couple of month and if it keeps on reducing then most users will come back to Ethereum ecosystem.

of course ， both cannt directly compare with ETH

killerfrost

sr. member

Activity: 1988

Merit: 254

PredX - AI-Powered Prediction Market

I see at this point it looks like MATIC is still getting more attention, and that's most evident when looking at the current capitalization of both. I think MATIC has a significant potential opportunity with the above motivations to become a strong competitor of layer 2, the ground for MATIC price growth will still have a very prosperous way.

Beparanf

hero member

Activity: 2954

Merit: 796

Quote from: Cointikka on July 11, 2021, 10:28:12 PM

Why do you need them when Ethereum is already there, as soon as Ethereum shifts to POS consensus most of this project will become redundant. Also the gas fee has considerably reduced in the past couple of month and if it keeps on reducing then most users will come back to Ethereum ecosystem.

Seriously? Ethereum TPS is very low compared on the 2 blockchains being discuss here. Ethereum can't handle big volume of transaction that's why this blockchain exist and its not a redundant if ever Ethereum manage to increase there TPS. This is competition not redundancy so this blockchains will exist and will continue to have user whatever happened to Ethereum.

irsada

full member

Activity: 994

Merit: 117

My choice matic is much more efficient and easy to use just like bsc and eth where the addresses can be combined in different blockchains. while solona I don't really understand how it works and have never tried it.

yhiaali3

legendary

Activity: 1848

Merit: 1982

Fully Regulated Crypto Casino

In fact, POLYGON'S MATIC and Solana are both very good and it's hard to choose between them, but I tend to prefer MATIC a bit more because of the good growth in a year compared to Solana's growth in a year can be clearly seen through the following comparison:

Investing in both coins is good, but for me I prefer investing in Matic because of the good growth in a year as well because its price is low compared to Solana, so you can buy larger quantities at a lower price and store them for a long time.

Cointikka

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 36

Why do you need them when Ethereum is already there, as soon as Ethereum shifts to POS consensus most of this project will become redundant. Also the gas fee has considerably reduced in the past couple of month and if it keeps on reducing then most users will come back to Ethereum ecosystem.

caryoscar

member

Activity: 63

Merit: 12

In comparison, I support MATIC more. It may also be because I pay less attention to Solana. But I was also a holder of SOL, but I did not hold it for a long time. Maybe in the future, I will invest a little bit.

[email protected]

full member

Activity: 1120

Merit: 101

the development of the platform will follow what is popular in the market. and what the community is interested in. what happens in the crypto market is always like that. so future developers are sure to belong to a platform that really gets support from the market.
the more adoptions the better. and currently, both are in the same stage. but Polygon's popularity is probably bigger today than Solona's rising from the hype.

lenovop-70

full member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 108

I like more matic, with simple ecosystem but powerful inside, and also matic team still good until now, look at the price that increased day by the day, i believe it will be 5$ at the end of year. The price up indicated people like matic much than solana. I hope the matic team not lack of idea to develope their ecosystem, some of good coin lack of improvement, so people start to moveng and make market red on their coin, IMHO.

panjay

sr. member

Activity: 1079

Merit: 352

FTX as a platform growing big over the year, acquired FTX-TSM (esports team)..naming the stadium into their own name (FTX-ARENA)...pouring donation into elected US president etc..
So their own product will stay or even become bigger in the future, SOL was their blockchain for "smart contract"..so as long FTX grows...their own product will also grow.

I might be biased because I even doesn't know what matic do (L2, cheaper fee on farm etc).

Handsome Boy

copper member

Activity: 812

Merit: 12

I ❤ ₿itcoin and Ethereum

I prefer MATIC, because I believe that MATIC will be more popular than Solana in the future, so the price of MATIC can increase higher than the price of Solana, therefore if you ask me it's better to invest in MATIC or Solana, then I will definitely prefer to invest in MATIC, because I believe if MATIC can give me a lot of profit than Solana in the future.

Malam90

full member

Activity: 1099

Merit: 116

Quote from: BlackPinker on July 09, 2021, 01:33:56 AM

I don’t like Solana’s wallet a little bit. It feels a little strange. It may also be because I’m not used to it.

Solana's wallet like Sollet.io seems good to me because i have been using this wallet for few months and participated in few IDOs also. I haven't faced any problem. Although it needs more improvements.

Quote from: zasad@ on July 11, 2021, 05:05:26 AM

Quote from: amishmanish on July 11, 2021, 02:38:30 AM

MATIC, Well, the same situation here too. Just riding on the wave of L2 adoption by certain projects. As ETH goes to PoS, it won't need L2 and MATIC would basically become redundant. In the short term though, the upside can come from any bull run till Ethereum shifts to PoS.

Until the number of shards in the Ethereum 2.0 network grows to the required number, Level 2 solutions such as MATIC will be popular and useful for several years.

At the moment, I think Solana is very overvalued, so I am not investing in it. This coin gave its owners huge profits.

I also think Solana is overvalued in comparison to Matic. Matic's will be more popular in the next few years. I have both Matic an SOL but i prefer SOL.

zasad@

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 4602

Buy on Amazon with Crypto

Quote from: amishmanish on July 11, 2021, 02:38:30 AM

MATIC, Well, the same situation here too. Just riding on the wave of L2 adoption by certain projects. As ETH goes to PoS, it won't need L2 and MATIC would basically become redundant. In the short term though, the upside can come from any bull run till Ethereum shifts to PoS.

Until the number of shards in the Ethereum 2.0 network grows to the required number, Level 2 solutions such as MATIC will be popular and useful for several years.

At the moment, I think Solana is very overvalued, so I am not investing in it. This coin gave its owners huge profits.

amishmanish

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1159

The Sollet wallet is not at all intuitive. There are too many hoops to obtain there token.

You need to pay for something as trivial as adding a token to your wallet.

Most of it has been pre-mined and distributed to proxies of exchanges and the initial holders. So much so that 0.22% of all addresses hold over 90% of the circulating supply. It is abysmally centralized and the founders have just taken advantage of the bull-run to market themselves.

I for one, would never really put any money into something like this. Yeah, if you can earn it for free by building something, you should go ahead as they are well documented at least.

MATIC, Well, the same situation here too. Just riding on the wave of L2 adoption by certain projects. As ETH goes to PoS, it won't need L2 and MATIC would basically become redundant. In the short term though, the upside can come from any bull run till Ethereum shifts to PoS.

cryptoaddictchie

legendary

Activity: 2254

Merit: 1377

Fully Regulated Crypto Casino

Not sure about solana but Im well equipped on the matic ecosystem. Its an easy blockchain that can be connect using your metamask. Same goes to other blockchain, when it comes to nft. I think ethereum network still wins the race for example axie infinity resides on the eth network.

I dont like solana due to its very hard blockchain set up. But I know how to usef it. Its just that I am more comfortable with the metamask easy configure blockchain.

worle1bm

full member

Activity: 1834

Merit: 166

Quote from: MusaMohamed on July 09, 2021, 01:55:17 AM

You can choose both if you can afford short term losses. Both MATIC and SOLANA are overvalued and even they are corrected in past two months. They are still overvalued.

If you can not afford short term loses if the market becomes very bad for altcoins. If you feel you can not hold and have to exit because the market is bad in a few months, these coins are not for you.

These two altcoins are not similar to any other shitcoin in market which do not have any utility or development team to support them but have emerged as one of the top cryptos this year.On one side Solana which have broken the blockchain trilemma and can process 50k tps with low fees and faster confirmation based on POH and many dapps being built over this platform surely stand a firm future for those who believe in it.

Jaered

jr. member

Activity: 840

Merit: 4

I think Matic has the slight edge in that it has a more burgeoning community which drives more adoption

Gayong88

member

Activity: 1540

Merit: 22

Solana is my favorite. SOL has its own distinct qualities. Low transaction costs while assuring scalability and quick processing are the aims of this system. Proof-of-history (PoH) consensus is one of the most important improvements that Solana brings to the table. The most significant feature is that when a BTC correction happens, it rebonds extremely rapidly.

Topic: POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana - page 19. (Read 13491 times)