Topic: [POOL][Scrypt][Scrypt-N][X11] Profit switching pool - wafflepool.com - page 144. (Read 465716 times)

Nothing is crashing, the value is going down, then it goes back up. Please, do some research on what a crash is, and then look at how [un]stable cryptocoins have been. People sell in mass quantities, which affect the value, people mine in mass quantities, etc..

Now is the time to buy bitcoins since it's low.

Whoa...
I have been out a few days in work, and have returned...

I have auto-worked my farm, but after i analise the data, is just me, or the value of the crypto coins, have plunged?
The profitability is really on the line of water (0.005 per 1 Mh for the KWh that is needed to mine it).

Also BTC is loosing value really fast! 556 Dolars?

Did something new happend? Why are we seeing this kind of value crash?

In my case if the value lowers to 0.004 i will shut down the farm, and wait for the coins to recover some value...

Best Regards,

LPC

I have had the exact same thing!!!  What is going on Wafflepool?  My miner was still hard at work but luckily I opened the Wafflepool stats page and noticed that my reported hashrate was 0.00khs for the past 9.5 hrs or so.  I have reported shares according to my miner but not according to Wafflepool.  Has anyone else had this experience?

mine did the same thing at the same time

Is it just me whose stats have flatlined for the last 7h or so? My miner still reports shares being accepted and my Wafflepool stats page indicates 0khs submitted since 1:00AM EST

As I have not heard back from zSprawl, I will assume that he simply convinced himself that he was right and the rest of the world is dumber than him.  And as I know the rest of you are dying to pick this up again, I will show you all what he missed (though I think a lot of you already understood perfectly.)  Admittedly, I did purposefully present it the way I did earlier in order to get someone to fall into that order of operations argument trap, as it is usually much more fun that way!


The original unit expression of daily value is shown here:


 BTC  
 ---  
 Day  
=======
 1MH  
 ---  
  s  



Notice how at first glance it appears to be reduced to its most simple form, but if you examine it closer you will notice that it includes two different time scales in the denominators of both the upper and lower fractions,  one of which can be converted to the other, as 1 Day = 86400 seconds.  After conversion it looks like this:


  BTC  
 -------
 86400 s
=========
  1MH  
  ---  
   s    



Then just multiply the entire expression by 1, which we can choose to represent as ((86400s/1) / (86400s/1)):


 BTC          86400 s         BTC                
-------      -------         ---            BTC  
86400 s         1             1                  
=========  x  =========  =  =========   =  =========
 1MH          86400 s       86400MH              
 ---          -------       -------        86400MH
  s             1             1                  


Because I recognized that this reduction was possible earlier, but did not demonstrate it visually, I was able to ignore order of operations for division, because there are no divisional operators in either the numerator or denominator in the expression's most reduced form.

In an effort to be perfectly clear, this is not to suggest 1 BTC / 86400 MH, but it is only the proper unit name for the variable amount of value paid in BTC for 86400 MH generated daily by a 1 MH/s miner.  Earlier I had suggested that we call 86400MH a MegaHashDay, or MHD for short, but it is obvious no one wants to do that.

And in recognizing that I am not perfect, if anyone finds a problem with any of this, please do let me know.  But do not try to make your case with a false analogy.

You admit to having too little data to make a statement of fact, but then you proclaim the new switcher is working anyway?  I don't get it.  We'll know when we know.  And that will take time to gather a proper sample set size.

Too short a time testing but looks like new switcher working ... gaining profitability Good work PW.

GPU mining is not at all over but perhaps soon with ordinary Scrypt.
But it need know what to with GPU's.

But if someone know where is free gold to pick up - why tell it to others how to find it?

I'm going to take a wild stab at it and suggest that this might be an idiomatic expression similar to "every penny counts", but I'm really not sure.

Anyone here who can translate properly?

Update: I was close.  He is right to a degree, as if the pool were able to exploit every small opportunity, they all might add up to something more significant.  But as each new coin daemon and trading market creates another possible point of failure and additional component to manage daily, combined with the propensity of many coins to lose all value and leave miners with nothing to show for their efforts, we should leave the discretion to poolwaffle to act in the best interest of the pool.  He has shown himself to be very responsible overall.  If he fails to maintain a decent level of profitability, we are all free to try other pools if we think we can do better elsewhere.

A penny saved is a penny earned.
sorry.

He his trying, so I deleted my previous message which I hope did not offend him.  But have you considered registering the name wafflebasin.com?

And again, if we literally mined _every_ last coin, we would increase our daily intake by 1.5btc (1%).

Fluttercoin (FLT)
Network Hashrate: 4.19 GH/s

Yes. we need to specify how we work, what is important for the development of the basin. If not specified, then work on a simple Scrypt, while others may include innovative Scrypt.

I have, but your chicken-scratch takes a while to verify.  Plus I make a lot of typos when punching them in...

Why is my reported hashrate so low?  Haven't you been receiving my letters via postal mail?

The pool has no way of knowing if a user is an ASIC, a GPU, or some guy manually writing down numbers and sending them in...

sorry do not know English. Google helps

Coming soon forks only for video cards (Asic stable) and it should be considered in the development of a pool.

So, I made some major changes to our profitability switcher a couple hours ago.

Short synopsis is that it more accurately gauges the amount of hash power is on each individual section of the pool, and assigns them more appropriately to various coins.  It should end up being a bit more aggressive on small coins than it was before (and more accurate).  Previously for efficiency, it was treating all segments of the pool as static sizes (we have 24 switchable servers, so each was counted as 1/24 of the pool), this was just meant to be an estimate, and only really became a problem when our servers got horribly lopsided (mostly a few days ago when we switched to the new stratum servers).  Pool is split roughly: 60% usw, 25% use, 14% eu, 1% sea.  Which meant any time we switched use/eu, everything worked out pretty correctly, but when sea/usw got switched, we'd see higher orphan rates than we wanted (or less blocks than we'd want).

The other major switch is that we now switch pieces of the pool that match up closest with what we're mining.  If our switcher says "We need 2GH on coin X", it was previously randomly assigning segments of the pool (again, we counted them as even), but now tries to find the right combination of servers to switch to closest match the goal.

Ideally this means a bump in profitability, and so far I've seen a significant bump over the last 2 hours, however, its damn near impossible to tell if this is based on a better script, or just random luck (which is the next major upgrade - tracking luck).  So we'll see as the day progresses and luck evens itself out.