Topic: [POOL][Scrypt][Scrypt-N][X11] Profit switching pool - wafflepool.com - page 70. (Read 465769 times)

would like and invite to the Freenode irc #wafflepool please

I have a problem with a payout two days ago:

https://blockchain.info/tx/777e28f50b22cc32afb885e819eb485c84a1334f4fe1f6056a0d18a48d01a576
Here it shows as unconfirmed,

but in my wallet it's confirmed and the ammount is missing from my total balance.
the total balance on blockchain includes the ammount of that tx.

I'm confused here.

Yep, assuming it holds up for the week or so to get there, yep

are you going to make x13 pool also if there is a lot of coins available?

Basically everything mentioned here by others is correct, but I'll reiterate

This is almost all one mining farm, he moved to CM for a bit, he's back now   He's free to go wherever he likes

Hopefully done today/tomorrow.  The pool looks stable enough to be out of beta at this point, so as soon as I get the docs/howto/etc written up, I'll have them posted and Scrypt-N won't need that little "BETA" page anymore.

Soon as the docs/howto are done and live.  I wanted to get to like 100-200MHs so we could mine Vertcoin (highest difficulty coin I think) at roughly 1hr blocks on average, so variance wasn't too high, before adding it, and we're almost there (80MHs right now).  So probably tomorrow or so

Will be this week most likely.  Soon as Scrypt-N is done, fully live, and filled up with new coins, X11 will go through the same process Scrypt-N just did (beta page + opt-in, testing for a couple days with only a few coins, then docs and release, expanding to more coins).  The bulk of the work was done to get WP to understand the difference between algorithms, Scrypt-N was an easy jump from Scrypt in terms of backend (once the DB supported it).  X11 is a larger jump because things like difficulty aren't the same (X11 miner difficulty is like 0.01, vs Scrypt at like 32), so there are some formulas to change for calculating hashrates, and making sure everything lines up nicely.  But it shouldn't take more than a couple days

Someone else mentioned this as well, will be added today/tomorrow.

Yep, working on figuring out the right way to display

Could any one tell where and what version of sgminer should I download to mine nscrypt here and what are the basic parameters?
I downloaded from https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer and compiled in Ubuntu. Tried to use  smth like "--nfactor 11 --kernel psw  --intensity 13,20  -g 1 --worksize 256,256 --gpu-vddc 1.10,1.10 --thread-concurrency 8192,22336 --lookup-gap 2  --scan-time 30 --queue 0 --no-submit-stale --gpu-memclock 1500,1500 --gpu-engine 1100,1050 --gpu-powertune 20,20 --temp-cutoff 85,85 --gpu-fan 40-70,40-60 --temp-target 80,70" but it keeps saying 100% rejects and low difficulty of shares.
I also tried to use other kernels and "--algorythm" parameter but no use...

In new stats page "Total (approximate)" has "Sent" included, can we have another "Total (approximate)" that only shows not sent earnings?
And +1 for Scrypt-N profit calculations based on 450khs (as CoinWars do)...

I think that scrypt-n profitability should be shown as profit to 450khs (as CoinWars do) because same GPU makes about little less than half the hashrate, so 250% 'LTC profitability' is nonsense, as you get only half hashrate from equipment that do 1MHs in scrypt.

Maybe two values should be shown, profitability compared to VTC at 1MHs and profitability compared to LTC at 450kHs.

I'm considering switching back to waffle now that scrypt-n is on, but any idea when a few more coins will be added to keep up with fluctuations? Also, seems like very few people are on the beta, I'd have a big chunk of the total pool if I switched. Is that going to cause any issues?

There is no negative balance. That paste shows negative profitability because you looked at these stats right when the day started, before the pool had found any blocks, and previously mined (but unexchanged) had coins dropped in value.

Whats up with the negative balance?

Jun 01, 2014 (partial)    -0.00077463    12.74 GH/s    -0.00001712    0%
May 31, 2014    24.89335007    14.12 GH/s    0.00176342    88%
May 30, 2014    43.34552632    20.54 GH/s    0.00211011    98%
May 29, 2014    84.92031113    34.14 GH/s    0.00248740    111%

poolwaffle has stated that as soon as scrypt-n goes live then x11 will open for beta.

Any chance of x11?

Waffle Pool Widget updated to add Scrypt-N Support and a couple of bug fixes. I have not tested Scrypt-N yet as I don't have a compatible miner, but it should work. Let me know if there are any issues 

The new version will be up in Google Store soon.

Nscrypt looking solid. WafflePool currently has 10% of the EXECoin network hashrate.  Markets are holding up so far too - EXE looks to be stabalizing back around recent pre-pump values.

I really hope we get a holdback coin system soon too. Sign a generated message with the coin and your address, paste and submit, and then get e.g. LTC, EXE without exchange to BTC.

But, PoolWaffle is obviously kicking ass already.

I keep bouncing between mining straight exe and waffles scrypt-n pool. I think if we get some more hash on the scrypt-n pool, i'd stay full time.

Indeed.

That said, nscrypt with only two coins is already looking a fair bit more profitable then scrypt.  Things might change once a significant amount of hashing power hits tho.

scrypt   Hashrate: 15.24 GH/s   Miners: 3234   Mining: dogecoin   Time: 19:08:49
nscrypt  Hashrate: 58.31 MH/s   Miners: 91     Mining: execoin

Not anywhere close to half.

Every wafflepool hash drops significantly, it is due to sfire going somewhere else.

The "whale" moved to CM, I think.

@poolwaffle
Looking forward to  scrypt-n miner setup guide, looks like a lot of ppl moving to scrypt-n early (at least a lot of hashrate lol).  
Looking for sgminer 4.1.271 config for R9-280X for waffle-n