Author

Topic: [POT]PotCoin - Banking for the Legal Cannabis Industry ✦ ✦ ✦Grow With Us ✦ ✦ ✦ - page 257. (Read 920101 times)

full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
looks like the miners control this coin.  Soon there will be 100 million outstanding and it will be impossible to get to $1.00 with that many coins out.  we are going lower and lower.  they can stop this by halving but miners rule.  

ok well maybe it might be at the moment etc, but if you remember btc was about .30 when I heard about it. Now its over $500 and got up to $1200, so just remember how history may repeat itself and has a very high probability of doing so with this coin. After all this coin has a product that 3 out of every 5 people on the planet on average use. Can you say that about bitcoin? nope, didn't think so. Also even though the price isn't that much atm, the difficulty hasn't lowered past early March and is at 1.61 million last I checked a few hours ago. It seems people do not care what the difficulty is at or what the price is, they still want this coin, minus the people looking just to pump and dump. I say pot to Pluto in the future, regardless of what the current price is at.

Oh and also if this coin (hopefully will be) used by the mj industry on large levels, when the coin distribution stops, do you think people will just say "ahh well, even though it has lots of demand for it? The big dumpers and pump and dumpers are just hammering the prices, but overall long term it doesn't make any difference what the price is at when there will be no more coins to get in the future as far as mining goes besides for transaction fees or buying them from ppl selling. If anyone wanted a overnight high ass priced coin, the should be somewhere else because this is a long term hold, and by that I mean not just Jan 21 (Release date - today 3/25).

see bitcoin history

2009
Exchange rates published by New Liberty Standard. $1 = 1,309.03 BTC (and theymos thought NLS was overcharging[3])
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/History


1 potcoin = almost .01, so if you think ..... then you may be full of it because history shows something different.

Also look at this

Bitcoin began 2013 at $13 a coin, only to ring in 2014 around $800 with worldwide fascination driving the 60-times gain. But according to Boston University Finance Professor Mark Williams the price has really been driven by an influential few. Just 47 people own 29% of all outstanding Bitcoins; 930 own 50%. Another 10,000 folks bring the total owned by the largest coin holders to roughly 75%, leaving a sliver to be split among about 1 million small-change Bitcoiners.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/samanthasharf/2014/01/15/10-one-perspective-on-what-bitcoin-will-be-worth-in-2014/
member
Activity: 296
Merit: 10
looks like the miners control this coin.  Soon there will be 100 million outstanding and it will be impossible to get to $1.00 with that many coins out.  we are going lower and lower.  they can stop this by halving but miners rule. 
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
too many large exchanges = too much downward pressure. you need to keep in mind that the majority of miners just want to MINE AND IMMEDIATELY SELL. The collection of people on here and reddit and in other places who are fanatically positive about this coin (and other coins, it's not just potcoin) are the minority. If more people would legitimately HOLD then coins would rise faster and more steadily, the problem is most people talk the good talk but in reality the second it goes up a few ticks they are unloading coins like crazy trying to make sure they cover their electric bill, their mining rig investment costs, etc. no one wants to be left holding the bag if the whole scene collapses.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 534
wow who dumped POT to 20 satoshi on mintpal and why didnt i have any orders??? Sad

I did. And there is going to be a lot more dumps when people find out this coin is staying 'scrypt' ewww.
sr. member
Activity: 713
Merit: 252
hello potcoin people, enjoying the moon yet? with love
that guy with red
whatever happened to this "investment" thing, OH WAIT

That was you who dumped? I wish I would have had an order. Thanks for filling others coffers. That candle may have been red, but my pockets are black, and the grass is green.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
wow who dumped POT to 20 satoshi on mintpal and why didnt i have any orders??? Sad

Surely that was a mistake or typo....I hope no one is dumb enough to do that on purpose.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
hello potcoin people, enjoying the moon yet? with love
that guy with red
whatever happened to this "investment" thing, OH WAIT
sr. member
Activity: 713
Merit: 252
wow who dumped POT to 20 satoshi on mintpal and why didnt i have any orders??? Sad
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500

we are not changing from scrypt people!

all we wanted to discuss is halving the coin, and most people are saying NO.

Changing block reward would also be suicide. Please don't. There's no need.

If you would have bothered to read the original reddit quote you'd have noticed that its a mistake by the author.

I stated I don't keep up, and have been invited in here by several folks within the community to chime in on the recent requests to change the coin.

Ooh, and you sound very concerned. Rage much ASIC freak?

Yes I'm concerned from the standpoint of someone who supports the coin and its agenda, because I've been around long enough to know what happens when you make drastic changes--even a coin halving--it destroys the coin. Most people call for these changes usually because they're afraid of value lowering.

Rage? ASIC freak? I don't even own ASIC Scrypt systems. My farm is GPU.

I hope you'll hit a wall this time around.

Huh?

Your arguments above are very cheap propaganda.

I've been invited in here because my analysis is respected by many members of the community, as is my input. If you don't recognize value, and you can't provide the input I requested in my post (such as , find me a coin whose fundamentals have been changed which also didn't die), then perhaps you're the one lacking insight? Or not, who knows right?

If most of the Altcoins were changing algos in a concerted effort there would be some turmoil shortly, but afterwards one distorting factor would just be missing. YOU.

Yawn

How has it hurt the coin being on Cryptsy? Its in a range like before, maybe 10% less. Good volume though.


Uh, did you not notice the 25% drop in value as soon as folks dumped on Cryptsy? It hasn't returned yet. Honestly POT's floor is 1.1-1.2k if you ask me, which is where it's at right now.

It needs to be taken seriously on the business side, then you'll really see growth. It's going to be a race between POT, DOPE, CANNA and the other marijuana options out there right now.

Best of luck to your endeavors.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Coinano.com Digital Currency Exchange Platform

Hello PotCoin Community.

We added POT to our voting poll.
You can vote for POT at coinano.com/vote

Our reward system will give a different and exciting experience.
Be online, trade safely&funny and always win !  
Happy trading !!



More Info  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annnewexchangecoinanocom-cryptocurrency-exchange-market-launched-527950
Visit us   www.coinano.com
Follow us  https://twitter.com/Coinano


hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 534
I haven't kept up with this thread daily, but pop in every now and then. I heard people were considering switching from Scrypt, so I had to pop in here.

WTF would you do that? Because of the fear of ASIC? You guys realize hashpower = security, right? ScryptN ASIC is under development, I estimate Q4 you will see them.

Go find me coins which have serious value which have completely switched algo's and design and have stayed alive. Go on, I'll wait. I might be waiting until eternity. The biggest death of any coin is lack of use, not ASICs eating it up. Shoot, being listed on Cryptsy has done more to harm the value lately than ASIC's mining the coin.

Instead of being worried about block value and being "raped by ASIC" (lawdy lawdy), you guys need to study successful coins and business uses and focus on deploying toward that. There's no feasible/reasonable reason to completely change the foundation of a coin to avoid hashpower security, especially when the coin is still in its infancy.

You'll always have dumpers, you'll always have pumpers, but stability comes when volatility is minimized by volume of legitimate use and increasing hashpower.

Also, less power and more heat? Seriously? Please tell me that was a 12yr old who posted that, and not an adult who can do 2+2.

we are not changing from scrypt people!

all we wanted to discuss is halving the coin, and most people are saying NO.

Not changing from scrypt? Can't afford to just burn GPUs out for no good reason expecially when ASICs are going to come and make all the work i did look like a speck of dust. My gpus already run at 88c with scrypt, running up my AC bill in the middle of winter, can you imagine how it's going to get in summer? I only invest long term in cutting edge, innovative coins that offer features, not get rich schemes. Scrypt is on the way out the door, it's inferior to other hashing algorithms so why not evolve? Notice how much the price has gone down for potcoin since you made that announcement? It was that announcement alone that brought the price down. I've been with potcoin since DAY 1 and have helped spread the word, been active on reddit, etc. I'm pulling out and putting on darkcoin.
hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 640
Undeads.com - P2E Runner Game
I haven't kept up with this thread daily, but pop in every now and then. I heard people were considering switching from Scrypt, so I had to pop in here.

WTF would you do that? Because of the fear of ASIC? You guys realize hashpower = security, right? ScryptN ASIC is under development, I estimate Q4 you will see them.

Go find me coins which have serious value which have completely switched algo's and design and have stayed alive. Go on, I'll wait. I might be waiting until eternity. The biggest death of any coin is lack of use, not ASICs eating it up. Shoot, being listed on Cryptsy has done more to harm the value lately than ASIC's mining the coin.

Instead of being worried about block value and being "raped by ASIC" (lawdy lawdy), you guys need to study successful coins and business uses and focus on deploying toward that. There's no feasible/reasonable reason to completely change the foundation of a coin to avoid hashpower security, especially when the coin is still in its infancy.

You'll always have dumpers, you'll always have pumpers, but stability comes when volatility is minimized by volume of legitimate use and increasing hashpower.

Also, less power and more heat? Seriously? Please tell me that was a 12yr old who posted that, and not an adult who can do 2+2.
If you would have bothered to read the original reddit quote you'd have noticed that its a mistake by the author.
Of course it generates less heat.

Ooh, and you sound very concerned. Rage much ASIC freak?
I hope you'll hit a wall this time around.
Your arguments above are very cheap propaganda.

If most of the Altcoins were changing algos in a concerted effort there would be some turmoil shortly, but afterwards one distorting factor would just be missing. YOU.

How has it hurt the coin being on Cryptsy? Its in a range like before, maybe 10% less. Good volume though.
sr. member
Activity: 335
Merit: 251
I haven't kept up with this thread daily, but pop in every now and then. I heard people were considering switching from Scrypt, so I had to pop in here.

WTF would you do that? Because of the fear of ASIC? You guys realize hashpower = security, right? ScryptN ASIC is under development, I estimate Q4 you will see them.

Go find me coins which have serious value which have completely switched algo's and design and have stayed alive. Go on, I'll wait. I might be waiting until eternity. The biggest death of any coin is lack of use, not ASICs eating it up. Shoot, being listed on Cryptsy has done more to harm the value lately than ASIC's mining the coin.

Instead of being worried about block value and being "raped by ASIC" (lawdy lawdy), you guys need to study successful coins and business uses and focus on deploying toward that. There's no feasible/reasonable reason to completely change the foundation of a coin to avoid hashpower security, especially when the coin is still in its infancy.

You'll always have dumpers, you'll always have pumpers, but stability comes when volatility is minimized by volume of legitimate use and increasing hashpower.

Also, less power and more heat? Seriously? Please tell me that was a 12yr old who posted that, and not an adult who can do 2+2.

we are not changing from scrypt people!

all we wanted to discuss is halving the coin, and most people are saying NO.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I haven't kept up with this thread daily, but pop in every now and then. I heard people were considering switching from Scrypt, so I had to pop in here.

WTF would you do that? Because of the fear of ASIC? You guys realize hashpower = security, right? ScryptN ASIC is under development, I estimate Q4 you will see them.

Go find me coins which have serious value which have completely switched algo's and design and have stayed alive. Go on, I'll wait. I might be waiting until eternity. The biggest death of any coin is lack of use, not ASICs eating it up. Shoot, being listed on Cryptsy has done more to harm the value lately than ASIC's mining the coin.

Instead of being worried about block value and being "raped by ASIC" (lawdy lawdy), you guys need to study successful coins and business uses and focus on deploying toward that. There's no feasible/reasonable reason to completely change the foundation of a coin to avoid hashpower security, especially when the coin is still in its infancy.

You'll always have dumpers, you'll always have pumpers, but stability comes when volatility is minimized by volume of legitimate use and increasing hashpower.

Also, less power and more heat? Seriously? Please tell me that was a 12yr old who posted that, and not an adult who can do 2+2.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
"Mining X11 gives 3-4 times the hash power of Scrypt, uses less energy and generates more heat"

Admittedly, I am ignorant about X11.  I know nothing about it.
"uses less energy and generates more heat"  makes no sense.
When a processor uses less energy, it should generate less heat, not more heat.

I don't deny that X11 may be more ASIC resistant than scrypt and scrypt-n.
But consider this.

Yesterday, I briefly switched my GPU's to mining a new scrypt-n coin.
What is the difference between mining POT and mining this other scrypt-n coin?
The scrypt-n coin mined at approximately 1/2 hash rate of POT coin with gpu usage at 99-100%.
Same gpu usage and same gpu temperature as when POT coin runs.
POT mining allocates 500-600MB vram.  The scrypt-n coin allocates 1000-1100MB vram.

Personally, I had zero issues running scrypt-n on my 2GB graphics cards.  One-half hash rate did not bother me at all.
As long as my gpu's are running at 99-100% gpu usage, then in general, that means my gpu's are hashing as fast as possible.
The slower hash rate simply means new coins are produced at a slower rate.  The gpu's still generate coins as fast as possible.

If switching from scrypt to X11 would increase the production of new coins by 3-4 times the current rate, then I am definitely against it.
POT developers are considering to decrease the mining rate of new coins.  No one (except maybe dumpers) wants the rate of new coin production to increase.

Show me an ASIC which mines scrypt-n and then I will believe that scrypt-n is insufficient protection against ASIC's.

By the way, the little ASIC miners don't bother me at all.  In fact, they might even be good for the coin industry.
The little ASIC's are not terribly expensive and are very energy efficient.
The big, powerful, expensive ASIC machines are a big problem since only rich people will buy them (rich people become richer), and as already stated, they cause problems for coins with low net hash rate.
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
The green PotCoin pool!

http://potcoin.cryptocoinpool.net

At 0% Fee Donation go to Charity

Happy mining...
hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 640
Undeads.com - P2E Runner Game
Is it possible to change Potcoin to Scrypt-N?
If yes, that would be my suggestion for a re-design.
I think what happened to Bitcoin in regard to ASICs won't happen to Scrypt coins that way.
I think Scrypt will be abandoned for PoW, if only ASIC owners could mine them.
For most of the Scrypt coins there is no real market and the inflation will kill them.

I'm all for GPU mining.
Look whats happening to VTC.

I think it is most important to build a mostly independent transfer cycle.
Big growers, vendors, merchants could spin off their own mines and sell the coins to the folk thru outlets.
The more it decouples from Bitcoin, the better. Make it a currency on its own.

Scrypt N is total crap GPU killer and uneconomical. X11 is superior. 50% less energy consumption and heat, 11 hashing algorithms for super secure hashing and asic resistant if not proof.

Can you elaborate a little bit of why you would refer to Scrypt-N as a "total crap GPU killer".
It works quite alright just for the Vertcoin.
Have a look how the coin is performing and then tell me again its crap Mr. Smart.
And "crap" is what I do in the morning, after my first coffee.



Quote taken from here: http://www.reddit.com/r/Hirocoin/comments/215lkd/changing_landscape_for_scrypt/

Quote
The GPU mining landscape is about to change drastically and many have not woken up to this fact. KNc recently took $2m in pre-orders for their 100MH Scrypt ASIC. These may start coming on to the network in Q2/Q3 of this year. There is no doubt that these will be turned on to many of the small Scrypt coins out there to strip them, sell the coins and then leave. This is going to leave many small coins unusable, many have less than 1MH. People do not seem to be aware of the problems this is going to cause and perhaps were not around for the SHA-256 ASICs turning up. This left many small SHA-256 at the time in a state where they had to hard fork to resolve the issues and others just disappeared. It is possible to move hashing algos in those coins.
Some may remember that Terracoin was a target for the SHA-256 ASICs, with the very large hashing power Terracoin was left no alternative but to hard fork its way out of trouble. For all that they tried to dodge the ASICs these devices were used again to run some very devastating attacks on Terracoin forcing them to amend their code again and hard fork. The additional hard fork was an exceptional case as their attempts to introduce smoother difficulty adjust left flaws in their code.
There other hash solutions out there the best known of these being Scrypt-Jane and Adaptive-N which for the most part are the same. They both use a variable N factor which is locked to 210 in Scrypt. This is the memory requirement, 210 works out to 1024 bytes. Vertcoin a very popular Adaptive-N coin currently uses an N factor of 211 which works out to 2048 bytes, every time the N factor goes up the performance of miners drops by half. Vertcoin currently has half the performance of Scrypt and has a maximum N of 232 which works out to 4GB, most graphic cards cannot even do work at that level and with the current hash rate the difficulty of Vertcoin could not go low enough to support that level of N. Scrypt-Jane and Adaptive-N may be ASIC hostile but they are also GPU hostile.
There is an alternative that has been largly over looked which was created by Even Duffield. This is the chap who created DarkCoin which looks to include the DarkSend feature that will allow anonymous transactions. X11 uses 11 well known and high performing hashing solutions chained together to generate the hashes required to generate new blocks. Since it uses 11 different hashes it is complex and unlikely to see a ASIC for it any time soon. The good news for miners is that they can use X11 right now to avoid multipools and start gathering coins that are going to become very important when the Scrypt ASICs hit. Mining X11 gives 3-4 times the hash power of Scrypt, uses less energy and generates more heat. This is the solution that people have been looking for.
There is also Hirocoin that has launched recently and adopted X11 as its hashing solution. Hirocoin does not have the DarkSend feature but has been meticulously coded and fully featured on launch including DNS seed and binaries for different platforms. DarkCoin uses an inverse difficulty reward which means that the higher the difficulty the lower the reward. More miners means less coins, Hirocoin is more conventional in that it has 400 coins a block and is likely to be the first choice for miners.
For all that there is the X11 alternative for GPU mining there does not seem to be any Scrypt coins who are seriously talking about changing their hashing algorithms. They may soon have their hand forced in the same way that Terracoin had no choice but to fork. However many small Scrypt coins do not seem to have an active developer in site, just communities of users who may soon be left without a working coin.

I think if possible we should change to X11 before script asics tear us apart. I think we are already suffering being strip mined for BTC and BC and our price is suffering for being up on coinwarz/poolwarz. I think if we make this move early enough in our existence we could set ourselves apart early from the other coins, especially from the clone POTcoins. Avoid being strip mined because it will become very easy. KNC already accepted 2 million dollars worth of orders for their 100Mhs script asic miners.

As soon as we set ourselves apart and make it difficult to mine for asics, we could then also take advantage of the price boosting effects of a multipool.

Hm, sounds good. I'll give it a try with sph-sgminer and Darkcoin.

On the other hand its not all bad if there are a lot of coins available for cheap in the beginning.
All stupid miners are selling at the bid all day long. Let them do all the work and then later you rape them.
Its easy to get the coins cheap if you play the same game by placing orders just a little higher than the usual sharks.

Merchants, growers and vendors could build a chest, wait for the new version to come out and then start promoting and selling to their customers. If well timed it could create a nice vacuum.

Edit: the quoted description of X11 says it generates more heat, which is probably wrong.
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
Is it possible to change Potcoin to Scrypt-N?
If yes, that would be my suggestion for a re-design.
I think what happened to Bitcoin in regard to ASICs won't happen to Scrypt coins that way.
I think Scrypt will be abandoned for PoW, if only ASIC owners could mine them.
For most of the Scrypt coins there is no real market and the inflation will kill them.

I'm all for GPU mining.
Look whats happening to VTC.

I think it is most important to build a mostly independent transfer cycle.
Big growers, vendors, merchants could spin off their own mines and sell the coins to the folk thru outlets.
The more it decouples from Bitcoin, the better. Make it a currency on its own.

Scrypt N is total crap GPU killer and uneconomical. X11 is superior. 50% less energy consumption and heat, 11 hashing algorithms for super secure hashing and asic resistant if not proof.

Can you elaborate a little bit of why you would refer to Scrypt-N as a "total crap GPU killer".
It works quite alright just for the Vertcoin.
Have a look how the coin is performing and then tell me again its crap Mr. Smart.
And "crap" is what I do in the morning, after my first coffee.



Quote taken from here: http://www.reddit.com/r/Hirocoin/comments/215lkd/changing_landscape_for_scrypt/

Quote
The GPU mining landscape is about to change drastically and many have not woken up to this fact. KNc recently took $2m in pre-orders for their 100MH Scrypt ASIC. These may start coming on to the network in Q2/Q3 of this year. There is no doubt that these will be turned on to many of the small Scrypt coins out there to strip them, sell the coins and then leave. This is going to leave many small coins unusable, many have less than 1MH. People do not seem to be aware of the problems this is going to cause and perhaps were not around for the SHA-256 ASICs turning up. This left many small SHA-256 at the time in a state where they had to hard fork to resolve the issues and others just disappeared. It is possible to move hashing algos in those coins.
Some may remember that Terracoin was a target for the SHA-256 ASICs, with the very large hashing power Terracoin was left no alternative but to hard fork its way out of trouble. For all that they tried to dodge the ASICs these devices were used again to run some very devastating attacks on Terracoin forcing them to amend their code again and hard fork. The additional hard fork was an exceptional case as their attempts to introduce smoother difficulty adjust left flaws in their code.
There other hash solutions out there the best known of these being Scrypt-Jane and Adaptive-N which for the most part are the same. They both use a variable N factor which is locked to 210 in Scrypt. This is the memory requirement, 210 works out to 1024 bytes. Vertcoin a very popular Adaptive-N coin currently uses an N factor of 211 which works out to 2048 bytes, every time the N factor goes up the performance of miners drops by half. Vertcoin currently has half the performance of Scrypt and has a maximum N of 232 which works out to 4GB, most graphic cards cannot even do work at that level and with the current hash rate the difficulty of Vertcoin could not go low enough to support that level of N. Scrypt-Jane and Adaptive-N may be ASIC hostile but they are also GPU hostile.
There is an alternative that has been largly over looked which was created by Even Duffield. This is the chap who created DarkCoin which looks to include the DarkSend feature that will allow anonymous transactions. X11 uses 11 well known and high performing hashing solutions chained together to generate the hashes required to generate new blocks. Since it uses 11 different hashes it is complex and unlikely to see a ASIC for it any time soon. The good news for miners is that they can use X11 right now to avoid multipools and start gathering coins that are going to become very important when the Scrypt ASICs hit. Mining X11 gives 3-4 times the hash power of Scrypt, uses less energy and generates more heat. This is the solution that people have been looking for.
There is also Hirocoin that has launched recently and adopted X11 as its hashing solution. Hirocoin does not have the DarkSend feature but has been meticulously coded and fully featured on launch including DNS seed and binaries for different platforms. DarkCoin uses an inverse difficulty reward which means that the higher the difficulty the lower the reward. More miners means less coins, Hirocoin is more conventional in that it has 400 coins a block and is likely to be the first choice for miners.
For all that there is the X11 alternative for GPU mining there does not seem to be any Scrypt coins who are seriously talking about changing their hashing algorithms. They may soon have their hand forced in the same way that Terracoin had no choice but to fork. However many small Scrypt coins do not seem to have an active developer in site, just communities of users who may soon be left without a working coin.

I think if possible we should change to X11 before script asics tear us apart. I think we are already suffering being strip mined for BTC and BC and our price is suffering for being up on coinwarz/poolwarz. I think if we make this move early enough in our existence we could set ourselves apart early from the other coins, especially from the clone POTcoins. Avoid being strip mined because it will become very easy. KNC already accepted 2 million dollars worth of orders for their 100Mhs script asic miners.

As soon as we set ourselves apart and make it difficult to mine for asics, we could then also take advantage of the price boosting effects of a multipool.
hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 640
Undeads.com - P2E Runner Game
Is it possible to change Potcoin to Scrypt-N?
If yes, that would be my suggestion for a re-design.
I think what happened to Bitcoin in regard to ASICs won't happen to Scrypt coins that way.
I think Scrypt will be abandoned for PoW, if only ASIC owners could mine them.
For most of the Scrypt coins there is no real market and the inflation will kill them.

I'm all for GPU mining.
Look whats happening to VTC.

I think it is most important to build a mostly independent transfer cycle.
Big growers, vendors, merchants could spin off their own mines and sell the coins to the folk thru outlets.
The more it decouples from Bitcoin, the better. Make it a currency on its own.

Scrypt N is total crap GPU killer and uneconomical. X11 is superior. 50% less energy consumption and heat, 11 hashing algorithms for super secure hashing and asic resistant if not proof.

Can you elaborate a little bit of why you would refer to Scrypt-N as a "total crap GPU killer".
It works quite alright just for the Vertcoin.
Have a look how the coin is performing and then tell me again its crap Mr. Smart.
And "crap" is what I do in the morning, after my first coffee.
Jump to: