[PRE-ANN] Stone - DAG Data-Structured Private Cryptocurrency - page 81.

tyz

legendary

Activity: 3360

Merit: 1533

Quote from: IBuyCoins on December 27, 2017, 04:04:37 PM

Quote from: tyz on December 27, 2017, 03:41:18 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: tyz on December 27, 2017, 09:18:09 AM

I sent you a donation to pursue the development of the project Wink

Risky.

You seem to be a really smart guy.

I don't like the fact you donated to something that could essentially be absolute vapour.

You are encouraging certain individuals to attempt something similar to what OP *might* be doing by your behaviour.

It's your behaviour and your donation, but it affects the whole community because people will now know they can get free money by just creating a fake ANN (not saying this pre-ANN is fake, I am saying that OP got money only based on a pre-ANN with no code to show, which sets a dangerous precedent imo).

Sometimes you lose, sometimes you win. I have donated a lot of to crypto projects over the years. Below the line there is a big plus in the balance and brought me of being a very early investor of two top ten crypto projects. Every donation comes along with some risk.

salterious

full member

Activity: 258

Merit: 100

The revolutionary Export system/One-click Export

Quote from: ReasonOff on December 27, 2017, 04:23:30 PM

I like what Raiblocks did and the idea of adding privacy to this technology is a very good one. It also really needs smart contracts and decentralized apps but who knows may be Stone will have this in future.

Yes but how does this coin differ exactly it RaiBlocks is soon to add privacy? In any regard we gotta wait 1-2 months like dev said so until the launch of the coin anything we say about Stone is pure speculation.

Kaskad

member

Activity: 351

Merit: 15

Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Network

Follow

GTTIGER

sr. member

Activity: 527

Merit: 250

Wish you luck!
Great to see people attempting to innovate. I will donate more if I see progress or if you further explain your expertise:)
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x08c430ce8325ee42d484e05bd64cbe8df287094c29dc637fe1e561f0bf742fa6

IBuyCoins

newbie

Activity: 32

Merit: 0

Quote from: ReasonOff on December 27, 2017, 04:23:30 PM

I like what Raiblocks did and the idea of adding privacy to this technology is a very good one. It also really needs smart contracts and decentralized apps but who knows may be Stone will have this in future.

Even if this ANN is vapour, this needs to happen regardless

ReasonOff

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

I like what Raiblocks did and the idea of adding privacy to this technology is a very good one. It also really needs smart contracts and decentralized apps but who knows may be Stone will have this in future.

IBuyCoins

newbie

Activity: 32

Merit: 0

Quote from: tyz on December 27, 2017, 03:41:18 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: tyz on December 27, 2017, 09:18:09 AM

I sent you a donation to pursue the development of the project Wink

Risky.

You seem to be a really smart guy.

I don't like the fact you donated to something that could essentially be absolute vapour.

You are encouraging certain individuals to attempt something similar to what OP *might* be doing by your behaviour.

It's your behaviour and your donation, but it affects the whole community because people will now know they can get free money by just creating a fake ANN (not saying this pre-ANN is fake, I am saying that OP got money only based on a pre-ANN with no code to show, which sets a dangerous precedent imo).

Chronowax

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

I like the idea and the name. I'll donate once there is some proof this isn't a scam.

rumpel_tusk

full member

Activity: 171

Merit: 105

Quote from: tyz on December 27, 2017, 03:41:18 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: tyz on December 27, 2017, 09:18:09 AM

I sent you a donation to pursue the development of the project Wink

Risky.

You seem to be a really smart guy.

No risk, you don't get scammed.

tyz

legendary

Activity: 3360

Merit: 1533

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: tyz on December 27, 2017, 09:18:09 AM

I sent you a donation to pursue the development of the project Wink

Risky.

You seem to be a really smart guy.

crush

full member

Activity: 260

Merit: 100

I haven't go though these math behind the coin, so I want to see more technology of this coin. This is not another copy and paste coin or hard fork.
I will read its whitepaper for more details.

fedmahnkassad

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 500

Twitter: @FedKassad

Sorry if this was already discussed, I could not find it: Is there a date after which you will stop accepting donations, or donations will not count against the distribution? If there is no such date it's better to select one earlier, so there aren't salty people afterwards.

chris_nor

sr. member

Activity: 256

Merit: 250

I will be checking this one out. Since you're essentially working by yourself and ICO wouldn't be a good rout to go. I say do an airdrop and for reference look at Nem. That all came about through volunteers that came out during the strong community that they immediately built. That's the tough part.

monsanto

legendary

Activity: 1241

Merit: 1005

..like bright metal on a sullen ground.

So it seems to me the most important comments are that DAG protocols are designed for low fees and minimal transaction sizes while zkSNARKs require a lot of data and therefore are not really compatible with DAG networks. I'm all for experimentation though, so maybe it's worth the dev's attempt. Another alternative might be to use a less data intensive private transaction protocol, or have specialized private transaction nodes.

Glynmoor

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

Considering donating but to be honest the argument against a faucet is weak. What does "stress on the community" even mean? That is not a self-evident claim. I'm willing to hear you out on why it puts stress on the community but I need to hear some logic behind it.

Is there also anything you can do to reassure people it's not a scam? Prior work? Reveal who you are? No one wants to get Confido'd

Kencha77

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 251

Quote from: ?? on ??

Too many newbie and brand new accounts in this thread.. The dev hasn't answered any technical questions.. I would never donate in something like that. My feeling is this is a scam.

I just wish that this people are investors who just got into bitcointalk. The dev is not at fault for those to have an interest for the project if that is the case

Kencha77

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 251

Quote from: fracas on December 27, 2017, 04:47:16 AM

My opinion is:
- no ICO
- no airdrops to XRB owners (this would make already rich people more richer, please give us a new opportunity)
- focus on development, bug free products (not like XRB ones) and community

Make this project have a own life (not depending on XRB).

and also no 30% to be distributed to donators. I can see it as an ICO already if that is the plan.

Lets try to come up with a new distribution model. Solving Captchas is out of the options

user113

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

faucet distribution.
fair.
bring newbies to the project.

tyz

legendary

Activity: 3360

Merit: 1533

I sent you a donation to pursue the development of the project Wink

xiaoxz

member

Activity: 196

Merit: 10

Quote from: fracas on December 27, 2017, 04:47:16 AM

My opinion is:
- no ICO
- no airdrops to XRB owners (this would make already rich people more richer, please give us a new opportunity)
- focus on development, bug free products (not like XRB ones) and community

Make this project have a own life (not depending on XRB).

I agree with this option very very much.
If the technology of one coin is excellent, the development team is serious and responsible, the community is active and why to make it relation to another coin?
I think making it independent, unique is the most perfect.
I am looking forward to the progress of this project. In addition, I did not see the official telegram, hoping to quickly build one.

Topic: [PRE-ANN] Stone - DAG Data-Structured Private Cryptocurrency - page 81. (Read 42181 times)