Business in football of course plays an important role, therefore Tuchel was sacked because of his stubbornness about not fulfilling the wishes of the higher-ups. Well, this is just my speculation as far as I know Tuchel should always target his players to keep winning, but the sponsor's wish is that they play under management. I don't know how to put it into a scoring game and also the desire for sponsors to be one of the factors why Tuchel was sacked. It's hard to pin down but the crux of the Tuchel sacking case I know is purely business.
Todd Boehly was too quick to have sacked Thomas Tuchel as he just took over from Roman Ibramovic. I still stand against it that it wasn't a good decision made by the current Chelsea owner. To be honest, Chelsea and its management team should learn to give their managers time and too sometimes allow them to independently take decision as a coach when it comes to buying players, because the coaches only knows the kind of players that is needed in the team and suitable to his tactics.
Yes and also, with the sudden sacking of Tuchel and then, will Chelsea be able to immediately sign the players they want?
In fact, Tuchel's dismissal occurred when the transfer window had closed, meaning Todd Boehly should have been more patient until the transfer window re-opened in January.
I think the benefits of successful marketing come not only from the top players, but if it can come from the team's success in winning titles or at least being a strong team that is consistently in the top four.
Therefore, instead of getting an advantage, they are at a loss because they have lost their best form and also, they are losing because they still haven't got the players they want.
In fact, there is nothing wrong with giving Tuchel time at least until the half-season break like this time, but it has happened and Chelsea must be able to start again from the beginning.