Topic: "Prepare for deflation in 2023" - page 4. (Read 1457 times)

i am definitely unique

if i was to be another crowd hugger just going with the flow of the social narrative, then thats just spam of no discussion, just ass-kissery

i do offer differing opinions when it matters most, especially when some people get stuck in some social echo chamber of details they didnt learn via researched sources, but just what some other social influencer said

EG instead of researching my opinions. for years windy has taken on the cause of calling me a liar because someone else called me a liar. and so he just circle chased his own tail into perpetual insanity of finger pointing

heres one prime example
gmax's first gripe with me was about "anyonecanspend" opcode being abused to function as the tx format trojan where he and co-devs were ademant that segwit can be soft and people can easily just start making segwit transactions with the anyonecanspend opcode without needing some hard activation of upgrading the nodes and all, nor nodes being ready to service said upgrade should it activate

however it turns out with all his cries and him staying by his beleifs until the last minute, that soft and easy to use segwit adoption he thought was true to him.. wasnt..
reality showed that it ended up needing a contentious hard activation, where unupgraded nodes would be given a stripped down version of blocks and not relayed on purpose zero-confirm segwit tx's..
and even after activation, a delay of many months until core deemed it safe to then release the wallet functionality to then make segwit transactions.. (they wanted to ensure the unupgraded nodes had enough upgraded nodes to filter the unupgraded nodes to the edges of the network. as end points. not midpoint peers)
 so they end up taking my point.. even though it must have felt like to them they were getting their head beaten to the wall before they realised it

its not about knowing everything.
its about actually giving a crap to learn things outside some scope certain people want to pigeon hole people
its about knowing bitcoin is not some self creating AI code. its made by devs
its about caring about bitcoin enough to want to learn and also review and critique those that have the power to change or add bugs into the protocol
its about not kissing ass because there are already too many sleep ass kissers, we dont need more of them

---

case-in-point
windy thinks bitcoins price is reflective of the FIAT inflation.. (facepalm)
no bitcoins market price is not about how much large money is thrown at a market

i can easily do some whale trades of large money to keep the price at the same price.. oh wait someone else is doing that most weeks (note the resistance wall of $17k in december the 21.5k wall early jan and the $23k wall those week)

bitcoins market is not dependant on all the 19m coins of circulation either

yes as a simplification bitcoin is deflationary meaning looking at the 4 year view bitcoin moves up in price and value compared to previous. as oppose to fiats inflation where every few years you get to buy LESS bread(down value) for same amount of fiat

but to suggest x=y as a exact mirror of the minutia of daily price. . nope. theres no correlation

2022 seen alot more institutional investors doing futures option on bitcoin which caused the "step down" correction pattern rather than a free market of speculation

2023 will see some stepping up but not for reasons windy heard from some other social influencer

I haven't actually caught franky1 lying, what he does is to differ from many people's opinion which seems to be some general opinions. So, not joining the believe of the crowd doesn't make him a liar. And many as possible he gives detailed analysis to support his claim.

About bitcoin surge or dip, he had always maintained that for this circle, the bitcoin window is opened between $15k to $75. With due diligence, you can see how bitcoin made a u turn after testing 15k and disappointed many that waited for $10k.
I am not saying franky is always right, but give the dude some respect, he is unique and knowledgeable.

topic title "in 2023"
topic post content "2023"


"in 2023" yet now you want to sneak out of your own timescales

also.. funny thing is all your cries for last couple years about how features activated.. seems this month you finally seen the light. and have been in a topic surprisingly saying along with a couple of your chums the exact process i was describing to you for years.

but hey. seems it took you years of crying to realise it

heck even your defenders/girlfriends blackhat & doomad are both admitting that their favoured LN is not the scaling solution and admits LN cant cope with all bitcoin utility offramps they were promoting..
and now even saying how the 2017 contentious hardfork was not about scaling (another broken promise) and all that crap.. seems they and you are quick to suddenly agree with my versions of events after all
so welcome to 2023 a fresh start

so.. like i just said in previous post
ill let time itself teach you a lesson. seems its the only way you will learn

oh
and i dont even pretend or try to know everything about everything.. thats what research is for .. TO LEARN
try it

Don't post as if you truly know EVERYTHING behind EVERYTHING. Because, as many posters have already discovered, you have always lied especially about technical discussions about Bitcoin, you have disinformed and gaslighted newbies during the Scaling Debate, everyone can see the proof in your trust-rating.

I know that what I said is debatable, but I'm merely arguing for a deflationary event followed by massive QE and a massive inflationary event when Money Printer goes BRRRRR. Bitcoin will surge, and surge like it was 2015 - 2017. If I'm wrong by 2025 - 2027 then remind me, if I'm right then ignore me.

you do not understand the reasons for the previous surges nor bothered to calculate their scales nor understand the basics of the market window of value:premium to which the PRICE pivots INBETWEEN

if you cannot even work out the value:premium window. you have no clue to then gauge how much volatility possibility the market PRICE can then have inbetween the window frame

so instead of trying to give you suggestions to then research.. which you seem to waste years ignoring until it hits you in the face.. ill leave you to let things play themselves out and let the markets teach you a lesson the hard way. all by themselves

you mention the surges of 2011-13-15-17    which range from 10x-100x
im going to say a window of 2x-10x at most

see ya next year

 

There's nothing that you can say or tell me that would remove that negative trust-rating in your profile. You brought this to yourself because you truly gaslighting people, and spread disinformation, then when it doesn't work, you start name-calling and tell lies about the person and put words in their mouths. That's franky 101. Haha.


so i done the math on which you implied your expected "big surge" to be
so i said what that "big surge" was(by doing the research and math for you):
(333->20k) because thats what you said to expect this year to be like('like it was 2015-2017')
its called maths & research.
a surge from 333->20k in 2015-2017= 60x
so yes you said expect a big surge like 2015-17
so yes you implied a surge like the 60x surge of your specified date


and now you are trying to suggest that there would be a 2011-13 style surge
(facepalm)
a $0.30 -> $1200 = 4000x
or $30 -> $1200 = 40x
a $3 -> $1200 = 400x
(depending on what part of 2011 you want to include)

seriously you are trying to play the fool but then double down and double down and double down on your absent mindedness to go even further into fantasy land then pretend you never said what you said because you didnt include the simple maths you imply, even though you still made the implication.