Wer seine Tezos an "tezoscommunity" delegiert hat, sollte in dem google sheet prüfen ob seine Adresse dort auftaucht.
Leider bekommen zählt zwar die Delegation, aber wegen des "overdelegated" bekommen diese Adressen keine Rewards.
Quote
The over-delegation problem is getting ugly. At Tezos Community, we stopped accepting new KT1 addresses for delegation way back in cycle 26. But as of today, we have 158 delegators with over 1M of new delegations made to us since then. Please check this link if you think you might control one of those KT1s:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XrhaMJLFFtH_l46uMQ41viciJInHr-JRdqPty90kkrw/edit?usp=sharing
These delegators are not receiving rewards from us - but they still count towards our staking balance. This means that we are more likely to become over-delegated despite our best efforts to mitigate the risk. I feel bad for these delegators because there is no good way to notify them of their mistake. One of the protocol improvements we need to consider is a way for a baker to stop accepting new delegators.
As many bakers become over delegated, the chain will become impacted. As a threat to decentralization, our largest bakers (TF, Polychain, and presumably Draper) will start to earn many steals. Because they bake for themselves, they have lots of bond available to pick up all the steals that the public delegation services will miss. This crisis is going to come to a head over the next 15 cycles.
What can you do to help?
If you have a roll and some technical skills, start baking for yourself.
If you have delegated with an over-delegated (or soon to be over-delegated) baker, consider switching your delegation to a baker with capacity.
If you are a large XTZ holder, consider joining a bond pool with some of your holdings to help secure and decentralize the network. Tezos Community is always looking for new bond pool participants ([email protected]).
If you are a delegation service, be mindful of your ratios. The minimum 8.25% ratio is not nearly enough with current ecosystem constraints. Delegators will need closer to 15% bond to stay out of over-delegation as we reach cycle 64 and beyond. I’m not sure what ratio MyTezosBaker.com is using, but there are already dozens of bakers listed as over capacity there.
https://www.reddit.com/r/tezos/comments/9ufhcl/tezos_we_have_a_problem/ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XrhaMJLFFtH_l46uMQ41viciJInHr-JRdqPty90kkrw/edit?usp=sharing
These delegators are not receiving rewards from us - but they still count towards our staking balance. This means that we are more likely to become over-delegated despite our best efforts to mitigate the risk. I feel bad for these delegators because there is no good way to notify them of their mistake. One of the protocol improvements we need to consider is a way for a baker to stop accepting new delegators.
As many bakers become over delegated, the chain will become impacted. As a threat to decentralization, our largest bakers (TF, Polychain, and presumably Draper) will start to earn many steals. Because they bake for themselves, they have lots of bond available to pick up all the steals that the public delegation services will miss. This crisis is going to come to a head over the next 15 cycles.
What can you do to help?
If you have a roll and some technical skills, start baking for yourself.
If you have delegated with an over-delegated (or soon to be over-delegated) baker, consider switching your delegation to a baker with capacity.
If you are a large XTZ holder, consider joining a bond pool with some of your holdings to help secure and decentralize the network. Tezos Community is always looking for new bond pool participants ([email protected]).
If you are a delegation service, be mindful of your ratios. The minimum 8.25% ratio is not nearly enough with current ecosystem constraints. Delegators will need closer to 15% bond to stay out of over-delegation as we reach cycle 64 and beyond. I’m not sure what ratio MyTezosBaker.com is using, but there are already dozens of bakers listed as over capacity there.
, man muss sowieso einen großteils de Portfolios immer einmal durchsehen 
. Aber bei den meisten Bäcker gibt's ca. 10% Fee also wären sie eigentlich selbst "dumm" wenn sie längere Serverausfälle hätten.
)
