Quickseller escrowing for himself - page 24.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2926

Merit: 2348

Quote from: Wardrick on September 07, 2015, 06:13:39 PM

Quote from: worhiper_-_ on September 07, 2015, 06:04:38 PM

Funily enough, the person that just gave a negative rating to tspacepilot is only under tomatocage in default trust. What a biased rating too. Almost makes this look like a conspiracy.

Seriously TC, trim your trust list. Roll Eyes

/jk you're free to do as you please

TC has an exclusion against me, I am not in his trust list. I'm no fool and I'm not afraid to stand up when I see wrong. It's clear that turtlehurricane and tspacepilot have teamed up and attacked QS over various different things in order to get negative trust removed for things they did. at one point they even called out for others to join in and fire more accusations against him at once. They'll have to do the same thing against me to get me removed from DT.

I can't see your rating against him. Did the Bear remove you or is it my custom trust list?

LFC_Bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 3556

Merit: 9709

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Wardrick (who is on DT) hasn't posted since mid May 2015 but returns today (after QS's negative trust report on tsp's account no longer harms him) to leave negative trust to ruin tsp again.

This is getting silly now.

worhiper_-_

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: Wardrick on September 07, 2015, 06:13:39 PM

Quote from: worhiper_-_ on September 07, 2015, 06:04:38 PM

Funily enough, the person that just gave a negative rating to tspacepilot is only under tomatocage in default trust. What a biased rating too. Almost makes this look like a conspiracy.

Seriously TC, trim your trust list. Roll Eyes

/jk you're free to do as you please

TC has an exclusion against me, I am not in his trust list. I'm no fool and I'm not afraid to stand up when I see wrong. It's clear that turtlehurricane and tspacepilot have teamed up and attacked QS over various different things in order to get negative trust removed for things they did. at one point they even called out for others to join in and fire more accusations against him at once. They'll have to do the same thing against me to get me removed from DT.

That's correct, he removed you. BadBear is the only one that keeps you in. My mistake.

BadBear also had QS in his trust list, perhaps he did so because QS was a 'scam buster'. You being in a mod's list doesn't seem justified though. Kinds seems suspicious.

Quote from: deadley on September 07, 2015, 06:15:42 PM

A guy who is not active since last may and suddenly appeared to give only negative feedback.

What a drama going on. It's really clearly showing how this system is manipulated by some high command.

hahaha

Conflic of interest much? Unless Wardrick is a justice warrior that has arisen from his grave I feel like there's something fishy here.

deadley

legendary

Activity: 2562

Merit: 1064

Quote from: worhiper_-_ on September 07, 2015, 06:04:38 PM

Funily enough, the person that just gave a negative rating to tspacepilot is only under tomatocage in default trust. What a biased rating too. Almost makes this look like a conspiracy.

Seriously TC, trim your trust list. Roll Eyes

/jk you're free to do as you please

A guy who is not active since last may and suddenly appeared to give only negative feedback.

What a drama going on. It's really clearly showing how this system is manipulated by some high command.

Wardrick

legendary

Activity: 1022

Merit: 1000

Quote from: worhiper_-_ on September 07, 2015, 06:04:38 PM

Funily enough, the person that just gave a negative rating to tspacepilot is only under tomatocage in default trust. What a biased rating too. Almost makes this look like a conspiracy.

Seriously TC, trim your trust list. Roll Eyes

/jk you're free to do as you please

TC has an exclusion against me, I am not in his trust list. I'm no fool and I'm not afraid to stand up when I see wrong. It's clear that turtlehurricane and tspacepilot have teamed up and attacked QS over various different things in order to get negative trust removed for things they did. at one point they even called out for others to join in and fire more accusations against him at once. They'll have to do the same thing against me to get me removed from DT.

worhiper_-_

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Funily enough, the person that just gave a negative rating to tspacepilot is only under tomatocage in default trust. What a biased rating too. Almost makes this look like a conspiracy.

Seriously TC, trim your trust list. Roll Eyes

/jk you're free to do as you please

alani123

legendary

Activity: 2422

Merit: 1451

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Despite the fact that QS is out of default, most of the people he had sent negative trust ratings to still have a red rating as he wasn't the only one to go after them.

The list of people with a non-negative overall trust score while they have a negative rating from qs is smaller than the total.

http://pastebin.com/w4ex68rN part1
http://pastebin.com/a7PNVhD5 part2

The above is a somewhat accurate list of accounts with a neutral overal trust score that had received a negative trust rating from Quickseller.

tspacepilot

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1081

I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.

Quote from: tmfp on September 07, 2015, 05:20:48 PM

This whole episode is a clusterfuck which only strengthens the arguments against centralized trust, potentially creating far more opportunity for the scammers it was supposedly set up to neutralize.

I couldn't agree more. Links to relevant threads for those who may want to follow up:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/replacing-defaulttrust-914641
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/trim-or-eliminate-default-trust-1031791
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1163292

tmfp

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 1737

"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."

Quote from: tspacepilot on September 07, 2015, 04:52:55 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on September 07, 2015, 02:26:14 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quickseller is now removed from default trust completely

But now a lot of scammers that were negrated by qS wont have red marks.

Could you say who they are? If it's actually clear that they are scammers, surely one of the other default-trusters will be happy to mark them.

If it's not so clear that they are scammers, perhaps they ought to be offered the benefit of the doubt given QS' shoot first, rationalize later modus operandi.

It's quite easy to see who they are, just look at Quickseller's sent negative feedback and you'll find them. Loads of them.
A quick look thru the list confirms that the vast majority of her 'policing/scam busting' involved marking operators of ponzi type games in the Investor Games section, and collateral free newbie would be borrowers in the Lending section.
Hardly master criminals.
Seeing as QS appears to have been operating with Tomatocage's vicarious blessing, I'd suggest that TC should find time to look thru this loooong list and, should he find situations where a serious scammer may be getting off a legitimate hook, that he reinforce QS's now impotent neg trust with some of his own red stuff.

This whole episode is a clusterfuck which only strengthens the arguments against centralized trust, potentially creating far more opportunity for the scammers it was supposedly set up to neutralize.

tspacepilot

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1081

I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on September 07, 2015, 04:55:27 PM

Quote from: tspacepilot on September 07, 2015, 04:52:55 PM

Could you say who they are?

I didn't mean you... if thats what you're asking.

Just noob loan spammers that need to be swatted.

I didn't necessarily take it that way, I meant my comment quite directly: if someone lists them and they're clearly scammers, surely someone else on the standard trust list will mark them. If it's not so clear, maybe they've been unfairly repped, as was QS' wont.

jonald_fyookball

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1008

Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

Quote from: tspacepilot on September 07, 2015, 04:52:55 PM

Could you say who they are?

I didn't mean you... if thats what you're asking.

Just noob loan spammers that need to be swatted.

But yeah, its not acceptable to escrow for one's self, I think... even if there was no fees involved,
because its representing one as a third neutral party when that is not the case.

tspacepilot

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1081

I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on September 07, 2015, 02:26:14 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quickseller is now removed from default trust completely

But now a lot of scammers that were negrated by qS wont have red marks.

Could you say who they are? If it's actually clear that they are scammers, surely one of the other default-trusters will be happy to mark them.

If it's not so clear that they are scammers, perhaps they ought to be offered the benefit of the doubt given QS' shoot first, rationalize later modus operandi.

Quote from: Quickseller on September 07, 2015, 03:38:05 AM

Do you think it is fair that I should have to risk my money on the potential that someone else will run away while acting as escrow, when I have built up my own reputation to a level in which others are willing to risk their money on me, if I want to protect my own identity? This is not unheard of and has happened before. If you think this is fair, then why don't you repay shdvb the $400 that was stolen from him by maidak, the $5,000 that was stolen fromandresmm91, and the $10,000 that he apparently stole from someone on OTC? Maidak was previously one of the most reputable people on the forum until it was revealed that he stole all this money.

There is no reason why I should have to risk my money like that just so I can protect my privacy.

^^^He believes that his "contribution" makes him above the rules that the rest of us mortals are supposed to abide by. If we were all "scambusters" like quickseller, then we'd be free to interpret ethical principals to our own advantage too.

worhiper_-_

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: Tomatocage on September 07, 2015, 01:55:14 PM

I guess you're all just waiting on me now. In light of the evidence that's been presented here, I think it would be prudent at this time to remove QS from my Trust list until the issues can be sorted.

Tomatocage, this isn't the first time you remove Quickseller from your trust list. Even if the issues are resolved, do you think there's good reason to add him back in default trust? He just keeps getting involved in controversial stories.

jonald_fyookball

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1008

Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quickseller is now removed from default trust completely

But now a lot of scammers that were negrated by qS wont have red marks.

That's why its important for at least 2-3 DF peeps to do it, because sometimes
people lose the DF.

Not sure why QS wanted to escrow for himself. Bad decision I guess.

EcuaMobi

legendary

Activity: 1862

Merit: 1469

Quote from: Patejl on September 07, 2015, 02:11:11 PM

I dont see the negative rating you claim from dooglus

I didn't mean he left a negative rating, I meant he negated QS on the DT as in "~Quickseller" shown as "~~Quickseller~~"

Quote from: Patejl on September 07, 2015, 02:11:11 PM

and by the way the removal won't mean any change in his trust score right?

No, it doesn't. It just means QS' feedback is shown as untrusted by default.

Quote from: Patejl on September 07, 2015, 02:11:11 PM

And btw TC hasn't yet taken out QS from his trust list AFAIK.

He doesn't appear on either TC's or BadBears's list on my side (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;full), probably there's some cache.

Patejl

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

You have eyes but can see Mt. Tai?!

Quote from: EcuaMobi on September 07, 2015, 02:07:54 PM

Quote from: Patejl on September 07, 2015, 02:00:34 PM

Lastly I had a question, does you removing QS from defaulttrust mean he is kicked out of DF altogether or will he just drop to a lower Trust level?

At the moment both TC and BadBear removed QS from the DT and dooglus has him negated. As a result he has '-1' on level 2 and therefore can't be on any other level, regardless of how many people from DT levels 2+ add him.
If a single person from level 1 adds him then he'd be back on level 2 as I've seen '0' is enough to be there (unless that logic changed recently).

I dont see the negative rating you claim from dooglus, and by the way the removal won't mean any change in his trust score right?
And btw TC hasn't yet taken out QS from his trust list AFAIK.

EcuaMobi

legendary

Activity: 1862

Merit: 1469

Quote from: Patejl on September 07, 2015, 02:00:34 PM

Lastly I had a question, does you removing QS from defaulttrust mean he is kicked out of DF altogether or will he just drop to a lower Trust level?

At the moment both TC and BadBear removed QS from the DT and dooglus has him negated. As a result he has '-1' on level 2 and therefore can't be on any other level, regardless of how many people from DT levels 2+ add him.
If a single person from level 1 adds him then he'd be back on level 2 as I've seen '0' is enough to be there (unless that logic changed recently).

Patejl

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

You have eyes but can see Mt. Tai?!

Quote

I guess you're all just waiting on me now

Don't know about the others but I sure was

Quote

In light of the evidence that's been presented here, I think it would be prudent at this time to remove QS from my Trust list until the issues can be sorted.

BTW I heard you removed QS from your trust list some time ago, but what made you put him back in, yup he does awesome scam-busting, that might be a reason, but if so, why remove him in the first place?
Lastly I had a question, does you removing QS from defaulttrust mean he is kicked out of DF altogether or will he just drop to a lower Trust level?

Tomatocage

legendary

Activity: 1554

Merit: 1222

brb keeping up with the Kardashians

I guess you're all just waiting on me now. In light of the evidence that's been presented here, I think it would be prudent at this time to remove QS from my Trust list until the issues can be sorted.

dooglus

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1333

Quote from: deadley on September 07, 2015, 11:51:42 AM

Click Trust then trust setting then scroll down and Hierarchical view.

You will see who added whom.

Got it. Thanks.

Topic: Quickseller escrowing for himself - page 24. (Read 33647 times)