How about you tell them about your $500 mycash paypal card that effectively triggered my paypal to get banned for the only reason I could think off the top of my head being the fact that you used stolen cards to push out those mycash cards hence why you were selling them for a $100 discount if I remember correctly. An then telling me that you assured me they were safe.
If anyone was scamming it was you bro an after tossing my name in the dirt when my paypal gets a ban hammer I walked away.
Topic: ===►Maidak scammed me 400$ BTC,this time is for sure===► (Read 18749 times)
I didnt check this thread earlier and today I see so many replies.
Maidak I dont know your story but the fact is you scammed my 1.707 BTC many years ago.
Plus,I didnt get banned on sythe for selling runescape gold,my account is still active.
Still, PAY ME BACK THE BTC !
Maidak I dont know your story but the fact is you scammed my 1.707 BTC many years ago.
Plus,I didnt get banned on sythe for selling runescape gold,my account is still active.
Still, PAY ME BACK THE BTC !
What happened::Last sunday he told me to send 400$ BTC to him then later in 1 hr he pay me 450$ in BTC ,but then later claimed to be the next day pay me.BUt now several days passed,I let him pay me either btc or paypal,he get online and then replied me on skype but stil dont pay me.
Scammers Profile Link:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/maidak-35312
Reference Link:n/a
Amount Scammed: 400$ BTC aka 1.707BTC
Payment Method:BTC
Proof of Payment:
http://block.oklink.com/tx/992dd247771efc0e9a3c489de300c8d648095dc05fa6f1bd62cb9c689831efb1
PM/Chat Logs:
Additional Notes: n\a
Scammers Profile Link:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/maidak-35312
Reference Link:n/a
Amount Scammed: 400$ BTC aka 1.707BTC
Payment Method:BTC
Proof of Payment:
http://block.oklink.com/tx/992dd247771efc0e9a3c489de300c8d648095dc05fa6f1bd62cb9c689831efb1
PM/Chat Logs:
Additional Notes: n\a
Contacted this dude multiple times you know backstory here a little bit since the slander is at this point becoming some player hating bulls*** His $400 was lost for starters because from what I remember it was some paypal mycash card which inevitably got banned because as you know it that was a really easy way to ''wash'' money. I was told these were safely purchased users just wanted anon purchases an I acted as a proxy for that purpose.
Honestly I try to avoid this childish confrontation but you guys really think i would of thrown away a multi million dollar name that escrowed on this website alone well over 10million USD and we're talking back from 2013 onward? Oh an get a ban on the sythe.org forums as a reputable buyer and seller effective middleman in another china dominant market which was the purchase an sale of Runescape gold as it would?
To be honest I helped push bitcoin into China and accelerate the FUCK out of this currency you guys are using today trading at values we only LOL'd about on this forums. I've contacted and paid everyone back and if theres anyone missing I didnt pay which I'm 100% on this because the only other person was Frankie and tbh I've called and talked w/ this person over the phone multiple times. Honestly shortly after my reputation being shit on and then losing the love of my life. I turned to drugs I didn't look back at this currency which saved my business mmoclub.com from completely going under when the users above Paypal MYCASH flagged the shit out of all my paypals and then locked me out of 95% of my entire payment network.
Honestly this dude can suck my ballz he's rude as hell and I was better than him at offering you tools who want to do peer2peer trading and he didnt like the competition. Yet you sheep just wanna have something fun to talk about because none of you care to actually educate yourselves and I dont know maybe realize ya'll are going to lose the whole point of bitcoins purpose I'm seeing it happen time, time and time again. The funniest thing is your still letting these exchanges take your cryptocurrency right from your dumb ape dipshit hands due to the gap between the ones who get this space on a level very few understand yet it comes to me like common sense.
Hey SHVBD why not just admit you couldn't make no profit cuz i had this market so tightly woven and close because of my method was legit and I did this for fun. You wanted a living here well you got it buddy. Its okay though I forgive you and I hope you profited tremendous amounts off of the ones you were hedging on in this forums. You know the only reason i'm even giving a shit about this original name of mine is because i'm completely loaded filthy stinking rich on a level you guys will never be at. An this name is tied to my real identity which I also openly gave out and to be honest I only came back to help educate the MASSES that barely even look at this forums anymore.
I would like to give an amazing shoutout to those in this forums who mentored me, gave me the knowledge needed to develop into the entrepreneur/visionary I am today. One who still looks at that bitcoin white paper from time to time and doesn't try to stray to far from that abstract view which was brainstormed and deployed successfully working as intended I've pointed so many people in the right direction for this space to grow. Its a good thing I only blow up like this once in a while I will admit I'm starting to feel slightly autist after blabbering about this but i'm beyond the point of watching a reputation that went farther then anyone ive ever seen go in this forums & beyond.
░░░░░▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░
░░░░░█░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▀▀▄░░░░
░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒░░█░░░
░░░█░░░░░░▄██▀▄▄░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░█░░
░▄▀▒▄▄▄▒░█▀▀▀▀▄▄█░░░██▄▄█░░░░█░
█░▒█▒▄░▀▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒░█
█░▒█░█▀▄▄░░░░░█▀░░░░▀▄░░▄▀▀▀▄▒█
░█░▀▄░█▄░█▀▄▄░▀░▀▀░▄▄▀░░░░█░░█░
░░█░░░▀▄▀█▄▄░█▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▀▀█▀██░█░░
░░░█░░░░██░░▀█▄▄▄█▄▄█▄████░█░░░
░░░░█░░░░▀▀▄░█░░░█░█▀██████░█░░
░░░░░▀▄░░░░░▀▀▄▄▄█▄█▄█▄█▄▀░░█░░
░░░░░░░▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░█░░
Well now that we know you're selling a Twitter account, all those neg feedbacks aren't exactly as relevant as if you were selling your BCT account...
I have said before that this name will never be sold and this name is associated with my real identity. Maybe an accident happened to me but I have always tried to be honest and will do my best, to be honest in the future. The negative feedback you see still bothers me today, I've been the victim of some bad things but I've tried my best to stay transparent, because I believe everything will be judged one day.
Well now that we know you're selling a Twitter account, all those neg feedbacks aren't exactly as relevant as if you were selling your BCT account...
Has everyone been made whole?
They would be shvbd refuses to change his feedback because I was a competitor in the past to him as far as the crypto to fiat trading goes.
Maidak is selling their account now. Has everyone been made whole? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/this-account-is-for-sale-twitter-5324236 https://web.archive.org/web/20210407205142/https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/this-account-is-for-sale-twitter-5324236
HI I just got to read this a few years later and Pmed you just now @maidak.
HAve you lost a good supplier of bitcoin miners?I have heard that Firedcat in China is lost.
HAve you lost a good supplier of bitcoin miners?I have heard that Firedcat in China is lost.
Wow... seldom to hear something like that happening. Maybe labcoin, activemining and and and can step forward also please? 
Yeah it's rare but I will be sure everyone is paid back. Long story short I personally hit a rock bottom point in my life and never intended to taint the online status that took me several years to build. Shvbd if you end up reading this send me a PM with contact information. Wow, that's amazing to hear.
I have never seen anyone that has came up with the funds and the balls to repay someone after all these years. You are truly the first to do this, and thank you for making the community better here at bitcointalk.
shdvb let us know when you are repaid please
Hopefully this ends well for everyone. Wow... seldom to hear something like that happening. Maybe labcoin, activemining and and and can step forward also please?
yeah wasn't scamming anyone.. trolls.
Wow... seldom to hear something like that happening. Maybe labcoin, activemining and and and can step forward also please?
I hate to revive a dead thread but I figured I would update everyone it looks like derrik goon has really gone MIA. The phone number I had for him stopped working a while ago and if you call his google voice number it just rings and rings.
I suspect that he probably got new phone number(s), and changed(?) his google voice number to forward to a number that he no longer uses. This is not uncommon behavior for deadbeat debtors. Maidak had opened several threads with business proposals that involved him potentially being entrusted with very large amounts of other people's money all not long before he was called out on being a scammer, so there is little doubt in my mind that that he was planning a long con exit scam.
MAIDAK PAID ME BACK IN FULL ABOUT FIVE MINUTES AGO
I have been talking to him and he wants to pay all of his debts.
https://insight.bitpay.com/tx/a624c3e600d21e719cec435a9a64c62b3e897422dd821b3e5106500e425b19e2
The transaction where he gave me 0.14 btc
Looks like he has at least 0.26 btc to pay back others
I hate to revive a dead thread but I figured I would update everyone it looks like derrik goon has really gone MIA. The phone number I had for him stopped working a while ago and if you call his google voice number it just rings and rings.
I suspect that he probably got new phone number(s), and changed(?) his google voice number to forward to a number that he no longer uses. This is not uncommon behavior for deadbeat debtors. Maidak had opened several threads with business proposals that involved him potentially being entrusted with very large amounts of other people's money all not long before he was called out on being a scammer, so there is little doubt in my mind that that he was planning a long con exit scam.
I hate to revive a dead thread but I figured I would update everyone it looks like derrik goon has really gone MIA. The phone number I had for him stopped working a while ago and if you call his google voice number it just rings and rings.
According to
http://odrc.drc.ohio.gov/OffenderSearch/Search.aspx
and
https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/
he is not in federal prison or jail in ohio,
however he did deactivate his facebook within the last few days which is why I am posting this. he reactived and I messaged him and he seems to want to pay back his debts and he even paid me back in monetary terms,
I was keeping in touch with him kinda since he owes me 1 BTC (but really like $250 at the time he scammed it)
If anyone as his address I would love to write him!!!
According to
http://odrc.drc.ohio.gov/OffenderSearch/Search.aspx
and
https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/
he is not in federal prison or jail in ohio,
I was keeping in touch with him kinda since he owes me 1 BTC (but really like $250 at the time he scammed it)
If anyone as his address I would love to write him!!!
No one bothered to say that I sent Maidak almost 4k and it took him around 2-3weeks ish to deliver the BTC. But after I made a scam accusation he payed me back pretty quickly BUT one month before this topic was made, sometime in early may, I sent him 250$ and he was supposed to send me 1 BTC but he never did. I never bothered to say anything on the forum because I figured if he didnt run with 4k why would he with 250. But he did.
It looked like he filled up his debts by asking for debts from other users. Like sending coins or funds from "his partners". Though those partners then had the same problem. Running after their money.
I really don't know how he could allow his financial problems intervene with his business. That is not acceptabled but his status let it run for some time.
Because it appears that his business was scamtastic. When someone bought 4k worth of BTC from him, he didn't actually have 4k worth of BTC, he took the 4k, and held onto it until he could buy enough BTC to pay the original person, hopefully for less than 4k.
Like the scammers who just borrowed from one person to pay back another loan, it works great until people stop lending you money and playing along, and then they just run away with whatever they are left holding at the end.
No one bothered to say that I sent Maidak almost 4k and it took him around 2-3weeks ish to deliver the BTC. But after I made a scam accusation he payed me back pretty quickly BUT one month before this topic was made, sometime in early may, I sent him 250$ and he was supposed to send me 1 BTC but he never did. I never bothered to say anything on the forum because I figured if he didnt run with 4k why would he with 250. But he did.
It looked like he filled up his debts by asking for debts from other users. Like sending coins or funds from "his partners". Though those partners then had the same problem. Running after their money.
I really don't know how he could allow his financial problems intervene with his business. That is not acceptabled but his status let it run for some time.
No one bothered to say that I sent Maidak almost 4k and it took him around 2-3weeks ish to deliver the BTC. But after I made a scam accusation he payed me back pretty quickly BUT one month before this topic was made, sometime in early may, I sent him 250$ and he was supposed to send me 1 BTC but he never did. I never bothered to say anything on the forum because I figured if he didnt run with 4k why would he with 250. But he did.
What kind of thing do you have with me and weakening the trust system?
I suggest stopping that stereotyped thinking and reading my posts again; if you still don't understand what I'm saying, I'll be happy to explain to you what I'm talking about. And what sarcasm is, too.
I suggest stopping that stereotyped thinking and reading my posts again; if you still don't understand what I'm saying, I'll be happy to explain to you what I'm talking about. And what sarcasm is, too.
What I completely dislike in this forum is when everyone - especially those on the default trust list - jump in to leave negative feedback for deals they have absolutely nothing to do with.
In my opinion, this is also some kind of abuse of power. I don't want to attack anyone here; I just want to leave my opinion.
The only ones leaving negative feedback here should be those who were involved in the trades, and no one else. There is no need for some sort of altruistic Samaritans jumping in on any situation possible.
This makes the reputation system flawed, misleading and a direct invitation for abuse. Actually, there should be an option to hide the trust data of any user, and it should be hidden by default.
Also, the default list should not exist. There should be some other way to define if a user's rating matters or not.
In my opinion, this is also some kind of abuse of power. I don't want to attack anyone here; I just want to leave my opinion.
The only ones leaving negative feedback here should be those who were involved in the trades, and no one else. There is no need for some sort of altruistic Samaritans jumping in on any situation possible.
This makes the reputation system flawed, misleading and a direct invitation for abuse. Actually, there should be an option to hide the trust data of any user, and it should be hidden by default.
Also, the default list should not exist. There should be some other way to define if a user's rating matters or not.
Maidak? I'm actually surprised to read another forum user claiming the same ridiculous opinion that maidak, a legendary scammer on bitcointalk that scammed k of thousands USD should have no red trust rating, no zero trust rating but instead a nice green trust rating.
Well, i wonder if you thought that through. If you did and you still demanded that then i wonder what kind of person you are. You would help scammers all the way to proceed scamming it seems.
I will assume that you did NOT think this through.
Well, one thing I obviously did not think through might be the fact that if only those who were involved in the trades gave negative feedback, his overall feedback would still be green, giving a wrong impression to potential trade partners. hilariousandco pointet that out already, I think.
Nevertheless the system, as it is, leaves margin for errors and abuse (who is to decide whom to trust, whom to mark as scammer etc?), but I think at the end of the day, there is no such thing as a perfect implementation of a trust system, and best which can be done is to make it as good as possible and keep good track of who is being trusted.
What I completely dislike in this forum is when everyone - especially those on the default trust list - jump in to leave negative feedback for deals they have absolutely nothing to do with.
In my opinion, this is also some kind of abuse of power. I don't want to attack anyone here; I just want to leave my opinion.
The only ones leaving negative feedback here should be those who were involved in the trades, and no one else. There is no need for some sort of altruistic Samaritans jumping in on any situation possible.
This makes the reputation system flawed, misleading and a direct invitation for abuse. Actually, there should be an option to hide the trust data of any user, and it should be hidden by default.
Also, the default list should not exist. There should be some other way to define if a user's rating matters or not.
In my opinion, this is also some kind of abuse of power. I don't want to attack anyone here; I just want to leave my opinion.
The only ones leaving negative feedback here should be those who were involved in the trades, and no one else. There is no need for some sort of altruistic Samaritans jumping in on any situation possible.
This makes the reputation system flawed, misleading and a direct invitation for abuse. Actually, there should be an option to hide the trust data of any user, and it should be hidden by default.
Also, the default list should not exist. There should be some other way to define if a user's rating matters or not.
I love it when newbies chime in with their opinion. It's adorable.
Maybe that is just how people who argue for weaknesses in the trust system think
What I completely dislike in this forum is when everyone - especially those on the default trust list - jump in to leave negative feedback for deals they have absolutely nothing to do with.
In my opinion, this is also some kind of abuse of power. I don't want to attack anyone here; I just want to leave my opinion.
The only ones leaving negative feedback here should be those who were involved in the trades, and no one else. There is no need for some sort of altruistic Samaritans jumping in on any situation possible.
This makes the reputation system flawed, misleading and a direct invitation for abuse. Actually, there should be an option to hide the trust data of any user, and it should be hidden by default.
Also, the default list should not exist. There should be some other way to define if a user's rating matters or not.
In my opinion, this is also some kind of abuse of power. I don't want to attack anyone here; I just want to leave my opinion.
The only ones leaving negative feedback here should be those who were involved in the trades, and no one else. There is no need for some sort of altruistic Samaritans jumping in on any situation possible.
This makes the reputation system flawed, misleading and a direct invitation for abuse. Actually, there should be an option to hide the trust data of any user, and it should be hidden by default.
Also, the default list should not exist. There should be some other way to define if a user's rating matters or not.
Maidak? I'm actually surprised to read another forum user claiming the same ridiculous opinion that maidak, a legendary scammer on bitcointalk that scammed k of thousands USD should have no red trust rating, no zero trust rating but instead a nice green trust rating.
Well, i wonder if you thought that through. If you did and you still demanded that then i wonder what kind of person you are. You would help scammers all the way to proceed scamming it seems.
I will assume that you did NOT think this through.
Well, one thing I obviously did not think through might be the fact that if only those who were involved in the trades gave negative feedback, his overall feedback would still be green, giving a wrong impression to potential trade partners. hilariousandco pointet that out already, I think.
Nevertheless the system, as it is, leaves margin for errors and abuse (who is to decide whom to trust, whom to mark as scammer etc?), but I think at the end of the day, there is no such thing as a perfect implementation of a trust system, and best which can be done is to make it as good as possible and keep good track of who is being trusted.
What I completely dislike in this forum is when everyone - especially those on the default trust list - jump in to leave negative feedback for deals they have absolutely nothing to do with.
In my opinion, this is also some kind of abuse of power. I don't want to attack anyone here; I just want to leave my opinion.
The only ones leaving negative feedback here should be those who were involved in the trades, and no one else. There is no need for some sort of altruistic Samaritans jumping in on any situation possible.
This makes the reputation system flawed, misleading and a direct invitation for abuse. Actually, there should be an option to hide the trust data of any user, and it should be hidden by default.
Also, the default list should not exist. There should be some other way to define if a user's rating matters or not.
In my opinion, this is also some kind of abuse of power. I don't want to attack anyone here; I just want to leave my opinion.
The only ones leaving negative feedback here should be those who were involved in the trades, and no one else. There is no need for some sort of altruistic Samaritans jumping in on any situation possible.
This makes the reputation system flawed, misleading and a direct invitation for abuse. Actually, there should be an option to hide the trust data of any user, and it should be hidden by default.
Also, the default list should not exist. There should be some other way to define if a user's rating matters or not.
I love it when newbies chime in with their opinion. It's adorable.
Great that you can overthink your opinion. It shows grandeur to be able to do so. Many are not capable of that.
Saying that... you are right, the trust system surely is not perfect. But till now i did not see a proposal that would work better. There are proposals that would be a better system but it would not work because it would need work by every member. And that work surely won't be done.
Jump to: