Pages:
Author

Topic: Quickseller escrowing for himself - page 5. (Read 33609 times)

legendary
Activity: 3626
Merit: 2209
💲🏎️💨🚓
September 14, 2015, 02:18:59 AM
This whole thing is sort of sad really. At the end of the day, I would still trade with QS and would even have no issues sending first. He did a good job busting scams etc... I just do not get why he did the self escrow stuff  Undecided. While the self escrow thing was shady - not really sure it was a "scam" - more in the grey area.

When negative feedback / trust is given to a day old newbie who wants to buy BitCoin via PayPal with the message "scammer" and "use escrow" and similar threatening language in itself, but to add "I will remove if OP uses escrow" ... and wouldn't you know it, the person who left the negative feedback / trust is self escrowing.

So, if the newbie then uses escrow, they are charged an escrow fee on top of the 5% - 25% over preev.com spot price (and people say newbies are scammers?), so the escrow can rake in a few extra cents per transaction.

As these escrow scammers say themselves, "Scammers will scam for pennies!"

I've said in other post threads, I can see zombie newbies rising from the dead with not day old activity but weeks or months of activity time up and I can't envision anyone on the DT giving out negative trust for historical suspicion of scammer activity for a newbie wanting to use PayPal (yes, yes, PayPal is reversible, let's not forget people can scam that way).

Quickseller seems determined to take down Tomatocage with him/her, but in the long run they've both created a long term problem I don't think many people yet realise.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
September 13, 2015, 02:26:44 PM
@TBZ - I am sorry if my actions are something that you do not approve of. I repeat this same statement to anyone else who does not approve of my actions. I am not going to repeat my arguments as to why I believe that escrowing for yourself is okay because I have echo'ed them many times across multiple threads and for the most part they have mostly been ignored. There have also been no logical and/or factual arguments that counter any of my arguments, but rather nothing but trolls, scammers and shit posters who in no way address my arguments.

At the end of the day, what I did was a result of my witnessing of similar activity by one of the most, if not the most trusted and respected member of the community doing what was essentially the exact same thing out in the open and without consequence. I had posted in the thread where this was happening out in the open multiple times, so it is difficult to say that I was unaware of the situation.

If there are no rules regarding how people can and cannot conduct their own business, then how can you argue that someone who is conducting business in similar ways to one of the most trusted people in the community in the open months after he had done so is in the wrong?

Escrowing for yourself isn't okay because by definition an escrow is a neutral third party. 
It's been logically explained to you by numerous people.  TC isn't right for doing it either
but he's not going on trying to justify it. 

The more you argue it, the more I'm tempted to leave negative feedback.  I haven't done so thus
far because I thought the offense was minor and DT removal was good enough, but your attitude
makes me not trust your judgement.

Okay, if you and/or the community thinks that self escrowing is not okay, then why was there no outcry when it happened months ago? New users should know that asking for a loan without collateral is not okay because a) there is a sticky warning advising not to request such loans and b) because it happens often and the public result is that the new users receive negative ratings. On the other hand, escrowing for ones self happens out in the open with zero public outcry (there is more then one person engaging in this practice, however I am not going to call anyone out on this for obvious reasons).

Furthermore, if the appropriate disclosures are made (as I have since done), then whose business is it to say that others are not able to engage in a consensual transaction, that in reality, is going to overwhelmingly result in all parties involved saying they are happy with the transaction. This is exactly what a free market is, the ability for market participants to be able to make informed decisions as to how and what they wish to trade.


It's not consensual when there is deception involved.  no one cares when self escrowing is disclosed, but they do when it's not, which is what you've been doing.  

Pretty simple, dude.

Since I don't think you are stupid, I can only conclude you're unable to stop yourself from trying to rationalize your behavior and you're unwilling to just admit you're not right.

Let me give you an analogy and you can try to explain how your situation is any different.

Alice owns a small private airplane and hires Bob, an airplane engine mechanic to perform maintenance.
Afterward, Alice decides it would be prudent to have a second mechanic just double check the engine.  She hired Charlie, but it's really Bob who has a disguise and a fake mustache.  

Alice flies her plane, it works fine, no one gets hurt.  Bob points to this fact to rationalize his behavior.  
But his friend David is giving him flak for the deception, so Bob decides not to cash the second check made to Charlie.  Now he really feels good because no one got hurt and he never double charged Alice.

But what he's missing is that he deceived Alice, deprived her of the benefit of lower risk, and justified it all by pointing that he had done the job correctly.  Using insanely twisted logic, he says: "well if I didn't know what I was doing, the plane would have gone down, but that would have happened the same if she didn't hire a second mechanic to double check, or if I did the checking myself."

so, how is what you did any different than "Bob"?

Still waiting for QS to answer this.

staff
Activity: 3374
Merit: 6530
Just writing some code
September 13, 2015, 10:36:06 AM
This whole thing is sort of sad really. At the end of the day, I would still trade with QS and would even have no issues sending first. He did a good job busting scams etc... I just do not get why he did the self escrow stuff  Undecided. While the self escrow thing was shady - not really sure it was a "scam" - more in the grey area.


What about the 'fake' 3 days ban from the forum? Only an opinion and obviously you are free to don't reply to my question.

I do not get the fake ban, but did it really affect anything? Maybe he thought a couple day break would clear his thoughts, and slow down the pitchforks? I think the only thing he did bad was the self-escrow thing.
I think he said at some point in this thread that he took the fake ban in order to allow his alt, panthers52, to attempt to respond to tsp as if there were other people who supported qs.
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042
#Free market
September 13, 2015, 10:21:23 AM
This whole thing is sort of sad really. At the end of the day, I would still trade with QS and would even have no issues sending first. He did a good job busting scams etc... I just do not get why he did the self escrow stuff  Undecided. While the self escrow thing was shady - not really sure it was a "scam" - more in the grey area.


What about the 'fake' 3 days ban from the forum? Only an opinion and obviously you are free to don't reply to my question.

I do not get the fake ban, but did it really affect anything? Maybe he thought a couple day break would clear his thoughts, and slow down the pitchforks? I think the only thing he did bad was the self-escrow thing.

He created an account called Quickseller - Banned(or something similar) to post in this thread during is fake ban period.

I think that's why he got caught, because people started to think that the admins were protecting him by not banning him again for ban evasion, so they had no choice other than deny that QS has been banned

Yes, this is the post :


I believe I am allowed to post in scam accusations threads that have to do with me.

Tspacepilot, you are a scammer and a troll. You are an idiot for thinking you can find my unknown alts. You are an asshole and are wrong. I am looking forward to when karma catches up to you.

I can PGP sign this message if necessary. This is the only newbie account of mine that posted on this thread.

Edit:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

This is to confirm that I personally authored the post located at https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/quickseller-escrowing-for-himself-1171059 in a thread created by the troll tspacepilot

QS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEVAwUBVep6KFMt0pDwvrUWAQisBgf8CicPaGI+zoBXfZExgpc/ti/e0c9xqVmL
dFUTF63MxrH1In7uTxAnBRkdVyvMo7kRGa+/68kIB1gVsi6RVvAWD3OyImLyLKZe
XLF2pIvZgM90BXupRgQBrxwf79nL5ydqqL7MYekfcpdusbebJn1/Pe2bRAgo5EHv
HVSOjUvYFQsmb7KdcwwCl59PHTEnIaY7OMkvU8CDcaDlo1gIKwKfOAlrTKRcGo64
pfZR3f6z9hpU09KH01XFoaghDhq9pLj9OqlC9+mYVQkb1Jg1QQSNOy/4J6vocfB3
WbI1ErWatlc9uZBm/odko5S6rud+qE+cwJIGuUOUuOOvQwtbsgZhag==
=9UNQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

member
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
Tipsters Championship www.DirectBet.eu/Competition
September 13, 2015, 10:19:34 AM
This whole thing is sort of sad really. At the end of the day, I would still trade with QS and would even have no issues sending first. He did a good job busting scams etc... I just do not get why he did the self escrow stuff  Undecided. While the self escrow thing was shady - not really sure it was a "scam" - more in the grey area.


What about the 'fake' 3 days ban from the forum? Only an opinion and obviously you are free to don't reply to my question.

I do not get the fake ban, but did it really affect anything? Maybe he thought a couple day break would clear his thoughts, and slow down the pitchforks? I think the only thing he did bad was the self-escrow thing.

He created an account called Quickseller - Banned(or something similar) to post in this thread during is fake ban period.

I think that's why he got caught, because people started to think that the admins were protecting him by not banning him again for ban evasion, so they had no choice other than deny that QS has been banned
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042
#Free market
September 13, 2015, 10:15:49 AM
This whole thing is sort of sad really. At the end of the day, I would still trade with QS and would even have no issues sending first. He did a good job busting scams etc... I just do not get why he did the self escrow stuff  Undecided. While the self escrow thing was shady - not really sure it was a "scam" - more in the grey area.


What about the 'fake' 3 days ban from the forum? Only an opinion and obviously you are free to don't reply to my question.

I do not get the fake ban, but did it really affect anything? Maybe he thought a couple day break would clear his thoughts, and slow down the pitchforks? I think the only thing he did bad was the self-escrow thing.

At the end it didn't affect anything but only his 'reputation'. A lie is always a lie, and he lied so I don't trust a liar and I obviously agree with you (about the self-escrow thing).
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
September 13, 2015, 10:08:37 AM
This whole thing is sort of sad really. At the end of the day, I would still trade with QS and would even have no issues sending first. He did a good job busting scams etc... I just do not get why he did the self escrow stuff  Undecided. While the self escrow thing was shady - not really sure it was a "scam" - more in the grey area.


What about the 'fake' 3 days ban from the forum? Only an opinion and obviously you are free to don't reply to my question.

I do not get the fake ban, but did it really affect anything? Maybe he thought a couple day break would clear his thoughts, and slow down the pitchforks? I think the only thing he did bad was the self-escrow thing.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
September 13, 2015, 10:05:21 AM
@TBZ - I am sorry if my actions are something that you do not approve of. I repeat this same statement to anyone else who does not approve of my actions. I am not going to repeat my arguments as to why I believe that escrowing for yourself is okay because I have echo'ed them many times across multiple threads and for the most part they have mostly been ignored. There have also been no logical and/or factual arguments that counter any of my arguments, but rather nothing but trolls, scammers and shit posters who in no way address my arguments.

At the end of the day, what I did was a result of my witnessing of similar activity by one of the most, if not the most trusted and respected member of the community doing what was essentially the exact same thing out in the open and without consequence. I had posted in the thread where this was happening out in the open multiple times, so it is difficult to say that I was unaware of the situation.

If there are no rules regarding how people can and cannot conduct their own business, then how can you argue that someone who is conducting business in similar ways to one of the most trusted people in the community in the open months after he had done so is in the wrong?

Escrowing for yourself isn't okay because by definition an escrow is a neutral third party. 
It's been logically explained to you by numerous people.  TC isn't right for doing it either
but he's not going on trying to justify it. 

The more you argue it, the more I'm tempted to leave negative feedback.  I haven't done so thus
far because I thought the offense was minor and DT removal was good enough, but your attitude
makes me not trust your judgement.

Okay, if you and/or the community thinks that self escrowing is not okay, then why was there no outcry when it happened months ago? New users should know that asking for a loan without collateral is not okay because a) there is a sticky warning advising not to request such loans and b) because it happens often and the public result is that the new users receive negative ratings. On the other hand, escrowing for ones self happens out in the open with zero public outcry (there is more then one person engaging in this practice, however I am not going to call anyone out on this for obvious reasons).

Furthermore, if the appropriate disclosures are made (as I have since done), then whose business is it to say that others are not able to engage in a consensual transaction, that in reality, is going to overwhelmingly result in all parties involved saying they are happy with the transaction. This is exactly what a free market is, the ability for market participants to be able to make informed decisions as to how and what they wish to trade.


It's not consensual when there is deception involved.  no one cares when self escrowing is disclosed, but they do when it's not, which is what you've been doing.  

Pretty simple, dude.

Since I don't think you are stupid, I can only conclude you're unable to stop yourself from trying to rationalize your behavior and you're unwilling to just admit you're not right.

Let me give you an analogy and you can try to explain how your situation is any different.

Alice owns a small private airplane and hires Bob, an airplane engine mechanic to perform maintenance.
Afterward, Alice decides it would be prudent to have a second mechanic just double check the engine.  She hired Charlie, but it's really Bob who has a disguise and a fake mustache.  

Alice flies her plane, it works fine, no one gets hurt.  Bob points to this fact to rationalize his behavior.  
But his friend David is giving him flak for the deception, so Bob decides not to cash the second check made to Charlie.  Now he really feels good because no one got hurt and he never double charged Alice.

But what he's missing is that he deceived Alice, deprived her of the benefit of lower risk, and justified it all by pointing that he had done the job correctly.  Using insanely twisted logic, he says: "well if I didn't know what I was doing, the plane would have gone down, but that would have happened the same if she didn't hire a second mechanic to double check, or if I did the checking myself."

so, how is what you did any different than "Bob"?
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042
#Free market
September 13, 2015, 10:05:15 AM
This whole thing is sort of sad really. At the end of the day, I would still trade with QS and would even have no issues sending first. He did a good job busting scams etc... I just do not get why he did the self escrow stuff  Undecided. While the self escrow thing was shady - not really sure it was a "scam" - more in the grey area.


What about the 'fake' 3 days ban from the forum? Only an opinion and obviously you are free to don't reply to my question.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
September 13, 2015, 10:03:11 AM
This whole thing is sort of sad really. At the end of the day, I would still trade with QS and would even have no issues sending first. He did a good job busting scams etc... I just do not get why he did the self escrow stuff  Undecided. While the self escrow thing was shady - not really sure it was a "scam" - more in the grey area.
full member
Activity: 130
Merit: 100
Tipsters Championship www.DirectBet.eu/Competition
September 13, 2015, 09:35:50 AM
And now Quickseller has the "Warning: Trade with extreme caution!" tag in his profile.

That's was a good lesson about how quickly dig an abyss and straight jump into it. From DT and 100+ dark green reputation to red trust in few days
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
September 13, 2015, 09:14:36 AM
haahaa..sorry For Going A bit Off Topic , I am Happy to see Vod Back with Positive Trust !
I am also Following this thread from 2 hours and Find that is is really bad to deceive people on the name of Escrow.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
September 13, 2015, 09:03:35 AM
I am still in the process of my investigating but it seems quickseller and BiPolarBob are the same. I have started the accusation but I will build some evidence before making a big show of it

I know for a fact they are not the same people...
Watch out! Before you know it, you are a paid shill. Just like LaudaM and me. Grin


Wish I had known that before I asked you to escrow that windmill deal I set up. Grin
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
September 13, 2015, 08:42:28 AM
The amount of psychopaths in the bitcoin community is alarming  Cool

Greed does that to a LOT of people.   Undecided
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 1036
September 13, 2015, 08:36:09 AM
The amount of psychopaths in the bitcoin community is alarming  Cool
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1499
No I dont escrow anymore.
September 13, 2015, 08:03:40 AM
Escrowing your own trade is NOT ESCROW it just becomes a straight 1:1 transaction.
Right. And there is no reason why someone would not trust you to engage in a 1:1 transaction if they would trust you to act as escrow.
Quote
Why cant you grasp that simple concept quickseller, why should someone pay an "Escrow" fee for zero protection and zero impartiality!
A economically rational person would be willing to pay at least an amount more that is equal to the escrow fee in a 1:1 trade because this cost is no longer associated with the trade. Just because neither party trusts eachother sufficiently to send money/goods first does not change the value of which either party is willing to pay for such goods/services.


But there person you traded with did not wish to trade with you on a 1:1 basis hence their request for the a 3rd party Escrow.

They were trying to implement a safety measure should the trade go wrong so by you faking a 3rd party Escrow you circumvented the buyers wishes.
I disagree. If someone were to trust markj113 to escrow a deal for a $100 widget, then what logical reason would the same person not trust markj113 to ship the exact same $100 widget after sending the same $100 to markj113? The risk of markj113 running away with the coins is exactly the same.

I understand your argument, but I dont think its valid. Another example. Lets say I wanted to buy a coin from Mitchell for 1 BTC. Lets fruther assume I am nervous about the trade or do not trust them enough to go first. The same is true the other way around. We both argee on an escrow agent. I am willing to pay a 1% fee, but that does equal me willing to pay 1.01 BTC for the coin. I am willing to pay the fee for someone that is neutral and I can trust to look at things without bias should something go wrong. Yes, I have to trust the escrow service with at least 1 BTC. Yes, I am at risk towards the escrow. On the other hand a single bad deal can easily ruin their business. Remember redsn0w? They didnt even scam and are out of business.

Just because I would go frist in a 1 BTC deal with you, does not mean I would pay you 0.01 BTC for a biased opinion. If you are the other party and the escrow you can not be without bias. Same as BadBear can not moderate reports regarding their own posts without bias. It does not matter how good a moderator BadBear is or how honest an escrow agent you are. If you could judge an issue regarding yourself without bias you would suffer from a dissociative identity disorder. Even in that case it would still be a gamble for me which indetity is active when judging my case.

#
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 516
September 13, 2015, 06:47:32 AM
Has Quickseller provided a list of those he has escrow scammed?  I haven't seen one.

He claims he will refund anyone he scammed if they ask for a refund.   How are they supposed to know?

Please state where did he say that?
We should quote this for reference.
Even if he said something like that, we will not be able to know how many people have been scammed.
Let's say I used his escrow service.
How should I know if my customer was actually him? There might be tens of QS alts out there, nobody knows.

But HE knows so if he really wanted to do it, he would, at this point i don´t trust a word QS says and no one should.
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
September 13, 2015, 05:25:12 AM
Has Quickseller provided a list of those he has escrow scammed?  I haven't seen one.

He claims he will refund anyone he scammed if they ask for a refund.   How are they supposed to know?

Please state where did he say that?
We should quote this for reference.
Even if he said something like that, we will not be able to know how many people have been scammed.
Let's say I used his escrow service.
How should I know if my customer was actually him? There might be tens of QS alts out there, nobody knows.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
September 13, 2015, 05:14:45 AM
Has Quickseller provided a list of those he has escrow scammed?  I haven't seen one.

He claims he will refund anyone he scammed if they ask for a refund.   How are they supposed to know?
copper member
Activity: 3892
Merit: 2197
Verified awesomeness ✔
September 13, 2015, 04:48:28 AM
I am still in the process of my investigating but it seems quickseller and BiPolarBob are the same. I have started the accusation but I will build some evidence before making a big show of it

I know for a fact they are not the same people...
Watch out! Before you know it, you are a paid shill. Just like LaudaM and me. Grin
Pages:
Jump to: