Topic: Quickseller is a dangerous person to deal with - avoid - page 3. (Read 3234 times)

But are the instances observably verifiable, and if so, can they be independently observable? It's time we got to the bottom of this.

Impossible to PROVE 100% either way. Are we the true legend or just a friend, or spokesman for the true legend?  are you lauda or just laudas feltching puppet willing to back stab even theymos for your continued schemes and shared corrupt goals?

After the observable instances have been reviewed previously in this post have been thoroughly analyzed then NOBODY with any credibility here gives one fuck what a fat pig like you can or can not take seriously?

Get it now?

The credibility of your CLAIMS has been crushed by observable instances that are independently verifiable and do not require trust in ourselves. We encourage the reader to verify those instances for themselves. One should never accept anything here at face value.

Get it now?

Your diversion means nothing and is a weak tactic that we will crush at every attempt to use it. Actually it just serves as ANOTHER strength to our own argument that you have NOTHING to prevent observable instances being presented and NOTHING to discredit them. It just looks sneaky and pathetic to even try to mislead people in this way.

So am I Lauda or Lauda's pal?


I'm sorry, but I can't take seriously any posturing about credibility from a lying trolling sockpuppet. At least man up and post from your main account.

Thank you for a short-enough-to-read post though.

Okay lauda you are welcome.

This thread is an endorsement of QS because his actions are being put in the context of you and your pal lauda et al.

You don't have the credibility to raise a flag against anyone else without it coming under close scrutiny and being placed in the context of you and your friends. No double standards here any longer.

Thanks for bumping this, cryptohunter. I can't be bothered to read it but if you didn't call me fat at least once in that wall of text I'd be disappointed. I bet Quickseller is enjoying any exposure he gets for his shenanigans.

Yes but ANYONE CAN CLICK this link

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51452598

then research the ONLY people supporting you are also supporters and pals of this friend/alt of yours lauda?

Why are you NOT pushing for this far more seriously untrustworthy person to have a flag??

This is what ANYONE can verify?

You tried to cast negativity on the board warden theymos for requesting a PROVEN scammer, probable extortionist and shady escrow and blatant trust abuser  was excluded FROM A POSITION OF TRUST.

ANYONE can verify all of these things.

That looks far worse for Lauda and YOU than any of this does for QS. 

This adds lots of credibility to QS suggestion that you DO INDEED USE THESE WEAPONS  SELECTIVELY like you quite probably do your copy and past snitch bot, you fat slob.

ANYONE can see a regular pattern here with you suchmoon/lauda/scumbuster et al

The best part is you are demonstrating how corrupt you are, and now you tried to stab theymos in the back ... a few red pills were force-fed that day to plenty of people. You will do ANYTHING to keep this gang in power. However cracks a starting to open up and this will be eroded from the edges. The core will be left vulnerable very vulnerable and isolated soon.

" I hate asskissers, they are the first to stab you in the back "  -  a smart person told a friend of ours that once. Theymos just found that was the case with you. Snake.

The only acceptable way forward is a fair set of transparent rules that are applied to ALL members equally. No more selective punishment for lesser crimes than those you support your friends for suchmoon. Stop thinking people are so blind they can not see exactly what you are doing here now.

Anyone can click those links and decide for themselves. Considering that the threshold of opposing a flag is very low ("because you believe that it is at least partially false") you should have many users opposing it in your favor, if what you're saying is true.

None of my accusations are frivolous.

You are a liar and are intentionally presenting mischaracterized and inaccurate information in the OP. 

You're infamous for doing this shit over the years. Every little (or big) butthurt leads to a frivolous accusation of some sort. You seem to be unable to accept being wrong or being rejected like a properly-functioning human should.

I strongly disagree with your characterization of any of my accusations. 

In regards to the Hhampuz accusation, I believe the evidence is very solid. The existence of the loan from Darkstar_ should eliminate any reasonable doubt as to if the money was stolen or not. I believe he is being protected because of who he is associated with, not based on the merits. I believe any the "possible" explanations his friends have posted are excuses not to call him a scammer -- if Hhampuz wanted to go on the record to give some kind of explanation as to what happened, one of the "possible" explanations would perhaps be sufficient to create reasonable doubt, but he has not given any explanation. Another one of his campaigns shut down not long after the BestMixer campaign was shut down, and the owner of that site confirmed receipt of the excess money, so I don't think it is reasonable to say the alligation is so ludicrous to Hhampuz that it does not even deserve to be acknowledged. Obviously, if evidence was later found that contradicted Hhampuz's explanation, it would be clear he is a liar, and it would be more clear the money was in fact stolen from BestMixer.

If I see someone doing something they shouldn't be doing, or doing something unethical, I am not going to stay silent just because they are powerful.   

What bothers me is the fact that you frequently engage in yellow journalism when writing up your "accusations." They are usually devoid of actual substance and are presented in a way to maximize sensationalism. A prime example of this is what you just mentioned above. You have zero concrete evidence of what actually happened and are making accusations purely based on speculation.


Actually its extremely unlike that. But I'm not retelling the story for the umpteenth time.

Added Exhibit E to the OP. Might run out of alphabet at this rate.

I read a couple of reviews online, this could help with all of your issues!



Honk Honk.

I get it, you don't like that I am calling out Hhampuz for stealing from BestMixer. If Hhampuz were to be labeled a scammer (rightfully so), your earnings from your signature campaign would likely stop. I am sure you don't like actual scammers, but when calling out a scammer means you lose out on income, you are more than willing to put pressure on the person to stop calling out the scammer.

This is not unlike how you described as selling an account as "borderline evil" and subsequently tried to sell your account for money.

What am I derailing? You weird obsession with me? I don't wonder about anything other than where your hatred for the world stems from. Something is seriously wrong in your life or your chemical balance. I know you're a certifiable troll who won't let go of grudges. That's what you and QS have in common. QS sold dozens or hundreds of accounts. I sold zero. Do you begin to see the irony of your whole cause now?


Weewie. This is... I dunno what else to say... Should I bother? Something tells me the answer is "no."

I got caught up thinking I needed to defend myself but all I was really doing was feeding your trollery. Now that I realize that I won't be responding to you any further. Have a terrific day Not Cryptohunter.

You are claiming you were being ironic about saying it was evil and facilitated scamming?  is this the lauda secret agents really play?

Stop derailing. QS has legitimate concerns and has voiced them. They are very strong cases that are independently verifiable. People can make their own minds up. They don't need someone who can be demonstrated willing to allow others to be scammed for 0.3btc making up nonsense to leave them MORE open to being scammed.

STFU and stay out of debates on scamming. You are woefully open criticism based on observable instances that are independently verifiable. You wonder why you keep getting blasted by us... stop wondering!! just shut up and stop trying to protect other scammers and those that can be demonstrated to be financially REALLY HIGH RISK. You are misleading the reader and could very well be facilitating and increasing the probability of them being scammed here.

Are you blind and EVIL

the strongest observable instances we have on you are BY YOUR OWN WORDS  knowingly and willingly open to facilitating scams and acting in an EVIL manner for 0.3 btc

Now stop going off topic  

Quicksellers observable instances that demonstrate credible and verifiable evidence of financially motivated wrong doing by your pals should not be cast in doubt by a PROVEN WILLING SCAM FACILITATOR like nutildah.

That is NOT A NON EVENT.   Let people make up their own minds
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50719875

K Jr Member. If you want to leave a flag for me feel free. The only reason you quoted Vod was because you know if you didnt your post about me might be deleted for being off-topic.

Really Jr Member, if the best dirt you have on me is taking loans and a non-event from 3 years ago then you have nothing. Publish it every day. Rent out an opinion piece in Forbes. I don't give a fuck.

Have anything to say that countermands my arguments against Quickseller being trustworthy or do you want to just continue your epically tragic, attention-seeking trolling saga?

I mentioned a couple of these in the OP, Exhibit B.

---

Added Exhibit D to the OP.

From our own research on the internet under your name there does seem to be quite a lot of credibility to several instances within those claims about you. Which is far more worrying in your case than in QS's.

@nutildah most of your post is presenting one sided KNOWN associates and supporters of those the observable instances of clear undeniable wrong doing reference. That along with the FACT you are willing to facilitate scamming for 0.3BTC means the reader should totally strike or investigate VERY THOROUGHLY the misleading information you are trying to present here.

I would certainly trust QS in a financial transaction over these other 2 members.

Vod would perhaps dox you, and depending on who you are you could have far far more to worry about.

Nutildah is broke and begging for 0.02btc loans and has previously BY HIS OWN WORDS demonstrated he will certainly not mind to facilitating scams for 0.3BTC.

Imagine sending him 0.3BTC  upfront............BOOM that is likely to be the last you see of him. He may throw in a free account? if you want the account of someone like that.

If he didn't keep poking his scam facilitating nose into other peoples business, then we would not have to keep informing the reader of this background to give them opportunity to reach the optimal opinion of these matters.

As we have said before laudas own probable extortion and shady looking escrow is NOTHING TO THE PROVEN scamming we have demonstrated he is capable of before. That is iron clad evidence of the danger he represents the other instances are just what you would expect from this scum bag.

Nutildah trying to discredit this kind of warning about proven scammers is WORRYING.

Why would you not want a valid warning for newbies regarding these types of members that are directly related to financial wrongdoing nutildah?

We strongly believe the is credible and verifiable evidence to warrant a warning on most persons NUTILDAH is trying to get off the hook here.