This a thread to substantiate a warning flag on
Quickseller. I believe that if you engage in any kind of deal with Quickseller, or even as much as debate him on a forum topic, you risk being attacked via frivolous accusations with the intent to damage your reputation and your ability to conduct business on the forum. This may happen for any reason, such as the deal not going the way Quickseller expected, or no particular reason at all.
Exhibit AQuickseller was
hired then fired as a participant in a signature campaign managed by Hhampuz. Shortly after being fired he launched an unsubstantiated scam accusation against Hhampuz. Quickseller is not a victim or otherwise affected by the alleged scam, there is no proof, and it is based on the mere fact of coins being moved by Hhampuz. Despite the extremely flimsy basis Quickseller makes bold claims such as "Hhampuz has stolen the excess money from the BestMixer campaign for his own personal use". Note that he didn't use the trust system (old or new) to label Hhampuz and when called out on this he said this:
I did not say that I wanted others to tag him as a scammer. I said I believe him to be a scammer, and the reason he has not been tagged is due to tribalism.
I do think he should be tagged, but due to the trust system being broken, I don't think anyone tagging him will have any affect any anything. In lieu of tagging him, I will leave this thread open and any potential customers of his (and his current customers) can look at the evidence themselves, including the fact that many of those defending him are being paid his advertisers money by him.
Which makes me think he's seeking to damage HH's business and doesn't have an actual concern or proof of a scam, which would necessitate feedback/flag.
Exhibit BQuickseller took a
20 BTC payment from a known scammer to sue Vod, whose "crime" was to suggest that Quickseller should repay victims of his (Quickseller's)
escrow scam. Eventually Quickseller failed to sue and
claims to have returned part of the payment.
Quickseller has also repeatedly posted unfounded allegations against Vod that originated from a known shady website specializing in extorting targets of such allegations.
Exhibit CQuickseller accused Lauda of having a
pill addiction. Quickseller's conflicts with Lauda are numerous, proof of addiction is non-existent to the point where Quickseller was
claiming that Lauda's lack of denial was proof and that other users trying to dispute the frivolous accusation
were Lauda's alts.
Exhibit DQuockseller accused dooglus of
supporting a Ponzi scheme with the alleged reasons being that dooglus fixed a bug in open-source code used by a Ponzi site. The accusation was an
attempt to put pressure on dooglus (a DT1 member at the time) to exclude Vod and/or cryptodevil who both had posted negative trust ratings for Quickseller, as well as for dooglus'
role in the tspacepilot conflict (see below).
Later Quickseller accused dooglus and other users of
condoning violence just because they included a person Quickseller doesn't like (and who in Quickseller's opinion threatened him) in their trust lists. A few years later Quickseller
edited the thread to remove the accusation.
Exhibit EQuickseller used his
later-exposed alt Panthers52 to argue in his dispute against tspacepilot pretending he's someone else as can be seen from
references to himself in the 3rd person. Later Quickseller
faked a ban in an apparent attempt to give himself and/or his alts more credibility.
Exhibits F through ZMore examples of Quickseller's retaliatory destructive actions:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51462407
Flag:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=79 
