Topic: Racism is a real thing (this thread is extremely racist) - page 10. (Read 11719 times)

The Hispanic category actually upsets the apple cart, as it is not a "race," but is defined as a collection of about 800 some surnames.  Hispanics generally are mixed European and native american, but this varies wildly - all the way from pure native american to 50-75% spanish heritage.

I can't recall offhand studies of various North American Indians and IQ, but they would not be the same as the measurements of Mexican Indian tribes.  Probably.  Who knows.

Just correcting you: There is only one specie, which are the humans, but multiple races, which are for example the Caucasian race.

Difference is that two individuals from different species can't have children whereas two individuals from different races can have children but will have notable genetics differences due to their evolution in different environments.

The Hispanic category actually upsets the apple cart, as it is not a "race," but is defined as a collection of about 800 some surnames.  Hispanics generally are mixed European and native american, but this varies wildly - all the way from pure native american to 50-75% spanish heritage.

I can't recall offhand studies of various North American Indians and IQ, but they would not be the same as the measurements of Mexican Indian tribes.  Probably.  Who knows.

ohh dear ohh dear, ot very intelligent are we?

There is only 1 race the human race, those who place themselves anywhere other than equal to their fellow equals, elect to place them selves beneath the rest of us, ohh and just because some humans have tallent with the arts, and some are science genius' and some are good with their hands, DOES NOT mean they are indifferent or unequal, you choose that position with your own silly beliefs, WE ARE ALL EQUAL !!!!

Why do people deny such a obvious thing as racism (inequality of the human races)? People don't deny if someone says that one is smarter than other one. But when you apply the rule to the races this is a crime.

There was a great tv documentary that analysed the dna of english bigots. Only one was pure north european. The one that came up time and time again was mongolian. Lots of arabian too. One of the testees subsequently tried suing the show makers for ruining her purity.

Too many niggers here. To Whites: always ask questions like these when you are told we are equal:

• How many scientists are black? (there are almost no black scientists)
• Why do blacks have a lower average IQ than any other race? (they have backward genes - sad but true)
• How many things were invented by blacks? (super soaker water gun, that's all)
• Why are African counties the poorest in the world? (they are a backward society - sad but true)
• How many civilizations did blacks create? (none of them)
• Why do men (even black!) prefer white/asian/latin women over black? (no one wants its children to have blacks genes - chosen instinctively)

My hypothesis is that genes play a much more important role than race. In the image we see large amounts of people both black and white who have an iq lower than 100. However we must be sceptical. What year is this picture from? What source?

This is a bell curve showing results of studies comparing races and ethnic groups with IQ among U.S. test subjects show differences in average test scores (Reynolds et al. 1987)

However there may be bias due to people (value education, in some Asian families a bad grade is shame to the family), educational possibilities (in the US education is not free), drugs usage etc.  When we look at the number of people with an iq higher or equal to 130 this is pretty low in all races.

But, within the Asian countries there are vast differences. The average iq of South Korea is 106, Indonesia is 89 and Philippines 86. (IQ and the Wealth of Nations, 2002). That is to say, either education or genes play an enormous role. This means the Philippines (Asian) has about the same bell curve as the black curve, while the South Korean bell curve is much more similar to the asian curve.  This is why we could claim that genes play a much more important role than race.

The claim of picture four "These are not the same species" may be false, because a species is defined as the largest group of organisms (animals) where two individuals are capable of reproducing (sexual reproduction).

The other images are jokes and historical events, so no comment on those.

True, you'd also need to measure it on a regular basis during all the life of an individual.

You should find a way to define intelligence, then measure intelligence (not IQ, a good way) but then measure it like once every month or at least 5 or 6 times a year for 60 years before being able to start to make an assumption backed with scientific proofs.

Exactly, and intelligence changes throughout a person's life. So how does one measure someone's intelligence if it will only change?