Racism is a real thing (this thread is extremely racist) - page 12.

Elwar

legendary

Activity: 3598

Merit: 2386

Viva Ut Vivas

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 08:34:40 AM

Again. It's not about the colors. It's all about intelligence! Color is just a mark that helps to "categorize" a human.

Melanin does not help differentiate intelligence. It is a physiological advantage that has no disadvantages. Those with less are disadvantaged for not having as much as those with more melanin.

criptix

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1145

Quote from: valta4065 on February 03, 2016, 08:55:54 AM

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 08:34:40 AM

Quote from: Elwar on February 03, 2016, 08:26:57 AM

Melanin is a horrible differentiator to group people by. Especially since melanin levels can rise and fall which can change someone from one "category" to another.

Why not focus more on something that cannot change such as eye color? Sure you can hide your eye color but it does not change.

If you're going to be collectivist, at least be smart about it.

Again. It's not about the colors. It's all about intelligence! Color is just a mark that helps to "categorize" a human.

Well it's a poor indicator. And it's stupid to try to categorize by intelligence! How do you even define intelligence?

>.<

valta4065

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Join @Bountycloud for the best bounties!

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 08:34:40 AM

Quote from: Elwar on February 03, 2016, 08:26:57 AM

Melanin is a horrible differentiator to group people by. Especially since melanin levels can rise and fall which can change someone from one "category" to another.

Why not focus more on something that cannot change such as eye color? Sure you can hide your eye color but it does not change.

If you're going to be collectivist, at least be smart about it.

Again. It's not about the colors. It's all about intelligence! Color is just a mark that helps to "categorize" a human.

Well it's a poor indicator. And it's stupid to try to categorize by intelligence! How do you even define intelligence?

criptix

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1145

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 12:10:15 AM

Quote from: criptix on February 01, 2016, 11:47:30 AM

Quote from: -Greed- on February 01, 2016, 11:41:44 AM

Quote from: criptix on February 01, 2016, 11:31:59 AM

Oh well inbred for a (several) thousand years and lets talk again

Jews detect nationality by mother this is why there's no such nation as jews. Look at all these people. Guess what? They are all "jews". This absolutely anti-scientific. This is so fucking ridiculous.

These are for sure no Ashkenazi Jews.
Im sure u dont know what Ashkenazi Jews *are, so please look it up.

/edit
typo

Lol. No matter who these Huenazi Jews are. They are "Jews", after all.

Please you cite science to support racism atleast look at the correct results (known as facts).
Makes you look very stupid like nigga status stupid Grin

Btw. The undeniable goal of humanity is a race with super intelligent organisms aka super humans.
Dont fred, if this come true most of the imbeciles will disappear over night.

-Greed-

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Decentralized Jihad

Quote from: zivone on February 03, 2016, 08:19:41 AM

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 05:22:45 AM

Random mutations also need to be considered.

If this is true, it would be the first positive genetic mutation I've ever heard.

http://thehealthinfosite.com/what-is-alexandrias-genesis/

Didn't really get it... What benefits do violet eyes provide?

Quote from: valta4065 on February 03, 2016, 08:21:13 AM

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 08:15:15 AM

Quote from: mOgliE on February 03, 2016, 07:54:29 AM

Oh. You're refusing to consider the infinity of variations of shades and forms?

Well then you're more or less right... Wait! No you're not!
Black + white = an infinity of results without any preponderance.

When you mix two very different races you get a metis, and metis are all different. There sin't any great trend.

Quote from: valta4065 on February 03, 2016, 08:08:42 AM

Seems like you don't understand genetics xD

Ok let's be clear. For eyes color you can have a very precise view of the outcome simply because eye color is determined by one unique gene with two alleles. So the possibilities are not very numerous, each giving a precise result.

But skin color is determined by multiple genes all having two alleles all combining. So the results are infinite! It's not all a question of dominant/recessive.

Shades do matter. No doubt. Grin

https://i.imgur.com/lwEDYdF.jpg

xD
Well at least you have humour that's good.

But you understand that the "nigga" photo will become the norme? The more the time passes the more genetics mix and we will have one unique race in the end!

Whites is minority in the world so it's not gonna happen. Anyway, the idea of turning the human race into a single race is utopia IMO.

Quote from: Elwar on February 03, 2016, 08:26:57 AM

Melanin is a horrible differentiator to group people by. Especially since melanin levels can rise and fall which can change someone from one "category" to another.

Why not focus more on something that cannot change such as eye color? Sure you can hide your eye color but it does not change.

If you're going to be collectivist, at least be smart about it.

Again. It's not about the colors. It's all about intelligence! Color is just a mark that helps to "categorize" a human.

valta4065

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Join @Bountycloud for the best bounties!

Quote from: Elwar on February 03, 2016, 08:26:57 AM

Melanin is a horrible differentiator to group people by. Especially since melanin levels can rise and fall which can change someone from one "category" to another.

Why not focus more on something that cannot change such as eye color? Sure you can hide your eye color but it does not change.

If you're going to be collectivist, at least be smart about it.

Yeah another good point.

Races are defined by multiple genetic differences. If only skin color was different it wouldn't even matter, it wouldn't be enough to say that humanity is divided in different races.

So you got to consider the multiple variations of genes... It's just impossible to categorize most people, and TOTALLY impossible to categorize metis!

Elwar

legendary

Activity: 3598

Merit: 2386

Viva Ut Vivas

Melanin is a horrible differentiator to group people by. Especially since melanin levels can rise and fall which can change someone from one "category" to another.

Why not focus more on something that cannot change such as eye color? Sure you can hide your eye color but it does not change.

If you're going to be collectivist, at least be smart about it.

valta4065

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Join @Bountycloud for the best bounties!

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 08:15:15 AM

Quote from: mOgliE on February 03, 2016, 07:54:29 AM

Oh. You're refusing to consider the infinity of variations of shades and forms?

Well then you're more or less right... Wait! No you're not!
Black + white = an infinity of results without any preponderance.

When you mix two very different races you get a metis, and metis are all different. There sin't any great trend.

Quote from: valta4065 on February 03, 2016, 08:08:42 AM

Seems like you don't understand genetics xD

Ok let's be clear. For eyes color you can have a very precise view of the outcome simply because eye color is determined by one unique gene with two alleles. So the possibilities are not very numerous, each giving a precise result.

But skin color is determined by multiple genes all having two alleles all combining. So the results are infinite! It's not all a question of dominant/recessive.

Shades do matter. No doubt. Grin

xD
Well at least you have humour that's good.

But you understand that the "nigga" photo will become the norme? The more the time passes the more genetics mix and we will have one unique race in the end!

zivone

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 05:22:45 AM

Random mutations also need to be considered.

If this is true, it would be the first positive genetic mutation I've ever heard.

http://thehealthinfosite.com/what-is-alexandrias-genesis/

-Greed-

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Decentralized Jihad

Btw about jews... They don't want niggers to breed. Cry

-Greed-

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Decentralized Jihad

Quote from: mOgliE on February 03, 2016, 07:54:29 AM

Oh. You're refusing to consider the infinity of variations of shades and forms?

Well then you're more or less right... Wait! No you're not!
Black + white = an infinity of results without any preponderance.

When you mix two very different races you get a metis, and metis are all different. There sin't any great trend.

Quote from: valta4065 on February 03, 2016, 08:08:42 AM

Seems like you don't understand genetics xD

Ok let's be clear. For eyes color you can have a very precise view of the outcome simply because eye color is determined by one unique gene with two alleles. So the possibilities are not very numerous, each giving a precise result.

But skin color is determined by multiple genes all having two alleles all combining. So the results are infinite! It's not all a question of dominant/recessive.

Shades do matter. No doubt. Grin

valta4065

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Join @Bountycloud for the best bounties!

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 06:59:24 AM

Quote from: valta4065 on February 03, 2016, 05:59:30 AM

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 05:22:45 AM

Quote from: mOgliE on February 03, 2016, 03:15:49 AM

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 12:10:15 AM

Totally agreed. How genes (dominant/recessive) work in a nutshell (for those who don't know):

Black + white = black child
Black + blonde = black child with black hair
White with blue eyes genes + white with blue eyes genes = white child with blue eyes

Hmm... no...

You know it's not only a question of dominant/recessive right? Most genes mix together, only some very precises genes (such as some hair colors or eye colors for example) are dominant/recessive couple.

Genetics is a natural science so there could be no exact answer. Random mutations also need to be considered. But the combinations above most likely (like 95% or so) will outcome such results.

You're wrong really. Here two articles which may help you understand how more subtile genetic is. It's not "95%" for most of genes. Most genes have an infinite number of possible combinations.

https://www.quora.com/How-is-skin-color-determined-in-babies
http://multiracial.com/site/index.php/2000/10/01/how-do-we-inherit-our-skin-color/

Only very precise genes work with the dominant/recessive theory , others gives a result which is a combination of the two genes.

I was talking about the examples I provided above. So black + any = black skin. It might be. A little bit. Less black. Shades are absolutely insignificant. Eventually, black + white = ~~nigger~~ niglet.
Yes, white + white outcomes pretty various results.

Edit: it's even possible that black + black will have a white! But that's a miserably small amount of cases.

Seems like you don't understand genetics xD

Ok let's be clear. For eyes color you can have a very precise view of the outcome simply because eye color is determined by one unique gene with two alleles. So the possibilities are not very numerous, each giving a precise result.

But skin color is determined by multiple genes all having two alleles all combining. So the results are infinite! It's not all a question of dominant/recessive.

mOgliE

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1251

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 06:59:24 AM

Quote from: valta4065 on February 03, 2016, 05:59:30 AM

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 05:22:45 AM

Quote from: mOgliE on February 03, 2016, 03:15:49 AM

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 12:10:15 AM

Totally agreed. How genes (dominant/recessive) work in a nutshell (for those who don't know):

Black + white = black child
Black + blonde = black child with black hair
White with blue eyes genes + white with blue eyes genes = white child with blue eyes

Hmm... no...

You know it's not only a question of dominant/recessive right? Most genes mix together, only some very precises genes (such as some hair colors or eye colors for example) are dominant/recessive couple.

Genetics is a natural science so there could be no exact answer. Random mutations also need to be considered. But the combinations above most likely (like 95% or so) will outcome such results.

You're wrong really. Here two articles which may help you understand how more subtile genetic is. It's not "95%" for most of genes. Most genes have an infinite number of possible combinations.

https://www.quora.com/How-is-skin-color-determined-in-babies
http://multiracial.com/site/index.php/2000/10/01/how-do-we-inherit-our-skin-color/

Only very precise genes work with the dominant/recessive theory , others gives a result which is a combination of the two genes.

I was talking about the examples I provided above. So black + any = black skin. It might be. A little bit. Less black. Shades are absolutely insignificant. Eventually, black + white = ~~nigger~~ niglet.
Yes, white + white outcomes pretty various results.

Edit: it's even possible that black + black will have a white! But that's a miserably small amount of cases.

Oh. You're refusing to consider the infinity of variations of shades and forms?

Well then you're more or less right... Wait! No you're not!
Black + white = an infinity of results without any preponderance.

When you mix two very different races you get a metis, and metis are all different. There sin't any great trend.

-Greed-

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Decentralized Jihad

Quote from: saddampbuh on February 01, 2016, 12:31:54 PM

Quote from: Spendulus on February 01, 2016, 11:46:27 AM

Well, having spent some time in South Africa, I would disagree.

There are outstandingly beautiful women among the blacks. Just like almost anywhere, there are some. To find a large percentage of women who qualify as beautiful, one might need to look at various Asian subgroups.

Also, in Africa there are many, many different "Tribes" or ethnic subgroups of blacks. (I am not sure the phrase "blacks" translates correctly, it has specific meaning in South Africa.)

scandinavian, russian, baltic over asian any day, upper class asian female of good genetic stock can be very beautiful but not so much the peasants

there was some research done on dating site profiles a while back and black females turned out to be the least desired

Here it is:

How Your Race Affects The Messages You Get

TLDR: black women are the least desired dating block.

http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/your-race-affects-whether-people-write-you-back/

-Greed-

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Decentralized Jihad

Quote from: valta4065 on February 03, 2016, 05:59:30 AM

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 05:22:45 AM

Quote from: mOgliE on February 03, 2016, 03:15:49 AM

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 12:10:15 AM

Totally agreed. How genes (dominant/recessive) work in a nutshell (for those who don't know):

Black + white = black child
Black + blonde = black child with black hair
White with blue eyes genes + white with blue eyes genes = white child with blue eyes

Hmm... no...

You know it's not only a question of dominant/recessive right? Most genes mix together, only some very precises genes (such as some hair colors or eye colors for example) are dominant/recessive couple.

Genetics is a natural science so there could be no exact answer. Random mutations also need to be considered. But the combinations above most likely (like 95% or so) will outcome such results.

You're wrong really. Here two articles which may help you understand how more subtile genetic is. It's not "95%" for most of genes. Most genes have an infinite number of possible combinations.

https://www.quora.com/How-is-skin-color-determined-in-babies
http://multiracial.com/site/index.php/2000/10/01/how-do-we-inherit-our-skin-color/

Only very precise genes work with the dominant/recessive theory , others gives a result which is a combination of the two genes.

I was talking about the examples I provided above. So black + any = black skin. It might be. A little bit. Less black. Shades are absolutely insignificant. Eventually, black + white = ~~nigger~~ niglet.
Yes, white + white outcomes pretty various results.

Edit: it's even possible that black + black will have a white! But that's a miserably small amount of cases.

gregyoung14

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: criptix on January 31, 2016, 11:37:13 PM

I just cant get over the fact that inbred jews are the master race regarding iq ;(

go holocaust! perhaps Hitler was so insecure with his Jewish classmate getting an A+ on his exams.

valta4065

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Join @Bountycloud for the best bounties!

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 05:22:45 AM

Quote from: mOgliE on February 03, 2016, 03:15:49 AM

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 12:10:15 AM

Totally agreed. How genes (dominant/recessive) work in a nutshell (for those who don't know):

Black + white = black child
Black + blonde = black child with black hair
White with blue eyes genes + white with blue eyes genes = white child with blue eyes

Hmm... no...

You know it's not only a question of dominant/recessive right? Most genes mix together, only some very precises genes (such as some hair colors or eye colors for example) are dominant/recessive couple.

Genetics is a natural science so there could be no exact answer. Random mutations also need to be considered. But the combinations above most likely (like 95% or so) will outcome such results.

You're wrong really. Here two articles which may help you understand how more subtile genetic is. It's not "95%" for most of genes. Most genes have an infinite number of possible combinations.

https://www.quora.com/How-is-skin-color-determined-in-babies
http://multiracial.com/site/index.php/2000/10/01/how-do-we-inherit-our-skin-color/

Only very precise genes work with the dominant/recessive theory , others gives a result which is a combination of the two genes.

-Greed-

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Decentralized Jihad

Quote from: mOgliE on February 03, 2016, 03:15:49 AM

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 12:10:15 AM

Totally agreed. How genes (dominant/recessive) work in a nutshell (for those who don't know):

Black + white = black child
Black + blonde = black child with black hair
White with blue eyes genes + white with blue eyes genes = white child with blue eyes

Hmm... no...

You know it's not only a question of dominant/recessive right? Most genes mix together, only some very precises genes (such as some hair colors or eye colors for example) are dominant/recessive couple.

Genetics is a natural science so there could be no exact answer. Random mutations also need to be considered. But the combinations above most likely (like 95% or so) will outcome such results.

valta4065

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Join @Bountycloud for the best bounties!

Races are a fact. If you can separate humans in different groups, then you can classify them... That's just plain logic! If they're different you can say "this one is better than this one".

mOgliE

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1251

Quote from: -Greed- on February 03, 2016, 12:10:15 AM

Totally agreed. How genes (dominant/recessive) work in a nutshell (for those who don't know):

Black + white = black child
Black + blonde = black child with black hair
White with blue eyes genes + white with blue eyes genes = white child with blue eyes

Hmm... no...

You know it's not only a question of dominant/recessive right? Most genes mix together, only some very precises genes (such as some hair colors or eye colors for example) are dominant/recessive couple.

Topic: Racism is a real thing (this thread is extremely racist) - page 12. (Read 11719 times)