Pages:
Author

Topic: RandomX Benchmarks! https://monerobenchmarks.info (Read 6455 times)

sr. member
Activity: 633
Merit: 267
Hi everyone, 5 years ago I created monerobenchmarks.info and in the next days I will no longer manage it.

When I started, monero was just around $8 price and had different miners like joblo, yam, cpu-miner opt and others for cpu mining. Claymore, Wolf and ccminer were the ones for gpu mining. This spreadsheet was the only one gathering results: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RqXRS9d9GqLHUrvXXu_0Mxce-0kHSI63fjSgqYpXUU0/edit#gid=0

Since there a lot happened: attacks, asics, 4 algo switchs and a couple of bull runs that triggered the price above $400. Yet, monero development has always answered well as the scenario requires it.

To keep short and sweet, I thank all the community and everyone who visited and supported the site. Also thanks to all miners for submitting their results, I will no longer run site due to personal reasons but i am going to keep an eye on monero as I really use it.

I thank again the community for adding a link on getmonero.org to monerobenchmarks.

Happy weekend and happy mining!

PS. I am gonna try to make a dump of the data and publish it on a google spreadsheet or similar for everyone to use. Will add link when it is done.
full member
Activity: 1424
Merit: 225
legendary
Activity: 4326
Merit: 8950
'The right to privacy matters'
Hi, as Monero gets closer to October POW's algo will switch from previous Cryptonight-R to RandomX (https://github.com/tevador/RandomX).

Coins like Loki and Wownero have already switched to a RandomX variation and Xmrig support them.
In particular, GPUs on RandomX perform similar or worst than they did on Cryptonight as data shows:

GPUCryptonight-RRandomX
AMD
Vega 642200 H/s1225 H/s
RX 480/580960-1000 H/s400-410 H/s
RX 560 4GB (1400/2200 MHz)495 H/s260 H/s
NVIDIA/EVGA
RTX 2080 Ti (1915/13600 MHz)960-1000 H/s400-410 H/s
GTX 1080 Ti (2037/11800 MHz)927 H/s1122 H/s
GTX 1070 Ti (1900/7600 MHz)625 H/s769 H/s

Source: https://github.com/SChernykh/RandomX_OpenCL
Source: https://github.com/SChernykh/RandomX_CUDA

For CPUs:
CPUCryptonight-RRandomX
AMD 3900X (4.25GHZ ALL CORE, 3600MHZ RAM)1335 H/s13330 H/s
RYZEN 3700X1018 H/s6853 H/s
RYZEN 5 3600803 H/s6580 H/s
INTEL I9 9900K630 H/s2102 H/s
2X XEON E5 2670 V2 930 H/s5815 H/s
INTEL I7 7700K350 H/s2100 H/s

Source: https://monerobenchmarks.info/
Source: https://monerobenchmarks.info/index.php
Source: https://github.com/tevador/RandomX#cpu-performance

Hope It is helpful for everyone, and those willing to share can submit results on this thread or website:

CPU
https://monerobenchmarks.info/submitCPU.php
GPU
https://monerobenchmarks.info/submitGPU.php

RandomX Benchmark tool: https://github.com/tevador/RandomX/releases
Xmrig CPU Miner: https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig

Others links
RandomX Audits: https://github.com/hyc/RandomxAudits



so


Xmrig CPU Miner: https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig

this is a viable link?
sr. member
Activity: 633
Merit: 267
Right now it's tight, it's possible to get profits only on free/low electric rate per kWh.
Also, efficiency matters being ~100+ Hash per Watts the best performing processors.
Alt-season was short-lived too, just lasted around 3-4 months.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1136
Finally, now beginners can clearly see that there is no freebie in mining on processors.
The payback of the processor is 1500-2000 days, so mining is now useless.
It is possible, of course, to mine coins in order to sell them in the future at a better price. But on the other hand, if it is not profitable to mine the coin now, it may be better to invest
sr. member
Activity: 633
Merit: 267
Monero mining calculator added to site -> https://monerobenchmarks.info/miningCalculator.php
sr. member
Activity: 633
Merit: 267
Ryzen 7 3700X ~10061 H/s
Details and screenshots -> https://monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=YzNwRGVVRkJRVDA9 
sr. member
Activity: 633
Merit: 267
sr. member
Activity: 633
Merit: 267
sr. member
Activity: 633
Merit: 267
member
Activity: 116
Merit: 66
XMRig have native support for Ampere? Or how do i understand you post?
NVIDIA GPUs are efficient enough with straight-forward RandomX VM emulation, they even support directed rounding floating point operations in CUDA, so there's no need to add support for each new GPU. Generic CUDA code will just work. But even 2080 Ti does only 1600-1700 h/s. 3000 series will do a bit more, but still far from enough to compete with CPUs. AMD GPUs, on the other side, require native GCN/RDNA assembler code to run RandomX efficiently.
member
Activity: 1558
Merit: 69
Anyone have a clue about Ampere vs Big Navi on RandomX?
Both will suck compared to CPUs. Big Navi will suck even more due to lack of native support for RDNA2 in xmrig.

XMRig have native support for Ampere? Or how do i understand you post?
member
Activity: 116
Merit: 66
Anyone have a clue about Ampere vs Big Navi on RandomX?
Both will suck compared to CPUs. Big Navi will suck even more due to lack of native support for RDNA2 in xmrig.
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
Anyone have a clue about Ampere vs Big Navi on RandomX?
sr. member
Activity: 633
Merit: 267
If anyone has gotten their hands on a Ryzen 3 3100/3300x   feel free to share the hashrate , settings etc...

Im thinking maybe swap a 1600 to the newer 3100..

Ryzen 3 3100 ~ 4600 H/s using XMRig
https://monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwbGQwRkJRVDA9
member
Activity: 273
Merit: 17
If anyone has gotten their hands on a Ryzen 3 3100/3300x   feel free to share the hashrate , settings etc...

Im thinking maybe swap a 1600 to the newer 3100..
sr. member
Activity: 633
Merit: 267
A new section has been added where CPU with 4+ records are listed with all details: #cores, #threads, default tdp, socket type, memory supported, cache size (L1, L2 & L3), lithography, hash per watts, average hashrate, and more.

https://monerobenchmarks.info/list.php
sr. member
Activity: 633
Merit: 267
thats a LOT! Is there any info on hashrate on the same setup on RagerX miner?

Coinluminary and Herry Toms only use their accounts to SHILL, you have done it before on this thread and you do on others particularly today as your post history shows.

Yet, I will take your statement and point some facts:

- RagerX is closed source with 3.5% fee. And was only created to mine on pool with same name (does not accept any other mining software), so miner/rig owner is not on control of it.
- Those who have used it regret it, as they figure out they will never get paid. So they switch to XMRig and point rig to any other pool they choose.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/ff4bfh/ragerx/
- You are breaking forum rules by spamming, and creating posts with no value to discussion.

I encourage community to report spammers to moderators.
Thanks.
sr. member
Activity: 633
Merit: 267
Now to get back on topic, I'm looking forward to seeing some result for the 3990x.

AMD THREADRIPPER 3990X ~43800 H/s (156,4 Hash per Watts) with XMRig 5.7.0
https://monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwVmVrSm5RVDA9

Source from crypto mining blog: https://cryptomining-blog.com/11384-randomx-mining-performance-on-amd-ryzen-threadripper-3990x-processor-64c-128t/
Pages:
Jump to: