sell it in a year and be green greeN
We all want to be green greeN!
Topic: RandomX Benchmarks! https://monerobenchmarks.info - page 7. (Read 6442 times)
We all want to be green greeN!
Right now my i7 3930k making 300h/s on cryptonightR and it values as 0.10$ for a day consuming 130w .
if im not wrong it will pay me about 0.25$ with randomx.im sure it will pay this for 2-3 days then after it will be again like 0.10$.All people waiting something huge but results becomes same at the end of the road.cryptonight always paid for cpu very little.so dont be sooo exited.
if im not wrong it will pay me about 0.25$ with randomx.im sure it will pay this for 2-3 days then after it will be again like 0.10$.All people waiting something huge but results becomes same at the end of the road.cryptonight always paid for cpu very little.so dont be sooo exited.
It's not that cryptonight paid so little for CPU.
It's a fact that there are many more CPUs active at the moment rather than GPUs.
So, there will be a lot more CPUs mining RandomX algorithm for Monero thus reducing profits drastically.
If it's profitable for people, they are going to mine and they will activate each and every bit of CPU power they have which is really good for decentralization but not for incentives.
This is what I have been saying all along. If you think you will profit from investing in 4-5 or even 10 Ryzen 3900x systems in preparation for the XMR RandomX fork, you will be sorely disappointed. Please learn from both the Loki and ArQMA networks....there are a lot of CPU hashpower out there. Your multiple 3900X systems isn't going to make you any profit worth investing on. You have been warned..
those older cpus will do 3k for 70 to 100 watt so you are talking 4x maybe power use, the 3900x will make momey for at least six months and probably pay for themselves, beyond that who knows but either way its a new cpu so you can probably sell it in a year and be green greeN
Right now my i7 3930k making 300h/s on cryptonightR and it values as 0.10$ for a day consuming 130w .
if im not wrong it will pay me about 0.25$ with randomx.im sure it will pay this for 2-3 days then after it will be again like 0.10$.All people waiting something huge but results becomes same at the end of the road.cryptonight always paid for cpu very little.so dont be sooo exited.
if im not wrong it will pay me about 0.25$ with randomx.im sure it will pay this for 2-3 days then after it will be again like 0.10$.All people waiting something huge but results becomes same at the end of the road.cryptonight always paid for cpu very little.so dont be sooo exited.
It's not that cryptonight paid so little for CPU.
It's a fact that there are many more CPUs active at the moment rather than GPUs.
So, there will be a lot more CPUs mining RandomX algorithm for Monero thus reducing profits drastically.
If it's profitable for people, they are going to mine and they will activate each and every bit of CPU power they have which is really good for decentralization but not for incentives.
This is what I have been saying all along. If you think you will profit from investing in 4-5 or even 10 Ryzen 3900x systems in preparation for the XMR RandomX fork, you will be sorely disappointed. Please learn from both the Loki and ArQMA networks....there are a lot of CPU hashpower out there. Your multiple 3900X systems isn't going to make you any profit worth investing on. You have been warned..
I need help running RandomX benchmark with largepages enabled.
My bat file content:
benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --threads 8 --init 8 --nonces 100000
Result:
RandomX benchmark v1.1.1
- full memory mode (2080 MiB)
- JIT compiled mode
- hardware AES mode
- large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
ERROR: Cache allocation failed
To use large pages, please enable the "Lock Pages in Memory" policy and reboot.
I have in "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory" set to Everyone
Using windows 10
Any ideas?
My bat file content:
benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --threads 8 --init 8 --nonces 100000
Result:
RandomX benchmark v1.1.1
- full memory mode (2080 MiB)
- JIT compiled mode
- hardware AES mode
- large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
ERROR: Cache allocation failed
To use large pages, please enable the "Lock Pages in Memory" policy and reboot.
I have in "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory" set to Everyone
Using windows 10
Any ideas?
What's your hardware specs?
Probably not enough L2/L3 cache to run 8 threads as RandomX requires: 16 KiB of L1 cache, 256 KiB of L2 cache and 2 MiB of L3 cache per mining thread.
Ryzen 7 1700x
Ok, then try: --mine --jit --largepages --threads 8 --init 16 --nonces 100000
Examples:
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwVGVVRkJRVDA9
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwWlEwRkJQVDA9
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwSlFVRkJQVDA9
Same result, it has to do something with "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory"
Without largepages it is running, but the hashrate is much less then reported from others for the same hardware.
Right now my i7 3930k making 300h/s on cryptonightR and it values as 0.10$ for a day consuming 130w .
if im not wrong it will pay me about 0.25$ with randomx.im sure it will pay this for 2-3 days then after it will be again like 0.10$.All people waiting something huge but results becomes same at the end of the road.cryptonight always paid for cpu very little.so dont be sooo exited.
if im not wrong it will pay me about 0.25$ with randomx.im sure it will pay this for 2-3 days then after it will be again like 0.10$.All people waiting something huge but results becomes same at the end of the road.cryptonight always paid for cpu very little.so dont be sooo exited.
It's not that cryptonight paid so little for CPU.
It's a fact that there are many more CPUs active at the moment rather than GPUs.
So, there will be a lot more CPUs mining RandomX algorithm for Monero thus reducing profits drastically.
If it's profitable for people, they are going to mine and they will activate each and every bit of CPU power they have which is really good for decentralization but not for incentives.
Right now my i7 3930k making 300h/s on cryptonightR and it values as 0.10$ for a day consuming 130w .
if im not wrong it will pay me about 0.25$ with randomx.im sure it will pay this for 2-3 days then after it will be again like 0.10$.All people waiting something huge but results becomes same at the end of the road.cryptonight always paid for cpu very little.so dont be sooo exited.
if im not wrong it will pay me about 0.25$ with randomx.im sure it will pay this for 2-3 days then after it will be again like 0.10$.All people waiting something huge but results becomes same at the end of the road.cryptonight always paid for cpu very little.so dont be sooo exited.
The RYZEN 5 3600 seems like a pretty good compromise without having to break the bank and looks to be similar in performance to the 3700 but the 3900x is a beast and is very tempting. I imagine the new Threadrippers are going to have some amazing results on RandomX but will probably be cost prohibitive.
I need help running RandomX benchmark with largepages enabled.
My bat file content:
benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --threads 8 --init 8 --nonces 100000
Result:
RandomX benchmark v1.1.1
- full memory mode (2080 MiB)
- JIT compiled mode
- hardware AES mode
- large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
ERROR: Cache allocation failed
To use large pages, please enable the "Lock Pages in Memory" policy and reboot.
I have in "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory" set to Everyone
Using windows 10
Any ideas?
My bat file content:
benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --threads 8 --init 8 --nonces 100000
Result:
RandomX benchmark v1.1.1
- full memory mode (2080 MiB)
- JIT compiled mode
- hardware AES mode
- large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
ERROR: Cache allocation failed
To use large pages, please enable the "Lock Pages in Memory" policy and reboot.
I have in "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory" set to Everyone
Using windows 10
Any ideas?
What's your hardware specs?
Probably not enough L2/L3 cache to run 8 threads as RandomX requires: 16 KiB of L1 cache, 256 KiB of L2 cache and 2 MiB of L3 cache per mining thread.
Ryzen 7 1700x
Ok, then try: --mine --jit --largepages --threads 8 --init 16 --nonces 100000
Examples:
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwVGVVRkJRVDA9
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwWlEwRkJQVDA9
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwSlFVRkJQVDA9
I need help running RandomX benchmark with largepages enabled.
My bat file content:
benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --threads 8 --init 8 --nonces 100000
Result:
RandomX benchmark v1.1.1
- full memory mode (2080 MiB)
- JIT compiled mode
- hardware AES mode
- large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
ERROR: Cache allocation failed
To use large pages, please enable the "Lock Pages in Memory" policy and reboot.
I have in "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory" set to Everyone
Using windows 10
Any ideas?
My bat file content:
benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --threads 8 --init 8 --nonces 100000
Result:
RandomX benchmark v1.1.1
- full memory mode (2080 MiB)
- JIT compiled mode
- hardware AES mode
- large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
ERROR: Cache allocation failed
To use large pages, please enable the "Lock Pages in Memory" policy and reboot.
I have in "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory" set to Everyone
Using windows 10
Any ideas?
What's your hardware specs?
Probably not enough L2/L3 cache to run 8 threads as RandomX requires: 16 KiB of L1 cache, 256 KiB of L2 cache and 2 MiB of L3 cache per mining thread.
Ryzen 7 1700x
I need help running RandomX benchmark with largepages enabled.
My bat file content:
benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --threads 8 --init 8 --nonces 100000
Result:
RandomX benchmark v1.1.1
- full memory mode (2080 MiB)
- JIT compiled mode
- hardware AES mode
- large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
ERROR: Cache allocation failed
To use large pages, please enable the "Lock Pages in Memory" policy and reboot.
I have in "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory" set to Everyone
Using windows 10
Any ideas?
My bat file content:
benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --threads 8 --init 8 --nonces 100000
Result:
RandomX benchmark v1.1.1
- full memory mode (2080 MiB)
- JIT compiled mode
- hardware AES mode
- large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
ERROR: Cache allocation failed
To use large pages, please enable the "Lock Pages in Memory" policy and reboot.
I have in "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory" set to Everyone
Using windows 10
Any ideas?
What's your hardware specs?
Probably not enough L2/L3 cache to run 8 threads as RandomX requires: 16 KiB of L1 cache, 256 KiB of L2 cache and 2 MiB of L3 cache per mining thread.
It's time to turn on some servers, is HiveOS a good option to boot these servers and mining RandomX? or does anyone have any better suggestions?
nicehash OS could be a free alternative for you.
It's time to turn on some servers, is HiveOS a good option to boot these servers and mining RandomX? or does anyone have any better suggestions?
I need help running RandomX benchmark with largepages enabled.
My bat file content:
benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --threads 8 --init 8 --nonces 100000
Result:
RandomX benchmark v1.1.1
- full memory mode (2080 MiB)
- JIT compiled mode
- hardware AES mode
- large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
ERROR: Cache allocation failed
To use large pages, please enable the "Lock Pages in Memory" policy and reboot.
I have in "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory" set to Everyone
Using windows 10
Any ideas?
My bat file content:
benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --threads 8 --init 8 --nonces 100000
Result:
RandomX benchmark v1.1.1
- full memory mode (2080 MiB)
- JIT compiled mode
- hardware AES mode
- large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
ERROR: Cache allocation failed
To use large pages, please enable the "Lock Pages in Memory" policy and reboot.
I have in "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory" set to Everyone
Using windows 10
Any ideas?
Anyone tried the older 2990x threadripper yet on random-x ?
guessing the new trx40 processors wil be a lot faster than the 3900x cpu...
guessing the new trx40 processors wil be a lot faster than the 3900x cpu...
CLI v0.15.0.0 'Carbon Chamaeleon' released: https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/dtt2j3/cli_v01500_carbon_chamaeleon_released/
There is already a single Loki miner contributing a whopping 17MH to the Loki network!! That hashrate is equivalent to 11K Ryzen 3900X units and that is only from a single miner. Once XMR forks, where do you think he will be diverting his hashrate to. And how many more of these giants lurking around waiting for the xmr fork. So, I'd say good luck trying to make a good profit from CPU mining.
Do your math, it's only 1400 Ryzen 3900X, not 11K, but I think in reality it's more like 10,000 old Xeon or Opteron farm. I don't think there are more than 10-20 such giant farms out there. Loki network is much bigger than 17 MH, and there's only 1 such farm mining it. Well Loki cant show anything. XMR alone will bring 100x times USD value in daily rewards. Loki and Wownero together are traded about 2k usd daily. Thats ridic low.
There will probably be a lot of coins following monero, probably more than ever before.
So the market will be so much bigger for bad actors to dilute.
Still could go either way....
PS: Epic Cash based on Randomx shows 1.3-1.4usd per day for 3900x. Dont know if it's accurate though as havent had time to try.
Meiby someone could test just for lulz
There will probably be a lot of coins following monero, probably more than ever before.
So the market will be so much bigger for bad actors to dilute.
Still could go either way....
PS: Epic Cash based on Randomx shows 1.3-1.4usd per day for 3900x. Dont know if it's accurate though as havent had time to try.
Meiby someone could test just for lulz
There is already a single Loki miner contributing a whopping 17MH to the Loki network!! That hashrate is equivalent to 11K Ryzen 3900X units and that is only from a single miner. Once XMR forks, where do you think he will be diverting his hashrate to. And how many more of these giants lurking around waiting for the xmr fork. So, I'd say good luck trying to make a good profit from CPU mining.
Shoot... It may be time to fire up my 100+ Xeon X5660 CPUs and my bank of Dell R815 servers again (120+ Opteron 6380).
Exciting stuff... I've had a lot of my farm turned off lately.
Exciting stuff... I've had a lot of my farm turned off lately.
My X5660 CPUs are doing ~1400-1500 server side after 24 hours. Not bad!
Excited to turn the Dell's back on and give them a go =) I have read they should do around 11kh each total.
Sure hope there is a decent profit window when Monero ports.
-----
Using a profit calc right now it shows 1500 H/S at $0.45 a day (which has good profit margin on my XEON chips) and the R815s at 11kh at $3.39… and I would guess it's a good assumption network hash rate will drop A LOT after the fork? That would be nice.
Well Loki cant show anything. XMR alone will bring 100x times USD value in daily rewards. Loki and Wownero together are traded about 2k usd daily. Thats ridic low.
There will probably be a lot of coins following monero, probably more than ever before.
So the market will be so much bigger for bad actors to dilute.
Still could go either way....
PS: Epic Cash based on Randomx shows 1.3-1.4usd per day for 3900x. Dont know if it's accurate though as havent had time to try.
Meiby someone could test just for lulz
There will probably be a lot of coins following monero, probably more than ever before.
So the market will be so much bigger for bad actors to dilute.
Still could go either way....
PS: Epic Cash based on Randomx shows 1.3-1.4usd per day for 3900x. Dont know if it's accurate though as havent had time to try.
Meiby someone could test just for lulz
3900x are very profitable on CPU coins right now , close to 2-3 a day
Well Loki cant show anything. XMR alone will bring 100x times USD value in daily rewards. Loki and Wownero together are traded about 2k usd daily. Thats ridic low.
There will probably be a lot of coins following monero, probably more than ever before.
So the market will be so much bigger for bad actors to dilute.
Still could go either way....
PS: Epic Cash based on Randomx shows 1.3-1.4usd per day for 3900x. Dont know if it's accurate though as havent had time to try.
Meiby someone could test just for lulz
There will probably be a lot of coins following monero, probably more than ever before.
So the market will be so much bigger for bad actors to dilute.
Still could go either way....
PS: Epic Cash based on Randomx shows 1.3-1.4usd per day for 3900x. Dont know if it's accurate though as havent had time to try.
Meiby someone could test just for lulz
Jump to: