OK, now I am getting very concerned. I am going to step aside and see how this shakes out.
@Leewilson: I suggest you calm down and start being more tactful while there still is someone for you to talk to.
This is the in fighting and blatant lies that required a restructure....I hope that you will come back in a day or two and take a look again.
Why would that person come back after you accused him of a "blatant lie"? Keep in mind that the people who are looking from the outside and deciding what to do can't tell which one of you is telling the truth. Maybe it would be better to not even bring up the subject of lies. Let us think it might have been a mistake. That way we wouldn't have to figure out which of you two is the liar.
2 days is a lie...the community took this coin and began to move forward less than 24 hours ago and we are now light years ahead.
Maybe, but the only difference I can see so far is that some people have left. I was already concerned that this coin didn't have a large enough community to be a success, despite people's good intentions. Now we have even fewer people.
There has been a much need reorganization in order to move forward in a professional community based manner.
Professional is good. Excessive perfectionism is bad. I can't judge yet which it was.
Just contacted "Centro de Estudios Che Guevara" for permission to use CHE picture in our project. So let's keep everything legit.
I'm glad you followed my recommendation after seeing the facts presented.
This struck me as being very
unprofessional when I first read it. It's as if you had to get in a dig after the person agreed to do what you wanted them to do! Even if you were frustrated, it's not professional to make the other person look bad publicly. But I read through all of your comments here, and the vast majority of them seem fine, so I don't know. (If I had seen more like that, I would be gone.)
Conclusion: I don't know. I intend to step back and keep an eye on things from a distance.
