I think that the new board looks very good!
The only thing that may be helpful for new users, is description of terms:
p - posts
f - fixed
d - daily
w - weekly
2w- biweekly
m - monthly
For us is obvious what that mean, but when someone will see this table for first time can be confused without this information.
Topic: Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns - page 10. (Read 17849 times)
it could be better min & max in separate column,
but letter appendix is not neccesary imo..
What? How do you mean? Min and Max are currently in a separate column and I added `|` because it makes everything a whole lot less confusing.but letter appendix is not neccesary imo..
Apparently he is talking about the previous / latest table not the updated one in the OP
The OP one is just fine
it could be better min & max in separate column,
but letter appendix is not neccesary imo..
What? How do you mean? Min and Max are currently in a separate column and I added `|` because it makes everything a whole lot less confusing. but letter appendix is not neccesary imo..
it could be better min & max in separate column,
but letter appendix is not neccesary imo..
but letter appendix is not neccesary imo..
Alright, I have updated the OP, but I did make some slight adjustments because I really did not like how Min and Max were displayed. The size was decreased heavily though so it shouldn't matter. Thanks everyone for the hard work, I appreciate that.
However, I still don't see why the manager should be displayed. The crucial part of any campaign is escrow and escrow only. A manager will either pay or they won't pay, but escrow will always have your back (if the campaign manager does not do the escrow, but that shouldn't be allowed anyway).
However, I still don't see why the manager should be displayed. The crucial part of any campaign is escrow and escrow only. A manager will either pay or they won't pay, but escrow will always have your back (if the campaign manager does not do the escrow, but that shouldn't be allowed anyway).
It seems that another campaign ended and yahoo announces spectre signature campaign ends.
-snip-
Removed. -snip-
It seems that another campaign ended and yahoo announces spectre signature campaign ends.
Payments have been sent to those who qualified. You may now remove your sigs. I have openings in xaurum campaign for members and under if anyones interested
can we remove theses abbreviations?
Actually we can't. Not at the moment at least. The A, PNYC, CFNP, and FLUX words are all in the same column as the "Full" column. -snip-
Thanks for the answer fatanut
The latest table isn't hard to understand once you get used with it a part from the min-max which is confusing i think that separating the 2 is better
https://paste.ee/r/ohNof
can we remove theses abbreviations?
Actually we can't. Not at the moment at least. The A, PNYC, CFNP, and FLUX words are all in the same column as the "Full" column. -snip-
Thanks for the answer fatanut
The latest table isn't hard to understand once you get used with it a part from the min-max which is confusing i think that separating the 2 is better
Edit: it is good, keep up the good work fatanut + Mitchell
That's how Shorena's table looks like. The mix-max is messed up because of the "x". I can fix it tomorrow if you guys want me to properly align it.
There's not that much difference actually:
I can simply remove the | in between min and max to save space but have it aligned.
There's not that much difference actually:
I can simply remove the | in between min and max to save space but have it aligned.
I'm definitely with both SFR10 and Shorena suggestion as It looks better then this : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17027855 and everything is visible.
May I suggest not to cram Min-Max and Escrow in the same field?
ACK on that. 
Here's a sample of how the table could be a bit more compact.
Current table:
Current table:
| A | |||||||||||
| | | Campaign
hey fatanut, i find the new table better than the previous one Thanks! can we remove theses abbreviations? Actually we can't. Not at the moment at least. The A, PNYC, CFNP, and FLUX words are all in the same column as the "Full" column. I can go and put one word per column which would occupy the Hero, Senior, Full, and Member column to implement your idea but it would expand the columns because of the words "Participants" in CFNP, "Accepting" in FLUX (in between closed and accepting).If someone could find a way to merge cells or something similar to the "colspan" syntax, then we can implement your idea.
hey fatanut, i find the new table better than the previous one but i have one suggestion
can we remove theses abbreviations? Quote The following abbreviations will be used for campaigns (where applicable): A || Currently active PNYC || Payment not yet confirmed FLUX || Campaign in flux between closed and accepting CFNP || Closed for new participants i mean you could just write it in a whole letter like this A --> Currently active | Campaign ...etc EDIT: you can also put something like this in order to implement lauda's suggestion bitmixer.io (Ld) or bitmixer.io-Ld or Ld/bitmixer or 1/bitmixer.io whyfuture (Lp) or ... or .... or 2/whyfuture ...etc then Ld -> Lauda or 1 -> Lauda lp -> Lutpin or 2 -> Lutpin
Finally figured it out!
This is my biggest contribution to this thread so far aside from updating the table (almost) every day. I hope it fixes the problem of most users.Edit: Still wasn't satisfied with the length of the table. I renamed Let's Talk About the Future and then removed the ".io" and ".net" of some items so the table can be as narrow as it could be. https://paste.ee/r/fSJM2 Signature campaign is stopped. Decision regarding how payout will be distributed is still to be made. I will let you all know. I've discussed with Avirunes and the Ebitz signature campaign has been stopped, effective immediately.It can be removed from the listing. "Let's Talk About The Future" is the widest in its column, it can be shortened to the maximum width "Crypto-Games.net" has now. Rename it to WhyFuture (their domain name), problem solved. What do people think about adding another column, i.e. 'Manager'? I think it is also important to list, and provide a nice overview of users managing the campaigns in question. This comes with the cost of widening the list, thus making it look worse on some smaller screens. I'm not even able to see 'Max' and 'Escrow' at the moment (and I guess It's the case for other people as well) unless I make things smaller so another column will screw the table probably. Seeing that many people complain about the table's size, I think that a way to reduce it a little would be to shorten the contents of the term field. Since it's always pretty standard post/weekly could become post/w or even p/w, post/biweekly fixed/biweekly to fixed/biw or f/bw etc. And Legendary could be shortened to Legen. I have an additional suggestion: switch from Bitcoins to milliBitcoins, and abbreviate all accounts levels.Example: Member | Junior > would become > Mbr | Jr 0.00017 | 0.00006 > would become > 0.17 | 0.06 "Let's Talk About The Future" is the widest in its column, it can be shortened to the maximum width "Crypto-Games.net" has now. This makes the table more compact without removing data. I tried that. The horizontal length of the tables do not match with each other. Edit: I PMed Avirunes asking about how to do the codes. Hope we can get some help for the table. Let me move the updated table in this post: -snip- Perhaps to fix that issue, you should add in a final empty column -- one that has the widest column's letters but invisible like so <--- like so. example with highlight #ECEDF3 is the color; this should theoretically be the simplest brute-force way to resolve the problem. Example: Let's Talk About The Future would be an invisible phrase within an empty column in PNYC, FLUX, and CFNP. This is exactly what's on my mind. The only problem right now is I don't know how to code it. Well, instead of a singular table, try working around it. For instance, end the current table when you need a centralized text (e.g. 'Closed') and then open another table. However, this may complicate the code a bit further. I tried my best but I really can't figure it out. I found the code 'colspan' but it doesn't work.  I tried that. The horizontal length of the tables do not match with each other. Edit: I PMed Avirunes asking about how to do the codes. Hope we can get some help for the table. Jump to:
|
