Topic: Red trust accounts wearing signature..... (Read 1303 times)
It does not matter if there are projects that accept accounts with negative beliefs to participate in a bounty project as long as the red trust is not obtained from cheating in a bounty campaign or because of the fraud they commit in handling a bounty project,Because in my opinion not all accounts that have red trust indicate bad behavior.
other projects hire negative trusted accounts becauase they are also scam and will not pay the particpants.
That must be the reason but in my own opinion, bounty managers should not allow red trust participant on signature campaigns as this is the penalty to forum members for doing mischief on their accounts and you already mentioned that it could ruin the projects image since it was advertise by red trust accounts.
I would also give them chance if they are not accused as scammer but just spammer or what will be forgiven, still they can play a big role in the bounty, as every person can contribute thru sharing the project, so for me, there is nothing wrong with it for as long as they will not cheat in that campaign, that they will not create a lot of account just for them to get more tokens.
other projects hire negative trusted accounts becauase they are also scam and will not pay the particpants.
That must be the reason but in my own opinion, bounty managers should not allow red trust participant on signature campaigns as this is the penalty to forum members for doing mischief on their accounts and you already mentioned that it could ruin the projects image since it was advertise by red trust accounts.
the manager's job is simply to take a position in the project that they consider potential, and then manage the campaign in this forum, the altcoin campaign is not limited in terms of the participant's reputation because they pay in stake. If in BTC, the quality of participants will be prioritized. Provisions for a red trust account are the authority of the project team, the manager only offers terms and conditions (including trust and merit), this is a summary after I communicate with the existing manager.
With this topic, I am not trusting any accounts that has red trust because it is the symbol in which they committed that are not obeying the rules, most of them are scammers. Every signature campaign should not accept accounts that have red trust because it may be a big threat to any other participants. They used to scam other people they can do it again with that account. Maybe they have some warning if they really want to accept accounts that have red trust or a condition in which if that particular condition is not obeyed, banning is the perfect solution. depends on the rules of the manager . most bounties allow red trusted accounts but that does not mean that the project is scam but i think its still not approriate becuase this affect the image of the project . other projects hire negative trusted accounts becauase they are also scam and will not pay the particpants . they knew that these red trusted participants will just join and wont complain too much compare to those who have clean forum account .
It really don't care whether the participants have red trust or not especially if they are accepting by the bounty manager, so I really don't care at all, I will accept them and let them enjoy the benefit in participating besides everyone of us have the chance to earn here. So, for me this should not be our focus, but our main focus should be how are we going to help the project to become successful.
depends on the rules of the manager . most bounties allow red trusted accounts but that does not mean that the project is scam but i think its still not approriate becuase this affect the image of the project . other projects hire negative trusted accounts becauase they are also scam and will not pay the particpants . they knew that these red trusted participants will just join and wont complain too much compare to those who have clean forum account .
We can not say that the bounty manager is bad. It's a common thing that might be bounty manager forget to add this rule & for me if the bounty is running successfully it does not matter whether red trust account holder doing signature campaign. If further bounty manager adds this rule automatically all red trust signature campaigners will be out from the campaign.
This is not normal at all. Accounts should not be entrusted with their signature red as this is not really secure. When the bonus project is managed by the bonus manager, I agree.
Some managers also prohibit participants with Redtrust to follow the campaign signature, so this is not very much related to the campaign, the trust is another person's judgment on one of the accounts where they may have covenanted or Violation.
Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?
Bounty which don't care about their reputation,all they want exposure.Bounty manager lazy to check the participants individually so they allowed such accounts.
I seen a notification from Maggiordomo, that I allow red trusted in Signature Campaign, well, not anymore, in my last campaigns they are not allowed.
This allow also depends on red trust, EZ365 also allow negative trust members. bubbalex allow negative members according red trust.
not all managers who give free red trust to the bounty signature are that they are not good for the project they are working on. all that is the policy of each manager how they apply the rules.
It is also quite confusing if there are obstacles such as red trust, because if it is seen it also happens as if it is not in accordance with clear reports. so there is actually no problem if the project is carried out by the manager with these criteria as long as he can be trusted with the previous project. 
the manager's job is simply to take a position in the project that they consider potential, and then manage the campaign in this forum, the altcoin campaign is not limited in terms of the participant's reputation because they pay in stake. If in BTC, the quality of participants will be prioritized. Provisions for a red trust account are the authority of the project team, the manager only offers terms and conditions (including trust and merit), this is a summary after I communicate with the existing manager.
don't look at it from the manager's side, because not all managers with red trust produce bad projects too. and on the one hand no one will know about the success of a project. but I say this does not mean that red trust managers are good. my suggestion is to take the time to research in more detail about the project you want to follow including the developer background.
All of us make mistakes and pay the price for them. I am not against the rule of banning people with red beliefs from participating in signature campaigns but if possible give them one more chance.
I think as long as they do a good contribution to the community and do not violate the rules of the forum, the signature they absolutely deserve.
I think as long as they do a good contribution to the community and do not violate the rules of the forum, the signature they absolutely deserve.
managers bounty affected by red trusts usually they have a belief that bad in this forum plumpness manager bounty they get red trust because they commit fraud and do not pay the amount corresponding to the bounty hunter they also commit fraud by creating multiple accounts to get a great gift they greedy want to enrich themselves.
Many bounty campaign manager never allowing for red trust account participated at their campaign but not worry if you have red trust account you can participated with bounty campaign allowed for participants have red trust, maybe you can check spreadsheet or bounty campaign rule first before you joined, when you get participants have red account accepted you can join. 
managers bounty affected by red trusts usually they have a belief that bad in this forum plumpness manager bounty they get red trust because they commit fraud and do not pay the amount corresponding to the bounty hunter they also commit fraud by creating multiple accounts to get a great gift they greedy want to enrich themselves.
There are some bounty project that their admin has red trust and they are the ones managing, giving rules and information about the bounty project on ANN and altcoin bounties thread. What happens to their red trust, does it mean people won't join the campaign or the project is a scam because of that.
It is up to the owner and the BM if they wanted to allow tagged accounts. Getting a red tagged happens due to various reasons as what you can see from the feedback left by the DT Members.
It is kinda slightly unclean to see some participant with bad rep to promote a certain project, but I don't think that it should be the sole reason to not allow them to join, but again it is fairly subjective from the owner and the BM sometimes.
It is kinda slightly unclean to see some participant with bad rep to promote a certain project, but I don't think that it should be the sole reason to not allow them to join, but again it is fairly subjective from the owner and the BM sometimes.
I don't have personal issue about this too, if they were given chance by the team and the bounty manager, then who I am to judge them, will just do my part and that is to promote and to help the project, and not to criticize and judge other people. Everyone of us has chance to earn while we are learning here, if I will be the bounty manager, will be glad to accept them for as long as it is not a serious offense.
Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?
I think it is none of your business
Jump to: