Topic: Red trust accounts wearing signature..... - page 3. (Read 1280 times)
It is the bounty manager and the team's decision if they will allow users with red trust to join signature campaigns. And it doesn't directly reflect how hood or bad a manager is. Some projects doesn't care about the participants post or trust, what they care about the traffic and # of participants who will promote for their project.
What impression you are giving if someone with red trust is carrying your project signature? Definatly a bad image. Bounty manager need to be careful while designing the policy, so that red entries are not carrying your signature. A small mistake can turn out to be disastrous.
It is not necessary that the impression will be bad. It is important for project developers to advertise a project by any means.
The more often the project signature will appear on the forum pages, the better, the more people will see it, and the more potential investors will come to the project.
But only on condition that the owners of accounts with a negative trust will not be abusers who write shit posts and spam.
What impression you are giving if someone with red trust is carrying your project signature? Definatly a bad image. Bounty manager need to be careful while designing the policy, so that red entries are not carrying your signature. A small mistake can turn out to be disastrous.
The main problem is that the red trust accounts for the most part belong to multi accounts, which means that taking on such accounts,
the manager runs the risk of launching all multi-accounts associated with a particular account in the company.
This is normal if the rules do not prohibit the use of multiple accounts by one owner, but I have not seen such a permit in any company.
the manager runs the risk of launching all multi-accounts associated with a particular account in the company.
This is normal if the rules do not prohibit the use of multiple accounts by one owner, but I have not seen such a permit in any company.
Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?
This had been happening for a long time.
Why the sudden brought up to this?
It is the campaign managers take if he want to input it in the rules.
Mostly ICO's doesnt have much participants when it comes to signature campaigns.
Maybe that way they could add some more even though they are tagged with red. It doesn't mean though that the user is associated with them.
More like another help to advertise the campaign.
I don't know why this user brought this up either. It is almost like they are trying to look for trouble. I don't bother about trust unless it is for a scammer. So many people get red trust for such light things and they are never given the opportunity to reverse it and it is permanent and that is not very fair. I think trust should be wiped clean after a while but if you scam then it stays because that is a thief and a crime. But if it is for some people having quarrels then it doesn't matter. If you think this is what is important when choosing a project then you going to lose all your money.
Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?
I think allowing or disallowing participants with Red trust rating is a call of the bounty managers. Although it is important that bounty participants follow rules to sustain the bounty program and it is important that this restriction is stressed-out in the bounty instructions.
Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?
it's still natural, there are even gifts that managers also trust in red, there is also success. so the red trust is not the main benchmark whether the project is a scam or not, in my opinion. then what if the manager doesn't have red trust but the project is a scam? Red trust is not the main issue in the prize, but a solid team is the main key. Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?
Red trust means a lot of things, those who have red trust must either scammed someone, low quality posting, and other unforgivable act that is against the forum rules. In my opinion, bounty managers will not have a problem if they are going to let some people who have red trust as long as they didn't get that because of spamming, if they got it because they scammed someone, then it is not the problem at all cause he can't scam a project because he is the one who works for the project, and only the team could scam him.
On the other side, most of the bounty campaigns and managers doesn't allow red trust users to join their bounty, I guess it depends on who is managing the campaign or to the team but that doesn't mean that they are scam also.
As long as there is no red trust restriction and not break the rules, I think it's OK. Because ICO is not very likely lately, The managers give looseness to allow for more participants to participate in the campaign, and its normal for me. And by allowing participants that had red trust To participate not mean the campaign are scam.
Yes, restrictions are coming from the bounty manager, it was the agreement of both part and if it is not prohibited, then it is fine.Of course, allowing participants with red trust does not determine the legitimacy of a project.
It's strange because I always see bounties state categorically that no red trust member is allowed to wear their signature. If it's happening now, it has to be a case of incompetent bounty manager.
if I were a bounty manager, I would look for why a person received red trust before allowing him to participate in his campaign. if he is a cheater and was caught cheating in participating in a bounty campaign, then, of course, such a person should not be allowed to enter the projectAside from cheating in the bounty campaign. I think it is a bounty manager's decision what he will do if he caught someone in the campaign.
It's strange because I always see bounties state categorically that no red trust member is allowed to wear their signature. If it's happening now, it has to be a case of incompetent bounty manager.
if I were a bounty manager, I would look for why a person received red trust before allowing him to participate in his campaign. if he is a cheater and was caught cheating in participating in a bounty campaign, then, of course, such a person should not be allowed to enter the project
It's strange because I always see bounties state categorically that no red trust member is allowed to wear their signature. If it's happening now, it has to be a case of incompetent bounty manager.
I thought manager came from team but I saw it was not, because if it came from the team didn't know about red trust but it all depends on rules made by the manager himself, maybe the manager wants to make a full promotion so that it doesn't ban red trust accounts
Maybe, but for that rule given it still affect the project. negative feedback users are those who committed scam or promote scam projects. signature campaigns is a highest promotions in the forum and everyone are looking in it if that project run so good but with negative users and base on their feedback I didn't trust even the project. bounty managers are aware on it at first and give the project a proper criteria for users to see the project as trustworthy and intentional.
I thought manager came from team but I saw it was not, because if it came from the team didn't know about red trust but it all depends on rules made by the manager himself, maybe the manager wants to make a full promotion so that it doesn't ban red trust accounts
On the said campaign, bounty manager is not part of the campaign, and rules are to be made according to the instruction of the developer, bounty managers just guide to make rules and handle the bounty campaign itself. In this case, maybe the team and bounty manager have discussed it and they have agreed to allow red trust users to participate just to promote the project.
Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?
Allowing a red trust member to participate in a bounty campaign doesn't mean the manager is bad. The Bounty manager only runs according to the instructions from the developer team and I think as long as this forum allows, I don't think this is a problem
Bounty managers are those trusted to endorse here and influential user here in crypto currency community. Also they just refer as per instructions of the owner of the project, having a meeting first and plan their protection maps and schedules so if they include red trust user it's up to them as for the good of the project.
Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?
Allowing a red trust member to participate in a bounty campaign doesn't mean the manager is bad. The Bounty manager only runs according to the instructions from the developer team and I think as long as this forum allows, I don't think this is a problem
I think the rules is up to the team and bounty manager on who joins the bounty. If they allow any red trust account to join the bounty,I don't see anything wrong with that
I thought manager came from team but I saw it was not, because if it came from the team didn't know about red trust but it all depends on rules made by the manager himself, maybe the manager wants to make a full promotion so that it doesn't ban red trust accounts
Some of these bounty owners might not even be aware of what the trust system is all about. They should, but they might now. Or even worse, they might not care as long as they can get as many members as possible to advertise for them. I don't trust these project devs at all, but I would trust them even less (were that even possible) if they allow red trusted members to join their bounties. It's bad business practice and the fact that they don't care makes me question how serious they are about their projects.
That's correct and that's why they should be contacted, the things explained and asked if this was intentional or a mistake.
I mean that there should be the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise.
Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?
It's in the option or prerogative of bounty manager, two reasons I could think of is, there are lack of promoters and they want as many members to participate in their bounty campaign, so they include even with those red trust bounty hunters to join, the second one is bounty managers also has red trust and he has no issue with trust rating so they allow it. 
Some of these bounty owners might not even be aware of what the trust system is all about. They should, but they might now. Or even worse, they might not care as long as they can get as many members as possible to advertise for them. I don't trust these project devs at all, but I would trust them even less (were that even possible) if they allow red trusted members to join their bounties. It's bad business practice and the fact that they don't care makes me question how serious they are about their projects.
That's correct and that's why they should be contacted, the things explained and asked if this was intentional or a mistake.
I mean that there should be the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise.
They do not limit their participants just to make their project reach every corner of this forum including social media sites.
I have found a review about Dcoin, and I think it is not a good exchange
https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/as0f6y/never_use_dcoin_exchange_they_dont_let_you/
Jump to: