Pages:
Author

Topic: Red trust accounts wearing signature..... - page 4. (Read 1323 times)

sr. member
Activity: 896
Merit: 268
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
November 12, 2019, 02:23:28 AM
#64
Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

Is there any problem with that 'cause I don't think so. In the end they are still human, they can submit what the campaign may require as long as they passed the initial requirements. So, if there are no red trust issues on submitting an account requirement then they passed. The only thing that matter here is the appearance of the campaign itself 'cause they seemed as well not reliable.
hero member
Activity: 3024
Merit: 629
November 12, 2019, 02:21:29 AM
#63
Nowadays the top priority of developers are how to advertise their project effectively with many bounty hunters to help them spread awareness.

Sometimes the manager are just following the team's condition when implementing the rules so its not always the manager's decision.

If you have doubt on those campaign accepting red trust account then simply dont join.
sr. member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 259
November 12, 2019, 02:17:11 AM
#62
Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

This had been happening for a long time.
Why the sudden brought up to this?  Huh

It is the campaign managers take if he want to input it in the rules.
Mostly ICO's doesnt have much participants when it comes to signature campaigns.
Maybe that way they could add some more even though they are tagged with red. It doesn't mean though that the user is associated with them.
More like another help to advertise the campaign.
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
November 12, 2019, 02:14:29 AM
#61
new developers who don't have experience or don't have a lot of lunge in project promotion, always don't care about redstrust participants, because the most important thing for them is that many participants are involved and can attract other users. that is normal in ICO advertising, it is important that users are more selective if they want to join such a project. what else do they plan to register token on the Dcoin exchange? isn't the Dcoin exchange very shady?

And they will just lose money, because many will avoid projects advertised by red-trust users, thinking "if they allow scammers for advertising, what if they are also scammers?"
sr. member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 261
November 12, 2019, 02:12:44 AM
#60
I think they are more interested in the promotion and don't bother have much restriction or quality of posts and it's quite obvious that the project might or might not be successful as they are not bothered about the basic requirement for the participants. It's time for the other bounty managers and owners to buckle up and have stringent rules if they don't want people to think their project as scam.
jr. member
Activity: 40
Merit: 1
November 12, 2019, 02:08:12 AM
#59
Some of these bounty owners might not even be aware of what the trust system is all about.  They should, but they might now.  Or even worse, they might not care as long as they can get as many members as possible to advertise for them.  I don't trust these project devs at all, but I would trust them even less (were that even possible) if they allow red trusted members to join their bounties.  It's bad business practice and the fact that they don't care makes me question how serious they are about their projects.

That's correct and that's why they should be contacted, the things explained and asked if this was intentional or a mistake.
I mean that there should be the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise.
new developers who don't have experience or don't have a lot of lunge in project promotion, always don't care about redstrust participants, because the most important thing for them is that many participants are involved and can attract other users. that is normal in ICO advertising, it is important that users are more selective if they want to join such a project. what else do they plan to register token on the Dcoin exchange? isn't the Dcoin exchange very shady?
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
November 12, 2019, 01:56:48 AM
#58
Some of these bounty owners might not even be aware of what the trust system is all about.  They should, but they might now.  Or even worse, they might not care as long as they can get as many members as possible to advertise for them.  I don't trust these project devs at all, but I would trust them even less (were that even possible) if they allow red trusted members to join their bounties.  It's bad business practice and the fact that they don't care makes me question how serious they are about their projects.

That's correct and that's why they should be contacted, the things explained and asked if this was intentional or a mistake.
I mean that there should be the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise.
jr. member
Activity: 40
Merit: 1
November 12, 2019, 01:44:11 AM
#57
in my opinion it's normal, as long as the project team allows participants the red trust won't be a big problem. unless the project team bans it it will be a big problem.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1292
Hhampuz for Campaign management
November 12, 2019, 01:39:17 AM
#56
You must be new in bounty hunting my friend, this is normal here, some bounty managers allow negative accounts to promote their project and that's not against the forum rules, its their discretion and its their rules.
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 271
November 12, 2019, 01:27:50 AM
#55
Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

Well since the trust flags are now introduced negative feedbacks are now just feedbacks so, some managers like yahoo himself are accepting participants with negative trust  in signature campaign except in cryptotalk campaign which negative trust aren't allowed to join. if you want to join in signature campaign you have let the manager reviews your profile and let them decide if you are accepted or not.
member
Activity: 868
Merit: 10
November 12, 2019, 01:14:40 AM
#54
each project has its own rules, if the rules of a project do not mention the prohibition of red trust means they allow participants of the red trust as well. and I see in the E3T project spreadsheet there are many users with red trust, but you need to know that not all projects or managers are bad if they accept red trust participants.
jr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 2
November 12, 2019, 01:09:41 AM
#53
Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?
because a certain bounty allows hunters with red trust to join the bounty doesn't make the manager bad. The bounty has its rules and if the rule didn't state that, then there is nothing wrong with that
full member
Activity: 812
Merit: 100
www.cd3d.app
November 12, 2019, 01:07:35 AM
#52
not always bad projects allow red trusts to participate. like moozicore, where red trusts can participate in a signature campaign, and in the end their sales are good, judging from the current rate, the price on the exchange is quite satisfactory for bounty hunters, even though on November 14th the new tokens are unlocked

legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1185
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
November 12, 2019, 01:05:10 AM
#51
Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think?
They literally don't care about their participants, they just want to get more members for more exposure.

Most of the signature campaign does not accept accounts with red tag but there are still some who are accepting and I think its up to the investors now on how to decide as for sure if the company allows these members to be in the campaign, they have already evaluated that and might see some possible good result for allowing.

for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?
It's not unusual as well, some campaigns accepts red trust participants, some does not and that's normal.
full member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 147
November 12, 2019, 01:00:48 AM
#50
There are several types about negative trust, such as scammer, default loan, the user who has a lot of alternative account and the last account buyer. If there is a bounty campaign which promoted by scammer I just think that the end of the projret will end up being scam too.

It should be pay attention by bounty manager of this forum, because the risk that will be faced when they try to allow negative account that I mentioned above will be difficult to attract an investor. So, I can be disagree if there is bounty campaign which allow negative trust account being a promoter.

And I just believe, the trusted bounty manager won't be ever to allow negative trust account become his participant, because they will know its affect. Also, it seem like the developer of the project should give a requirement for their participant, because it will give many affect to the development of the project in the future. You can imagine how the affect it is.
legendary
Activity: 3094
Merit: 1472
November 12, 2019, 12:46:59 AM
#49
Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

That means that they are eager to get mass promotion even if it is done by someone who is quite not trusted or have scammed someone earlier. There are many but some of the managers also allow them if some feedbacks are given due personal issues or spat which is not the correct use of trust system.
sr. member
Activity: 1680
Merit: 263
November 12, 2019, 12:40:08 AM
#48
Generally a truly legitimate project will prohibit users with red credentials, but the example of the project you mentioned, I saw in the rules about their project mentioned that (there is no ban on red trust accounts). so I think this is normal and allowed by their project.
member
Activity: 406
Merit: 14
November 12, 2019, 12:36:12 AM
#47
Red trust accounts can still promote bounty projects if the project teams allow them, it should be on the bounty rules and regulation if red trust account is allowed or not.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1178
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
November 12, 2019, 12:32:53 AM
#46
Maybe they E3T bounty is pretty new because they might be more or less breaking btct rules as well:

  • During this period, you must make a minimum of 5 Posts per Week and 1 Post per week in the Announcement Thread .

In this specific quote they are breaking the rules of btctalk as they seem to link on their own ann thread and want to users to post there.
here's the rule they are breaking: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/incentivising-posting-within-one-or-more-threads-is-not-allowed-2559282
full member
Activity: 887
Merit: 100
November 12, 2019, 12:25:05 AM
#45
in my opinion a valid project and the responsible manager will not accept account participants with a red trust and vice versa for the project also will not accept managers with a red trust. and if other than that, you can redefine the meaning of the red trust account.
Pages:
Jump to: