Author

Topic: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. - page 105. (Read 636455 times)

legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
So... I'm just going to chime in regarding the OP's posts and not about all the other debates going on here.

Basically, r/science is a private board with specific rules that aim at producing peer-reviewed scientific research. This means they should let anyone post who has something like that, regardless of the study's conclusions. This also means that any comments should be regarding the specific study or should be providing referenced citations of adding anything not included in the study.

So, should global warming bashers be banned? Yes, if all they do is spout non-referenced non-scientific non-peer-reviewed research or do not present solid logical arguments to discuss the contents of the study. This should be the case for proponents of global warming as well.

It's r/science. It's not about opinion. It's about science. That's it.
Nonsense.

In r/science, those presenting solid scientific evidence and peer reviewed articles supporting one or another of the antithesis of your global warming religion's creed were banned.  You know it, we all know it.

10 Images Show What Coastal Cities Will Look Like After Sea-Levels Rise

Let's look at some of your "solid scientific" reddit topics.

CALL TO ACTION  - Please take 3 minutes today to make an important phone call.

India blames heat wave deaths on climate change

Rap News does it again... Pope Francis: The 10 Climate Commandments (RAP NEWS 33)

15 Strangest Weather Events So Far in 2015

Western Heat Wave Enters History Books; At Least Six June Records Already Broken; All-Time Records Threatened

Exxon knew of climate change in 1981, email says – but it funded deniers for 27 more years

10 Images Show What Coastal Cities Will Look Like After Sea-Levels Rise

Climate Change is making me depressed

NOAA: Hottest first half of the year in Northern Hemisphere by stunning 0.36º Farenheit

World's most famous climate scientist outlines an alarming scenario for planet's future


To be fair, your closing paragraph (bolded) proposes "equal banning."  But who bans the banners?

Once you invoke the heavy hand of censorship in the guise of promoting the common good, you live with the consequences.  If you don't like the consequences, don't complain here.   The joke that is Reddit is being laughed at here.

Further, by your own logic your post should not be allowed.  I hereby ban you from all places where words are typed on keyboards and from using electrons to move imperfect and flawed ideas.  
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
Bitcoin promoter. Pro Crypto tee wearer. Nice guy.
So... I'm just going to chime in regarding the OP's posts and not about all the other debates going on here.

Basically, r/science is a private board with specific rules that aim at producing peer-reviewed scientific research. This means they should let anyone post who has something like that, regardless of the study's conclusions. This also means that any comments should be regarding the specific study or should be providing referenced citations of adding anything not included in the study.

So, should global warming bashers be banned? Yes, if all they do is spout non-referenced non-scientific non-peer-reviewed research or do not present solid logical arguments to discuss the contents of the study. This should be the case for proponents of global warming as well.

It's r/science. It's not about opinion. It's about science. That's it.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon



“To Save The Planet We Must Shrink The Economy; Curb White Population”







“Significant segments of our movement celebrate a “green new deal,” that will create an economic boom and new jobs while greening our economy. This is dangerous self-deception. Everyone needs living-wage jobs, but if the additional millions of job-holders produce more products and consume as the typical living-wage worker and their families do today, we’ll collectively emit even more carbon and make the problem worse.

Therefore we must couple the new green jobs with significantly reduced hours and substantially increased wages/salaries for all workers, including professionals. These workers and their families must spend their increased funds and free time in a manner that does not produce more greenhouse gases. This complex of interactions won’t work without careful planning and re-education. We’ll make no progress if we create more consumers taking part in the throw-away society.

Progressive environmental activists are also reluctant to talk about population. We believe in sharing the world’s resources more equitably, but don’t calculate what that means as the global population approaches eight billion. The issue of population control has racist roots and a history of unequal practice. In addition, five hundred million relatively affluent North American and Western European whites produce 80 percent of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions, while billions of people of color in the third world have tiny carbon footprints. While masses of people living in poverty are not responsible for global warming, increasing their level of consumption to that enjoyed in the “developed world” will have a profoundly negative impact on the world’s carbon footprint.”


http://peoplesworld.org/the-way-to-save-the-planet-shrink-the-economy/


-------------------------------------
Finally. Some honesty. Again, the ones proposing the cleansing seem to always forget themselves, their own family, and keep breeding more of their own... While pushing for the elimination of their neighbors...



legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386


The thing the CDC whistleblower Thompson blew the whistle on was the study showing that young African American males are statistically more prone to autism associated with the MMR vaccine than other kids and the burying of that result by changing the study protocol.

Asthma is one of many autoimmune related disorders which has skyrocketed in the last decade or two (to the delight of pharma shareholders no doubt.)  It seems to me a workable hypothesis that whatever 'environmental' factors are at work here can affect people of African origin more than others.


FYI, I'm not an anti-vaccine guy. 

But I'll take your workable hypothesis any day of the week over the assertion being made that our SUV carbon emissions causes those kids' asthma.
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276


The thing the CDC whistleblower Thompson blew the whistle on was the study showing that young African American males are statistically more prone to autism associated with the MMR vaccine than other kids and the burying of that result by changing the study protocol.

Asthma is one of many autoimmune related disorders which has skyrocketed in the last decade or two (to the delight of pharma shareholders no doubt.)  It seems to me a workable hypothesis that whatever 'environmental' factors are at work here can affect people of African origin more than others.

legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386



MSNBC Host Blames Climate Change For August Heat Forcing Obama Speech On Climate Change Inside…

'Mother nature may be making his point for him'




MSNBC host José Díaz-Balart called the decision Monday to move President Obama’s speech on climate change inside because of hot temperatures an example of “Mother Nature … making his point for him” on the issue.

The network made a move against left-wing programming by canceling three of its progressive commentary shows last week, but this was an example of editorializing on behalf of the White House showing up in an ostensibly straight newscast.

“A couple of hours from now, President Obama will unveil a new plan to slash greenhouse gases and promote renewable energy, all in an effort to fight climate change,” Díaz-Balart said. “In fact, it seems like Mother Nature may be making his point for him sometimes. Today’s event was supposed to be held outside, but with temperatures expected to be in the mid-90s, officials figured it was too hot, so they moved it to the East Room.”


http://freebeacon.com/issues/msnbc-host-blames-climate-change-for-august-heat-forcing-obama-speech-inside/



Wait, you mean they all LIKE AIRCONDITIONING?  That's a big contributer to GHG if you believe them liars...
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon



MSNBC Host Blames Climate Change For August Heat Forcing Obama Speech On Climate Change Inside…

'Mother nature may be making his point for him'




MSNBC host José Díaz-Balart called the decision Monday to move President Obama’s speech on climate change inside because of hot temperatures an example of “Mother Nature … making his point for him” on the issue.

The network made a move against left-wing programming by canceling three of its progressive commentary shows last week, but this was an example of editorializing on behalf of the White House showing up in an ostensibly straight newscast.

“A couple of hours from now, President Obama will unveil a new plan to slash greenhouse gases and promote renewable energy, all in an effort to fight climate change,” Díaz-Balart said. “In fact, it seems like Mother Nature may be making his point for him sometimes. Today’s event was supposed to be held outside, but with temperatures expected to be in the mid-90s, officials figured it was too hot, so they moved it to the East Room.”


http://freebeacon.com/issues/msnbc-host-blames-climate-change-for-august-heat-forcing-obama-speech-inside/


legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
Let's face it, it's true everywhere. The reward of the moment always outweighs the possible future risks. That's why corporations don't want to do anything about global warming.


Let's face it, real science is inconvenient...  Wink


 
'One one-hundredth of a degree?' EPA's McCarthy admits Obama regs have no measurable climate impact


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkkeLpbz0-Y

Well, which is it?

Do the rewards of the moment outweigh the possible future risk of that deadly one hundredth of a degree?


Carbon taxing will be rewarding for those in charge of the pollution granted licencing delivery...



You mean by calling alarm on the deadly one hundredth, we make hundreds of very lively millionaires?


We make sure the developing nations won't mess up the planet more, by using their own natural resources... Also a green millionaire is much more human than one from a poor nation.

Capitalism gives ovarian cancer to polar bears... By spreading the future wealth to today's green millionaires you help the planet. Free chemotherapy to kodiak bears too.


legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
Let's face it, it's true everywhere. The reward of the moment always outweighs the possible future risks. That's why corporations don't want to do anything about global warming.


Let's face it, real science is inconvenient...  Wink


 
'One one-hundredth of a degree?' EPA's McCarthy admits Obama regs have no measurable climate impact


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkkeLpbz0-Y

Well, which is it?

Do the rewards of the moment outweigh the possible future risk of that deadly one hundredth of a degree?


Carbon taxing will be rewarding for those in charge of the pollution granted licencing delivery...



You mean by calling alarm on the deadly one hundredth, we make hundreds of very lively millionaires?
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon



Obama Takes Air Force One Jet And Marine One Helicopter To Play Round Of Golf Less Than 48 Hours Before Today’s Big Climate Speech…






-------------------------
Optical illusion...


legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
Let's face it, it's true everywhere. The reward of the moment always outweighs the possible future risks. That's why corporations don't want to do anything about global warming.


Let's face it, real science is inconvenient...  Wink


 
'One one-hundredth of a degree?' EPA's McCarthy admits Obama regs have no measurable climate impact


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkkeLpbz0-Y

Well, which is it?

Do the rewards of the moment outweigh the possible future risk of that deadly one hundredth of a degree?


Carbon taxing will be rewarding for those in charge of the pollution granted licencing delivery...


legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
Let's face it, it's true everywhere. The reward of the moment always outweighs the possible future risks. That's why corporations don't want to do anything about global warming.


Let's face it, real science is inconvenient...  Wink


 
'One one-hundredth of a degree?' EPA's McCarthy admits Obama regs have no measurable climate impact


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkkeLpbz0-Y

Well, which is it?

Do the rewards of the moment outweigh the possible future risk of that deadly one hundredth of a degree?
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
Let's face it, it's true everywhere. The reward of the moment always outweighs the possible future risks. That's why corporations don't want to do anything about global warming.


Let's face it, real science is inconvenient...  Wink


 
'One one-hundredth of a degree?' EPA's McCarthy admits Obama regs have no measurable climate impact


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkkeLpbz0-Y




legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
Let's face it, it's true everywhere. The reward of the moment always outweighs the possible future risks. That's why corporations don't want to do anything about global warming.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon



“The sea ice might be a little more resilient than we thought...”




Using new satellite data, researchers at University College London reported in Nature Geoscience on Monday that the total volume of sea ice in the Northern Hemisphere was well above average in the autumn of 2013, traditionally the end of the annual melt season, after an unusually cool summer when temperatures dropped to levels not seen since the 1990s.

“We now know it can recover by a significant amount if the melting season is cut short,” said the study’s lead author Rachel Tilling, a researcher who studies satellite observations of the Arctic. “The sea ice might be a little more resilient than we thought.”

A steady decline in the extent of Arctic sea ice since the late 1970s has been taken as a barometer of longer-term warming trends in the Northern hemisphere. The U.S. Navy last year predicted that by 2030 the Arctic’s northern sea route could be ice-free and navigable for nine weeks every year.

Miss Tilling and her colleagues used new data from the European Space Agency’s Cryosat-2 radar satellite, launched in 2010. For the first time, they measured changes in the overall volume of seasonal sea ice across the Arctic and Greenland. Until now, researchers have been able to track the extent of ice, but not its thickness.

In 2013, summer temperatures were about 5% cooler than the previous year and the volume of autumn ice jumped 41%, they said.


http://www.wsj.com/articles/sea-ice-might-be-more-resilient-than-thought-1437404447


legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386







------------------------------
How to communicate with the reddit generation...




http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/27/the-mathematics-of-carbon-dioxide-part-2/

The Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice age had to be hidden because if they were not, natural climate variability was much, much higher.  In that case, claims of "Unprecedented Warming due to Human's CO2 Emissions" could simply not be made - the math would not support it.

Through the 1990s and first decade of the new millenium, they got away with this.  But unfortunately for the Warmers, it stopped warming.  This provided evidence to even the man in the street that the shrill alarms of Doom Just a Decade Off were lies.

If the MWP and LIA did not exist, the current 20 year+ level temperatures would be an anomaly that required the effect of CO2 to be lowered.  But they did exist - thus the current 20 years with no warming is no big deal.

The correct calculations were possible all along.  Hiding past climate extremes to allow production of alternate numbers was a direct bending of science to political uses.  Now they've been found out at this.

Do not let them get away with this.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon







------------------------------
How to communicate with the reddit generation...


legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
Professor: Guy HIT BY LIGHTNING And Two Others Possibly Assassinated Over Climate Research
A professor at the University of Cambridge has suggested that three climate-change scientists involved in the investigation of melting Arctic ice could have been assassinated during a few months in 2013.

The professor is Peter Wadhams, reports The Telegraph. He is a professor of ocean physics in the applied mathematics and theoretical physics department at the prestigious English university.

The trio of researchers who met their tragic ends in 2013 are Seymour Laxon, Katherine Giles and Tim Boyd. Laxon and Giles were climate change scientists at University College London. Boyd was employed by the Scottish Association for Marine Science.

Laxon met his demise when he fell down a flight of stairs at a New Year’s Eve party on Jan 1, 2013. He was 49. Witnesses say the stairs were quite steep.

Giles died a few months later, in April, when she was hit by a truck while riding a bicycle to work. She was 35.

The truck — filled with dirt — made a left turn, explained the London Evening Standard in a story urging cyclists to watch out for trucks. Giles was caught by this maneuver and run over.

The driver of the truck, James Matovu, was exiting a construction site. He said he was unaware of the accident until an off-duty-police officer waved him down. At once, Matovu exited the truck and ran back to the scene.

“I can highlight once again the danger of coming up on the near-side of lorries,” coroner Shirley Radcliffe a few months later. “It’s been recognized as causing many deaths in London.”

Evidence indicates that Boyd, the third climate-change scientist who died in 2013, was struck by lightning.

On the afternoon of January 27, 2013, Boyd, 54, was out walking his dog in the small, lakeside Scottish town of Port Appin.

There was a storm at the time.

A passerby found Boyd’s body on the “the impressively long and rickety” Jubilee Bridge, which stretches “across the tidal marshes of Loch Laich.”

“There would appear to be no suspicious circumstances,” a local police spokeswoman said contemporaneously, according to the Daily Mail. “However, a post mortem will be carried out in due course to establish the exact cause of death.”

Wadhams, the Cambridge professor, said he believes talented hitmen likely carried out the killings of Laxon, Giles and Boyd.

“I do believe assassins possibly murdered them but I can see that I would be thought of as a looney for believing this,” Wadhams told the Telegraph. “But it’s just very odd coincidence that something like that should happen in such a brief period of time.”

Wadhams blames — but at the same time stops short of blaming — nefarious, unnamed actors in the energy industry for the deaths of the academics.

“I can only think of the oil lobby but I don’t think the oil lobby goes around killing people,” Wadham told the online English broadsheet.

“I thought if it was somebody assassinating them could it be one of our people doing it and that would be even more frightening. I thought it would be better not to touch this with a barge pole.”



http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/28/professor-guy-hit-by-lightning-and-two-others-possibly-assassinated-over-climate-research/


-------------------------------------------------------------
I am glad I am not his friend, nor his future psychiatrist...

 Cheesy Grin Cheesy


Reminds me of all the holistic doctors that have been dying and disappearing.


Yet... We are the deniers, they are the believers...



I know who kill them!  Gaia kill them!  She say they lie!  She tired of all the lies!


... Unless the "oil lobby" has its hands on a top secret lightning bolt canon, created for the only purpose of striking his colleague... FROM OUTER SPACE!!!!!!!1!!11!!11!



legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
Professor: Guy HIT BY LIGHTNING And Two Others Possibly Assassinated Over Climate Research
A professor at the University of Cambridge has suggested that three climate-change scientists involved in the investigation of melting Arctic ice could have been assassinated during a few months in 2013.

The professor is Peter Wadhams, reports The Telegraph. He is a professor of ocean physics in the applied mathematics and theoretical physics department at the prestigious English university.

The trio of researchers who met their tragic ends in 2013 are Seymour Laxon, Katherine Giles and Tim Boyd. Laxon and Giles were climate change scientists at University College London. Boyd was employed by the Scottish Association for Marine Science.

Laxon met his demise when he fell down a flight of stairs at a New Year’s Eve party on Jan 1, 2013. He was 49. Witnesses say the stairs were quite steep.

Giles died a few months later, in April, when she was hit by a truck while riding a bicycle to work. She was 35.

The truck — filled with dirt — made a left turn, explained the London Evening Standard in a story urging cyclists to watch out for trucks. Giles was caught by this maneuver and run over.

The driver of the truck, James Matovu, was exiting a construction site. He said he was unaware of the accident until an off-duty-police officer waved him down. At once, Matovu exited the truck and ran back to the scene.

“I can highlight once again the danger of coming up on the near-side of lorries,” coroner Shirley Radcliffe a few months later. “It’s been recognized as causing many deaths in London.”

Evidence indicates that Boyd, the third climate-change scientist who died in 2013, was struck by lightning.

On the afternoon of January 27, 2013, Boyd, 54, was out walking his dog in the small, lakeside Scottish town of Port Appin.

There was a storm at the time.

A passerby found Boyd’s body on the “the impressively long and rickety” Jubilee Bridge, which stretches “across the tidal marshes of Loch Laich.”

“There would appear to be no suspicious circumstances,” a local police spokeswoman said contemporaneously, according to the Daily Mail. “However, a post mortem will be carried out in due course to establish the exact cause of death.”

Wadhams, the Cambridge professor, said he believes talented hitmen likely carried out the killings of Laxon, Giles and Boyd.

“I do believe assassins possibly murdered them but I can see that I would be thought of as a looney for believing this,” Wadhams told the Telegraph. “But it’s just very odd coincidence that something like that should happen in such a brief period of time.”

Wadhams blames — but at the same time stops short of blaming — nefarious, unnamed actors in the energy industry for the deaths of the academics.

“I can only think of the oil lobby but I don’t think the oil lobby goes around killing people,” Wadham told the online English broadsheet.

“I thought if it was somebody assassinating them could it be one of our people doing it and that would be even more frightening. I thought it would be better not to touch this with a barge pole.”



http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/28/professor-guy-hit-by-lightning-and-two-others-possibly-assassinated-over-climate-research/


-------------------------------------------------------------
I am glad I am not his friend, nor his future psychiatrist...

 Cheesy Grin Cheesy


Reminds me of all the holistic doctors that have been dying and disappearing.


Yet... We are the deniers, they are the believers...



I know who kill them!  Gaia kill them!  She say they lie!  She tired of all the lies!
Jump to: