Why are we discussing this in terms of cryptocurrency.
It really has nothing to do with it you're talking about a totally different website and not this website.
Topic: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. - page 17. (Read 636455 times)
Scientist Outsells Gore On Kindle
.....
“It’s wrong because everything Gore shows in the new movie happens naturally,” said Spencer, who’s been studying Earth’s climate for decades.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/04/al-gore-outsold-on-kindle-by-an-e-book-debunking-an-inconvenient-sequel/?utm_campaign=atdailycaller&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Social
So ManBearPig's idiocy is at last apparent?
I would be cautiously optimistic to believe so, but how old is this thread already... The fight for changing people's mind is half never ending, half mind melding, and half thankless...
Scientist Outsells Gore On Kindle
.....
“It’s wrong because everything Gore shows in the new movie happens naturally,” said Spencer, who’s been studying Earth’s climate for decades.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/04/al-gore-outsold-on-kindle-by-an-e-book-debunking-an-inconvenient-sequel/?utm_campaign=atdailycaller&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Social
So ManBearPig's idiocy is at last apparent?
Scientist Outsells Gore On Kindle
Former Vice President Al Gore’s new book is lagging in sales, and, in fact, is being outsold on Amazon Kindle by an e-book debunking many of the claims made in “An Inconvenient Sequel.”
Climatologist Roy Spencer authored an e-book “An Inconvenient Deception” to critique the “bad science, bad policy and some outright falsehoods” in Gore’s latest movie and book, which were released in August. Now, it’s ranked higher in Amazon’s Kindle store.
“There are three big weaknesses in Gore’s new movie: science, economics and energy policy,” Spencer, a noted skeptic of catastrophic global warming, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.
Gore released the sequel to his widely popular 2006 film “An Inconvenient Truth” in August, embarking on a media tour to promote the book and film. But so far, ticket sales have lagged, and even left-wing reviewers have harshly criticized the film.
The e-book published to accompany Gore’s film is ranked #51,031 for purchases in the Kindle Store, according to Amazon.com. Spencer’s book is ranked #1,201 for Kindle Store purchases.
On the media circuit, Gore repeatedly said “every night on the network news is like a nature hike through the Book of Revelations.” His movie points to extreme weather events as evidence of man-made global warming, including the drought in Syria.
“It’s wrong because everything Gore shows in the new movie happens naturally,” said Spencer, who’s been studying Earth’s climate for decades.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/04/al-gore-outsold-on-kindle-by-an-e-book-debunking-an-inconvenient-sequel/?utm_campaign=atdailycaller&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Social
Collusion: Jerry Brown Going to Russia Conference Hosted by Putin
California Governor Jerry Brown is flying to Vladivostok Sunday for an economic cooperation conference hosted by Russian President Vladimir Putin, where the governor plans to promote decarbonizing investments.
Despite hydrocarbons being 70 percent of Russia’s exports, and 50 percent of government revenues, Brown will self-represent the United States to promote what he refers to as sustainable investments in de-carbonizing the planet.
Brown is scheduled to participate on a panel on September 6 titled: “The Russia-China-Japan-U.S. Quadrangle: Are There Opportunities for Cooperation?” President Vladimir Putin will host the conference and give the opening speech. It is unknown if Brown will meet privately with Putin.[…]
Brown has been jetting around the planet over the last couple years to promote climate change and a planet with a smaller carbon footprint in Paris, Bonn, Beijing, Quebec, Mexico City and now Vladivostok. His travel has been paid for by the California State Protocol Foundation. CSPF grants for Brown’s travel appear to have been funded by a $100,000 grant from the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation’s social justice investing.
http://www.breitbart.com/california/2017/09/03/cal-gov-brown-going-to-russia-conference-hosted-by-putin/
--------------------------------------------------------
Maybe he should drink less carbonated water on board of the planes he took on his many trips around the globe... to save the planet.
.....Robertson said rising temperatures and increased rainfall had people driving more miles than they would have otherwise, leading to more deaths.
This problem is easily solved.
Just change the unit of miles to kilometer.
There will be FEWER deaths per kilometer so everything's okay.
Study Blames Global Warming, Not Cell Phones, For Spike In Car Accident Deaths
Global warming was responsible for thousands of road deaths in 2015, according to a new study, contradicting many public safety experts who blame increased cell phone use for the spike in traffic fatalities.
“As temperatures continue to increase from heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere, road deaths will likely increase more than expected unless there are major mitigating countermeasures,” retired Yale University epidemiologist Leon Robertson said in a statement.
Traffic deaths rose by 2,348, or 7.2 percent, in 2015 to 35,200, according to Transportation Department data. Robertson said rising temperatures and increased rainfall had people driving more miles than they would have otherwise, leading to more deaths.
“If millions more people drive cars because the temperature is getting warmer … then that adds up to a lot of miles,” Robertson told the Thomson Reuters Foundation. “Mainly it’s a simple multiplication.”
http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/01/study-blames-global-warming-not-cell-phones-for-spike-in-car-accident-deaths/
If these banned posters were just being trolls, then I have no problem with it. I mean these posters are staring at scientific evidence in the face and denying its truth and validity in a science forum itself.
Sez who?Methinks it is the Reddit forum and it's moderators that are denying science. Most of the posts there are auto generated by the forum moderators, and most are pure propaganda.
However, let's assume you are correct, and some poster stared scientific evidence in the fact and denied its truth and validity. Let's say he vigorously defended his incorrect position, and all of the Reddit moderators and visitors were unable to argue down the convincing presentations made.
That's called DEBATE.
In the absence of that, you don't have a science forum. You have a forum ran by Deniers of Science.
So here you go, buddy.
The crust of the earth is elastic, which is obvious because gravity has formed it into a near sphere. Worry about sea level rise is groundless, because whether the h20 is ice or water, the same weight pushes inward, and the forces will equalize. A bit more weight, a bit more compression, and hence there will be no sea level rise, even if all of Greenland were to melt.
Either refute this with science, or shut the fuck up.
Gravity is bullshit, it's an unproven theory.
If these banned posters were just being trolls, then I have no problem with it. I mean these posters are staring at scientific evidence in the face and denying its truth and validity in a science forum itself.
Sez who?Methinks it is the Reddit forum and it's moderators that are denying science. Most of the posts there are auto generated by the forum moderators, and most are pure propaganda.
However, let's assume you are correct, and some poster stared scientific evidence in the fact and denied its truth and validity. Let's say he vigorously defended his incorrect position, and all of the Reddit moderators and visitors were unable to argue down the convincing presentations made.
That's called DEBATE.
In the absence of that, you don't have a science forum. You have a forum ran by Deniers of Science.
So here you go, buddy.
The crust of the earth is elastic, which is obvious because gravity has formed it into a near sphere. Worry about sea level rise is groundless, because whether the h20 is ice or water, the same weight pushes inward, and the forces will equalize. A bit more weight, a bit more compression, and hence there will be no sea level rise, even if all of Greenland were to melt.
Either refute this with science, or shut the fuck up.
Gravity is bullshit, it's an unproven theory.
If these banned posters were just being trolls, then I have no problem with it. I mean these posters are staring at scientific evidence in the face and denying its truth and validity in a science forum itself.
Sez who?Methinks it is the Reddit forum and it's moderators that are denying science. Most of the posts there are auto generated by the forum moderators, and most are pure propaganda.
However, let's assume you are correct, and some poster stared scientific evidence in the fact and denied its truth and validity. Let's say he vigorously defended his incorrect position, and all of the Reddit moderators and visitors were unable to argue down the convincing presentations made.
That's called DEBATE.
In the absence of that, you don't have a science forum. You have a forum ran by Deniers of Science.
So here you go, buddy.
The crust of the earth is elastic, which is obvious because gravity has formed it into a near sphere. Worry about sea level rise is groundless, because whether the h20 is ice or water, the same weight pushes inward, and the forces will equalize. A bit more weight, a bit more compression, and hence there will be no sea level rise, even if all of Greenland were to melt.
Either refute this with science, or shut the fuck up.
If these banned posters were just being trolls, then I have no problem with it. I mean these posters are staring at scientific evidence in the face and denying its truth and validity in a science forum itself.
Can you be a scientist and believe Global warming is not science fact?
Do you believe Bill Nye is a science guy?
If these banned posters were just being trolls, then I have no problem with it. I mean these posters are staring at scientific evidence in the face and denying its truth and validity in a science forum itself.
It didn't take me long to realize this isn't a bigotry or being unobjective, it's that the science no longer is valid to justify climate change denial and that's that. We cannot risk having uninformed people being influenced by faulty science, at least that's my $0.02 on the issue..
How about trying to write just one, clear, simple sentence?
It didn't take me long to realize this isn't a bigotry or being unobjective, it's that the science no longer is valid to justify climate change denial and that's that. We cannot risk having uninformed people being influenced by faulty science, at least that's my $0.02 on the issue..
Don't worry if you don't understand science, or any of that tech stuff about climate. We'll tell you everything you need to know. It doesn't matter if you have trouble remembering it as long as you have the right attitude.
Your job will be to fight Deniers.
It's an important task today, and a lot of money is riding on it. That's why we want the best, and only the best. If you had trouble in school, difficulty even passing, don't worry. We can use you. The ability to think and especially, the ability to think about complicated stuff, only gets in your way. Just think about the self confidence you'll gain by getting right up in the face of Deniers every day, and with a snarl and a look of fierce righteousness, telling them to Shut Up.
They'll try to reason with you, and your job is to tell them to Shut Up. It's a great future.
It can be yours.
If you apply now.
The interesting part to me is the absolute desperation in your replies trying to convince someone that you are far beyond everyone's understanding. I started pointing out things changing in major ways, but you'll find some little bit of evidence countering some scientist's claims at some point.
A way of speaking that shows that you understand the climate problem is astounding.. But can it guarantee all that he has said? Chances are we are a little off the mark,, But no matter what happens. Climate denial is something that reflects ignorance..
Have you considered a career with the Climate Adjustment Special Services(Climate ASS)? We can use people that understand "ways of speaking," as you put it. People that know the importance of efficiently stomping out dissent, while praising those who follow the true faith and the righteous path.
Perks of the job include air conditioned cubicle, a generous mileage allowance in a Climate ASS car, and when traveling, first class airline travel.
--Recruiter, C. ASS.
--Temperature Adjustment Services
--Northern Hemisphere
New Study Proves Earth Was Warmer During Medieval Times
Typical of most such temperature series, it zigzags up and down while showing two rising trends: the first peaks about 1200 AD and corresponds with a period known as the Medieval Warm Period (MWP), while the second peaks in 1980 and then shows decline. In between, is the Little Ice Age (LIA), which according to the Northern Hemisphere composite bottomed-out in 1650 AD. (Of course, the MWP corresponded with a period of generally good harvests in England – when men dressed in tunics and built grand cathedrals with tall spires. It preceded the LIA when there was famine and the Great Plague of London.)
Ignoring for the moment the MWP and LIA, you might want to simply dismiss this temperature series on the basis it peaks in 1980: it doesn’t continue to rise to the very end of the record: to the year 2000.
In fact, this decline is typical of most such proxy reconstructions – derived from pollen, stalagmites, boreholes, coral cores and especially tree rings. Within mainstream climate science the decline after 1980 is referred to as “the divergence problem”, and then hidden.
In denial of this problem, leading climate scientists have been known to even graft temperature measurements from thermometers onto the proxy record after 1980 to literally ‘hide the decline’. Phil Jones, the head of the Climate Research Unit, University of East Anglia, aptly described the technique as a ‘trick’.
Grafting thermometer data onto the end of the proxy record generally ‘fixes’ the problem after 1980, while remodelling effectively flattens the Medieval Warm Period.
There are, however, multiple lines of evidence indicating it was about a degree warmer across Europe during the MWP – corresponding with the 1200 AD rise in our Northern Hemisphere composite. In fact, there are oodles of published technical papers based on proxy records that provide a relatively warm temperature profile for this period.
https://www.spectator.com.au/2017/08/big-data-finds-the-medieval-warm-period-no-denial-here/
You must just be ignorant. We got rid of that annoying Medieval Warmer Period and that Little Icy Age. If you don't believe, just go back to the primary source.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8E42mIvjzRw
It's about "climate reconstruction" and "tricks" to explain a very complicated, almost magical science wizardry to the
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3riDY_a9vVc
How things has changed for him... and not for the best.
Be reasonable. Think of how impossibly complicated life would be if we allowed regular people, such as yourself, to measure the temperature.
We'll do the temperature measurements.
We'll tell you how hot it is.
Now run along and go back to your life with the other deplorables.
Oh, and by the way. That chart doesn't mean what you think it means. Adjustment Staff here inform me that when the temperatures go down, that just means that much more warming is boiling in the pot, and when the lid flies off, it'll be that much more dramatic. So when you thought temperatures were down, that proves global warming.
Any other questions feel free to ask.
Bureau of Temperature Adjustments
Public Information Officer XY111.01
The interesting part to me is the absolute desperation in your replies trying to convince someone that you are far beyond everyone's understanding. I started pointing out things changing in major ways, but you'll find some little bit of evidence countering some scientist's claims at some point.
A way of speaking that shows that you understand the climate problem is astounding.. But can it guarantee all that he has said? Chances are we are a little off the mark,, But no matter what happens. Climate denial is something that reflects ignorance..
Jump to: