Sure, you are just repeating misinformation.
First, let's look at the ACTUAL thing happening in the blog I suggested you look at. Quoting the final paragraph is a nice way to get to the heart of the controversy.
Here’s Scientific American on the story yesterday:
The disagreement may seem esoteric, but it underpins the biggest climate disagreement of the past decades. Climate models, which are virtual representations of our planet, project that temperatures were much higher in the early 2000s than was the case in reality. Scientists have been trying to understand why.
Here the question is the disagreement of climate models with reality. So you don't even have the subject right, do you? Strange that you blow the horn of triumph on your bicycle that just sailed off the cliff of reason, but hey, stranger things have happened.
Nope. It has nothing to do with the subject. You wanna say models have problem confronting reality? Well sure go on, I'll agree on that with you no problem. That's not with this statement that I have a problem as it is a rather true statement!
Next,
Please look at the EXACT claim that I made, which for convenience you may call the "Pause Claim." It has to do with satellite data, very specifically the lack of any statistically significant warming showed in a particular data set.
You are not refuting this claim, and neither are those you quote. Rather you are just sort of talking side by side, like babies do when they play side by side with other babies. Babies have not yet learned to play with others.
That's very simple and should be obvious. Is it not?
Lol, so you're actually claiming people saying the rise of temperature is of 0.1° per decade are saying there is a pause in temperature increase...
What's obvious is that you quoted a shitty blog claiming scientists admited there was a pause in temperature increase, and when you look in the source of this shitty article you see that it's not the case. Not the case at all.