Pages:
Author

Topic: Reference topic: Why are these members excluded on trust lists? (Read 4214 times)

hero member
Activity: 517
Merit: 11957
Rest of you post is also nonsense..

As I said, not a single argument, but only one value judgments of me, my posts, and other nonsense that does not have to the point of the question.

eddie13 has shown himself to be incapable of substantiating his accusations and incapable of arguing for his words. I asked him a number of questions, but he did not answer any of them.

eddie13 is a liar and is no different from airfinex or scumbuster. They also say a lot of words, and when it comes time to answer questions, they pretend to be fools who do not understand what they are being asked about or simply ignore uncomfortable questions.    Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 517
Merit: 11957
I like them for other reasons..

As I understand it, you cannot provide answers to other questions, absurdly ignoring them.

Well, you see, but you are talking about some kind of revenge. It was like this: eddie13 saw a topic in meta and read the accusations against me, then some PM was sent to him and he made conclusions based on everything, where he accused me of having shit tags and I received 3000 merit for google translate. But to check the information that he received, eddie13 considered it superfluous, well, since someone wrote it, then it’s true, eddie13 thought.

So, eddie13, I gave you ~ for not having your opinion, but simply repeating after someone, without checking the information that you are spreading. Since you, eddie13, instead of proofs that confirm your accusations against me, are mumbling something incoherent, you cannot be trusted. Your judgments cannot be trusted because they are based more on hearsay than facts.




~

My post was not intended to prove to someone that my trust carry weight. The point of the post was that eddie13 is two-faced - it simultaneously despises such tags and adds people to his trust list who have a lot of such tags.

If he does this, it does not mean that it was precisely these tags, most likely there was a personal disagreement, it is also worth considering that I was in the chipmixer, and eddie13 is a chipmixer hater. He cannot properly answer the rest of the accusations, because he has never verified this information and cannot objectively answer for what he wrote about me.

He now has two ways: either to pretend to be a fool that he does not understand what he is being asked about, or to express himself with some general phrases that can be substituted for any situation.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Bump with an update that will also count as my Reference link for neutral feedback:
~Timelord2067
I've hesitated to exclude this user for a long time. That moment has arrived: he's too stubborn to admit he was wrong leaving negative feedback to 2 users while he was on DT2. Even after locking his topic and adding neutral feedback (with the same incorrect claims) he hasn't removed his negative feedback. It's unfortunate he removes the importance of all his good ratings by leaving ratings that are objectively incorrect.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
none of the DT paid attention to my arguments.
I read it, but this isn't the right topic to discuss specific users. I don't mind some discussion, but in this case you have another topic already. This is a Reference topic (which kinda failed I might add: barely anyone explained why they exclude users).
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 146
Quote
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
Timelord2067, on this forum, messages are deleted not only on personal initiative. I don't want to get personal, but if you were a little smarter, then you would not be saying stupid things, then maybe those around you would stop considering you an idiot.

And few people care about your preconceived opinion, since you do not see the obvious facts, and I think this is the reason why you were kicked out of the DT.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
I am sure that if these arguments were published by someone from DT, then exactly the same post would have attracted public attention.

Perhaps if you didn't keep deleting your prior posts (and from what I can tell, that doesn't include merited posts), then readers might feel inclined to sit up and take more notice of your ramblings (which is all they seem to be thus far).  Others have already suggested you stop, yet you don't.
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 146
A lot of time has passed, but none of the DT paid attention to my arguments.

I am sure that if these arguments were published by someone from DT, then exactly the same post would have attracted public attention.
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 146
Fix your fucking quote before you get banned for plagiarism. It would be immensely amusing but I'm really tired of this sockpuppeting shit-stiring drama.
Thanks for pointing that out, I really did accidentally make a mistake.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
That would be very obvious Trust abuse.
(~~~)
You are incapable of defending yourself, which is why you attack those who accuse you of plagiarism.Stop deflecting, address your problems head on.  It's the only way to resolve them.
To me it seems like a weakness to try to defame the person who made some valid arguments. I still think the plagiarism rules should be adjusted, this shouldn't be allowed (see my reasons why). Big surprise: the guy who first posted about Ratimov's plagiarism received negative feedback the next day:

Image loading...

I can't help but think Ratimov was angry when he tagged those users. Here's another "brain-dead fucker". I don't know why Ratimov left them negative feedback in English, because I can't read the Russian Reference links. I see one very strong connection though: they've criticized Ratimov, so he tags them. And then you wonder why people use alt accounts? Allow me to quote myself:
Be the bigger man!With great power comes great responsibility (source unknown). Especially when you're on DefaultTrust (or if you want to be on DefaultTrust in the future), you shouldn't (ab)use that power by leaving (negative) feedback when someone does something you don't like. Your Sent feedback is what others use to judge your judgement.If someone on the internet is mean to you: boo fucking hoo! Use the Ignore button, and forget about them.

Fix your fucking quote before you get banned for plagiarism. It would be immensely amusing but I'm really tired of this sockpuppeting shit-stiring drama.
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 146
I don't trust Ratimov because:

1. There is no more egregious case of text-spinning with the help of Google translator than the case of Ratimov.

Thanks to RapTarX, suchmoon, icopress, The Pharmacist, Poker Player for constructive answers ON THEME. The rest of the speculation and blah blah are not interesting to me.


3. Ratimov is an inveterate liar who publishes deliberately false facts.

3000+ merits for using Google translate eh? What a great method of distributing DT voting power ..

Stop trying to discredit those who allege that you're a plagiarist.
The most delusional thing that can be said about this. What does this have to do with it?
I got the same impression. The feedback you left airfinex doesn't help either: this looks more like a personal attack than anything based on facts:Image loading...
When I read feedback like this, it makes whoever wrote it look bad, not whoever received it.
(~~~)
As for his accusation, if I wanted some kind of revenge, I would put him a negative trust.
That would be very obvious Trust abuse.
(~~~)
You are incapable of defending yourself, which is why you attack those who accuse you of plagiarism.Stop deflecting, address your problems head on.  It's the only way to resolve them.
To me it seems like a weakness to try to defame the person who made some valid arguments. I still think the plagiarism rules should be adjusted, this shouldn't be allowed (see my reasons why). Big surprise: the guy who first posted about Ratimov's plagiarism received negative feedback the next day:

Image loading...

I can't help but think Ratimov was angry when he tagged those users. Here's another "brain-dead fucker". I don't know why Ratimov left them negative feedback in English, because I can't read the Russian Reference links. I see one very strong connection though: they've criticized Ratimov, so he tags them. And then you wonder why people use alt accounts? Allow me to quote myself:
Be the bigger man!With great power comes great responsibility (source unknown). Especially when you're on DefaultTrust (or if you want to be on DefaultTrust in the future), you shouldn't (ab)use that power by leaving (negative) feedback when someone does something you don't like. Your Sent feedback is what others use to judge your judgement.If someone on the internet is mean to you: boo fucking hoo! Use the Ignore button, and forget about them.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
You know you can use the "Beautify" (AKA "delete") button, right?
Hey Loyce, Brother, although the conversation does not strike me off topic however you are the sailor of this topic so feel free if this seems off to you. However, I hope you find this argument the reason of distrusting someone not having a sense of proper judgement 😉
If this were my thread I would delete every post made since March 3rd.
I am/was way too busy this weekend to even read all posts completely. So I'll let it play out for a while, and when I have a lot of time (and popcorn) to spare, I'll read everything (with my finger itching above the delete button).

Once in a while I'll summarize posts and clean up this thread.
This whole topic can be reduced to about 8 posts Grin
full member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 140



That is, I earned a rating for scam buster, activity on the forum. And eddie13 thinks these are shit ratings. Now let's see who eddie13 trusts:

You started this shit on other topics, and now you are not able to answer for your words.

You really think the rating from Bitcoingirl is positive? Your translator stopped working, fix it.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
I like CM just fine.. Actually I align with their mission very well..
That thread, if you would have read it, was about ChipMixer posters having contrary positions to that of what they advertise for..

Rest of you post is also nonsense.. Gaslighting..
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 2100
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
That is, I earned a rating for scam buster, activity on the forum. And eddie13 thinks these are shit ratings.
According to my custom trust list, I can see three positive feedback where one feedback is in Russian text. I didn’t check with google translator as automated translation can be terrible and my judgement on that feedback may go wrong. So, I'm sharing the views on the rest two feedback.

First one says, "You are the first to receive 2000 merits as Russian"
2nd says, "You are useful user as you write good stuff."

Now, come to the point of what positive feedback means. This is what written in the feedback sending page-
Quote
You think that this person is unlikely to scam anyone.
Let's break it down. According to your feedback, you are unlikely to scam. But, did you ever trade here? Do both the feedback includes any trading activities? Did you risk any financial thing? Nothing, right. Then, how can these two feedback represent you as you are unlikely to scam? Don't you think these two feedbacks are wrong according to the definition of the positive feedback?
In the past, there were users who scam huge money with such feedback. See theyoungmillionaire case. He got exactly the same feedback like you, got trusted by others and scammed 0.30 BTC I think.
I'm not saying you are going to scam, or I'm not saying it’s your fault but you feedbacks doesn’t worth in my opinion also.

@LoyceV, sorry. I think this discussion is off topic here and also my post is.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST



That is, I earned a rating for scam buster, activity on the forum. And eddie13 thinks these are shit ratings. Now let's see who eddie13 trusts:

Shit ratings yup..

I like them for other reasons..
copper member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 4543
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Wow, what a clusterfuck of a thread this has become!  

Public Service Announcement:  Everyone engaging in, and contributing to personal squabbles in this thread; you're not helping the situation.  If this were my thread I would delete every post made since March 3rd.
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 2736
Farewell LEO: o_e_l_e_o
Loyce.. Feel free to wipe all this after a while..
My name was just mentioned here so many times I kinda had to reply..
Damn it!
I forgot that this is another of LoyceV's self moderated thread where off topics will be deleted 😛

Hey Loyce, Brother, although the conversation does not strike me off topic however you are the sailor of this topic so feel free if this seems off to you. However, I hope you find this argument the reason of distrusting someone not having a sense of proper judgement 😉
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 2736
Farewell LEO: o_e_l_e_o
Trust is not the place where you need to leave your bets on some event. Will or will not go away. ; D
Sorry to know your ignorance.
I am not interested to go further with your ignorant kid zone but I can not help to know who else are with you? What did you mean with we?
It is a pity, we all sincerely regret that BitcoinGirl.Club does not understand something there. Roll Eyes

We? Mind giving the list?
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 2736
Farewell LEO: o_e_l_e_o
You have a typical bounty boy mindset who primarily looks at everything through the lens of money.
Boy you are so mistaken and it's not my job to correct you.
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 2736
Farewell LEO: o_e_l_e_o
That's enough. There is no point to write you anything. I would like to see how long you stay around with this shit mindset. In fact, I am certain that without having a signature campaign or a way of earning any money from this forum you will last the next one year. Today is 14th March 2021.



Conversation reference : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56564234

With connection, which tariff did you choose? What the hell are you talking about? To draw attention? Whose? Your? Or eddie13? You write this to me, not I to you. I just answer you.

If you use your logic, it means that you were looking for attention, so that I turned my attention to you. Is that how it turns out? Or you have selective blindness and you see only what you want.

So let's do some research. How many times eddie tried to get attention before yesterday before I answered him. Can you count? Then count it.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56464147
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56468340
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5317072
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56506969

You talk about that kind of shit trying to hide behind your registration date. Let me tell you a terrible secret, the fact that you have been registered here for a long time does not in any way negate the fact that you can be an idiot. So don't try to hide him and yourself behind these registration dates.

Those users who are really busy with useful things here will never write this bravado in style: you know how long I have been on the forum, and you are so much, but I know how much I have done here.

You are an ordinary poser.

Apparently here some kind of diagnosis is observed with the same development of events:

- the user writes to me
- I reply to the user
- the user claims that I am trying to attract attention by attacking him.

Thank you, I laughed at your naive arguments.  Cheesy

Full archive to see the comments made by the user: https://archive.ph/wip/EAv7w
Pages:
Jump to: