bump for more discussion.
Topic: ▄▀▄▀▄ Remove Corruption From DT - Union Trust List ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ - page 5. (Read 8058 times)
March 21, 2019, 11:42:59 AM
February 25, 2019, 01:22:13 PM
I'm pretty sure the OP realised without the 250 cycled gamed merits then any direct removal at this time was not going to happen straight away.
This is merely a good thread that people when abused with red trust over a non scam related matter can join and together plenty of other actions can be taken when there is the will to do so.
Trying to operate within a broken and gamed system against those already entrenched deeply and controlling that system is not going to work out well.
Better to aim to get the broken system fixed.
This is merely a good thread that people when abused with red trust over a non scam related matter can join and together plenty of other actions can be taken when there is the will to do so.
Trying to operate within a broken and gamed system against those already entrenched deeply and controlling that system is not going to work out well.
Better to aim to get the broken system fixed.
February 23, 2019, 11:15:04 PM
OP's resistance movement didn't reach anything near DT1 Ranking, and it looks like he gave up.
While I don't condone H8bussesNbicycles methods I would hazard a guess they are going to be more successful than you imagine given s/he is amassing UID alts to which both yourself, darkstar_ and mikeywith have effectively given him/her the green light to use those alts to bump up their overall DT trust starting (here) and continuing (here).
I'm not going to say anything which might be construed as guiding H8bussesNbicycles - I don't need to - you three have already shown H8bussesNbicycles the path to take.
(Archived)
February 22, 2019, 06:11:22 AM
That is indeed another possible explanation...
However, if one looks at the first page of this thread, it is now essentially just posts from the "For" side of this thread. All other replies were deleted and while it is true that remnants of some posts from other parties remain as quotes, you can never be sure that those quotes have not been modified nor taken out of context as the original post is now missing.
However, if one looks at the first page of this thread, it is now essentially just posts from the "For" side of this thread. All other replies were deleted and while it is true that remnants of some posts from other parties remain as quotes, you can never be sure that those quotes have not been modified nor taken out of context as the original post is now missing.
I think it is reasonable to have this as self moderated since the DT members all have nearly everyone of their threads as self moderated and now even try to impose this "local rules" or self moderated nonsense in meta.
There really can only be a "for" side of this argument since it is a collaboration to have DT trust abusers removed from the trust system. Unless they undo their PROVEN trust abuse then there is no need for an "against" side of the argument. This is simply a union to have them removed. There is no need to listed to them nor their "supporters" explain or tell us they can abuse the trust system and also stay there.
It isn't really a shall we remove lauda and other proven trust abusers from the trust system. It is a remove lauda and proven trust abusers kind of thread. No debate is really called for on a call to action thread. There can be suggestions of other tactics to get them out or spoil their reign of untrustworthy abuse though so if anyone wishes to post along those lines I am sure it will remain and not be removed.
February 21, 2019, 03:52:51 PM
In all fairness; H8bussesNbicycles deleted many of their replies.
^-- THIS(82 posts by 26 users with 23 merit deleted.)
It is impossible to have a reasoned debate, when one side puts their fingers in their ears and say "blah blah blah, I'm not listening to you"... which is effectively what has been happening with all the deleted posts.
I get that it is a self-moderated topic and OP is free to do as they please in that regards, but isn't it slightly hypocritical to complain about "abuse of power" and then abuse your self-moderation "power" by simply deleting one side of the debate?
Perhaps the deletions are to prevent the thread from being derailed.
February 21, 2019, 08:42:24 AM
These moronic DT members doesnt want to argue with our facts here,so they just want to forget what is being said here.
In all fairness; H8bussesNbicycles deleted many of their replies. Where is he anyway? Looks like he tried to start a fire and ran away from it.
What a situation; if you cannot trust people with negative Lauda clique trust anymore, then who can you trust on this forum?
February 21, 2019, 06:20:12 AM
These moronic DT members doesnt want to argue with our facts here,so they just want to forget what is being said here.
February 20, 2019, 12:21:32 PM
bump
February 14, 2019, 02:55:50 PM
The whole forum is a big joke.
Running by people who were caught scamming 3000btc+
what you expect?
Running by people who were caught scamming 3000btc+
what you expect?
Well this is perhaps extreme... these people do not run it they just have some minimal power to put a red mark on our accounts. However it is good to stand up to them and get them taken off DT at someone or else present facts and truth about them until they are known correctly as untrustworthy individuals.
February 14, 2019, 02:51:05 PM
The whole forum is a big joke.
Running by people who were caught scamming 3000btc+
what you expect?
Running by people who were caught scamming 3000btc+
what you expect?
February 14, 2019, 02:46:28 PM
let's get this scum bag on the list
Timelord2067 on bitcointalk is untrustworthy and a proven trust abuser.
he now seeks to red trust me for this post
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49714728
this is untrustworthy behaviour and trust abuse.
Timelord2067 on bitcointalk is untrustworthy and a proven trust abuser.
he now seeks to red trust me for this post
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49714728
this is untrustworthy behaviour and trust abuse.
February 10, 2019, 07:17:13 AM
I would like to help you because I do not understand why DT members are giving same negative comment for 1 thing. For example my profile: 4 same negative feedbacks for account selling... 
Because if one of the users is no longer DT, the other feedbacks serve to remind that the account has been mixed with shady activities, hence untrustworthy.
To destroy your account.
8 feedbacks for that small action makes you look like the worst scammer.Noone is going to touch you
So, what to do now? Do you really think that we can fight with them? I do not understand why they are so angry about it.
I have written a new post, kindly check it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5108175.new#new - waiting for DT members to answer
Of course we can fight them. DT is but one tool. Notice how they all rely on signatures and services they provide.
Why should untrustworthy persons proven untrustworthy like they are be allowed to ruin such projects image our next move is to bring this to the attention of those projects. If they fail to shun untrustworthy persons from their project then that could well mean their projects are unstrustworthy and their customers need to be informed of these facts so they can factor that in to any decision to deal or invest.
Each time a person is trust abused this movement will gather pace.
Also once a critical mass of persons understand the fact that DT is infested with proven untrustworthy persons and that red trust in some cases is an endorsement then that will collapse the power that they have.
February 10, 2019, 07:00:01 AM
I would like to help you because I do not understand why DT members are giving same negative comment for 1 thing. For example my profile: 4 same negative feedbacks for account selling...
Because if one of the users is no longer DT, the other feedbacks serve to remind that the account has been mixed with shady activities, hence untrustworthy.
To destroy your account.
8 feedbacks for that small action makes you look like the worst scammer.Noone is going to touch you
So, what to do now? Do you really think that we can fight with them? I do not understand why they are so angry about it.
I have written a new post, kindly check it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5108175.new#new - waiting for DT members to answer
February 10, 2019, 06:44:20 AM
I would like to help you because I do not understand why DT members are giving same negative comment for 1 thing. For example my profile: 4 same negative feedbacks for account selling...
Because if one of the users is no longer DT, the other feedbacks serve to remind that the account has been mixed with shady activities, hence untrustworthy.
To destroy your account.
8 feedbacks for that small action makes you look like the worst scammer.Noone is going to touch you
They are making sure you will wear the tagg even they get kicked out from DT one by one (irony)
February 10, 2019, 06:34:12 AM
I would like to help you because I do not understand why DT members are giving same negative comment for 1 thing. For example my profile: 4 same negative feedbacks for account selling...
Because if one of the users is no longer DT, the other feedbacks serve to remind that the account has been mixed with shady activities, hence untrustworthy.
February 10, 2019, 02:10:47 AM
Seems like Foxpup is unable to think logicly
ito-marketing wrote
Foxpup negative feedback after that
Telling people to not fight against DT members is conspiring to manipulate DT for a personal vendetta LOL ......delicious
ito-marketing wrote
Quote
Not worth to fight against them.
It only creates trouble.
It only creates trouble.
Foxpup negative feedback after that
Quote
Conspiring to manipulate DT for a personal vendetta at the risk of leaving other users vulnerable to known scammers.
Telling people to not fight against DT members is conspiring to manipulate DT for a personal vendetta LOL ......delicious
February 09, 2019, 04:01:59 PM
I had a short temp. ban for voicing my opinion.
Not worth to fight against them.
It only creates trouble.
Not worth to fight against them.
It only creates trouble.
February 09, 2019, 03:42:58 PM
Another very bad abuse happening here.
just after a post from the ass-licker suchmoon;
just after a post from the ass-licker suchmoon;
Most of my posts against suchmoon got deleted .Sometimes even immediately after posting like a few minutes ago.
Ohh that's why they accuse me on the other thread LOL .
February 09, 2019, 03:39:28 PM
Another very bad abuse happening here.
just after a post from the ass-licker suchmoon;
just after a post from the ass-licker suchmoon;
Most of my posts against suchmoon got deleted .Sometimes even immediately after posting like a few minutes ago.
February 09, 2019, 10:12:39 AM
let's get this sad pathetic loser added to the excludes
~Alone055
reason - this sad little gimp comes to my thread that is a sensible reasonable request for clarification of why stingers was excluded from merit source and attempted to falsely brand them as trolling. He is a annoying negative shitposting troll himself.
I posted this thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/theymos-can-you-explain-your-reasoning-on-merit-allocated-on-a-political-basis-5107640
and he comes and tries to derail and cast off as trolling certainly an ass kisser to untrustworthy scoundrels.
That is their defense mechanism they called us "trolling" given that we have provided facts. But if they do the same to us,they call that appropriate actions.~Alone055
reason - this sad little gimp comes to my thread that is a sensible reasonable request for clarification of why stingers was excluded from merit source and attempted to falsely brand them as trolling. He is a annoying negative shitposting troll himself.
I posted this thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/theymos-can-you-explain-your-reasoning-on-merit-allocated-on-a-political-basis-5107640
and he comes and tries to derail and cast off as trolling certainly an ass kisser to untrustworthy scoundrels.
Yes this is exactly that. They are total scum bags whom will do anything to avoid sensible debate.
They know there is no defense or victory for them when we have evidence and observable events of their REAL untrustworthy behaviours but they still want to be in positions of power to be able to red trust us for things THEY decide don't fit in with how they think things should be done or in extreme cases they will red trust you for daring to speak up and tell the truth that they are the ones that are proven untrustworthy.
Jump to: