Pages:
Author

Topic: ▄▀▄▀▄ Remove Corruption From DT - Union Trust List ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀&#9604 - page 10. (Read 8058 times)

sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
Is stingers still a merit source?

Not anymore. That's clear abuse, awarding merit for political reasons rather than any idea of quality. Only because he was a source, I effectively undid those merit sends. If he had not been a merit source, I still would've blacklisted anyone who got into DT1 through that type of shenanigans.


Well, it appears that this movement will have to come up with a different strategy. Enlisting a merit source does not appear to be the way to go. Good luck. Kiss
If you want merits, better hope to find an audience who legitimately appreciates what you have to write. The OP definitely has a few fans.  Wink


There are other supporters who have already 250 merits.
These DT abusers can't push new alts as quickly into DT as we are groing.
Like i said just a matter of time.
And in my opinion theymos will allow in the end to give people you support merit to equal the imbalance some DT members have created

Also you should read cryptohunters post.He already showed another possibility.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
▄▀ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT
Is stingers still a merit source?

Not anymore. That's clear abuse, awarding merit for political reasons rather than any idea of quality. Only because he was a source, I effectively undid those merit sends. If he had not been a merit source, I still would've blacklisted anyone who got into DT1 through that type of shenanigans.


Well, it appears that this movement will have to come up with a different strategy. Enlisting a merit source does not appear to be the way to go. Good luck. Kiss
If you want merits, better hope to find an audience who legitimately appreciates what you have to write. The OP definitely has a few fans.  Wink

doing better than your average newbie and not even rimjobing sources
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
▄▀ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT
Damn...  You really got flamed for your opinion here.  I guess if you aren't part of the "Cult of Lauda" (what they're calling themselves now) then you aren't allowed to have an opinion about other people's trust lists.  Only the "Cult of Lauda" is allowed to publicly post trust suggestions without retaliation.  While it is admirable to point out their abuse of the trust network as they try and undermine what theymos is trying to accomplish



yes
 i am hoping to reach -9999 trust for my opinion  Wink
too bad theymos's word will probably cause some to be removed so i will have to find more ways for my opinion to offend the cult into leaving me negative trust
when this started they though negative trust affected me


i would explain my true reasoning why to remove lauda and some lesser cult members but to do that could pinpoint me (ognasty i will send you a pm)
it has nothing to do with scammers
fuck scammers and fuck idiots stupid enough to fall for scammers too


i know my list has some bad users on it and excludes some good users in collateral damage that i am not proud of but the war to remove lauda is worth the sacrifice
please i beg good users excluded on my list to remove lauda so you do not have to go down in this war


think
i am smart enough and educated enough about bitcointalk to create this masterful piece of work to fight evil here dont you think i could pull off a hell of a scam if i wanted to ?


if i wanted to scam i could easily do it
i know how this place works
the ins and outs and what can be done
here i am fighting for morality
fighting for the good of this forum and am sorry for the casualties but lauda and likeminded have to go
member
Activity: 275
Merit: 11
Damn...  You really got flamed for your opinion here.  I guess if you aren't part of the "Cult of Lauda" (what they're calling themselves now) then you aren't allowed to have an opinion about other people's trust lists.  Only the "Cult of Lauda" is allowed to publicly post trust suggestions without retaliation.  While it is admirable to point out their abuse of the trust network as they try and undermine what theymos is trying to accomplish, allowing them to continue to rack up 'violations' of the system will only benefit the end goal of having them permanently blacklisted.

I'm just wondering who is going to be blacklisted first...  I would have thought for sure TMAN, but now Lauda is throwing his hat in the ring.


I'm just leaving this here:
- It is absolutely not appropriate to give someone negative trust because you disagree with them. I'm disappointed in the reaction to this post.

That's how most of us likely found our way here...
I would rather be accused a criminal than be part of that cult.They are enjoying the days with trust system but im sure something will happen if Theymos reconstruct how the forum works.We should have atleast one big poll asking which DTmembers should be blacklisted numbers wont lie,if they are good as you OgNasty they wont be removed.I just supported someone with good advocate and i immediately got negative trust funny asf.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Damn...  You really got flamed for your opinion here.  I guess if you aren't part of the "Cult of Lauda" (what they're calling themselves now) then you aren't allowed to have an opinion about other people's trust lists.  Only the "Cult of Lauda" is allowed to publicly post trust suggestions without retaliation.  While it is admirable to point out their abuse of the trust network as they try and undermine what theymos is trying to accomplish, allowing them to continue to rack up 'violations' of the system will only benefit the end goal of having them permanently blacklisted.

I'm just wondering who is going to be blacklisted first...  I would have thought for sure TMAN, but now Lauda is throwing his hat in the ring.


I'm just leaving this here:
- It is absolutely not appropriate to give someone negative trust because you disagree with them. I'm disappointed in the reaction to this post.

That's how most of us likely found our way here...
member
Activity: 275
Merit: 11
I just wanted to try out some new trust features,but what did i get ?redtrust by just customizing my own trustlist,even theymos was excluded few days ago.Does it mean trust is being controlled by these DT members? if you dont want to be painted dont to exclude the Godly DT's here.This looks like politics,not conspiracy to me between i strongly agree that my red trust is inapproriate .Who are these people to control which people you wanted to exlude/include to your list?doesnt make sense.

Its like senatorial elections thus the voting machines are getting tapped by those with the power to do that so they will remain with their position.


legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I'm just leaving this here:
- It is absolutely not appropriate to give someone negative trust because you disagree with them. I'm disappointed in the reaction to this post. Although H8bussesNbicycles is perhaps not particularly trustworthy for other reasons, the reasons many people gave for neg-trusting him are inappropriate. You can argue that what he's advocating is bad on a utilitarian level, but he would disagree, and his advocacy of a certain Trust philosophy doesn't by itself mean that he's an untrustworthy person. DT selection is meant to be affected by user lists, and it is totally legitimate to try to honestly convince other (real) people to use a list more in-line with your views.
(read the full post!)
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
Your double standards just have been proofed and the abuse of the trust feedback by you

Quote
The $600 was not a payment for the account, which I had no need for. Can't expect a sockpuppeting scammer to understand that of course.
No it was to pay out the debt 0.13B .
If you get the Glem account after paying Brunos debt its clearly a deal to get that account once you pay his debt.


No matter what you got a new account where a payment was involved.If directly or indirectly doesn't matter.


Quote
Can't expect a sockpuppeting scammer

Oh the personal attacks begin again ?No more arguments when facts about you are being presented ?
A DT calling me a scammer but being such a dick unable to show me even a single person i have scammed during the 7 years on this forum.
Your input is like always high quality /irony off



Quote
Case in point. "PM from somebody" LOL. Whatever justification of your vendetta makes you feel better.



Let's see what kind of information we will get
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
Quote
You do realize that $600 was like 0.1 BTC at the time? The red tags I was concerned about were Bruno's, not mine. I wanted him to be able to use the Gage account in a sig campaign and that obviously didn't work out.

So you activly worked on it that Bruno's red taggs get deleted even he tried to sell a legandary account in 2018?
You are a hyprocat .Giving everyone who tries to buy or sell an account negative feedback since 2017 and if there is a benefit for you you jump in and safe his reputation even there is full evidence he tried to sell a legendary to shitposters.
Makes total sense


Quote
No, I didn't. It was pretty much the opposite - preventing that account from getting into the hands of a shitposting/scamming account buyer.
Tagging that account from all DT members would be enough to make it worthless so everyone would know its a bought account.There was no need to pay $600 for that account.


sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
I read the thread and its clear It was a private deal between suchmoon and Bruno for paying his debt and receiving back his other alt.

Even suchmoon fighting to get all the red taggs away was such a laugh to read.

Argumenting that debt is paid there is no reason for a red tagg.No there isn't even somebody tried to sell that account to pay his debt.

Ohhh i forgat now its allowed to offer accounts for sale if you try to pay your debt with it.

Maybe people should not sell accounts directly but indirectly claiming to sell these accounts on private deals to pay their debt.


DOUBLE STANDARD AT ITS FINEST


People should tagg suchmoons alt which was sold by Bruno to suchmoon for $600 .Account sales are discouraged on BCT and lead instantly to red trust

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/gleb-gamow-349097


Quote
Interesting. And the best method, in your eyes, was to spend more funds than necessary. Instead of posting the service thread yourself, or obtaining a copper membership, or having someone else post the service thread...

You fucking moron at least check for what you are tagging.You tagged a try for an account buy back in 2017.There were no copper memberships.
And asking other people to add images and update it makes completly no sense since you will be always held responsible for that account you have no conrol about or know its full history.
The account offered at that time was
Quote
No loans, No scams, No hacks, Clean Account
.Ideal for a neutral image posting account.



Quote
How quaint. Do you want to spell out why you were buying an account, then? Was it to perhaps prevent the sold account from scamming? You hero.

HA HA HA HA who is going to belive in that shit that suchmoon spending $600 of his own money for a legandary account and removes all its negative taggs just to remove an account which maybe could be used for scams. LOL

Yeah sure funny suchmoon is not buying all accounts.What a samerita.

@actmyname

You are a pisshead and your argumentation are for dumb people.Anyone beliving in that crap must have an IQ like 60.
Even you have no high IQ if you are only able to make up such stupid argumentation


You know cryptohunter is right.Its time to go activly to your escrow thread and inform anyone there that you are a scam escrow who supports account sales and being used as collateral which proof is this thread
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
So you admitted buying that account in june 2018

@DT members where is the tagging ?Double standards again ?
What was suchmoon's intent for buying the account?
What are most users' intentions for buying accounts?

Examine the dichotomy, please.


Ohhh what was the intention ?I guess giving free money ($600) to someone for an account he/she can't use and thats why he/she fought so hard to get all the negative taggs removed. /irony off

Funny i never saw you asking me for what purpose i tried to buy an account.

DOUBLE STANDARDS YOU FAGGOT


Oh SORRY !!!!! I forgat i told you the reason i tried to buy an account so a friend would be able to add images on his service thread.But you faggot didn't care
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
@suchmoon a lot of dirt you got.

Now i understand why you support Lauda.




@SUCHMOON

DID YOU PAID Brunos loan default and BOUGHT THE GLEM ACCOUNT in June 2018 ?

Am asking cause i can't understand how else it would switch ownership in June 2018 where Bruno officaly said that this account belongs to him.
DID YOU ACTIVLY BOUGHT AN ACCOUNT ?

I mean i got tagged for trying to buy an account in 2017 and you bought one in june 2018.


Now have a look how suchmoon is defending Bruno against global moderators who clearly see that Gleb is not Bruno posting this as feedback comment


Quote
Unless there is any proof that this account is not under Brunos control the neg rating by hilourosandco appears to be based on an incorrect assumption and should be ignored along with this rating
Wow suchmoon you defend Bruno with a claim which you don't use when giving false feedbacks to other members ?


Quote
DarkStar_ tagged Gleb account because the Gage account was the collateral so he knew if he were to tag Gage account then there goes the collateral, you are also asking for negative feedbacks to be removed now for a few times because Gleb is in your hands and as long as it has negative trust it wont worth a buck.
You are trying to side with an account seller while you have been against such behavior yourself.


Quote
As long as you don't suddenly change your mind and give Gleb and his other alts positive trust to say what a good guy he is, I'm fine with it and everybody else is also fine with it other than suchmoon, what you should know is that suchmoon is the one who paid the loan and took Gleb account as collateral in exchange for $600, so she would do anything to restore the said accounts reputations in order to get back her money which is lost forever now.

I wonder what would suchmoon do if her bought accounts are tagged as an account dealer and not a loan defaulter? also where is the usual hypocrite a.k.a The Pharmacist? he's not here to tag these accounts but only he tags people in no position of power or influence. facking hypocrite.

Quote
Two different accounts, two different deals. I control the Gleb Gamow account (my own deal with Bruno), I never touched the Phinnaeus Gage account (DarkStar_'s deal with Bruno).

So you admitted buying that account in june 2018

@DT members where is the tagging ?Double standards again ?
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
if you could round some of those up to the next multiple of 10 would support this effort

To make this work you're gonna need at least a couple of 250-merit accounts. And you don't need more than eight 10-merit votes for each pair of 250-merit votes. But don't get me wrong, I thoroughly enjoy watching how you morons waste your merits in this scheme.

dont know how trust system work ?
many on list have 250 merit votes but need 10s

more 250s will come or i will buy them

No, not a single user in your army of miscreants has 250 earned merits. If you had any you'd have them hooked up to your trust lists already because the "election" could happen any minute now. You have ~20 or so 10-merit votes and you're gonna waste them all. Good show, will watch again.

Are you afraid anyone will get there very soon and put all of you lauda ass-lickers down ?

I can feel your fear by the way! Cheesy

Yeah, I'm quaking in my boots. Please aim between the eyes and make my suffering short. Thank you.


Boasting that you are hiding behind a proven cycled bunch of subjective and misleading junk pile of merits from pals is only making it worse for you and demonstrating that system is broken and needs fixing or abolishing.

Getting on DT is just a secondary bonus it is not even required. It is time to proceed with the honest duties I have described in my prior 2 posts here. This is far more effect than counter red strikes on DT. Although I am sure as time goes on those will take place too until the forum is a place where trust abuse no longer takes place unanswered

I sense you are getting upset suchmoon. Go have a rest this is just the start. You know you will end up saying something even more stupid than usual if you keep being stressed out for long periods. You know I worry about you.

sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
if you could round some of those up to the next multiple of 10 would support this effort

To make this work you're gonna need at least a couple of 250-merit accounts. And you don't need more than eight 10-merit votes for each pair of 250-merit votes. But don't get me wrong, I thoroughly enjoy watching how you morons waste your merits in this scheme.

dont know how trust system work ?
many on list have 250 merit votes but need 10s

more 250s will come or i will buy them

No, not a single user in your army of miscreants has 250 earned merits. If you had any you'd have them hooked up to your trust lists already because the "election" could happen any minute now. You have ~20 or so 10-merit votes and you're gonna waste them all. Good show, will watch again.

Are you afraid anyone will get there very soon and put all of you lauda ass-lickers down ?

I can feel your fear by the way! Cheesy

Yeah, I'm quaking in my boots. Please aim between the eyes and make my suffering short. Thank you.

suchmoon you need to understand.Its not our fulltime time job to sit on this forum.
We come slowly but we come.No rush needed.

Here a small anecdote for you from an old known movie i liked when i was a kid.

Son and daddy bull standing on a hill see below a herd of cows.
Son says to dad bull :Daddy daddy let's run down and fuck a cow we catch.

Daddy bull answers : No son we get slowly down and fuck them all !


Wish everyone a nice day as i have some more work to do today.


Btw suchmoon did i mentioned i got a PM from somebody offering to sell me your doxx ?
I just made s very short digging.
How many accounts do you got ?

Gleb Gamow
21000 posts
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/gleb-gamow-349097
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
My avatar not the highest one but at least my name is the boldest one.  

I would call it funny wouldn't i see the missuss of ill people by degenerates.

Making fun of other people illness is not something i support.

Well I would not worry about that. This just demonstrates further that these people should be removed from positions of trust and also any persons or projects employing such individuals are now also going to be tainted by their actions.

That would be very worrying for me as a project owner or manager that people such as this are tainting the image of my project.

This should immediately become our next focus.

Remove the trust abuse, else it is our duty to present proven facts demonstrating lies, and other untrustworthy deeds to the projects they are involved with and if they are seen to condone this by not removing them then the projects themselves can be seen as untrustworthy.

This is simply a case of if you are proven untrustworthy and dishonestly are abusing honest members then you need to reverse these wrong deeds or else this it is the duty of any honest member to present the facts that you are dishonest to any projects and the investors of those projects that you are involved with.

This is why politicians step down  and CEOs step down because at the end of the day when a persons actions start to negatively reflect on the image of the company or party then that person will find they are shunned and made a pariah and correctly so.

Perhaps it is the projects that support these abusers financially that we need to ALERT first? and help them ensure they are doing the correct and best thing they can for their investors with regard employing untrustworthy individuals.

If they resist then that is a worrying sign that these projects and companies are willingly employing proven untrustworthy persons??




sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
My avatar not the highest one but at least my name is the boldest one.  

I would call it funny wouldn't i see the missuss of ill people by degenerates.

Making fun of other people illness is not something i support.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
Wake up people, no one care what the bitcointalk community want but only what the "Mafia" of very few people.
This is not people forum, this is forum controlled by few people who do not care about you but your money.
If you trying to earn money by the way they do not like, no matter it is legal, you are out.
If you don't agree with them, you are out.
If you don't meet the criteria of being cock sucker of those people, you are out.
Our words means nothing.
After 10 years of existing, this forum do not own official rules.
And even those DT members do not respect the unofficial rules also.
Why any of you think someone care what we say?
Censorship, control, abuse.
Its been since ages, wake up...

Don't be negative. Force of numbers can crush a small group of abusers.  

Read this to see what can be done without DT members to project you.

DT is but one tool.
On topic relevant facts regarding their wrongdoing can be presented over and over until they realise posting here their double standards bullshit is not going to wash any longer. Their days of punishing people for the same shit they have pulled in public is going to be rubbed in their faces until they get sick and tired of this board being plastered with the ill deeds over and over.

They can reverse our trust abuse else they can enjoy a torrent of their own proven misdeeds presented to them over and over a critical mass of people realise DT members are not to be trusted themselves. I mean I am sorry but if you do not want evidence of your wrong doing presented then don't do wrong. It is quite simple reverse your abuse then you will have no reason to fear the truth.

If any of you persons that have been genuinely trust abused are refused entry to a sig campaign on the basis of that abuse, next we will advise that campaign manager and that entire project of what its actions actually say about that project.

 It is quite simple, that if the campaign manager or the project itself sides with untrustworthy abusers against honest members that project is now therefore operated by untrustworthy persons. I mean who else would side with proven liars, trust abusers and other shady dealings over honest members who are victims??

We will use the union to demonstrate these facts and alert investors to the morals of the project manager or the project itself. Would you want to risk investing with a project that sides with abusers and liars over honest persons? Sounds very risky to me.

I don't really use signatures other than to promote persons projects who I like or projects I actually believe in so it is not a big issue for me but those that want to join a sig campaign and are refused on the basis of a CLEAR abuse of trust then the union should therefore help demonstrate to that project that the person is honest and is the victim of abuse and therefore should be allowed entry.

If not then that is discrimination on untrustworthy and corrupt grounds.

The systems of control are out of control. Time to use force of numbers to bring some fairness and honesty to the board.

Also any of those trust abusers where we can PROVE dishonest and untrustworthy behaviour. Watch which projects they are involved with and alert this forming union. It is the duty of any honest individual to alert the project and the investors to potential dangers of becoming engaged or entangled with any project that calls on the services of PROVEN untrustworthy individuals.  Be very careful though to stick to what can be proven so we do not make any false allegations.

It is up to them. Remove the CLEAR red trust abuse if you know you have made it or else you will correctly and fairly be demonstrated to be abusers and any proven untrustworthy and dishonest behaviour will be highlighted to any project or investors you become involved with.

I say again though the only way that the union can be damaged is to be seen to protect or defend real scammers or untrustworthy persons here. We must ensure they are never defended or aided by all of us that will join to fight trust abuse.

Think about this post it has far reaching implications for these proven untrustworthy persons. We have a lot of leverage here to ensure fair and honest treatment of all individuals on this board.

I am on vacation but there are plenty of smart guys here getting abused. Lots of leverage here outside of DT and merit. They control those so yes we will do what we can to gain fair access to the systems of control so they can be used fairly and honestly with regard to all members but at the same time there is much more powerful leverage here to be used.






member
Activity: 222
Merit: 24
The army grows!





Lol, this made my day. Thank you!

BTW, are signatures allowed for this type of thing? I will gladly pay for a set if folks will wear them without fear. Hopefully, they can help spread the word about this thread and the vile chancers ruining this forum.

Any interested and competent signature designers reading this can pm me with their samples and price. Don't mind the fake ratings on my trust, but if it bothers you, I'll go 1st if you're "trusted" or we use an escrow.

member
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
Wake up people, no one care what the bitcointalk community want but only what the "Mafia" of very few people.
This is not people forum, this is forum controlled by few people who do not care about you but your money.
If you trying to earn money by the way they do not like, no matter it is legal, you are out.
If you don't agree with them, you are out.
If you don't meet the criteria of being cock sucker of those people, you are out.
Our words means nothing.
After 10 years of existing, this forum do not own official rules.
And even those DT members do not respect the unofficial rules also.
Why any of you think someone care what we say?
Censorship, control, abuse.
Its been since ages, wake up...
Pages:
Jump to: