Pages:
Author

Topic: ▄▀▄▀▄ Remove Corruption From DT - Union Trust List ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀&#9604 - page 6. (Read 8058 times)

sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
Quote
I would like to help you because I do not understand why DT members are giving same negative comment for 1 thing. For example my profile: 4 same negative feedbacks for account selling...


Its a clear intention to destroy your account.Who would do business with someone who has 200 negative trust points ?
And to your question why you get it so often ?Because you are not their buddy.
Would you be their buddy they wouldn't tagg you even if you would have been catched with full evidence.
Good examples are Bruno and some escrows who tried selling their accounts and got nothing for it with the explanation they don't deserve to be tagged.
BUT YOU DESERVE TO BE TAGGED since you are not their buddy.

Also suchmoon bought herself in june 2018 a legendary account which is a known fact.Have you seen her getting a tagg or the bought account ?No ?Why ?

Btw you didn't get 4 taggs but 6.You are moving to the worst scammer parts.

You can also ask these faggots because thats what they are why they don't tagg real scammers and their projects like Eric Gu and Zengold,Metaverse ?Attacking these kind of projects they fear.



As escrow i would recommend Ognasty.
Very good service and his rates are also very good.
member
Activity: 275
Merit: 11
let's get this sad pathetic loser added to the excludes

~Alone055

reason -  this sad little gimp comes to my thread  that is a sensible reasonable request for clarification of why stingers was excluded from merit source  and attempted to falsely brand them as trolling. He is a annoying negative shitposting troll himself.

I posted this thread

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/theymos-can-you-explain-your-reasoning-on-merit-allocated-on-a-political-basis-5107640

and he comes and tries to derail and cast off as trolling certainly an ass kisser to untrustworthy scoundrels.
That is their defense mechanism they called us "trolling" given that we have provided facts. But if they do the same to us,they call that appropriate actions.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
let's get this sad pathetic loser added to the excludes

~Alone055

reason -  this sad little gimp comes to my thread  that is a sensible reasonable request for clarification of why stingers was excluded from merit source  and attempted to falsely brand them as trolling. He is a annoying negative shitposting troll himself.

I posted this thread

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/theymos-can-you-explain-your-reasoning-on-merit-allocated-on-a-political-basis-5107640

and he comes and tries to derail and cast off as trolling certainly an ass kisser to untrustworthy scoundrels.
member
Activity: 275
Merit: 11
did anyone notice they got rid of that thread that was discussing the facts of the pharmacist using a sock puppet to racist troll sig spam for extra btc dust?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/racism-is-allowed-5096914

or did they just move it somewhere?
Are they being backed up by the moderators? what a pussy,they are hiding the truth from @Theymos,and the people.
member
Activity: 275
Merit: 11
If someone has excluded the cult members it is abuse,like what i have received,but then if the CULT excluded people from their trustlist it is acceptable? imbecile piece of shit.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
did anyone notice they got rid of that thread that was discussing the facts of the pharmacist using a sock puppet to racist troll sig spam for extra btc dust?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/racism-is-allowed-5096914

or did they just move it somewhere?
member
Activity: 275
Merit: 11
We have more DT1 in our side,but i wont name them hahaha there's a big progress in here,lets just wait for the others to get into DT1 position then we are going to exclude these abusers in just 1 hit Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3158
I would like to help you because I do not understand why DT members are giving same negative comment for 1 thing. For example my profile: 4 same negative feedbacks for account selling...  Huh

Because if one of the users is no longer DT, the other feedbacks serve to remind that the account has been mixed with shady activities, hence untrustworthy.
hero member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 502
I would like to help you because I do not understand why DT members are giving same negative comment for 1 thing. For example my profile: 4 same negative feedbacks for account selling...  Huh
member
Activity: 222
Merit: 24
thinking about starting a donation based BTC signature campaign
YES! and I'll donate to the campaign.
I appreciate the dedication!

I'm just curious to see which of the red trusted Newbies on your trust list you choose to escrow Tongue


I was thinking quickseller but you're welcome to escrow the deal if one materializes. It's a free market.
hero member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 502
Hello, what does it mean: 23 merit deleted? Who deleted the given merit and why? Thanks, really interested in this question.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
thinking about starting a donation based BTC signature campaign
YES! and I'll donate to the campaign.
I appreciate the dedication!

I'm just curious to see which of the red trusted Newbies on your trust list you choose to escrow Tongue
member
Activity: 222
Merit: 24
Oh, how I love Meta… Reading through the last few pages warms my heart.

All I see is fukem! They’re good for nothing trolls. They don’t matter, none of them will ever make it to DT, and even if they did, bla bla and so forth. But I smell your fear. The fact that you’re all here, discussing a bunch of inconsequential no gooders in depth, shows we’re unto something.

It is worth noting that when this “movement” started it was one man’s idea. It has so far ballooned to 20 or so accounts in 9 days. And this is a thread buried deep in the reputation sub, where only a small number of users on this forum visit.

The initial reactions were hilarious; threads popped everywhere demanding bans and blacklists. Lol! When that failed, the tune changed to oh don’t worry; they will never achieve the required merit threshold to get into DT.

The best lesson I’ve learnt in my very short life is to never say never.

A few weeks ago Lauda’s ratings were worthless and last week Ognasty wasn’t on DT. Some of the newbie DT’s running around making definitive statements about how it will never happen, had no idea theymos would move things around.

Who is to say that theymos, after smoking some crack sometime in the near future, wouldn’t change things again? The simple truth is that bitcointak is subject to on man’s whims, but then I digress….

As long as certain people on DT keep abusing their powers, change is nigh. Resist it all you want, wish it away, but it will happen.

It may not happen now and maybe not through us. I honestly don’t expect this “movement” to succeed. Nonetheless, I signed up to make my voice heard because there is strength in numbers. As individuals, none of us could have made enough noise to be heard as we are now.

They said Trump would never win the presidency
They said brexit would never happen
Leicester was 5000/1 to win the premier league
Serena Williams crashed out from the 2019 Aussie open after going 5-1 up in the third set. But we were told none of these would happen. Impossible!

These are all recent modern examples, and as you can tell, I am a betting man. And I will gladly wager that, the current state of affairs regarding DT on this forum won’t remain the same for long if things don’t improve soon.

I’ll leave you all to your pillow talk. Thanks for having me.


preach brother
the response to my thread has been outstanding
it has been the center of attention on meta and reputation boards and elicited a response from theymos


"""20 or so""" was a week ago
surely are more now and grow every day
thread will be added to lists of historic threads and live on for eternity
if we win us early adopters will be heroes


will you wear a signature pointing to the thread if i make one for you ?




thinking about starting a donation based BTC signature campaign

YES! and I'll donate to the campaign.

any takers?
BTW, are signatures allowed for this type of thing? I will gladly pay for a set if folks will wear them without fear. Hopefully, they can help spread the word about this thread and the vile chancers ruining this forum.

Any interested and competent signature designers reading this can pm me with their samples and price. Don't mind the fake ratings on my trust, but if it bothers you, I'll go 1st if you're "trusted" or we use an escrow.


About meriting, surely, it wouldn't be considered manipulation if awarded to good posts, regardless of whether the poster is an "undesirable"? In this case a thread like this would suffice: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/self-moderated-report-unmerited-good-posts-to-merit-source-5093271 - where posters can report good unmerited post and anybody can merit them if they choose to.
sr. member
Activity: 793
Merit: 250
More important theymos officaly said that tagging for this thread is not allowed.
He said no such thing, but don't let the truth get in the way of your story:

I'm not going to blacklist people from DT selection due to not following my views, since a big point of this new system is to get me less involved,

it is allowed but disappointing abuse of the trust system to him
nice try foxy


you should make your own judgements based on the actions you see from people.


your action to support lauda is what i make my judgement based on

Doest it really help it? I do not see any progress Sad. Only you are receiving more and more negative ratings. I think that you can´t win this fight Sad.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
▄▀ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT
More important theymos officaly said that tagging for this thread is not allowed.
He said no such thing, but don't let the truth get in the way of your story:

I'm not going to blacklist people from DT selection due to not following my views, since a big point of this new system is to get me less involved,

it is allowed but disappointing abuse of the trust system to him
nice try foxy


you should make your own judgements based on the actions you see from people.


your action to support lauda is what i make my judgement based on
member
Activity: 275
Merit: 11
They dont have balls to face theur abusive acts,thats why they choose to hide in the form of silence.Exclude,the whole cult people should fight for their freedom.We shouldnt allow these people abusing the system and walk freely with their crimes.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
SILENCE HuhHuhHuh

What happened ?No arguments against facts ?

This is what it will all eventually boil down to: there is no way to deny observable fact. This is the WMD that the abused have that will eventually guarantee the demise of the abusers. We just have to make sure that we wield it correctly and efficiently. Not that it can be worn out or diminishes over time time it is just we will take longer to reach our goal of a fairer system where everyone is treated equally.
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
More important theymos officaly said that tagging for this thread is not allowed.
He said no such thing, but don't let the truth get in the way of your story:

I'm not going to blacklist people from DT selection due to not following my views, since a big point of this new system is to get me less involved,

quote the entire thing and stop being untrustworthy
the full post goes on to say if DT do not largely follow its intended purpose then boom no more DT and everyone needs to set up their own trust list which is a far better idea anyway

"I'm not going to blacklist people from DT selection due to not following my views, since a big point of this new system is to get me less involved, but if a culture somewhat compatible with my views does not eventually develop, then I will consider this more freeform DT selection to be a failure, and I'll probably get rid of it in favor of enforcing custom trust lists." theymos full post
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
More important theymos officaly said that tagging for this thread is not allowed.
He said no such thing, but don't let the truth get in the way of your story:

I'm not going to blacklist people from DT selection due to not following my views, since a big point of this new system is to get me less involved,

Just for you

Quote
It is absolutely not appropriate to give someone negative trust because you disagree with them. I'm disappointed in the reaction to this post. Although H8bussesNbicycles is perhaps not particularly trustworthy for other reasons, the reasons many people gave for neg-trusting him are inappropriate. You can argue that what he's advocating is bad on a utilitarian level, but he would disagree, and his advocacy of a certain Trust philosophy doesn't by itself mean that he's an untrustworthy person. DT selection is meant to be affected by user lists, and it is totally legitimate to try to honestly convince other (real) people to use a list more in-line with your views.
Pages:
Jump to: