Topic: Request: Disable JayJuanGee in the Wall Observer thread - page 2. (Read 2109 times)

It seems to me that you, philip, are giving too much benefit of the doubt to nutildah to even go along with the possibility that something like what he had said might be true without him having had shown any facts and/or actual logic - besides putting the assertion within a cute little poem.  

Since some members are not going to know these kinds of things, probably Nutildah has a bit of duty to clarify that he is full of shit, retract his statement, probably apologize and say that he will never do it again (even though that might not be true with the arrogant lil twat) and/or if he happens to have facts and/or logic to back up his bullshit likely to be disingenuine little assertion, then maybe he should set forth such facts and/or logic.. and maybe this here thread would be as good of a place as any.. or maybe starting another thread could be started.. There tends to be flexibility in these kinds of mud-slinging matters...

As sometimes "we" like to say around here (just like your mom used to say to you when a kid), "it is all fun and games until someone's eye gets poked out".. OUCH!!!!

Well between nutildah, JJG and myself we have amassed more than 23,000 merits and handed

out more than 25,000 merits. With those volumes  some merits are going to bad actors some of the time.

The 8000 or so merits I have handed out have gone to more than 1000 different member. And maybe 20+ were banned. you just can't always be correct about a person .

I would like to thin JJG does not get paid feedback money for merits. I don't and I think others are like me. I would prefer to think this of JJG.

Hoping that nutildah is wrong and its just a joke.

I will review his posts later too..


Oh..? I had not even noticed the part that I would supposedly be getting a kick back from some of the forum members (spammers in nutildah-speak).. so the little riddle seems to go a bit far in terms of making that kind of an allegation (making shit up)... it is a pretty BIG allegation (and mud-slinging that could get forum members into trouble for doing things like that) to accuse another forum member of getting a kick back, even if it is just a funzies joke... and I doubt that he either has evidence and he probably does not even have any "reasonable" inferences of evidence that might exist beyond what's in his fantasy pea-brain self-righteous paranoid accusing others without evidence little noggen. (too many adjectives in a row?  I think NOT)

Here is a shit ton of merits. I just spent a half hour reading your posts they are pretty good and you have beed around a while.






Do you think that is true? or are we just kidding.

I believe that the WO regulars theymos, and consequently the moderators, have a special consideration for you. Otherwise this thread would have been moved to off-topic or something a long time ago, because I don't remember in meta which is a serious section a thread with so many jokes, starting with the title, overquotes and things that make this thread look like a split of the WO that has fallen here.

It looks legit and even unbiased when you put it like that.

And, I Love the font.     #nohomo


Don't worry.

I cannot see Bob closing this thread... and probably even moderators don't give too many shits whether it stays open or not... even though the substance of the thread is a bit childish and whiny.. but maybe it ends up playing out as a bit of somewhat innocent humor too.... that likely reflects more on the pettiness of the authors rather than any substantively important topic that they believe that they may have raised.. . just like the nutildah thread of a similar theme.. if you had not seen that one....

and. .my feelings had not really gotten hurt from these kinds of topics.. let it aire out.. even if 100% ^confirmed dumb...

 

My bad, I didn't even check the date of the last reply. I got caught up in my feelings because it seemed like you guys were trying to hurt JJG's feelings  , and he's one of my favorite members on the forum. 

By the way, since I was the one who bumped it, maybe let me have the last word, and we can wrap it up here.

Indeed, on the fifth page of the thread, after the discussion has died down for more than a month, it’s the rightest time to disagree with the OP.

Since this thread was initially conducive to this, and now it has become the most relevant, OP, I haven’t figured out why yet, but I’ll also get in line to disagree with you!


There was yer one on Bitcointalk forum
Who came to create this topic quorum,
He wrote a poem
Which close to the bone,
We'll see how it's stirring up the forum.

and i sang it in the same Wellerman's tune

In addition to the conspiracy theory I mean why JJG is being targeted... because he merit's every deserving posts?

This is the beauty of his meriting spree, it's call an "equal opportunity" meriting. Irrespective of whether you are a spammer or a merit farmer or somewhat established legendary member "1" merit is for everyone who and that's all nothing more nothing less.

On Bitcointalk, he'd roam fancy-free.
No matter your gender,
Rank, or seniority tender,
One merit from JJG, you'd agree!

That's... That's not how any of this works.


Since this thread was recently bumped, I thought I would write a limerick about this conspiracy theory:

There once was a man named JJG
Oft he curiously did merit pee
The craftiest of scammers, he ranked up some spammers
For 20% of their campaign BTC

Respectfully, OP, I have to disagree with you on this one. That thread's been around even before the merit system got introduced. And if you're concerned about people using merit farming to snag a spot in a signature campaign, well, I think it's up to the campaign manager to figure out if someone truly deserves it.

Now, I don't have a ton of merits either, so sometimes when I apply for a campaign, I get that feeling that users with loads of merits are getting the nod. But I don't let it bother me, really. I just keep posting on the boards I love without any expectations of merits. If they come, they come.

The whole idea behind merit farming is to rank up or earn more merits to look appealing to campaign managers. But if you take a closer look, we don't even have to spend time investigating which accounts are legit because the moment they join a campaign, their post quality tends to shoot up. So, personally, I trust the judgment of those campaign managers – they're popular for a reason around here.

Lastly, I don't think Theymos would be on board with disabling that thread either. It's one of the biggest threads around, and we all love to gather there when the bull run hits.

Every joke has boundaries beyond which it would become not only unfunny, but simply ridiculous. So far, it seems that no one in this thread has come up with the idea to break out of these boundaries so much.

I have been reading replies made on this post, to check where someone would point out where JayJuanGee is farming an account through a WO thread or merits a particular set of people. But in all of the post replies I have read so far here, no one has given a bad remark about JayJuanGee, but rather a good remark that he merits different boards and gives out merits to the post he finds to be quality not minding the rank of the user.

For the record, I want to clarify my grudge with JJG.
It is not the constant repetition of its thesis, nor its extra salty cunt whilst doing so, let alone its gheyness.

It is because it pretends to be of human nature - which it absolutely is not.
Unless I’ve missed something of course - like a formal declaration of its silicon nature.

That said, of course I’m pro to its dismantle, no matter how pro Bitcoin it is or not.

Now that comment make some sense because jealousy is something that can be easily shown by someone's actions. However, I must say that your actions depict more or less a fun-loving person who's considering the whole situation as a way of entertainment, but I must tell you that it isn't that much funny if you see the whole picture. The first thread was a valid concern raised by @Nutillldah and I must say that thread was a serious one while this one is more or less like a way to make fun of someone which isn't really good by any means. But, I still think that the members of WO thread and the merit sources at that thread know well that what they are doing.

Both you and JJG are among the most senior members of the forum and that's why someone with so much seniority level should not really make things in this way. JJG and other reputed members of the WO thread have replied in that thread because they were sure that they weren't doing anything that would be in any way against the rules of the forum and I'm more than sure that the rules are for every merit source not for the ones on WO thread.

Let's wind things up and lock this thread because any more discussion on this thread would hurt JJG's feelings and I don't think that attacking a reputed member like JJG just for the sake of some entertainment is good at all. It's a request to lock this thread because allowing more comments on it won't make the situation better and there is no need to continue it any further because out of 47 total votes the 42 are in favor of JJG, and that's more than enough to for us to believe that all those members want JJG to stay at WO and they all voted in favor of him.

I don't think disabling JJG or WO is a solution. I agree WO is filled with merit farmers & shitposters. But destroying JJG? Nope. I only think this topic had to be bought up to the world. & now that you have & got the attention. The ones who previously gave out merits shouldn't give out any without any valid posts. If one deserves merit he/she should get them. But if anyone is a copy paste shitposters he/she shouldn't. Now that everyone is aware of this situation. I hope they would consider twice before meriting someone. That's how merit farming will be less & less. Look what happened after the posts. The merit farmers are less and less in WO.  

Neato. I guess I'll spend them on hats.

so i gave you 50 merit.

He's gayer than I am.

It's a jealously thing.