Então, mas se você enviar as moedas para a sua carteira e depois para exchange pode dar esse tipo de problema?
IMO, provavelmente.. está só a 1 salto/hop de distância.
O que eu estava lendo no tópico deles outro dia era isso:
Trocador was being pressured by some of their partners who collaborate with LE and practice shotgun KYC to delist eXch by freezing/suspending operations that include coins coming from eXch, because our BTC don't pass AML checks due to not having a known single aggregation address thus it's impossible to identify them as BTC coming from an exchange without providing a proof that it was made on eXch.
Consequently, Trocador has stopped listing eXch in their results. After some discussion between us and Trocador, we have showed them that there are coins from us that pass AML checks without any issue and never get frozen at major CEX, since we use a single ETH address which is whitelisted at exchanges like Binance and Kraken already to not trigger automatic suspensions (we have communicated with both of them about this subject), therefore Trocador relisted pairs from eXch that include ETH and XMR. We have then suggested Trocador to relist BTC and LTC coming from us along with showing an informative warning to their users regarding risks from sending those coins to major CEX and "shotgun KYC" services, but apparently Trocador decided to not relist them.
This situation has turned into a dilemma for us whether to continue with mixed UTXO's at BTC and LTC or to start aggregating them on a single address. The way we do it now is a reason why many users who seek privacy prefer our service to others, because it's nearly impossible for chain analysis to track our exchanges. Having a known address at all chains would make a lot easier for chain analysis to track our exchanges.
We will probably make a poll somewhere asking our users opinion on how their prefer our service to handle BTC and LTC, having 2 options:
1. Mixed UTXO's without aggregating (our current operation mode)
Pros: high anonymity level, almost impossible to track for chain analysis
Cons: outgoing transactions usually don't pass AML checks and there are risks of getting frozen at major CEX or services that do AML/KYC
2. Aggregated UTXO's at a single known address
Pros: no risks of being frozen at major CEX or services that do AML/KYC, everybody knows your coins come from an exchange
Cons: poor anonymity level, easy to track for chain analysis (although could be mitigated with multi-address distribution and payout delays)
There may be also a third option if we make 2 separated pools for mixed and aggregated coins and let users select which pool to use for their output, however it's a lot more complicated to implement and maintain.
However, we hope that in the near future more and more people leave taint-proclaiming services and opt for decentralized exchanges like Bisq or services like ours, where AML scores aren't a problem.
Consequently, Trocador has stopped listing eXch in their results. After some discussion between us and Trocador, we have showed them that there are coins from us that pass AML checks without any issue and never get frozen at major CEX, since we use a single ETH address which is whitelisted at exchanges like Binance and Kraken already to not trigger automatic suspensions (we have communicated with both of them about this subject), therefore Trocador relisted pairs from eXch that include ETH and XMR. We have then suggested Trocador to relist BTC and LTC coming from us along with showing an informative warning to their users regarding risks from sending those coins to major CEX and "shotgun KYC" services, but apparently Trocador decided to not relist them.
This situation has turned into a dilemma for us whether to continue with mixed UTXO's at BTC and LTC or to start aggregating them on a single address. The way we do it now is a reason why many users who seek privacy prefer our service to others, because it's nearly impossible for chain analysis to track our exchanges. Having a known address at all chains would make a lot easier for chain analysis to track our exchanges.
We will probably make a poll somewhere asking our users opinion on how their prefer our service to handle BTC and LTC, having 2 options:
1. Mixed UTXO's without aggregating (our current operation mode)
Pros: high anonymity level, almost impossible to track for chain analysis
Cons: outgoing transactions usually don't pass AML checks and there are risks of getting frozen at major CEX or services that do AML/KYC
2. Aggregated UTXO's at a single known address
Pros: no risks of being frozen at major CEX or services that do AML/KYC, everybody knows your coins come from an exchange
Cons: poor anonymity level, easy to track for chain analysis (although could be mitigated with multi-address distribution and payout delays)
There may be also a third option if we make 2 separated pools for mixed and aggregated coins and let users select which pool to use for their output, however it's a lot more complicated to implement and maintain.
However, we hope that in the near future more and more people leave taint-proclaiming services and opt for decentralized exchanges like Bisq or services like ours, where AML scores aren't a problem.
