Topic: eXch - instant exchange BTC / LN / XMR / LTC / ETH / ERC20 (Read 31094 times)

This is some really unhinged shit, and makes me worried about using your exchange for the first time (because it sounds like you are a crazy person).

You've COMMANDED the US government to "force" a bunch of (mostly not-American) companies to do something?

Nuts bro.

I was not surprised to see ByBit in the list as they have an atrocious reputation, using that exchange could mean having funds confiscated over non-existent issues. It was not that long ago Whitebit had a bad reputation and then I thought they disappeared therefore it was a surprise to see their name (and learn they are still active).

There could have been a different outlook on this whole matter if there was some camaraderie between the parties. Instead of supporting each other they have decided to exclude eXch. The steps they have taken means they are effectively banning transactions from eXch in their exchanges and with it they are excluding a significant entity and making it difficult for their customers.

Rulers are rulers and abuse their power.
I think you should do whatever is possible to protect your status of operations, the privacy of your clients, and your resilience against specious initiatives.
Well Done.

No doubt they see images. Also because I'm thinking about doing an unboxing.

But in the meantime, here are the photographs. 

I'm not at all surprised by such an attitude, considering that all these agencies are from one country - but the country that will become the friendliest when it comes to cryptocurrencies from January 20th will probably change something in that regard. Still, I wouldn't bet on it, because the obsession with controlling everyone and everything isn't something that will just go away.

I knew that eXch was a thorn in the side of many people, but I still couldn't have guessed that they were all so united in their attacks. I hope all this won't result by stopping eXch promotion on the forum, because that's how it started with mixers too.

Ninety days I believe to be the legal minimum for this type of requests.

For the rest, it will be really relevant to take measures to protect a legal business.

You have the full support of the community.
It has already been suggested here that you should use more than one address and thus make it difficult for them to try to discredit the eXch service. I wouldn't give them a single day, let alone 90.

This letter serves as a public domain demand letter to all the following entities that follow and read this Bitcointalk thread, but not limited to:

* U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
* U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ)
* U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
* U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
* Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
* Fiscal Information and Investigation Service (FIOD)
* Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
* And all other entities with institutional power that currently use it to influence on how cryptocurrency-related projects operate.

To all the relevant and entitled entities above,

Following applicable anti-monopoly market laws, you are COMMANDED to use your institutional power to force the following companies to stop discrimination and abuse against eXch:

1. ByBit exchange (artificially lowering eXch's risk score for intentional reputational influence)
2. WhiteBIT exchange (artificially lowering eXch's risk score for intentional reputational influence)
3. Elliptic (assigning a "red" risk score to eXch solely due to the fact that we do not ask users for KYC information)
4. TRM (assigning a "red" risk score to eXch solely due to the fact that we do not ask users for KYC information)
5. AMLBot (assigning a "red" risk score to eXch due to personal issues with our exchange)
6. Ciphertrace (government contractor advisory services with a biased stance against eXch and corrupt practices, blackmailing companies like ours by demanding customer data in exchange for "favorable" scores across the chain analysis ecosystem)
7. SlowMist (government contractor advisory services with a biased stance against eXch and defamatory declarations about eXch on Twitter)
8. CFInvestigators (government contractor advisory services with a biased stance against eXch)
(* this list does not reflect all the entities but contains the most abusive ones that influence the market)

All the above companies abuse their status to:

a) Prevent coins originating from our exchange (eXch) from entering their cryptocurrency wallet pools without any fair or legal ground for doing so
b) Tag eXch-known addresses as "high risk" solely because we refuse to ask our users for KYC information
c) Publish and distribute misinformation and defamatory materials about us

We expect the mentioned companies in this letter to:

1. Send a letter to our company with apologies for the intentional damage caused to us and our customers by their actions of suspending their customers' funds when they used our exchange

2. Stop immediately any discrimination against our exchange and the coins sent from addresses belonging to our exchange

3. Release immediately any frozen funds on their exchanges illegally "seized" from their customers on the basis of the wrong risk scoring of our entity (eXch)

Upon lack of a response satisfactory to us after the next ninety (90) days, counting from the date of this publication, we (eXch) will stop making it possible to identify our public cryptocurrency addresses for the Bitcoin and Ethereum blockchains, making it impossible for your contractors to trace coins entering and exiting any of our aggregation addresses in the future due to the activation of the eXch Aggregation Pool Customer Shield protocol. This protocol will prevent the association of our aggregated coins with our exchange in your partners' and contractors' blockchain analysis databases. Amateur blockchain researchers existing within the Twitter ecosystem will also be unable to link any transactions to eXch, which will make them unable to provide efficient voluntary help to your entities.

For any questions associated with this demand letter, please use our official email address [email protected] or SimpleX Chat handle specified at our contact page.

I think having multiple photographs would force the generosity of several merit sources. 

It is to inform you that I have already received the award!

Everything went well, thanks again eXch.

The 27^th eXch Free Raffle is now online!

You are welcome to join and try your chance to win a superb custom eXch Cryptosteel Capsule.

[FREE RAFFLE] - Custom eXch Cryptosteel Capsule (#27)!


Good luck!

Mweb's a breakthrough for private transfers. I didn't know about Cake or mweb. Cake supports Bitcoin Monero Ethereum & Litecoin so why didn't eXch recommend it ?

In the future, we will see a proliferation of stablecoins issued on Hadron, as this is meant to be a public platform. Ardoino said he made several dozen presentations to potentially interested subjects.
The involvement in these stablecoins from Tehter will stay minimal and on a technical size.

So let me repeat that Hadron is created and owned by Tether, and StablR is tokenized on Hadron, plus Tether openly invested in StablR.
Situation is clear to me, and I have not seen any information who actually owns StablR, just some CEO guy Gijs op de Weegh.

There are probably no Litecoin desktop wallets that get regular and often updates, that also includes the litecoin source code.
I would probably suggest Cake wallet for Litecoin because this wallet supports Litecoin mweb address, but that is just me.

The repo owner pooler hasn't used github for 2 years but it wasn't removed from eXch's recommendation. It's reassuring they've decided it's safe.

I am coming back on this, for a kind reminder to OP -- to add these translations to OP...

At same time, I also wish to announce that DrBeer made also an Ukrainian translation for this thread and it can be found here.

Since most browsers display an identical warning, anyone who ignores the message and decides to continue is not one of those we can save from making stupid and dangerous moves in life.

It hasn't been updated for 2.5 years, that's not necessarily the same as not being supported. I still use Electrum-LTC (in a VM, of course), and it works fine. But I only use it for small amounts, like any other hot wallet. Or you can use it with a hardware wallet.

eXch didn't remove it from recommendations. Electrum-LTC hasn't been supported after 2022 so is it safe to use in 2025 ?

CloudFlare just answered, now exch[dot]cy, exch[dot]cc, and exch[dot]cash are showing this:



These phishing copies are still online (unfortunately still waiting for a reaction from the companies contacted..), but at least people will be warned in the meantime...