Gambling an activity for fun also has the chance to turn someone's fortune. Calculated risk when taken in gambling can be the way to big wins from gambling. Who do you think should take more risk in gambling? The rich gambler or the gambler who is not yet rich. If a rich gambler takes risks in gambling, they are risking losing money and becoming poor from gambling, or getting richer, when a gambler who is not yet rich gambles, they can also get poorer or richer, so the gambler who should take the risk should be the gambler who can handle the dangers of the risk like losing too. When a rich gambler loses from taking a risk, there is a better chance of them being in a position to manage with the losses, than someone struggling financially who a big loss will really affect. So, I am confused after asking myself this question and answering it, does this mean a poor gambler should continue to play it safe in gambling? With no risk, how can a poor gambler change their fortune in gambling?
Speaking literally or sensibly on who would be the ones who would be risking more then of course the rich one but not on the sense that it would really be that totally on this side
considering that a particular individual is really that financially capable on which means that he could really just simply replenish those balance or loses which it is unlike into those poor
ones who had been using up those last funds or money that they do have on having those hopes that they could be able to flip it out and make those multipliers on which this is something
that you would really be having thoughts in mind. Well, in overall speaking in between risks then both things does impose risks on which its up to you whether
you would really be making yourself that responsible or not.