RitzGrandCasino not provably fair (Has nothing to do with their sig program) - page 6.

spartan82

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: RGBKey on March 04, 2014, 08:45:01 AM

Thanks for posting that, I knew they were using a script but didn't know which one.

Not a worry at all. Just hope it gets out there in time for people to not lose too much money on this kind of platform. Maybe tomatocage might intervene here and let the forum know about this, since noone else can post this kind of info in the casino's thread without it being deleted I suppose.

RGBKey

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 658

rgbkey.github.io/pgp.txt

Thanks for posting that, I knew they were using a script but didn't know which one.

spartan82

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: Tomatocage on March 02, 2014, 11:07:13 PM

I have retracted my initial negative rating for RGC, and here's why: Though there are allegations that he is using a method that isn't provably fair, users play at their own risk as with any other gambling site. Whether they play under the (possible) wrongful assumption that the system is fair is questionable, but not necessarily enough to warrant negative mark on their Trust. My decision isn't set in stone though, and I'll continue to monitor this thread for more evidence.

Dont mean to hurt anyones feelings here, but im just going to put a bit of information out there anyway about the specific casino platform used on RitzGrandCasino that is available from www.casinowebscripts.com Mind you, you can actually purchase this typical casino script from as low as $10,000US. Very low price for an online casino but for whoever decides to invest in this platform you risk losing your investment due to the bad name these casinos have since they are NOT FAIR after all.

PROOF:

It is to my understanding that if one has the power to adjust their profit or loss %, then the outcomes are not randomised and therefore can NOT be provably fair.

In no way am I affiliated with any other online casino, or Prime Dice for that matter.

zolace

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: FUR11 on March 03, 2014, 11:05:30 PM

Quote from: RitzGrandCasino on March 03, 2014, 10:58:22 PM

what do you know another prime dice signature troll

You need to calm down with that shit, son. PD pays (or they did until the rule change) the most per post with a history of successful payments. I'd guess 25-40% of active posters have a PD ad in their sig.

You are trying to derail from the thread, which is about you scamming, not being provably fair, and deleting replies. I can't say that you are a scam, because I've never trusted you with any money. I can't say that you aren't provably fair, because honestly I doubt that I have the ability to run the math needed to check that. It would be irresponsible for me to make a statement on either of those two things.

But I do have experience with you deleting replies. You deleted my replies (after you responded to them) for no good reason other then it made you look bad (because you said something that wasn't consistent with what was said in your T&C). I don't know why you would do that, I wasn't being mean or rude or hurling any sort of accusations, I just wanted a classification before I considered depositing on your site. It struck me as a very odd thing to do.

I agree, I guess I have a defense here when you take me to court, when you invite me to Korea.

RitzGrandCasino

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

fur = another prime dice troll

FUR11

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

FURring bitcoin up since 1762

Quote from: RitzGrandCasino on March 03, 2014, 10:58:22 PM

what do you know another prime dice signature troll

You need to calm down with that shit, son. PD pays (or they did until the rule change) the most per post with a history of successful payments. I'd guess 25-40% of active posters have a PD ad in their sig.

You are trying to derail from the thread, which is about you scamming, not being provably fair, and deleting replies. I can't say that you are a scam, because I've never trusted you with any money. I can't say that you aren't provably fair, because honestly I doubt that I have the ability to run the math needed to check that. It would be irresponsible for me to make a statement on either of those two things.

But I do have experience with you deleting replies. You deleted my replies (after you responded to them) for no good reason other then it made you look bad (because you said something that wasn't consistent with what was said in your T&C). I don't know why you would do that, I wasn't being mean or rude or hurling any sort of accusations, I just wanted a classification before I considered depositing on your site. It struck me as a very odd thing to do.

RitzGrandCasino

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

what do you know another prime dice signature troll

FUR11

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

FURring bitcoin up since 1762

I've had replies (that were relevant to his thread) deleted by RGC, so he certainly does that.

RitzGrandCasino

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

It is the only way to stop losers like you. Hit hard and keep on hitting.

You must be worried that you have broken the prime dice rules. Go cry to mummy that you may not be able to afford your next burger because you have been trolling. lol

RGBKey

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 658

rgbkey.github.io/pgp.txt

Also he felt the need to create a thread calling me a troll and further trying to affiliate me with PrimeDice just because I partake in their signature program.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/prime-dice-signature-scamming-trolls-499148

Childlike.

zolace

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Im gonna welcome my day in court and I am pleased to have you fly me at your expense to lovely Korea, as Ive heard the kimchi is delicious. I hope I can stay at your lovely RitzGrandCasino. Also a spelling tip for you, is not lier. It is spelled liar. Now see you later Hogi.

RitzGrandCasino

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Zolace, you are a rotten troll and lier. You slipped up. lol
Now get lost.

See ya in court. Grin

zolace

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: RitzGrandCasino on March 03, 2014, 01:05:18 AM

Zolace , answer the question. 3rd time we have asked.

I WILL ASK AGAIN: DID YOU WANT TO BUY OUR SOFTWARE? YES/NO
Just answer the question truthfully.

Avoidance tells us the following.
1) your a troll
2) You have no credibility
3) you make defamatory claims that are totally false. (hence the court action)
4) You are jealous of our software as you don't have the funds to buy some yourself

I think we are proving our point very well.

We are still waiting for you and your "friends" to prove their claims.

Perhaps RitzGrandCasino has confused me for someone else; as I've never contacted them, nor have any interest in their software, or opening any sort of casino. Clearly they are working on a false assumption. Further, they have threatened me with a ridiculous "defamation" lawsuit in Korea; and yet, as I am an American, seems there's a bit of a jurisdictional problem for them. One might wonder how well an online casino which regularly threatens and cajoles others could operate. If you cant figure that is a yes or no, then I think you need to go back to school and get yourself a real education.

RitzGrandCasino

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Thank you to membersound who has also retracted the claims.
The only ones not to retract are those that are prime dice signature advertisers.

Funny about that. Roll Eyes

Or a coincidence?

See, the truth now prevails.

RitzGrandCasino

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Zolace , answer the question. 3rd time we have asked.

I WILL ASK AGAIN: DID YOU WANT TO BUY OUR SOFTWARE? YES/NO
Just answer the question truthfully.

Avoidance tells us the following.
1) your a troll
2) You have no credibility
3) you make defamatory claims that are totally false. (hence the court action)
4) You are jealous of our software as you don't have the funds to buy some yourself

I think we are proving our point very well.

We are still waiting for you and your "friends" to prove their claims.

zolace

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: Tomatocage on March 02, 2014, 11:07:13 PM

I have retracted my initial negative rating for RGC, and here's why: Though there are allegations that he is using a method that isn't provably fair, users play at their own risk as with any other gambling site. Whether they play under the (possible) wrongful assumption that the system is fair is questionable, but not necessarily enough to warrant negative mark on their Trust. My decision isn't set in stone though, and I'll continue to monitor this thread for more evidence.

He committed retaliatory feedback against many others plus posted two casino threads in the gambling section. Plus he made threats to sue me for warning him that he had violated the TOS of the site. He made two accounts and neg me with both accounts. I dont think he deserves a retraction from anyone. My two cents. also he lies that I had asked for there software and I never had any interest opening a casino.

RitzGrandCasino

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: Tomatocage on March 02, 2014, 11:07:13 PM

I have retracted my initial negative rating for RGC, and here's why: Though there are allegations that he is using a method that isn't provably fair, users play at their own risk as with any other gambling site. Whether they play under the (possible) wrongful assumption that the system is fair is questionable, but not necessarily enough to warrant negative mark on their Trust. My decision isn't set in stone though, and I'll continue to monitor this thread for more evidence.

Thank you for your common sense. I am sure the others will use their common sense too and see the same.

Tomatocage

legendary

Activity: 1554

Merit: 1222

brb keeping up with the Kardashians

I have retracted my initial negative rating for RGC, and here's why: Though there are allegations that he is using a method that isn't provably fair, users play at their own risk as with any other gambling site. Whether they play under the (possible) wrongful assumption that the system is fair is questionable, but not necessarily enough to warrant negative mark on their Trust. My decision isn't set in stone though, and I'll continue to monitor this thread for more evidence.

RitzGrandCasino

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: zolace on March 02, 2014, 10:50:12 PM

This shows how far your willing to scam and lie to protect yourself, again everyone check my feedback of all the good business I had done here. You even got a negative from Tomatoe Cage. Why you keep making things worse for yourself. What you should have done is fought with positive comments and listen to people. You wont make it far with this kinda attitude.

Zolace why wont you admit it was you in that chat? Just admit it. We are not making anything worse. We are answering truthfully everyones questions including yours. But you just don't reciprocate in answering truthfully.

I WILL ASK AGAIN: DID YOU WANT TO BUY OUR SOFTWARE? YES/NO
Just answer the question truthfully.

zolace

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

This shows how far your willing to scam and lie to protect yourself, again everyone check my feedback of all the good business I had done here. You even got a negative from Tomatoe Cage. Why you keep making things worse for yourself. What you should have done is fought with positive comments and listen to people. You wont make it far with this kinda attitude.

Topic: RitzGrandCasino not provably fair (Has nothing to do with their sig program) - page 6. (Read 10851 times)